Aim: The purpose of this case study was to examine the sleep quality of patients receiving noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) or nasal high-flow oxygen therapy (NHF) in an intensive care unit and to inve...Aim: The purpose of this case study was to examine the sleep quality of patients receiving noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) or nasal high-flow oxygen therapy (NHF) in an intensive care unit and to investigate what types of nursing support are offered to such patients. Methods: We examined one patient each for NPPV and NHF. Polysomnography (PSG), review of the patient charts, and semi-structured interviews were used to collect the data for analysis. Results: Patients treated with NPPV or NHF demonstrated a noticeable reduction in deep sleep, with most of their sleep being shallow. Their sleep patterns varied greatly from those of healthy individuals. These results suggest that, in addition to experiencing extremely fragmented sleep, sleep in these patients was more likely to be interrupted by nursing interventions, such as during auscultation of breath sounds. Furthermore, it was revealed that “anxiety or discomfort that accompanies the mask or air pressure” in patients treated with NPPV and “discomfort that accompanies the nasal cannula or NHF circuit” in patients treated with NHF may be primary causes of disrupted sleep. Our results suggest a need for nursing care aimed at improving sleep quality in patients treated with NPPV or NHF.展开更多
AIM To characterize the clinical course and outcomes of nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation(NIMV) use in acute pediatric respiratory failure.METHODS We identified all patients treated with NIMV in the pediatric i...AIM To characterize the clinical course and outcomes of nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation(NIMV) use in acute pediatric respiratory failure.METHODS We identified all patients treated with NIMV in the pediatric intensive care unit(PICU) or inpatient general pediatrics between January 2013 and December 2015 at two academic centers.Patients who utilized NIMV with other modes of noninvasive ventilation during the same admission were included.Data included demographics,vital signs on admission and prior to initiation of NIMV,pediatric risk of mortality Ⅲ(PRIsM-Ⅲ) scores,complications,respiratory support characteristics,PICU and hospital length of stays,duration of respiratory support,and complications.Patients who did not require escalation to mechanical ventilation were defined as NIMV responders;those who required escalation to mechanical ventilation(MV) were defined as NIMV nonresponders.NIMV responders were compared to NIMV non-responders.RESULTS Forty-two patients met study criteria.six(14%) failed treatment and required MV.The majority of the patients(74%) had a primary diagnosis of bronchiolitis.The median age of these 42 patients was 4 mo(range 0.5-28.1 mo,IQR 7,P = 0.69).No significant difference was measured in other baseline demographics and vitals on initiation of NIMV;these included age,temperature,respiratory rate,O2 saturation,heart rate,systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure,and PRIsM-Ⅲ scores.The duration of NIMV was shorter in the NIMV nonresponder vs NIMV responder group(6.5 h vs 65 h,P < 0.0005).Otherwise,NIMV failure was not associated with significant differences in PICU length of stay(LOs),hospital LOs,or total duration of respiratory support.No patients had aspiration pneumonia,pneumothorax,or skin breakdown.CONCLUSION Most of our patients responded to NIMV.NIMV failure is not associated with differences in hospital LOs,PICU LOs,or duration of respiratory support.展开更多
目的探讨经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)和经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)作为早产儿气管插管拔管后无创呼吸支持模式的临床应用疗效对比。方法选取2016年1月~2017年6月在我院治疗的新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征65例,采用随机数字表法将患儿随机分为NI...目的探讨经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)和经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)作为早产儿气管插管拔管后无创呼吸支持模式的临床应用疗效对比。方法选取2016年1月~2017年6月在我院治疗的新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征65例,采用随机数字表法将患儿随机分为NIPPV组(n=32)和NCPAP组(n=33),观察两组撤机失败率、无创呼吸支持时间、无创后吸氧时间及总用氧时间,同时检测治疗前后二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、氧分压(PaO2)和氧合指数(OI),两组并发症的发生情况。结果NIPPV组和NCPAP组撤机失败率、无创后吸氧时间和总用氧时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);NIPPV组无创呼吸支持时间为2(1,3)d,明显短于NCPAP组(P<0.05);NIPPV组和NCPAP组治疗前后PaO2、PaCO2比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);NIPPV组治疗后12 h、24 h OI分别为(240.100±31.140)%和(260.040±38.890)%,明显高于NCPAP组(P<0.05);NIPPV组和NCPAP组支气管肺发育不良、早产儿视网膜病、新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎和总发生率的比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论相比较NCPAP,早产儿气管插管拔管后应用NIPPV可缩短无创呼吸支持时间,值得临床使用。展开更多
Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of high-flow nasal cannula(HFNC)on patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD).Methods:Systematic searches on Pub...Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of high-flow nasal cannula(HFNC)on patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD).Methods:Systematic searches on PubMed,Web of Science,the Cochrane Library,Embase,CBM(Chinese Biomedicine Database),CNKI(China National Knowledge Infrastructure),Wanfang Database and VIP were performed for randomized controlled trials(RCTs)which explored the effects of HFNC on patients with AECOPD.The retrieval time was from the establishment of each database to July 2019.RevMan5.3 software was used for statistical analysis.Results:A total of 12 articles were included,involving 812 patients.The results showed that:(1)Compared with conventional oxygen therapy,HFNC could improve patients'arterial partial oxygen pressure(PaO2)(MD=12.70,95%CI(7.00,18.40),Z=4.37,P<0.0001),reduce partial arterial blood carbon dioxide(PaCO2)(MD=-10.99,95%CI(-14.42,-7.55),Z=6.26,P<0.00001)and reduce endotracheal intubation rate(OR=0.19,95%CI(0.04,0.93),Z=2.05,P=0.04),shorten the hospitalization time(SMD=-0.74,95%CI(-1.11,-0.37),Z=3.95,P<0.0001).(2)Compared with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation,it has fewer adverse reactions(OR=0.18,95%CI(0.09,0.35),Z=5.08,P<0.00001)and shorter hospital stay(SMD=-0.57,95%CI(-0.90,-0.23),Z=3.33,P=0.0009).Conclusion:HFNC can improve the patients’hypoxia symptoms and CO2 retention,reduce the rate of tracheal intubation,and alleviate adverse reactions.However,Limited by the quality and region of the included studies,more high-quality are needed to test it.展开更多
文摘Aim: The purpose of this case study was to examine the sleep quality of patients receiving noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) or nasal high-flow oxygen therapy (NHF) in an intensive care unit and to investigate what types of nursing support are offered to such patients. Methods: We examined one patient each for NPPV and NHF. Polysomnography (PSG), review of the patient charts, and semi-structured interviews were used to collect the data for analysis. Results: Patients treated with NPPV or NHF demonstrated a noticeable reduction in deep sleep, with most of their sleep being shallow. Their sleep patterns varied greatly from those of healthy individuals. These results suggest that, in addition to experiencing extremely fragmented sleep, sleep in these patients was more likely to be interrupted by nursing interventions, such as during auscultation of breath sounds. Furthermore, it was revealed that “anxiety or discomfort that accompanies the mask or air pressure” in patients treated with NPPV and “discomfort that accompanies the nasal cannula or NHF circuit” in patients treated with NHF may be primary causes of disrupted sleep. Our results suggest a need for nursing care aimed at improving sleep quality in patients treated with NPPV or NHF.
基金supported by NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Science,No.UL1TR001881
文摘AIM To characterize the clinical course and outcomes of nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation(NIMV) use in acute pediatric respiratory failure.METHODS We identified all patients treated with NIMV in the pediatric intensive care unit(PICU) or inpatient general pediatrics between January 2013 and December 2015 at two academic centers.Patients who utilized NIMV with other modes of noninvasive ventilation during the same admission were included.Data included demographics,vital signs on admission and prior to initiation of NIMV,pediatric risk of mortality Ⅲ(PRIsM-Ⅲ) scores,complications,respiratory support characteristics,PICU and hospital length of stays,duration of respiratory support,and complications.Patients who did not require escalation to mechanical ventilation were defined as NIMV responders;those who required escalation to mechanical ventilation(MV) were defined as NIMV nonresponders.NIMV responders were compared to NIMV non-responders.RESULTS Forty-two patients met study criteria.six(14%) failed treatment and required MV.The majority of the patients(74%) had a primary diagnosis of bronchiolitis.The median age of these 42 patients was 4 mo(range 0.5-28.1 mo,IQR 7,P = 0.69).No significant difference was measured in other baseline demographics and vitals on initiation of NIMV;these included age,temperature,respiratory rate,O2 saturation,heart rate,systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure,and PRIsM-Ⅲ scores.The duration of NIMV was shorter in the NIMV nonresponder vs NIMV responder group(6.5 h vs 65 h,P < 0.0005).Otherwise,NIMV failure was not associated with significant differences in PICU length of stay(LOs),hospital LOs,or total duration of respiratory support.No patients had aspiration pneumonia,pneumothorax,or skin breakdown.CONCLUSION Most of our patients responded to NIMV.NIMV failure is not associated with differences in hospital LOs,PICU LOs,or duration of respiratory support.
文摘目的探讨经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)和经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)作为早产儿气管插管拔管后无创呼吸支持模式的临床应用疗效对比。方法选取2016年1月~2017年6月在我院治疗的新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征65例,采用随机数字表法将患儿随机分为NIPPV组(n=32)和NCPAP组(n=33),观察两组撤机失败率、无创呼吸支持时间、无创后吸氧时间及总用氧时间,同时检测治疗前后二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、氧分压(PaO2)和氧合指数(OI),两组并发症的发生情况。结果NIPPV组和NCPAP组撤机失败率、无创后吸氧时间和总用氧时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);NIPPV组无创呼吸支持时间为2(1,3)d,明显短于NCPAP组(P<0.05);NIPPV组和NCPAP组治疗前后PaO2、PaCO2比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);NIPPV组治疗后12 h、24 h OI分别为(240.100±31.140)%和(260.040±38.890)%,明显高于NCPAP组(P<0.05);NIPPV组和NCPAP组支气管肺发育不良、早产儿视网膜病、新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎和总发生率的比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论相比较NCPAP,早产儿气管插管拔管后应用NIPPV可缩短无创呼吸支持时间,值得临床使用。
文摘Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of high-flow nasal cannula(HFNC)on patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD).Methods:Systematic searches on PubMed,Web of Science,the Cochrane Library,Embase,CBM(Chinese Biomedicine Database),CNKI(China National Knowledge Infrastructure),Wanfang Database and VIP were performed for randomized controlled trials(RCTs)which explored the effects of HFNC on patients with AECOPD.The retrieval time was from the establishment of each database to July 2019.RevMan5.3 software was used for statistical analysis.Results:A total of 12 articles were included,involving 812 patients.The results showed that:(1)Compared with conventional oxygen therapy,HFNC could improve patients'arterial partial oxygen pressure(PaO2)(MD=12.70,95%CI(7.00,18.40),Z=4.37,P<0.0001),reduce partial arterial blood carbon dioxide(PaCO2)(MD=-10.99,95%CI(-14.42,-7.55),Z=6.26,P<0.00001)and reduce endotracheal intubation rate(OR=0.19,95%CI(0.04,0.93),Z=2.05,P=0.04),shorten the hospitalization time(SMD=-0.74,95%CI(-1.11,-0.37),Z=3.95,P<0.0001).(2)Compared with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation,it has fewer adverse reactions(OR=0.18,95%CI(0.09,0.35),Z=5.08,P<0.00001)and shorter hospital stay(SMD=-0.57,95%CI(-0.90,-0.23),Z=3.33,P=0.0009).Conclusion:HFNC can improve the patients’hypoxia symptoms and CO2 retention,reduce the rate of tracheal intubation,and alleviate adverse reactions.However,Limited by the quality and region of the included studies,more high-quality are needed to test it.
