Since 1985, the no-scalpel vasectomy technique has been widely used outside China. The prevalence of this tech-nique has helped to increase the acceptability of male sterilization in many parts of the world. More than...Since 1985, the no-scalpel vasectomy technique has been widely used outside China. The prevalence of this tech-nique has helped to increase the acceptability of male sterilization in many parts of the world. More than 5000 physi-cians in twenty-five developing countries have been trained in the no-scalpel vasectomy technique. In the United Statesin 1995, nearly one third of vasectomies employed the no-scalpel technique, and in the whole Northern American re-gion, a total of 1100 doctors have been made familiar with the technique. Doctors believe that there are several advan-tages of the no-scalpel technique, including no incision, no stitches, faster procedure, faster recovery, less chance ofbleeding, less discomfort and high efficacy. The key steps of the technique include fixation of the vas and infiltrationanaesthesia of the spermatic cord, as well as grasping, delivering and isolating the vas. No-scalpel technique providesa good approach to expose the vas, in conjunction with which, different vas-end occlusion methods may be used.(Asian J Androl 2000; 2: 21 - 24)展开更多
Because of unavoidable complications of vasectomy, this study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of male sterilization with a nonobstructive intravas device （IVD） implanted into the vas lumen by a mini...Because of unavoidable complications of vasectomy, this study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of male sterilization with a nonobstructive intravas device （IVD） implanted into the vas lumen by a mini-surgical method compared with no-scalpel vasectomy （NSV）. IVDs were categorized into two types： IVD-B has a tail used for fixing to the vas deferens （fixed wing） whereas IVD-A does not. A multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in China. The study was comprised of 1459 male volunteers seeking vasectomy who were randomly assigned to the IVD-A （n = 487）, IVD-B （n = 485） or NSV （n = 487） groups and underwent operation. Follow-up included visits at the 3rd-6TM and 12~ postoperative months, The assessments of the subjects involved regular physical examinations （including general and andrological examinations） and semen analysis. The subjects＇ partners also underwent monitoring for pregnancy by monthly interviews regarding menstruation and if necessary, urine tests, There were no significant differences in pregnancy rates （0.65% for IVD-A, 0 for IVD-B and 0.21% for NSV） among the three groups （P 〉 0.05）. The cumulative rates of complications at the 12th postoperative month were zero, 0.9% and 1.7% in the three groups, respectively. In conclusion, IVD male sterilization exhibits a low risk of long-term adverse events and was found to be effective as a male sterilization method, similar to the NSV technique. IVD male sterilization is expected to be a novel contraceptive method.展开更多
文摘Since 1985, the no-scalpel vasectomy technique has been widely used outside China. The prevalence of this tech-nique has helped to increase the acceptability of male sterilization in many parts of the world. More than 5000 physi-cians in twenty-five developing countries have been trained in the no-scalpel vasectomy technique. In the United Statesin 1995, nearly one third of vasectomies employed the no-scalpel technique, and in the whole Northern American re-gion, a total of 1100 doctors have been made familiar with the technique. Doctors believe that there are several advan-tages of the no-scalpel technique, including no incision, no stitches, faster procedure, faster recovery, less chance ofbleeding, less discomfort and high efficacy. The key steps of the technique include fixation of the vas and infiltrationanaesthesia of the spermatic cord, as well as grasping, delivering and isolating the vas. No-scalpel technique providesa good approach to expose the vas, in conjunction with which, different vas-end occlusion methods may be used.(Asian J Androl 2000; 2: 21 - 24)
文摘Because of unavoidable complications of vasectomy, this study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of male sterilization with a nonobstructive intravas device （IVD） implanted into the vas lumen by a mini-surgical method compared with no-scalpel vasectomy （NSV）. IVDs were categorized into two types： IVD-B has a tail used for fixing to the vas deferens （fixed wing） whereas IVD-A does not. A multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in China. The study was comprised of 1459 male volunteers seeking vasectomy who were randomly assigned to the IVD-A （n = 487）, IVD-B （n = 485） or NSV （n = 487） groups and underwent operation. Follow-up included visits at the 3rd-6TM and 12~ postoperative months, The assessments of the subjects involved regular physical examinations （including general and andrological examinations） and semen analysis. The subjects＇ partners also underwent monitoring for pregnancy by monthly interviews regarding menstruation and if necessary, urine tests, There were no significant differences in pregnancy rates （0.65% for IVD-A, 0 for IVD-B and 0.21% for NSV） among the three groups （P 〉 0.05）. The cumulative rates of complications at the 12th postoperative month were zero, 0.9% and 1.7% in the three groups, respectively. In conclusion, IVD male sterilization exhibits a low risk of long-term adverse events and was found to be effective as a male sterilization method, similar to the NSV technique. IVD male sterilization is expected to be a novel contraceptive method.
