通过田间试验,采用静态箱法研究不同施氮水平下控释肥和尿素(N 0、100、200、270 kg hm-2)对麦季N2O排放的影响。结果表明,与对照相比,整个小麦生长季N2O排放量均随尿素和控释肥施用量的增加呈指数增加(32%～164%,p<0.05),但控释肥...通过田间试验,采用静态箱法研究不同施氮水平下控释肥和尿素(N 0、100、200、270 kg hm-2)对麦季N2O排放的影响。结果表明,与对照相比,整个小麦生长季N2O排放量均随尿素和控释肥施用量的增加呈指数增加(32%～164%,p<0.05),但控释肥处理增加程度则较尿素处理缓和;施用控释肥可以有效抑制小麦生长季N2O排放(p<0.05),控释肥对N2O的减排量随着施氮量的增加而增加。小麦产量随尿素施用量的增加呈抛物线增加(24%～43%,p<0.05),随控释肥施用量的增加亦呈抛物线增加(30%～45%,p<0.05);与施用相同水平尿素相比,施用控释肥的小麦产量略有增加,但无显著差异(p>0.05)。单位产量N2O排放量随尿素施用量的增加而呈指数增加(31%～114%,p<0.05),随控释肥施用量的增加而呈抛物线增加(2%～50%,p<0.05);施用控释肥可以有效抑制小麦生长季单位产量N2O排放(p<0.05),控释肥对单位产量N2O的减排量随着施氮量的增加而增加。各处理N2O排放量与土壤水分存在显著正相关(p<0.05),与土壤NH4+-N、NO3--N浓度和土温不呈明显线性关系(p>0.05)。展开更多
Reducing CH4 and N20 emissions from rice cropping systems while sustaining production levels with less water requires a better understanding of the key processes involved. Alternate wetting and drying （AWD） irrigati...Reducing CH4 and N20 emissions from rice cropping systems while sustaining production levels with less water requires a better understanding of the key processes involved. Alternate wetting and drying （AWD） irrigation is one promising practice that has been shown to reduce CH4 emissions. However, little is known about the impact of this practice on N20 emissions, in particular under Mediterranean climate. To close this knowledge gap, we assessed how AWD influenced grain yield, fluxes and annual budgets of CH4 and N20 emissions, and global warming potential （GWP） in Italian rice systems over a 2-year period. Overall, a larger GWP was observed under AWD, as a result of high N20 emissions which offset reductions in CH4 emissions. In the first year, with 70% water reduction, the yields were reduced by 33%, CH4 emissions decreased by 97%, while N20 emissions increased by more than 5-fold under AWD as compared to PF; in the second year, with a 40% water saving, the reductions of rice yields and CH4 emissions （13% and 11%, respectively） were not significant, but N20 fluxes more than doubled. The transition from anaerobic to aerobic soil conditions resulted in the highest N20 fluxes under AWD. The duration of flooding, transition to aerobic conditions, water level above the soil surface, and the relative timing between fertilization and flooding were the main drivers affecting greenhouse gas mitigation potential under AWD and should be carefully planned through site-specific management options.展开更多
文摘通过田间试验,采用静态箱法研究不同施氮水平下控释肥和尿素(N 0、100、200、270 kg hm-2)对麦季N2O排放的影响。结果表明,与对照相比,整个小麦生长季N2O排放量均随尿素和控释肥施用量的增加呈指数增加(32%～164%,p<0.05),但控释肥处理增加程度则较尿素处理缓和;施用控释肥可以有效抑制小麦生长季N2O排放(p<0.05),控释肥对N2O的减排量随着施氮量的增加而增加。小麦产量随尿素施用量的增加呈抛物线增加(24%～43%,p<0.05),随控释肥施用量的增加亦呈抛物线增加(30%～45%,p<0.05);与施用相同水平尿素相比,施用控释肥的小麦产量略有增加,但无显著差异(p>0.05)。单位产量N2O排放量随尿素施用量的增加而呈指数增加(31%～114%,p<0.05),随控释肥施用量的增加而呈抛物线增加(2%～50%,p<0.05);施用控释肥可以有效抑制小麦生长季单位产量N2O排放(p<0.05),控释肥对单位产量N2O的减排量随着施氮量的增加而增加。各处理N2O排放量与土壤水分存在显著正相关(p<0.05),与土壤NH4+-N、NO3--N浓度和土温不呈明显线性关系(p>0.05)。
基金funded by Mars Belgium NV (Mars Food) and Ministero delle Politiche Agrarie, Alimentari e Forestali of Italy (POLORISO project, D.M.5337, Dec.5, 2011)
文摘Reducing CH4 and N20 emissions from rice cropping systems while sustaining production levels with less water requires a better understanding of the key processes involved. Alternate wetting and drying （AWD） irrigation is one promising practice that has been shown to reduce CH4 emissions. However, little is known about the impact of this practice on N20 emissions, in particular under Mediterranean climate. To close this knowledge gap, we assessed how AWD influenced grain yield, fluxes and annual budgets of CH4 and N20 emissions, and global warming potential （GWP） in Italian rice systems over a 2-year period. Overall, a larger GWP was observed under AWD, as a result of high N20 emissions which offset reductions in CH4 emissions. In the first year, with 70% water reduction, the yields were reduced by 33%, CH4 emissions decreased by 97%, while N20 emissions increased by more than 5-fold under AWD as compared to PF; in the second year, with a 40% water saving, the reductions of rice yields and CH4 emissions （13% and 11%, respectively） were not significant, but N20 fluxes more than doubled. The transition from anaerobic to aerobic soil conditions resulted in the highest N20 fluxes under AWD. The duration of flooding, transition to aerobic conditions, water level above the soil surface, and the relative timing between fertilization and flooding were the main drivers affecting greenhouse gas mitigation potential under AWD and should be carefully planned through site-specific management options.
