AIM: To compare the clinical efficacies of two surgical procedures for hemorrhoid rectal prolapse with outlet obstruction-induced constipation.METHODS: One hundred eight inpatients who underwent surgery for outlet obs...AIM: To compare the clinical efficacies of two surgical procedures for hemorrhoid rectal prolapse with outlet obstruction-induced constipation.METHODS: One hundred eight inpatients who underwent surgery for outlet obstructive constipation caused by internal rectal prolapse and circumferential hemorrhoids at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from June 2012 to June 2013 were prospectively included in the study.The patients with rectal prolapse hemorrhoids with outlet obstructioninduced constipation were randomly divided into two groups to undergo either a procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)(n = 54) or conventional surgery(n = 54; control group).Short-term(operative time,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative urinary retention,postoperative perianal edema,and postoperative pain) and long-term(postoperative anal stenosis,postoperative sensory anal incontinence,postoperative recurrence,and postoperative difficulty in defecation) clinical effects were compared between the two groups.The short- and long-term efficacies of the two procedures were determined.RESULTS: In terms of short-term clinical effects,operative time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the PPH group than in the control group(24.36 ± 5.16 min vs 44.27 ± 6.57 min,2.1 ± 1.4 d vs 3.6 ± 2.3 d,both P < 0.01).The incidence of postoperative urinary retention was higher in the PPH group than in the control group,but the difference was not statistically significant(48.15% vs 37.04%).Theincidence of perianal edema was significantly lower in the PPH group(11.11% vs 42.60%,P < 0.05).The visual analogue scale scores at 24 h after surgery,first defecation,and one week after surgery were significantly lower in the PPH group(2.9 ± 0.9 vs 8.3 ± 1.1,2.0 ± 0.5 vs 6.5 ± 0.8,and 1.7 ± 0.5 vs 5.0 ± 0.7,respectively,all P < 0.01).With regard to long-term clinical effects,the incidence of anal stenosis was lower in the PPH group than in the control group,but the difference was not significant(1.85% vs 5.56%).The incidence of sensory anal incontinence was significantly lower in the PPH group(3.70% vs 12.96%,P < 0.05).The incidences of recurrent internal rectal prolapse and difficulty in defecation were lower in the PPH group than in the control group,but the differences were not significant(11.11% vs 16.67% and 12.96% vs 24.07%,respectively).CONCLUSION: PPH is superior to the traditional surgery in the management of outlet obstructive constipation caused by internal rectal prolapse with circumferential hemorrhoids.展开更多
目的探究补气健脾疏肝法联合生物反馈治疗出口梗阻型便秘的临床疗效。方法选择河北省石家庄市中医院肛肠科气虚秘型出口梗阻型便秘患者80例作为研究对象,根据随机数字法分为试验组与对照组,两组各40例。对照组予以生物反馈治疗,30 min/...目的探究补气健脾疏肝法联合生物反馈治疗出口梗阻型便秘的临床疗效。方法选择河北省石家庄市中医院肛肠科气虚秘型出口梗阻型便秘患者80例作为研究对象,根据随机数字法分为试验组与对照组,两组各40例。对照组予以生物反馈治疗,30 min/次,每周3次;试验组在对照组基础上予补气健脾疏肝法治疗,每日1剂,水煎取汁400 mL,分早晚两次温服。两组均连续治疗4周。观察两组治疗前后的中医临床疗效、证候评分、肛门疼痛情况、生活质量及安全性。结果治疗后,试验组的临床总有效率(97.5%)优于对照组(72.5%)(P<0.05)。治疗后,与治疗前比较,两组排便频率、排便困难、粪便性状、排便时间、肛门堵塞感、排便不尽感的中医证候评分、疼痛数字评定量表(numerical rating scale,NRS)、便秘患者生活质量自评量表(patient assessment of constipation quality of life questionnaire,PAC-QOL)评分均下降(P<0.05);与对照组比较,试验组各项证候评分、NRS评分、PAC-QOL评分较低(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,试验组不良反应较低(P<0.05)。结论生物反馈联合补气健脾疏肝法治疗出口梗阻型便秘疗效确切,可有效缓解患者的临床症状,减轻患者的肛门疼痛,并提高患者的生活质量。展开更多
文摘AIM: To compare the clinical efficacies of two surgical procedures for hemorrhoid rectal prolapse with outlet obstruction-induced constipation.METHODS: One hundred eight inpatients who underwent surgery for outlet obstructive constipation caused by internal rectal prolapse and circumferential hemorrhoids at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from June 2012 to June 2013 were prospectively included in the study.The patients with rectal prolapse hemorrhoids with outlet obstructioninduced constipation were randomly divided into two groups to undergo either a procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)(n = 54) or conventional surgery(n = 54; control group).Short-term(operative time,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative urinary retention,postoperative perianal edema,and postoperative pain) and long-term(postoperative anal stenosis,postoperative sensory anal incontinence,postoperative recurrence,and postoperative difficulty in defecation) clinical effects were compared between the two groups.The short- and long-term efficacies of the two procedures were determined.RESULTS: In terms of short-term clinical effects,operative time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the PPH group than in the control group(24.36 ± 5.16 min vs 44.27 ± 6.57 min,2.1 ± 1.4 d vs 3.6 ± 2.3 d,both P < 0.01).The incidence of postoperative urinary retention was higher in the PPH group than in the control group,but the difference was not statistically significant(48.15% vs 37.04%).Theincidence of perianal edema was significantly lower in the PPH group(11.11% vs 42.60%,P < 0.05).The visual analogue scale scores at 24 h after surgery,first defecation,and one week after surgery were significantly lower in the PPH group(2.9 ± 0.9 vs 8.3 ± 1.1,2.0 ± 0.5 vs 6.5 ± 0.8,and 1.7 ± 0.5 vs 5.0 ± 0.7,respectively,all P < 0.01).With regard to long-term clinical effects,the incidence of anal stenosis was lower in the PPH group than in the control group,but the difference was not significant(1.85% vs 5.56%).The incidence of sensory anal incontinence was significantly lower in the PPH group(3.70% vs 12.96%,P < 0.05).The incidences of recurrent internal rectal prolapse and difficulty in defecation were lower in the PPH group than in the control group,but the differences were not significant(11.11% vs 16.67% and 12.96% vs 24.07%,respectively).CONCLUSION: PPH is superior to the traditional surgery in the management of outlet obstructive constipation caused by internal rectal prolapse with circumferential hemorrhoids.
文摘目的探究补气健脾疏肝法联合生物反馈治疗出口梗阻型便秘的临床疗效。方法选择河北省石家庄市中医院肛肠科气虚秘型出口梗阻型便秘患者80例作为研究对象,根据随机数字法分为试验组与对照组,两组各40例。对照组予以生物反馈治疗,30 min/次,每周3次;试验组在对照组基础上予补气健脾疏肝法治疗,每日1剂,水煎取汁400 mL,分早晚两次温服。两组均连续治疗4周。观察两组治疗前后的中医临床疗效、证候评分、肛门疼痛情况、生活质量及安全性。结果治疗后,试验组的临床总有效率(97.5%)优于对照组(72.5%)(P<0.05)。治疗后,与治疗前比较,两组排便频率、排便困难、粪便性状、排便时间、肛门堵塞感、排便不尽感的中医证候评分、疼痛数字评定量表(numerical rating scale,NRS)、便秘患者生活质量自评量表(patient assessment of constipation quality of life questionnaire,PAC-QOL)评分均下降(P<0.05);与对照组比较,试验组各项证候评分、NRS评分、PAC-QOL评分较低(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,试验组不良反应较低(P<0.05)。结论生物反馈联合补气健脾疏肝法治疗出口梗阻型便秘疗效确切,可有效缓解患者的临床症状,减轻患者的肛门疼痛,并提高患者的生活质量。
