Perioperative chemotherapy strategies in diffuse gastric cancer

This study reviews the findings of a recent study by Li et al,which demonstrated that perioperative chemotherapy benefits patients with diffuse-type gastric cancer compared to surgery alone.Despite potential biases,the study supports the inclusion of perioperative chemotherapy in treatment guidelines.Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy may also provide similar survival outcomes,allowing for flexible treatment planning.

Development of a clinical nomogram for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC)in advanced gastric cancer(GC)is still a controversial issue.AIM To find factors associated with chemosensitivity to NAC treatment and to provide the optimal therapeutic strategies for GC patients receiving NAC.METHODS The clinical information was collected from 230 GC patients who received NAC treatment at the Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine Affiliated Haikou Hospital from January 2016 to December 2020.Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression analysis was used to find the possible predictors.A nomogram model was employed to predict the response to NAC.RESULTS In total 230 patients were finally included in this study,including 154 males(67.0%)and 76 females(33.0%).The mean age was(59.37±10.60)years,ranging from 24 years to 80 years.According to the tumor regression grade standard,there were 95 cases in the obvious response group(grade 0 or grade 1)and 135 cases in the poor response group(grade 2 or grade 3).The obvious response rate was 41.3%.Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis showed that four risk factors significantly related to the efficacy of NAC were tumor location(P<0.001),histological differentiation(P=0.001),clinical T stage(P=0.008),and carbohydrate antigen 724(P=0.008).The C-index for the prediction nomogram was 0.806.The calibration curve revealed that the predicted value exhibited good agreement with the actual value.Decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram had a good value in clinical application.CONCLUSION A nomogram combining tumor location,histological differentiation,clinical T stage,and carbohydrate antigen 724 showed satisfactory predictive power to the response of NAC and can be used by gastrointestinal surgeons to determine the optimal treatment strategies for advanced GC patients.

Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND In recent studies,accumulating evidence has revealed a strong association between the inflammatory response and the prognosis of many tumors.There is a certain correlation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR)with the prognosis in gastric cancer(GC)patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC).However,the existing research results have remained controversial.AIM To explore the relationship between NLR ratio and prognosis of GC patients receiving NAC.METHODS A thorough systematic search was performed in databases such as PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,and Cochrane Library,the search is available until February 29,2024,and studies exploring the interaction of NLR with clinical outcomes were collected.Relevant studies meeting pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria were carefully chosen.The outcomes included progression-free survival(PFS),relapse-free survival,disease-free survival(DFS),and overall survival(OS).The hazard ratio(HR)and its corresponding 95%confidence interval(CI)were utilized for estimation.RESULTS Our analysis encompassed 852 patients and incorporated data from 12 cohort studies.The comprehensive analysis revealed a significant association of high NLR with reduced OS(HR=1.76;95%CI:1.22-2.54,P=0.003),relapsefree survival(HR=3.73;95%CI:1.74-7.96,P=0.0007),and PFS(HR=2.32;95%CI:1.42-3.81,P=0.0008)in patients.However,this correlation in disease-free survival was not significant.NLR demonstrated its crucial role in effectively predicting the OS of GC patients undergoing NAC at different detection times,ages,regions,and NLR thresholds.CONCLUSION In GC patients receiving NAC,an elevated NLR is strongly associated with reduced OS and PFS.NLR has become an effective biomarker for patient prognosis evaluation,providing valuable insights for the treatment strategies of NAC in GC patients.

Evaluating the effect and mechanism of Yiqi Huayu Jiedu decoction combined with FLOT regimen neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the patients with locally advanced gastric cancer:protocol for a prospective,double-arm,randomized controlled clinical trial

Background:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plays a vital role in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer(GC),however,optimizing its effectiveness remains an important research focus.Traditional Chinese medicine(TCM),a promising adjunctive therapy,has shown enhanced clinical outcomes when combined with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.Therefore,this study is designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Yiqi Huayu Jiedu decoction combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy FLOT in the treatment of advanced GC.Methods:This study is a prospective,double-arm,randomized controlled trial.It involves a total of 260 patients diagnosed with advanced GC,who will be randomly assigned to two groups-a TCM treatment group and a control group,each comprising 130 patients.All patients will receive standard FLOT chemotherapy,and patients in the TCM treatment group will additionally receive TCM treatment with Yiqi Huayu Jiedu decoction.After four cycles of chemotherapy,GC D2 radical surgery will be performed.The primary objective is to evaluate the postoperative pathological response rate of the tumor.The secondary objectives include evaluating the perioperative nutritional status,the efficacy of TCM syndrome,and adverse events associated with both chemotherapy and surgery.Discussion:Currently,no trials have investigated the impact of TCM in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the preoperative treatment in patients with advanced GC.Accordingly,it is imperative to conduct this prospective study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of this regimen,meanwhile providing high-level clinical evidence for TCM combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and introducing an innovative regimen for preoperative comprehensive treatment of GC.

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Treatment on Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer:a Retrospective Study

Objective To evaluate the prognostic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) in patients with local advanced gastric cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed prognosis in 191 patients with advanced gastric cancer, of whom 71 were treated with NAC and 120 received surgery only between February 2007 and July 2013. Postoperative complication rate was recorded. Survival by clinicopathological features, pathological T and N stages, and histopathological tumor regression was retrospectively compared between the two groups. Results According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, none of the 71 patients in the NAC followed by surgery group showed complete response, 36 showed partial response, 25 had stable disease, and 10 had progressive disease. The chemotherapy response rate was 50.7%; the disease control rate was 85.9%. Grade 3/4 adverse events were seen in less than 20% patients, with acceptable toxicities. No difference was found in the overall postoperative complication rates between the two groups(7 versus 22 cases, P=0.18). Median survival time was significantly different, at 54 months in the NAC combined with surgery group and 25 months in the surgery-only group(P=0.025). Conclusion In patients with operable gastric adenocarcinomas, NAC can significantly improve overall survival without increasing surgical complications.

Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant DOF [Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil] Chemotherapy Regimen in Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric and Gastro-Esophageal Junction Cancers: A Single Center Experience from India

Background:?The role of chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer is constantly evolving?with various neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies. Several chemotherapeutic agents are used in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) namely Platinum based compounds (Cisplatin, Oxaliplatin), Fluoropyrimidines like 5-Flurouracil [(5-FU), Capecitabine)], Taxanes (Docetaxel) and Anthracyclines (Epirubicin). Various doublet and triplet combination chemotherapy regimens have been used for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in LAGCs. In this study we evaluated the safety and efficacy of docetaxel based triplet regimen DOF [Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil] in LAGC. Material and methods:?50 Newly diagnosed patients of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (stage II or III) deemed fit to receive chemotherapy were included in our study. After 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients were assessed based on radiological and pathological response.?Results: 50 Patients were included in our study of which majority were male (32), median age at presentation was 55 years and 24 patients presented with a history of gastrointestinal reflux disease (GERD). The most common hematological toxicities observed in our study were anemia (61.2%), neutropenia (42.6%, febrile neutropenia constituted 6%) and thrombocytopenia (13.2%). The most common gastro-intestinal [GI] toxicities observed in our study included nausea (69.2%), vomiting (31.2%), diarrhea (34%), oral mucositis (14%) and constipation (6.6%). We found that safety profile of DOF regimen was favorable with majority of patients tolerating the regimen well. The Overall Response Rate (68%), Disease Control Rate (96%) and Resectability Rate (80%) were higher compared to western studies. Pathological CR (17.5%), ypN0?disease status (42.5%) and nodal down staging (52%), all showed positive correlations with survival outcomes. Conclusion:?DOF regimen is an effective and feasible option for neoadjuvant treatment of LAGC in an Indian population.

Development of a novel staging classification for Siewert Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND Stage classification for Siewert Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction(AEG)treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC)has not been established.AIM To investigate the optimal stage classification for Siewert Ⅱ AEG with NAC.METHODS A nomogram was established based on Cox regression model that analyzed variables associated with overall survival(OS)and disease-specific survival(DSS).The nomogram performance in terms of discrimination and calibration ability was evaluated using the likelihood-ratio test,Akaike information criterion,Harrell concordance index,time-receiver operating characteristic curve,and decision curve analysis.RESULTS Data from 725 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and gastrectomy were obtained from the Surveillance,Epidemiology,and End Results database.Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that sex,marital status,race,ypT stage,and ypN stage were independent prognostic factors of OS,whereas sex,race,ypT stage,and ypN stage were independent prognostic factors for DSS.These factors were incorporated into the OS and DSS nomograms.Our novel nomogram model performed better in terms of OS and DSS prediction compared to the 8th American Joint Committee of Cancer pathological staging system for esophageal and gastric cancer.Finally,a user-friendly web application was developed for clinical use.CONCLUSION The nomogram established specifically for patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG receiving NAC demonstrated good prognostic performance.Validation using external data is warranted before its widespread clinical application.

Perioperative chemotherapy improves survival of patients with locally advanced diffuse gastric cancer

BACKGROUND Whether patients with diffuse gastric cancer,which is insensitive to chemo-therapy,can benefit from neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy has long been controversial.AIM To investigate whether perioperative chemotherapy can improve survival of patients with locally advanced diffuse gastric cancer.METHODS A total of 2684 patients with locally advanced diffuse gastric cancer from 18 population-based cancer registries in the United States were analyzed.RESULTS Compared with surgery alone,perioperative chemotherapy improved the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.Before stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting(IPTW),the median overall survival(OS)times were 40.0 months and 13.0 months(P<0.001),respectively.After IPTW,the median OS times were 33.0 months and 17.0 months(P<0.001),respectively.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer compared with adjuvant chemotherapy after IPTW.After IPTW,the median OS times were 38.0 months in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 42.0 months in the adjuvant chemotherapy group(P=0.472).CONCLUSION Patients with diffuse gastric cancer can benefit from perioperative chemotherapy.There was no significant difference in survival between patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Surgical resection and neoadjuvant therapy in patients with gastric cancer and ovarian metastasis: A real-world study

BACKGROUND Regarding when to treat gastric cancer and ovarian metastasis(GCOM)and whether to have metastatic resection surgery,there is presently debate on a global scale.The purpose of this research is to examine,in real-world patients with GCOM,the survival rates and efficacy of metastatic vs non-metastasized resection.AIM To investigate the survival time and efficacy of metastatic surgery and neoadjuvant therapy in patients with GCOM.METHODS This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 41 GCOM patients admitted to Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital from June 2009 to July 2023.The diagnosis of all patients was confirmed by pathology.The primary study endpoints included overall survival(OS),ovarian survival,OS after surgery(OSAS),disease-free survival(DFS),differences in efficacy.RESULTS This study had 41 patients in total.The surgical group(n=27)exhibited significantly longer median OS(mOS)and median overall months(mOM)compared to the nonoperative group(n=14)(mOS:23.0 vs 6.9 months,P=0.015;mOM:18.3 vs 3.8 months,P=0.001).However,there were no significant differences observed in mOS,mOM,median OSAS(mOSAS),and median DFS(mDFS)between patients in the surgical resection plus neoadjuvant therapy group(n=11)and those who surgical resection without neoadjuvant therapy group(n=16)(mOS:26.1 months vs 21.8 months,P=0.189;mOM:19.8 vs 15.2 months,P=0.424;mOSAS:13.9 vs 8.7 months,P=0.661,mDFS:5.1 vs 8.2 months,P=0.589).CONCLUSION Compared to the non-surgical group,the surgical group’s survival duration and efficacy are noticeably longer.The efficacy and survival time of the direct surgery group and the neoadjuvant therapy group did not differ significantly.

Surgical outcome after docetaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally-advanced gastric cancer

AIM:To investigate feasibility,morbidity and surgical mortality of a docetaxel-based chemotherapy regimen randomly administered before or after gastrectomy in patients suffering from locally-advanced resectable gastric cancer.METHODS:Patients suffering from locally-advanced(T3-4 any N M0 or any T N1-3 M0)gastric carcinoma,staged with endoscopic ultrasound,bone scan,computed tomography,and laparoscopy,were assigned to receive four 21 d/cycles of TCF(docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 day 1,cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 day 1,and fluorouracil 300 mg/m 2 per day for days 1-14),either before(Arm A)or after(Arm B)gastrectomy.Operative morbidity,overall mortality,and severe adverse events were compared by intention-to-treat analysis.RESULTS:From November 1999 to November 2005,70 patients were treated.After preoperative TCF(Arm A),thirty-two(94%)resections were performed,85% of which were R0.Pathological response was complete in 4 patients(11.7%),and partial in 18(55%).No surgical mortality and 28.5%morbidity rate were observed,similar to those of immediate surgery arm(P= 0.86).Serious chemotherapy adverse events tended to be more frequent in arm B(23%vs 11%,P=0.07),with a single death per arm.CONCLUSION:Surgery following docetaxel-based chemotherapy was safe and with similar morbidity to immediate surgery in patients with locally-advanced resectable gastric carcinoma.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Is it a must or a fake?

AIM To investigate the neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) effect on the survival of patients with proper stomach cancer submitted to D2 gastrectomy.METHODS We proceeded to a review of the literature with Pub Med, Embase, ASCO and ESMO meeting abstracts as well as computerized use of the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials(RCTs) comparing NAC followed by surgery(NAC + S) with surgery alone(SA) for gastric cancer(GC). The primary outcome was the overall survival rate. Secondary outcomes were the site of the primary tumor, extension of node dissection according to Japanese Gastric Cancer Association(JGCA) performed in both arms, disease-specific(DSS) and disease-free survival(DFS) rates, clinical and pathological response rates and resectability rates after perioperative treatment. RESULTS We identified a total of 16 randomized controlled trials comparing NAC + S(n = 1089) with SA(n = 973) published in the period from January 1993-March 2017. Only 6 of these studies were well-designed, structured trials in which the type of lymph node(LN) dissection performed or at least suggested in the trial protocol was reported. Two out of three of the RCTs with D2 lymphadenectomy performed in almost all cases failed to show survival benefit in the NAC arm. Inthe third RCT, the survival rate was not even reported, and the primary end points were the clinical outcomes of surgery with and without NAC. In the remaining three RCTs, D2 lymph node dissection was performed in less than 50% of cases or only recommended in the "Study Treatment" protocol without any description in the results of the procedure really perfomed. In one of the two studies, the benefit of NAC was evident only for esophagogastric junction(EGJ) cancers. In the second study, there was no overall survival benefit of NAC. In the last trial, which documented a survival benefit for the NAC arm, the chemotherapy effect was mostly evident for EGJ cancer, and more than one-fourth of patients did not have a proper stomach cancer. Additionally, several patients did not receive resectional surgery. Furthermore, the survival rates of international reference centers that provide adequate surgery for homogeneous stomach cancer patients' populations are even higher than the survival rates reported after NAC followed by incomplete surgery.CONCLUSION NAC for GC has been rapidly introduced in international western guidelines without an evidence-based medicinerelated demonstration of its efficacy for a homogeneous population of patients with only stomach tumors submitted to adequate surgery following JGCA guidelines with extended(D2) LN dissection. Additional larger sample-size multicentre RCTs comparing the newer NAC regimens including molecular therapies followed by adequate extended surgery with surgery alone are needed.

Timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: Impact on outcomes

AIM To evaluate whether the neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAc T)-surgery interval time significantly impacts the pathological complete response(pc R) rate and longterm survival.METHODS One hundred and seventy-six patients with gastric cancer undergoing NAc T and a planned gastrectomy at the chinese p LA General hospital were selected from January 2011 to January 2017. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to investigate the impact of NAc T-surgery interval time(< 4 wk, 4-6 wk, and > 6 wk) on pc R rate and overall survival(OS).RESULTS The NAc T-surgery interval time and clinician T stage were independent predictors of pc R. The interval time > 6 wk was associated with a 74% higher odds of pc R as compared with an interval time of 4-6 wk(p = 0.044), while the odds ratio(OR) of clinical T3 vs clinical T4 stage for pc R was 2.90(95%c I: 1.04-8.01, p = 0.041). In cox regression analysis of long-term survival, postneoadjuvant therapy pathological N(yp N) stage significantly impacted OS(N0 vs N3: h R = 0.16, 95%c I: 0.37-0.70, p = 0.015; N1 vs N3: h R = 0.14, 95%c I: 0.02-0.81, p = 0.029) and disease-free survival(DFS)(N0 vs N3: h R = 0.11, 95%c I: 0.24-0.52, p = 0.005; N1 vs N3: h R = 0.17, 95%c I: 0.02-0.71, p = 0.020). The surgical procedure also had a positive impact on OS and DFS. The hazard ratio of distal gastrectomy vs total gastrectomy was 0.12(95%c I: 0.33-0.42, p = 0.001) for OS, and 0.13(95%c I: 0.36-0.44, p = 0.001) for DFS.CONCLUSION The NAc T-surgery interval time is associated with pc R but has no impact on survival, and an interval time > 6 wk has a relatively high odds of pc R.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer:A meta-analysis

AIM:To study the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for advanced gastric cancer by performing a meta-analysis of the published studies.METHODS:All published controlled trials of NAC for advanced gastric cancer vs no therapy before surgery were searched.Studies that included patients with metastases at enrollment were excluded.Databases included Cochrane Library of Clinical Comparative Trials,MEDLINE,Embase,and American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting abstracts from 1978 to 2010.The censor date was up to April 2010.Primary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) for improving overall survival rate of patients with advanced gastric cancer.Secondary outcome was the OR for down-staging tumor and increasing R0 resection in patients with advanced gastric cancer.Safety analyses were also performed.All calculations and statistical tests were performed using RevMan 5.0 software.tric cancer enrolled in 14 trials were divided into NAC group (n=1054) and control group (n=1217).The patients were followed up for a median time of 54 mo.NAC significantly improved the survival rate [OR=1.27,95% confidence interval (CI):1.04-1.55],tumor stage (OR=1.71,95% CI:1.26-2.33) and R0 resection rate (OR=1.51,95% CI:1.19-1.91) of patients with advanced gastric cancer.No obvious safety concerns were raised in these trials.CONCLUSION:NAC can improve tumor stage and survival rate of patients with advanced gastric cancer with a rather good safety.

Computed tomography-based radiomics for prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes in locally advanced gastric cancer: A pilot study

Objective： The standard treatment for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer has relied on perioperativeradio-chemotherapy or chemotherapy and surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the wealth of radiomicsfor pre-treatment computed tomography （CT） in the prediction of the pathological response of locally advancedgastric cancer with preoperative chemotherapy.Methods： Thirty consecutive patients with CT-staged Ⅱ/Ⅲ gastric cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapywere enrolled in this study between December 2014 and March 2017. All patients underwent upper abdominal CTduring the unenhanced, late arterial phase （AP） and portal venous phase （PP） before the administration ofneoadjuvant chemotherapy. In total, 19,985 radiomics features were extracted in the AP and PP for each patient.Four methods were adopted during feature selection and eight methods were used in the process of building theclassifier model. Thirty-two combinations of feature selection and classification methods were examined. Receiveroperating characteristic （ROC） curves were used to evaluate the capability of each combination of feature selectionand classification method to predict a non-good response （non-GR） based on tumor regression grade （TRG）.Results： The mean area under the curve （AUC） ranged from 0.194 to 0.621 in the AP, and from 0.455 to 0.722in the PP, according to different combinations of feature selection and the classification methods. There was onlyone cross-combination machine-learning method indicating a relatively higher AUC （〉0.600） in the AP, while 12cross-combination machine-learning methods presented relatively higher AUCs （all 〉0.600） in the PP. The featureselection method adopted by a filter based on linear discriminant analysis ＋ classifier of random forest achieved asignificantly prognostic performance in the PP （AUC, 0.722~0.108; accuracy, 0.793; sensitivity, 0.636; specificity,0.889; Z=2.039; P=0.041）.Conclusions： It is possible to predict non-GR after neoadiuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastriccancers based on the radiomics of CT.

Oxaliplatin plus S-1 or capecitabine as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer with D2lymphadenectomy: 5-year follow-up results of a phase II-III randomized trial

Objective： To compare the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy （NACT） with adjuvant chemotherapy （ACT） using oxaliplatin plus S-1 （sex） or capecitabine （CapeOX） on gastric cancer patients with D2 lymphadenectomy. Methods： This was a two-by-two factorial randomized phase Ⅱ-Ⅲ trial, and registered on ISRCTN registry （No. ISRCTN12206108）. Locally advanced gastric cancer patients were randomized to neoadjuvant sex, neoadjuvant CapeOX, adjuvant sex, or adjuvant CapeOX arms. Primary analysis was performed on an intention- to-treat （ITT） basis using overall survival （OS） as primary endpoint. Results： This trial started in September 2011 and closed in December 2012 with 100 patients enrolled. Treatment completion rate was 56%, 52%, 38% and 30% in the four arms, respectively. NACT group had fewer dropouts due to unacceptable toxicity （P=0.042）. Surgical complication rate did not differ by the four groups （P=0.986）. No survival signifcant difference was found comparing NACT with ACT （P=0.664; 5-year-OS： 70% vs. 74% respectively）, nor between the sex and CapeOX groups （P=0.252; 5-year-OS： 78% vs. 66% respectively）. Subgroup analysis showed sex significantly improved survival in patents with diffuse type （P=0.048）. Conclusions： No significant survival difference was found between NACT and ACT. sex and CapeOX had good safety and efficacy as neoadjuvant regimens. Diffuse type patients may survive longer due to sex.

Role of imaging in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer

With the proven overall benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer,there has come a need to discriminate responders from non-responders.In this article,the current role of anatomical and molecular imaging in the prediction of response to neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer is outlined and future prospects are discussed.

Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant chemotherapy benefits overall survival of locally advanced gastric cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has drawn more attention to the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in the current multidisciplinary treatment model. EORTC trial 40954 has recently reported that NAC plus surgery without postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy could not benefit the locally AGC patients in their overall survival. We performed a meta-analysis of 10 studies including 1518 gastric cancer patients. Stratified subgroups were NAC plus surgery and NAC plus both surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), while control was surgery alone. The results showed that NAC plus surgery did not benefit the patients with locally AGC in their overall survival [odds ratio (OR) = 1.20, 95% CI 0.80-1.80, P = 0.37] and the number needed to treat (NNT) was 74. However, the NAC plus both surgery and AC had a slight overall survival benefit (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.03-1.71, P = 0.03) and NNT was 14, which is superior to the NAC plus surgery. Therefore, we recommend that combined NAC and AC should be used to improve the overall survival of the locally AGC patients.

Nomogram for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND Survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC)for advanced gastric cancer(AGC)is a debatable issue.Studies have shown that the survival benefit of NAC is dependent on the pathological response to chemotherapy drugs.For those who achieve pathological complete response(pCR),NAC significantly prolonged prolapsed-free survival and overall survival.For those with poor response,NAC yielded no survival benefit,only toxicity and increased risk for tumor progression during chemotherapy,which may hinder surgical resection.Thus,predicting pCR to NAC is of great clinical significance and can help achieve individualized treatment in AGC patients.AIM To establish a nomogram for predicting pCR to NAC for AGC patients.METHODS Two-hundred and eight patients diagnosed with AGC who received NAC followed by resection surgery from March 2012 to July 2019 were enrolled in this study.Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed by logistic regression analysis to determine the possible predictors for pCR.Based on these predictors,a nomogram model was developed and internally validated using the bootstrap method.RESULTS pCR was confirmed in 27 patients(27/208,13.0%).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher carcinoembryonic antigen level,lymphocyte ratio,lower monocyte count and tumor differentiation grade were associated with higher pCR.Concordance statistic of the established nomogram was 0.767.CONCLUSION A nomogram predicting pCR to NAC was established.Since this nomogram exhibited satisfactory predictive power despite utilizing easily available pretreatment parameters,it can be inferred that this nomogram is practical for the development of personalized treatment strategy for AGC patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in gastric cancer patients with extensive lymph node metastasis

Gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis(ELM) is usually considered unresectable and is associated with poor outcomes. Cases with clinical enlargement of the para-aortic lymph nodes and/or bulky lymph node enlargement around the celiac artery and its branches are generally dealt with as ELM. A standard treatment for gastric cancer with ELM has yet to be determined. Two phase Ⅱ studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin followed by surgical resection with extended lymph node dissection could represent a treatment option for gastric cancer with ELM. However,many clinical questions remain unresolved,including the criteria for diagnosing ELM,optimal regime,number of courses and extent of lymph node dissection.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer invading the pancreatic head:A case report

BACKGROUND Pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD)for advanced gastric cancer is rarely performed because of the high morbidity and mortality rates and low survival rate.However,neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer has improved,and chemotherapy combined with trastuzumab may have a preoperative tumorreducing effect,especially for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)-positive cases.CASE SUMMARY We report a case of successful radical resection with PD after neoadjuvant S-1 plus oxaliplatin(SOX)and trastuzumab in a patient(66-year-old male)with advanced gastric cancer invading the pancreatic head.Initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy detected a type 3 advanced lesion located on the lower part of the stomach obstructing the pyloric ring.Computed tomography detected lymph node metastasis and tumor invasion to the pancreatic head without distant metastasis.Pathological findings revealed adenocarcinoma and HER2 positivity(immunohistochemical score of 3+).We performed staging laparoscopy and confirmed no liver metastasis,no dissemination,negative lavage cytological findings,and immobility of the distal side of the stomach due to invasion to the pancreas.Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy was performed at that time.One course of SOX and three courses of SOX plus trastuzumab were administered.Preoperative computed tomography showed partial response;therefore,PD was performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy,and pathological radical resection was achieved.CONCLUSION We suggest that radical resection with PD after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab is an option for locally advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer invading the pancreatic head in the absence of non-curative factors.