Breast cancer is the first cancer of women in the world and in France.In very elderly patients,the treatment options are often very limited.Neoadjuvant hormone therapy has shown similar or even better results than che...Breast cancer is the first cancer of women in the world and in France.In very elderly patients,the treatment options are often very limited.Neoadjuvant hormone therapy has shown similar or even better results than chemotherapy.This is why we decided to evaluate the clinical response following exclusive hormonal therapy and the 5,then 10 years survival in these very elderly women.This was a retrospective,longitudinal cohort-type study with descriptive and analytical purposes.The study population consisted of 59 patients,with an average age of 85 years.Fifteen(15,25%)of our patients had a complete clinical response after two years of treatment,16(27%)a partial clinical response,23(39%)lesion stabilization and 5(9%)cancer progression.The presence of metastasis at diagnosis increased the risk of cancer progression by 2.84.Overall 5-year survival was 72.5%,and breast cancer mortality 5.88%.The 10-year survival was 27.5%and breast cancer mortality 15%.In the age group 85 and over increased the risk of death by 3.25 in the first 10 years of treatment.The clinical response after 2 years was marked by a low rate of cancer progression.Mortality over 5 and 10 years was mostly related to patient comorbidities.展开更多
目的:探讨经直肠超声造影(contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound)时间-强度曲线(time-intensity curve,TIC)参数评估前列腺癌(prostate cancer,PCa)患者对新辅助内分泌治疗(neoadjuvant hormonal therapy,NHT)的反应程度。方法:纳...目的:探讨经直肠超声造影(contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound)时间-强度曲线(time-intensity curve,TIC)参数评估前列腺癌(prostate cancer,PCa)患者对新辅助内分泌治疗(neoadjuvant hormonal therapy,NHT)的反应程度。方法:纳入27例接受NHT的PCa患者的临床资料,根据术后病理学检查结果分为有效组(n=16)和无效组(n=11)。对比两组患者临床病理学特征、治疗前后血清前列腺特异性抗原(prostate-specific antigen,PSA)和CETRUS检查指标及其变化率,以筛选与NHT反应性有关的潜在指标。进一步采用相关性分析评价其在评估患者对NHT反应方面的价值。结果:有效组和无效组在临床病理学特征、治疗前的血清PSA和C E T R U S检查指标方面的差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。治疗后,仅有效组的TIC曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)低于无效组(560 dB·s vs 710 dB·s),其变化率大于无效组(-27.1%vs-5.3%)(均P<0.05)。相关性分析显示AUC变化率与组织学反应评分之间的相关性略高于治疗后AUC(r为-0.690 vs-0.630)。结论:CETRUS TIC参数中,NHT后的AUC及其变化率在评估PCa患者对NHT反应方面具有较好的价值。其中,AUC变化率可能与治疗反应程度更相关。展开更多
This study aimed to identify the pathological outcomes and survival benefits of neoadjuvant hormone therapy(NHT)combined with radical prostatectomy(RP)and radiotherapy(RT)administered to patients with high-risk prosta...This study aimed to identify the pathological outcomes and survival benefits of neoadjuvant hormone therapy(NHT)combined with radical prostatectomy(RP)and radiotherapy(RT)administered to patients with high-risk prostate cancer(HRPCa).We searched PubMed,Embase,and the Cochrane Library for studies comparing NHT plus RP or RT with RP or RT alone,administered to patients with HRPCa.We used a random-effects model to compute risk estimates with 95%confidence intervals(CIs)and quantified heterogeneity using the I2 statistic.Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.We selected 16 studies.NHT before RP significantly decreased lymph node involvement(risk ratio[RR]=0.69,95%CI:0.56–0.87)and increased the rates of pathological downstaging(RR=2.62,95%CI:1.22–5.61)and organ-confinement(RR=2.24,95%CI:1.54–3.25),but did not improve overall survival and biochemical progression-free survival(bPFS).The administration of NHT before RT to patients with HRPCa was associated with significant benefits for cancer-specific survival(hazard ratio[HR]=0.51,95%CI:0.39–0.68),disease-free survival(HR=0.51,95%CI:0.44–0.60),and bPFS(HR=0.54,95%CI:0.46–0.64).Short-term NHT combined with RT administered to patients with HRPCa conferred significant improvements.Although the advantage of local control was observed when NHT was administered before RP,there was no significant survival benefit associated with HRPCa.Therefore,short-term NHT combined with RT is recommended for implementation in standard clinical practice but not for patients who undergo RP.展开更多
文摘Breast cancer is the first cancer of women in the world and in France.In very elderly patients,the treatment options are often very limited.Neoadjuvant hormone therapy has shown similar or even better results than chemotherapy.This is why we decided to evaluate the clinical response following exclusive hormonal therapy and the 5,then 10 years survival in these very elderly women.This was a retrospective,longitudinal cohort-type study with descriptive and analytical purposes.The study population consisted of 59 patients,with an average age of 85 years.Fifteen(15,25%)of our patients had a complete clinical response after two years of treatment,16(27%)a partial clinical response,23(39%)lesion stabilization and 5(9%)cancer progression.The presence of metastasis at diagnosis increased the risk of cancer progression by 2.84.Overall 5-year survival was 72.5%,and breast cancer mortality 5.88%.The 10-year survival was 27.5%and breast cancer mortality 15%.In the age group 85 and over increased the risk of death by 3.25 in the first 10 years of treatment.The clinical response after 2 years was marked by a low rate of cancer progression.Mortality over 5 and 10 years was mostly related to patient comorbidities.
文摘目的:探讨经直肠超声造影(contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound)时间-强度曲线(time-intensity curve,TIC)参数评估前列腺癌(prostate cancer,PCa)患者对新辅助内分泌治疗(neoadjuvant hormonal therapy,NHT)的反应程度。方法:纳入27例接受NHT的PCa患者的临床资料,根据术后病理学检查结果分为有效组(n=16)和无效组(n=11)。对比两组患者临床病理学特征、治疗前后血清前列腺特异性抗原(prostate-specific antigen,PSA)和CETRUS检查指标及其变化率,以筛选与NHT反应性有关的潜在指标。进一步采用相关性分析评价其在评估患者对NHT反应方面的价值。结果:有效组和无效组在临床病理学特征、治疗前的血清PSA和C E T R U S检查指标方面的差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。治疗后,仅有效组的TIC曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)低于无效组(560 dB·s vs 710 dB·s),其变化率大于无效组(-27.1%vs-5.3%)(均P<0.05)。相关性分析显示AUC变化率与组织学反应评分之间的相关性略高于治疗后AUC(r为-0.690 vs-0.630)。结论:CETRUS TIC参数中,NHT后的AUC及其变化率在评估PCa患者对NHT反应方面具有较好的价值。其中,AUC变化率可能与治疗反应程度更相关。
基金This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81502195).
文摘This study aimed to identify the pathological outcomes and survival benefits of neoadjuvant hormone therapy(NHT)combined with radical prostatectomy(RP)and radiotherapy(RT)administered to patients with high-risk prostate cancer(HRPCa).We searched PubMed,Embase,and the Cochrane Library for studies comparing NHT plus RP or RT with RP or RT alone,administered to patients with HRPCa.We used a random-effects model to compute risk estimates with 95%confidence intervals(CIs)and quantified heterogeneity using the I2 statistic.Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.We selected 16 studies.NHT before RP significantly decreased lymph node involvement(risk ratio[RR]=0.69,95%CI:0.56–0.87)and increased the rates of pathological downstaging(RR=2.62,95%CI:1.22–5.61)and organ-confinement(RR=2.24,95%CI:1.54–3.25),but did not improve overall survival and biochemical progression-free survival(bPFS).The administration of NHT before RT to patients with HRPCa was associated with significant benefits for cancer-specific survival(hazard ratio[HR]=0.51,95%CI:0.39–0.68),disease-free survival(HR=0.51,95%CI:0.44–0.60),and bPFS(HR=0.54,95%CI:0.46–0.64).Short-term NHT combined with RT administered to patients with HRPCa conferred significant improvements.Although the advantage of local control was observed when NHT was administered before RP,there was no significant survival benefit associated with HRPCa.Therefore,short-term NHT combined with RT is recommended for implementation in standard clinical practice but not for patients who undergo RP.
