BACKGROUND Insulin injection is the basic daily drug treatment for diabetic patients.AIM To evaluate the comparative impacts of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion(CSII).METHODS Based on the treatment modality re...BACKGROUND Insulin injection is the basic daily drug treatment for diabetic patients.AIM To evaluate the comparative impacts of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion(CSII).METHODS Based on the treatment modality received,the patients were allocated into two cohorts:The CSII group and the multiple daily injections(MDI)group,with each cohort comprising 210 patients.Comparative assessments were made regarding serum levels of serum-secreted frizzled-related protein 5,homocysteine,and C1q/TNF-related protein 9.Furthermore,outcomes such as fasting plasma glucose,2-hour postprandial glucose levels,pain assessment scores,and the incidence of complications were evaluated post-treatment.RESULTS The CSII group displayed notably lower fasting plasma glucose and 2-h postprandial glucose levels in comparison to the MDI group(P<0.05).Subsequent analysis post-treatment unveiled a significantly higher percentage of patients reporting no pain in the CSII group(60.00%)in contrast to the MDI group(36.19%)(P<0.05).Additionally,the CSII group exhibited a markedly reduced occurrence of fetal distress and premature rupture of membranes compared to the MDI group(P<0.05).However,there were no significant variances observed in other pregnancy outcomes between the two groups(P>0.05).A statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in the incidence of complications between the groups(χ^(2)=11.631,P=0.001).CONCLUSION The utilization of CSII via an insulin pump,as opposed to MDI,can significantly enhance the management of insulin administration in patients with GDM by diversifying the sites of insulin delivery.This approach not only promotes optimal glycemic control but also regulates metabolic factors linked to blood sugar,reducing the likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes and complications.The clinical relevance and importance of CSII in GDM management highlight its wide-ranging clinical usefulness.展开更多
目的探讨胰岛素不同注射方式对糖尿病(DM)患者的治疗效果。方法136例DM患者均给予重组人胰岛素注射治疗,采用随机排列法将其分为研究1组和研究2组,各68例。研究1组采用多次皮下注射胰岛素(MSII)治疗方式,研究2组采用胰岛素泵持续皮下注...目的探讨胰岛素不同注射方式对糖尿病(DM)患者的治疗效果。方法136例DM患者均给予重组人胰岛素注射治疗,采用随机排列法将其分为研究1组和研究2组,各68例。研究1组采用多次皮下注射胰岛素(MSII)治疗方式,研究2组采用胰岛素泵持续皮下注射(CSII)治疗方式。比较两组治疗前后糖代谢指标水平及日均胰岛素用量、血糖指标达标时间。结果治疗前后两组组间空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PBG)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,研究1组FPG为(5.80±1.05)mmol/L、2 h PBG为(7.55±1.13)mmol/L、HbA1c为(6.52±0.84)%,研究2组FPG为(5.76±1.04)mmol/L、2 h PBG为(7.50±1.15)mmol/L、HbA1c为(6.49±0.83)%。两组FPG、2 h PBG及HbA1c水平均低于本组治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究2组日均胰岛素用量(35.07±3.26)U少于研究1组的(43.85±3.82)U,血糖指标达标时间(5.56±1.21)d短于研究1组的(10.08±1.54)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论MSII和CSII治疗方式均可以有效控制DM患者血糖水平,但CSII治疗方式相较于MSII可以减少胰岛素的使用剂量,达到快速见效的效果,临床应用价值显著。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Insulin injection is the basic daily drug treatment for diabetic patients.AIM To evaluate the comparative impacts of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion(CSII).METHODS Based on the treatment modality received,the patients were allocated into two cohorts:The CSII group and the multiple daily injections(MDI)group,with each cohort comprising 210 patients.Comparative assessments were made regarding serum levels of serum-secreted frizzled-related protein 5,homocysteine,and C1q/TNF-related protein 9.Furthermore,outcomes such as fasting plasma glucose,2-hour postprandial glucose levels,pain assessment scores,and the incidence of complications were evaluated post-treatment.RESULTS The CSII group displayed notably lower fasting plasma glucose and 2-h postprandial glucose levels in comparison to the MDI group(P<0.05).Subsequent analysis post-treatment unveiled a significantly higher percentage of patients reporting no pain in the CSII group(60.00%)in contrast to the MDI group(36.19%)(P<0.05).Additionally,the CSII group exhibited a markedly reduced occurrence of fetal distress and premature rupture of membranes compared to the MDI group(P<0.05).However,there were no significant variances observed in other pregnancy outcomes between the two groups(P>0.05).A statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in the incidence of complications between the groups(χ^(2)=11.631,P=0.001).CONCLUSION The utilization of CSII via an insulin pump,as opposed to MDI,can significantly enhance the management of insulin administration in patients with GDM by diversifying the sites of insulin delivery.This approach not only promotes optimal glycemic control but also regulates metabolic factors linked to blood sugar,reducing the likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes and complications.The clinical relevance and importance of CSII in GDM management highlight its wide-ranging clinical usefulness.
文摘目的探讨胰岛素不同注射方式对糖尿病(DM)患者的治疗效果。方法136例DM患者均给予重组人胰岛素注射治疗,采用随机排列法将其分为研究1组和研究2组,各68例。研究1组采用多次皮下注射胰岛素(MSII)治疗方式,研究2组采用胰岛素泵持续皮下注射(CSII)治疗方式。比较两组治疗前后糖代谢指标水平及日均胰岛素用量、血糖指标达标时间。结果治疗前后两组组间空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PBG)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,研究1组FPG为(5.80±1.05)mmol/L、2 h PBG为(7.55±1.13)mmol/L、HbA1c为(6.52±0.84)%,研究2组FPG为(5.76±1.04)mmol/L、2 h PBG为(7.50±1.15)mmol/L、HbA1c为(6.49±0.83)%。两组FPG、2 h PBG及HbA1c水平均低于本组治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究2组日均胰岛素用量(35.07±3.26)U少于研究1组的(43.85±3.82)U,血糖指标达标时间(5.56±1.21)d短于研究1组的(10.08±1.54)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论MSII和CSII治疗方式均可以有效控制DM患者血糖水平,但CSII治疗方式相较于MSII可以减少胰岛素的使用剂量,达到快速见效的效果,临床应用价值显著。
