BACKGROUND Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel(GA)and modified FOLFIRINOX(FFX)have been widely used as standard first-line treatment in pancreatic cancer.However,it is unclear which regimen is more efficacious.AIM To eval...BACKGROUND Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel(GA)and modified FOLFIRINOX(FFX)have been widely used as standard first-line treatment in pancreatic cancer.However,it is unclear which regimen is more efficacious.AIM To evaluate a retrospective analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of FFX and GA as first-line chemotherapeutic regimens in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed and compared outcomes in 101 patients who presented with pancreatic cancer and were treated with either GA(n=54)or FFX(n=47).Moreover,we performed subgroup analysis based on the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio(NLR)and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)performance status.RESULTS There were no significant differences between two groups in baseline characteristics,except for the ECOG performance status.The median progression-free survival(PFS)(6.43 mo vs 4.90 mo,P=0.058)was comparable between two groups;however,median overall survival(OS)(10.17 mo vs 6.93 mo,P=0.008)was longer in patients who received GA regimen.In patients with ECOG 0(PFS:8.93 mo vs 5.43 mo,P=0.002;OS:16.10 mo vs 6.97 mo,P=0.000)and those with NLR<3(PFS:8.10 mo vs 6.57 mo,P=0.008;OS:12.87 mo vs 9.93 mo,P=0.002),GA regimen showed higher efficacy.CONCLUSION GA regimen may be recommended to the patients with NLR<3 or ECOG 0 status although GA and FFX showed comparable efficacy outcomes in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.展开更多
BACKGROUND FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel(Gem+nabPTX)were recently introduced for metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment.However,studies that compared these two regimens and studies in Asian population...BACKGROUND FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel(Gem+nabPTX)were recently introduced for metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment.However,studies that compared these two regimens and studies in Asian populations are lacking.AIM To compare the treatment outcomes of FOLFIRINOX and Gem+nabPTX regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment in Korean population.METHODS Patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX(n=86)or Gem+nabPTX(n=81)as the first-line since January 2015 were identified using the Severance Hospital Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Registry.Treatment efficacy,treatment-related adverse events and economic aspects were compared.RESULTS Patients in the FOLFIRINOX group were significantly younger(54 vs 65 years;P<0.001)and had better performance statuses at diagnosis.The median overall survival(10.7 vs 12.1 mo;P=0.157),progression-free survival(8.0 vs 8.4 mo;P=0.134),and objective response rates(33.7%vs 46.9%;P=0.067)were not significantly different when compared with Gem+nabPTX group.Grade≥3 neutropenia and gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the FOLFIRINOX group.The drug costs of both regimens were similar.CONCLUSION Treatment efficacy and economic burdens were comparable between the two regimens.But,the details of adverse event were different.Gem+nabPTX regimen might be considered preferentially in certain conditions.展开更多
基金the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF)grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT),No.NRF-2018R1C1B5086234。
文摘BACKGROUND Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel(GA)and modified FOLFIRINOX(FFX)have been widely used as standard first-line treatment in pancreatic cancer.However,it is unclear which regimen is more efficacious.AIM To evaluate a retrospective analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of FFX and GA as first-line chemotherapeutic regimens in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed and compared outcomes in 101 patients who presented with pancreatic cancer and were treated with either GA(n=54)or FFX(n=47).Moreover,we performed subgroup analysis based on the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio(NLR)and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)performance status.RESULTS There were no significant differences between two groups in baseline characteristics,except for the ECOG performance status.The median progression-free survival(PFS)(6.43 mo vs 4.90 mo,P=0.058)was comparable between two groups;however,median overall survival(OS)(10.17 mo vs 6.93 mo,P=0.008)was longer in patients who received GA regimen.In patients with ECOG 0(PFS:8.93 mo vs 5.43 mo,P=0.002;OS:16.10 mo vs 6.97 mo,P=0.000)and those with NLR<3(PFS:8.10 mo vs 6.57 mo,P=0.008;OS:12.87 mo vs 9.93 mo,P=0.002),GA regimen showed higher efficacy.CONCLUSION GA regimen may be recommended to the patients with NLR<3 or ECOG 0 status although GA and FFX showed comparable efficacy outcomes in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
文摘BACKGROUND FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel(Gem+nabPTX)were recently introduced for metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment.However,studies that compared these two regimens and studies in Asian populations are lacking.AIM To compare the treatment outcomes of FOLFIRINOX and Gem+nabPTX regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment in Korean population.METHODS Patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX(n=86)or Gem+nabPTX(n=81)as the first-line since January 2015 were identified using the Severance Hospital Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Registry.Treatment efficacy,treatment-related adverse events and economic aspects were compared.RESULTS Patients in the FOLFIRINOX group were significantly younger(54 vs 65 years;P<0.001)and had better performance statuses at diagnosis.The median overall survival(10.7 vs 12.1 mo;P=0.157),progression-free survival(8.0 vs 8.4 mo;P=0.134),and objective response rates(33.7%vs 46.9%;P=0.067)were not significantly different when compared with Gem+nabPTX group.Grade≥3 neutropenia and gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the FOLFIRINOX group.The drug costs of both regimens were similar.CONCLUSION Treatment efficacy and economic burdens were comparable between the two regimens.But,the details of adverse event were different.Gem+nabPTX regimen might be considered preferentially in certain conditions.
