This study compared the efficacy of non-penetrating trabecular surgery and trabeculectomy for the treatment of open angle glaucoma. We searched the Cochrane Library, PUBMED （1966 to 2009）, Embase （1980 to 2009） an...This study compared the efficacy of non-penetrating trabecular surgery and trabeculectomy for the treatment of open angle glaucoma. We searched the Cochrane Library, PUBMED （1966 to 2009）, Embase （1980 to 2009） and CMB-disk （1979 to 2009） for the randomized clinical trials （RCT） concerning the two treatment strategies. The reports, including the papers listed in bibliographies, were evaluated against a set of quality criteria and the RCTs that satisfied the criteria were selected and subjected to Meta analysis by employing the Cochrane Collaboration＇s RevMan 4.5 software package. A total of nine RCTs were included in the study. The analyses of the reports showed that, 12 months after surgery, there was significant difference in the reduction of interocular pressure （IOP） between non-penetrating trabecular surgery and trabeculectomy （Z=6.05 P0.00001）. There also existed statistically significant difference in the reduction of IOP at the censored time between the two procedures （Z=4.92, P0.00001）. Difference in the success rate was also found between the two surgeries （Z=3.82, P=0.0001）. It is concluded that, compared with the non-penetrating trabeculectomy, the traditional trabeculectomy could reduce IOP more and had higher success rate while the non-penetrating trabecular surgery is associated with lower postoperative complications.展开更多
Background Non-penetrating trabecular surgery is a new filtrating surgery without opening in ternal trabecular structures. This study was to estimate the overall efficacy of non-penetrating trabecular surgery for ope...Background Non-penetrating trabecular surgery is a new filtrating surgery without opening in ternal trabecular structures. This study was to estimate the overall efficacy of non-penetrating trabecular surgery for open angle glaucoma.Methods The published articles selected for this study were obtained by a computerised Medline and China Biological Medicine Disk search of the literature and a manual search of the bibliographies of relevant articles. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed systematically, and the reported data were aggregated using the statistical techniques of meta-analysis.Results A total of 37 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled complete success rates of non-penetrating trabecular surgery with different techniques were: deep sclerectomy single, 69.7% (95% CI: 58.5%-81.0%); deep sclerectomy with collagen implant, 59.4% (95% CI: 47.0%-71.8%); deep sclerectomy with reticulated hyaluronic acid implant, 71.1% (95% CI: 56.8%-85.3%); and viscocanalostomy, 72.0% (95% CI: 57.6%-86.4%). The overall weighted complete success rate of non-penetrating trabecular surgery was 67.8% (95% CI: 61.4%-74.3%).Conclusions Non-penetrating trabecular surgery is the best available therapy method for medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma with a complete success rate of over 60%. But the different techniques cannot belie the complete success rate of non-penetrating trabecular surgery.展开更多
AIM:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of non-penetrating glaucoma surgery(NPGS)plus phacoemulsification(Phaco-NPGS)and NPGS-alone.METHODS:We systematically searched various databases and reviewed studies tha...AIM:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of non-penetrating glaucoma surgery(NPGS)plus phacoemulsification(Phaco-NPGS)and NPGS-alone.METHODS:We systematically searched various databases and reviewed studies that had evaluated the effects of Phaco-NPGS or NPGS-alone for patients with glaucoma.Primary outcomes included postoperative intraocular pressure(IOP)and the number of postoperative antiglaucoma medications.Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of complications,incidence of needling or goniopuncture,and surgical success rate.RESULTS:In total,380 and 424 eyes in NPGS-alone and Phaco-NPGS groups respectively were included.Both postoperative IOP and number of medications were significantly lowered in the Phaco-NPGS group than that in the NPDS-alone group[weighted mean difference(WMD)=-1.12,95%confidence interval(CI):-2.11 to-0.12,P=0.03;WMD=-0.31,95%CI:-0.53 to-0.09,P=0.006].Moreover,Phaco-NPGS had a significantly lower prevalence of complications and postoperative procedures compared to NPGS-alone,while no significant difference existed for surgical success.CONCLUSION:Phaco-NPGS superior to NPGS-alone in the reduction of IOP and medications.Phaco-NPGS can be recommended for glaucoma patients with coexisting cataracts owing to its superior efficacy,fewer complications,and postoperative procedures.展开更多
AIM：To describe a novel technique of creating a landing strip within the trabecular meshwork to guide trabecular micro-bypass stent（iStent） implantation in patients who underwent phacoemulsification.METHODS：Thirty...AIM：To describe a novel technique of creating a landing strip within the trabecular meshwork to guide trabecular micro-bypass stent（iStent） implantation in patients who underwent phacoemulsification.METHODS：Thirty-four eyes from 30 patients who underwent i Stent implantation after phacoemulsification from May 2014 to February 2015 were included in our retrospective study. All iStents were implanted via the ＂landing strip＂ technique. A 25-gauge microvitreoretinal blade was used to bisect the trabecular meshwork to less than 1 clock-hour, effectively creating a landing strip. The iStent applicator was pressed along the landing strip and then the stent was released into the trabecular meshwork. RESULTS：Of the 34 eyes with iStent implantation, 27（79.4%） eyes had primary open-angle glaucoma, 6（17.6%） eyes had pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and 1（2.9%） eye had ocular hypertension. At 6-month follow-up（n=17）, the mean number of hypotensive medications decreased from 2.2±1.2 at baseline to 0.8±1.3（P=0.05） and mean intraocular pressure decreased from 19.7±4.1 mm Hg at baseline to 16.7±2.1 mm Hg（P=0.58）. Two eyes（5.9%） required subsequent trabeculectomy. CONCLUSION：The ＂landing strip＂ technique appears to be an effective way to assist with iS tent implantation.展开更多
文摘This study compared the efficacy of non-penetrating trabecular surgery and trabeculectomy for the treatment of open angle glaucoma. We searched the Cochrane Library, PUBMED （1966 to 2009）, Embase （1980 to 2009） and CMB-disk （1979 to 2009） for the randomized clinical trials （RCT） concerning the two treatment strategies. The reports, including the papers listed in bibliographies, were evaluated against a set of quality criteria and the RCTs that satisfied the criteria were selected and subjected to Meta analysis by employing the Cochrane Collaboration＇s RevMan 4.5 software package. A total of nine RCTs were included in the study. The analyses of the reports showed that, 12 months after surgery, there was significant difference in the reduction of interocular pressure （IOP） between non-penetrating trabecular surgery and trabeculectomy （Z=6.05 P0.00001）. There also existed statistically significant difference in the reduction of IOP at the censored time between the two procedures （Z=4.92, P0.00001）. Difference in the success rate was also found between the two surgeries （Z=3.82, P=0.0001）. It is concluded that, compared with the non-penetrating trabeculectomy, the traditional trabeculectomy could reduce IOP more and had higher success rate while the non-penetrating trabecular surgery is associated with lower postoperative complications.
文摘Background Non-penetrating trabecular surgery is a new filtrating surgery without opening in ternal trabecular structures. This study was to estimate the overall efficacy of non-penetrating trabecular surgery for open angle glaucoma.Methods The published articles selected for this study were obtained by a computerised Medline and China Biological Medicine Disk search of the literature and a manual search of the bibliographies of relevant articles. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed systematically, and the reported data were aggregated using the statistical techniques of meta-analysis.Results A total of 37 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled complete success rates of non-penetrating trabecular surgery with different techniques were: deep sclerectomy single, 69.7% (95% CI: 58.5%-81.0%); deep sclerectomy with collagen implant, 59.4% (95% CI: 47.0%-71.8%); deep sclerectomy with reticulated hyaluronic acid implant, 71.1% (95% CI: 56.8%-85.3%); and viscocanalostomy, 72.0% (95% CI: 57.6%-86.4%). The overall weighted complete success rate of non-penetrating trabecular surgery was 67.8% (95% CI: 61.4%-74.3%).Conclusions Non-penetrating trabecular surgery is the best available therapy method for medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma with a complete success rate of over 60%. But the different techniques cannot belie the complete success rate of non-penetrating trabecular surgery.
文摘AIM:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of non-penetrating glaucoma surgery(NPGS)plus phacoemulsification(Phaco-NPGS)and NPGS-alone.METHODS:We systematically searched various databases and reviewed studies that had evaluated the effects of Phaco-NPGS or NPGS-alone for patients with glaucoma.Primary outcomes included postoperative intraocular pressure(IOP)and the number of postoperative antiglaucoma medications.Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of complications,incidence of needling or goniopuncture,and surgical success rate.RESULTS:In total,380 and 424 eyes in NPGS-alone and Phaco-NPGS groups respectively were included.Both postoperative IOP and number of medications were significantly lowered in the Phaco-NPGS group than that in the NPDS-alone group[weighted mean difference(WMD)=-1.12,95%confidence interval(CI):-2.11 to-0.12,P=0.03;WMD=-0.31,95%CI:-0.53 to-0.09,P=0.006].Moreover,Phaco-NPGS had a significantly lower prevalence of complications and postoperative procedures compared to NPGS-alone,while no significant difference existed for surgical success.CONCLUSION:Phaco-NPGS superior to NPGS-alone in the reduction of IOP and medications.Phaco-NPGS can be recommended for glaucoma patients with coexisting cataracts owing to its superior efficacy,fewer complications,and postoperative procedures.
文摘AIM：To describe a novel technique of creating a landing strip within the trabecular meshwork to guide trabecular micro-bypass stent（iStent） implantation in patients who underwent phacoemulsification.METHODS：Thirty-four eyes from 30 patients who underwent i Stent implantation after phacoemulsification from May 2014 to February 2015 were included in our retrospective study. All iStents were implanted via the ＂landing strip＂ technique. A 25-gauge microvitreoretinal blade was used to bisect the trabecular meshwork to less than 1 clock-hour, effectively creating a landing strip. The iStent applicator was pressed along the landing strip and then the stent was released into the trabecular meshwork. RESULTS：Of the 34 eyes with iStent implantation, 27（79.4%） eyes had primary open-angle glaucoma, 6（17.6%） eyes had pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and 1（2.9%） eye had ocular hypertension. At 6-month follow-up（n=17）, the mean number of hypotensive medications decreased from 2.2±1.2 at baseline to 0.8±1.3（P=0.05） and mean intraocular pressure decreased from 19.7±4.1 mm Hg at baseline to 16.7±2.1 mm Hg（P=0.58）. Two eyes（5.9%） required subsequent trabeculectomy. CONCLUSION：The ＂landing strip＂ technique appears to be an effective way to assist with iS tent implantation.
