Hepatocellular carcinoma progression in hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis patients receiving nucleoside(acid)analogs therapy:A retrospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND Antiviral therapy cannot completely block the progression of hepatitis B to hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Furthermore,there are few predictors of early HCC progression and limited strategies to prevent progression in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis who receive nucleos(t)ide analog(NA)therapy.AIM The study aim was to clarify risk factors and the diagnostic value of alphafetoprotein(AFP)for HCC progression in NA-treated hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related cirrhosis patients.METHODS In this retrospective cross-sectional study,we analyzed the clinical data of 266 patients with HBV-related cirrhosis who received NA treatment between February 2014 and April 2020 at Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital.The patients were divided into two groups,145 who did not progress to HCC(No-HCC group),and 121 who progressed to HCC during NA treatment(HCC group).The logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of HCC progression.The diagnostic value of AFP for HCC was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis.RESULTS Univariate analysis showed that age≥60 years(P=0.001),hepatitis B and alcoholic etiology(P=0.007),smoking history(P<0.001),family history of HBV-related HCC(P=0.002),lamivudine resistance(P=0.011),HBV DNA negative(P=0.023),aspartate aminotransferase>80 U/L(P=0.002),gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase>120 U/L(P=0.001),alkaline phosphatase>250 U/L(P=0.001),fasting blood glucose(FBG)≥6.16(mmol/L)(P=0.001)and Child-Pugh class C(P=0.005)were correlated with HCC progression.In multivariate analysis,age≥60 years[hazard ratio(HR)=3.089,95%confidence interval(CI):1.437-6.631,P=0.004],smoking history(HR=4.001,95%CI:1.836-8.716,P<0.01),family history of HBV-related HCC(HR=6.763,95%CI:1.253-36.499,P<0.05),lamivudine resistance(HR=2.949,95%CI:1.207-7.208,P=0.018),HBV DNA negative(HR=0.026,95%CI:0.007-0.139,P<0.01),FBG≥6.16 mmol/L(HR=7.219,95%CI:3.716-14.024,P<0.01)were independent risk factors of HCC progression.ROC of AFP for diagnosis of HCC was 0.746(95%CI:0.674-0.818).A cutoff value of AFP of 9.00 ug/L had a sensitivity of 0.609,and specificity of 0.818 for diagnosing HCC.CONCLUSION Age≥60 years,smoking history,family history of HCC,lamivudine resistance,HBV DNA negative,FBG≥6.16 mmol/L were risk factors of HCC progression.Serum AFP had limited diagnostic value for HCC.

Add-on pegylated interferon augments hepatitis B surface antigen clearance vs continuous nucleos(t)ide analog monotherapy in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis B surface antigen≤1500 IU/mL:An observational study

BACKGROUND Nucleos(t)ide analog(NA)has shown limited effectiveness against hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg)clearance in chronic hepatitis B(CHB)patients.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of add-on peginterferonα-2a(peg-IFNα-2a)to an ongoing NA regimen in CHB patients.METHODS In this observational study,195 CHB patients with HBsAg≤1500 IU/m L,hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg)-negative(including HBeAg-negative patients or HBeAg-positive patients who achieved HBeAg-negative after antiviral treatment with NA)and hepatitis B virus-deoxyribonucleic acid<1.0×10^2 IU/mL after over 1 year of NA therapy were enrolled between November 2015 and December2018 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University,China.Patients were given the choice between receiving either peg-IFNα-2a add-on therapy to an ongoing NA regimen(add-on group,n=91)or continuous NA monotherapy(monotherapy group,n=104)after being informed of the benefits and risks of the peg-IFNα-2a therapy.Total therapy duration of peg-IFNα-2a was 48 wk.All patients were followed-up to week 72(24 wk after discontinuation of peg-IFNα-2a).The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HBsAg clearance at week 72.RESULTS Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups.Intention-to-treatment analysis showed that the HBsAg clearance rate in the add-on group and monotherapy group was 37.4%(34/91)and 1.9%(2/104)at week 72,respectively.The HBsAg seroconversion rate in the add-on group was 29.7%(27/91)at week 72,and no patient in the monotherapy group achieved HBsAg seroconversion at week 72.The HBsAg clearance and seroconversion rates in the add-on group were significantly higher than in the monotherapy group at week 72(P<0.001).Younger patients,lower baseline HBsAg concentration,lower HBsAg concentrations at weeks 12 and 24,greater HBsAg decline from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 and the alanine aminotransferase≥2×upper limit of normal during the first 12 wk of therapy were strong predictors of HBsAg clearance in patients with peg-IFNα-2a add-on treatment.Regarding the safety of the treatment,4.4%(4/91)of patients in the add-on group discontinued peg-IFNα-2a due to adverse events.No severe adverse events were noted.CONCLUSION Peg-IFNα-2a as an add-on therapy augments HBsAg clearance in HBeAg-negative CHB patients with HBsAg≤1500 IU/m L after over 1 year of NA therapy.

Early renal injury indicators can help evaluate renal injury in patients with chronic hepatitis B with long-term nucleos(t)ide therapy

BACKGROUND Patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB)with long-term nucleos(t)ide therapy may experience renal insufficiency.Traditional renal function indicators,such as urine protein,serum urea nitrogen(BUN),and serum creatinine,are normal when early mild lesions occur.Therefore,more sensitive renal function indicators are needed.AIM To investigate the significance of early renal injury indicators in evaluating renal injury in patients with CHB with long-term nucleos(t)ide therapy.METHODS We collected the clinical data of 69 outpatients with CHB at Peking University First Hospital from March 2018 to January 2020 who had been treated with longterm nucleos(t)ide therapy and analyzed the results of early renal injury indicators.Continuous normal distribution data were analyzed by the t-test to determine the difference between two groups.Continuous non-normally distributed data were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test between two groups.The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to determine the differences among multiple groups.Enumeration data were analyzed by the chi-square test.The related factors of early renal injury indicators were analyzed by logistic regression analysis.RESULTS The average treatment duration with nucleos(t)ide analogs of the 69 patients with CHB was 99.7±28.7 mo.The cases of patients with elevated BUN and hypophosphatemia were 6(8.7%)and 13(18.8%),respectively;31(44.9%)patients had abnormal early renal injury indicators,including 9 patients with abnormal urine microalbumin,7 patients with abnormal urine immunoglobulin,6 patients with abnormal urine transferrin,and 19 patients with abnormalα1 microglobulin.There were no significant differences in the mean values of age,sex,BUN,estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR),serum uric acid,serum calcium,or serum phosphorus between the two groups of patients with and without early renal injury indicators.However,the mean levels of serum creatinine and urine creatinine,N-acetyl-β-D-glucosidase enzyme,α1 microglobulin,and urine immunoglobulin in the former group of patients were significantly higher than those in the latter group of patients(P<0.05).The incidence of early renal injury in patients with eGFR≥90,60-89,and 30-59 mL/(min·1.73 m2)was 36.4%(8/22),47.6%(20/42),and 60%(3/5),respectively.Logistic regression analysis results showed that gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase[odds ratio(OR)=1.05(1.008-1.093),P=0.020],direct bilirubin[OR=1.548(1.111-2.159),P=0.010],serum creatinine[OR=1.079(1.022-1.139),P=0.006],and age[OR=0.981(0.942-1.022),P=0.357]were independent predictors of early renal injury.CONCLUSION Patients with CHB treated with long-term nucleos(t)ide analog therapy had a high probability of early renal injury,and early renal injury indicators were highly sensitive and could be used to monitor early renal impairment.

Exploration of nucleos(t)ide analogs cessation in chronic hepatitis B patients with hepatitis B e antigen loss

BACKGROUND Nucleos(t)ide analogs(NAs)cessation in chronic hepatitis B(CHB)patients remains a matter of debate in clinical practice.Current guidelines recommend that patients with hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg)seroconversion discontinue NAs after relatively long-term consolidation therapy.However,many patients fail to achieve HBeAg seroconversion after the long-term loss of HBeAg,even if hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg)loss occurs.It remains unclear whether NAs can be discontinued in this subset of patients.AIM To investigate the outcomes and factors associated with HBeAg-positive CHB patients with HBeAg loss(without hepatitis B e antibody)after cessation of NAs.METHODS We studied patients who discontinued NAs after achieving HBeAg loss.The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors for virological relapse after cessation of NAs.The cut-off value of the consolidation period was confirmed using receiver operating characteristic curves;we confirmed the cut-off value of HBsAg according to a previous study.The log-rank test was used to compare cumulative relapse rates among groups.We also studied patients with CHB who achieved HBeAg seroconversion and compared their cumulative relapse rates.Propensity score matching analysis(PSM)was used to balance baseline characteristics between the groups.RESULTS We included 83 patients with HBeAg loss.The mean age of these patients was 32.1±9.5 years,and the majority was male(67.5%).Thirty-eight patients relapsed,and the cumulative relapse rate at months 3,6,12,24,36,60,120,and 180 were 22.9%,36.1%,41.0%,43.5%,45.0%,45.0%,45.0%,and 52.8%,respectively.Twentysix(68.4%)patients relapsed in the first 3 mo after NAs cessation,and 35 patients(92.1%)relapsed in the first year after NAs cessation.Consolidation period(≥24 mo vs<24 mo)(HR 0.506,P=0.043)and HBsAg at cessation(≥100 IU/mL vs<100 IU/mL)(HR 14.869,P=0.008)were significant predictors in multivariate Cox regression.In the PSM cohort,which included 144 patients,there were lower cumulative relapse rates in patients with HBeAg seroconversion(P=0.036).CONCLUSION HBeAg-positive CHB patients with HBeAg loss may be able to discontinue NAs therapy after long-term consolidation,especially in patients with HBsAg at cessation<100 IU/mL.Careful monitoring,especially in the early stages after cessation,may ensure a favorable outcome.

Antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues for severe chronic hepatitis B

To the Editor:I read the paper by Chen et al[1]with great interest.The authors performed a retrospective study to evaluate the short-term efficacy of antiviral therapy with

Serum hepatitis B surface antigen levels predict treatment response to nucleos(t)ide analogues

Quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg)has been suggested to be helpful in the management of chronic hepatitis B(CHB)patients.Nucleos(t)ide analogs(NAs)are the therapy of choice for CHB and are used in the majority of CHB patients.NAs are able to induce hepatitis B virus(HBV)viral suppression,normalization of alanine aminotransferase(ALT)levels,and improvement in liver histology.Automated quantitative assays for serum HBsAg have recently become available,facilitating standardized quantification of serum HBsAg.This has led to increased interest in the clinical application of quantitative serum HBsAg for predicting therapeutic response to NAs.Recent studies have shown that a decline in serum HBsAg levels in patients receiving peginterferon may signal successful induction of immune control over HBV,and can therefore be used to predict therapeutic response.NA treatment typically induces a less rapid decline in HBsAg than interferon treatment;it has been estimated that full HBsAg clearance can require decades of NA treatment.However,a rapid HBsAg decline during NA therapy may identify patients who will show clearance of HBsAg.Currently,there is no consensus on the clinical utility of serum HBsAg monitoring for evaluating patient responses to NA therapy.This review focuses on recent findings regarding the potential application of HBsAg quantification in the management of CHB patients receiving NA therapy.

Nationwide retrospective study of hepatitis B virological response and liver stiffness improvement in 465 patients on nucleos(t)ide analogue

BACKGROUND Hepatitis B virus(HBV)nucleos(t)ide analog(NA)therapy reduces liver disease but requires prolonged therapy to achieve hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg)loss.There is limited North American real-world data using non-invasive tools for fibrosis assessment and few have compared 1st generation NA or lamivudine(LAM)to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF).AIM To assess impact of NA on virological response and fibrosis regression using liver stiffness measurement(LSM)(i.e.,FibroScan®).METHODS Retrospective,observational cohort study from the Canadian HBV Network.Data collected included demographics,NA,HBV DNA,alanine aminotransferase(ALT),and LSM.Patients were HBV monoinfected patients,treatment naïve,and received 1 NA with minimum 1 year follow-up.RESULTS In 465(median 49 years,37%female,35%hepatitis B e antigen+at baseline,84%Asian,6%White,and 9%Black).Percentage of 64(n=299)received TDF and 166 were LAM-treated with similar median duration of 3.9 and 3.7 years,respectively.The mean baseline LSM was 11.2 kPa(TDF)vs 8.3 kPa(LAM)(P=0.003).At 5-year follow-up,the mean LSM was 7.0 kPa in TDF vs 6.7 kPa in LAM(P=0.83).There was a significant difference in fibrosis regression between groups(i.e.,mean-4.2 kPa change in TDF and-1.6 kPa in LAM,P<0.05).The last available data on treatment showed that all had normal ALT,but more TDF patients were virologically suppressed(<10 IU/mL)(n=170/190,89%)vs LAM-treated(n=35/58,60%)(P<0.05).None cleared HBsAg.CONCLUSION In this real-world North American study,approximately 5 years of NA achieves liver fibrosis regression rarely leads to HBsAg loss.

When to stop nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment for chronic hepatitis B? Durability of antiviral response

Introduction of nucleos(t)ide analogues(NAs)for oral antiviral therapy has dramatically improved the clinical outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB).Although current international guidelines for the management of CHB provide information regarding when to begin the antiviral therapy with NAs,there is no clear consensus on when to stop the treatment,especially for those who respond to the therapy.Hepatitis B surface antigen loss has been regarded as an ideal endpoint of oral antiviral therapy with NAs,however since this is rarely achieved,practical endpoints have been suggested by the international guidelines.Despite the stopping rules recommended by the international guidelines,whether oral antiviral therapy with NAs can be safely discontinued is of major concern.While attention has been drawn to whether antiviral treatment with NAs can be a finite therapy,there is lack of sufficient data on off-treatment durability of highly potent NAs.Based on the available evidences,current guidelines for stopping NA therapy seems to be inadequate in terms of off-treatment durability,with relapse rates of more than 40%for both hepatitis Be antigen(HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients.Therefore,further studies are required to accumulate data on off-treatment durability of highly potent NAs,and future studies are warranted to identify adequate predictive markers that could provide supplementary information to guide the timing of stopping NA therapy.

Nucleos(t)ide analogues to treat hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after radical resection

Significant advances have been made in nucleos(t)ideanalogue(NA) therapy to treat chronic hepatitis B,and this therapy reduces the risk of hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) in somepatients.However,whether NAs can also prevent recurrence after radical resection of HBV-related HCC remains controversial and is an important question,giventhat most patients will experience recurrence within afew years of curative surgery.Here we systematicallyreviewed the literature since 2004 on outcomes afteradministering NAs to patients with HBV-related HCCfollowing radical resection.We focused on treatmentindications,duration,effects on recurrence-free survivaland overall survival,and the management of NA resistance.We find that patients with HCC should stronglyconsider NA therapy if they are positive for HBV-DNA,and that the available evidence suggests that postoperative NA therapy can increase both recurrence-free andoverall survival.To minimize drug resistance,cliniciansshould opt for potent analogues with higher resistancebarriers,and they should monitor the patient carefully for emergence of NA-resistant HBV.

Efficacy compared between entecavir and adefovir dipivoxil on HBeAg-positive nucleos(t)ide-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B at week 12 and week 48

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of entecavir and adefovir dipivoxil on HBeAg-positive nucleos(t)ide-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B with the method of Meta analysis.Methods:We searched PUBMED,EMBASE,CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure),the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews with reference to all data documented before May 2010.The dosage of entecavir and adefovir dipivoxil was 0.5 mg/d and 10 mg/d,respectively.Heterogeneity was examined by Chi-square test,the relative risk calculated and forest plot drawn.Rates of undetected serum HBV DNA,serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization,HBeAg clearance,HBeAg seroconversion and adverse effect occurrence were analyzed.Results:Six articles were included,which fit well in with this study.Meta analysis showed that the rate of undetected serum HBV DNA(P=0.000 2 at week 12,P=0.002 at week 48)and that of serum ALT normalization(P=0.04 at week 12,P=0.008 at week 48)in the entecavir group were higher than those in the adefovir dipivoxil group.However,no statistic significance existed between the two groups in the rate of HBeAg clearance (P=0.17),the rate of HBeAg seroconversion(P=0.53)or the rate of adverse effect occurrence(P=0.92)at week 48.Conclusion:Entecavir was superior to adefovir dipivoxil in decreasing serum HBV DNA and normalizing serum ALT in the HBeAg-positive nucleos(t)ide-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Effects of antiviral therapy on preventing liver tumorigenesis and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence

Chronic hepatitis B virus(HBV)infection is the key driving force of liver disease progression,resulting in the development of hepatic dysfunction,cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).The primary aim of therapy is to suppress or eliminate HBV replication to reduce the activity of hepatitis,thus reducing the risk of,or slowing the progression of,liver disease.Nucleos(t)ide analogues(Nucs)may result in rapid suppression of HBV replication with normalization of serum transaminases and restore liver function,thus increasing survival in patients with hepatic decompensation.Long-term Nuc therapy may result in histological improvement or reversal of advanced fibrosis and reduction in disease progression,including the development of HCC.The long-term benefits of a finite course of interferon(IFN)-αtherapy also include a sustained and cumulative response,as well as hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance and reduction in the development of cirrhosis and/or HCC.Pegylated IFN and newer Nucs may achieve better long-term outcomes because of improved efficacy and a low risk of drug resistance.However,treatment outcomes are still far from satisfactory.Understanding the effects of anti-HBV treatment against HCC incidence and recurrence after hepatectomy or liver transplantation is required for further improvement of outcome.

Management of chronic hepatitis B infection: Current treatment guidelines, challenges, and new developments

Chronic hepatitis B(CHB)virus infection is a global public health problem,affecting more than 400 million people worldwide.The clinical spectrum is wide,ranging from a subclinical inactive carrier state,to progressive chronic hepatitis,cirrhosis,decompensation,and hepatocellular carcinoma.However,complications of hepatitis B virus(HBV)-related chronic liver disease may be reduced by viral suppression.Current international guidelines recommend first-line treatment of CHB infection with pegylated interferon,entecavir,or tenofovir,but the optimal treatment for an individualpatient is controversial.The indications for treatment are contentious,and increasing evidence suggests that HBV genotyping,as well as serial on-treatment measurements of hepatitis B surface antigen and HBV DNA kinetics should be used to predict antiviral treatment response.The likelihood of achieving a sustained virological response is also increased by extending treatment duration,and using combination therapy.Hence the paradigm for treatment of CHB is constantly evolving.This article summarizes the different indications for treatment,and systematically reviews the evidence for the efficacy of various antiviral agents.It further discusses the shortcomings of current guidelines,use of rescue therapy in drug-resistant strains of HBV,and highlights the promising clinical trials for emerging therapies in the pipeline.This concise overview presents an updated practical approach to guide the clinical management of CHB.

Optimization therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is currently medically managed with either interferon-alpha or one of the five nucleos(t)ide analogs. However, there are still a large number of CHB patients whose response to the above therapies remains less than satisfactory, and their incomplete or non-response to antiviral therapies has plagued clinicians worldwide. In recent years, a newly proposed optimization therapy has provided us with a new approach to solve this problem. The key points in this optimization therapy are to initiate antiviral therapy with an appropriate agent at the correct time point, and to adjust treatments in patients with poor early responses by adding a second agent or switching to another more potent agent. In this review, we summarize recent developments in optimization therapy for the treatment of CHB, and provide an outlook for future research in this field. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Potential use of serum HBV RNA in antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B in the era of nucleos（t）ide analogs

Although the efficacy of nucleos（t）ide analogue （NA） has been confirmed for treatment of chronic hepatitis B, long-term therapy has been recommended due to the high frequency of off-therapy viral DNA rebound and disease relapse. In this review, the RNA virion-like particles of hepatitis B virus （HBV） are integrated into the Hfe cycle of HBV replication, and the potential significance of serum HBV RNA is systematically described. The production of HBV RNA virion-like particles should not be blocked by NA; in this regard, serum HBV RNA is found to be a suitable surrogate marker for the activity of intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA （cccDNA）, particularly among patients receiving NA therapy. Therefore, the concept of virological response is redefined as persistent loss of serum HBV DNA and HBV RNA. In contrast to hepatitis B surface antigen （HBsAg） that can originate from either the cccDNA or the integrated HBV DNA fragment, serum HBV RNA, with pregenomic RNA origination, can only be transcribed from cccDNA. Therefore, the loss of serum HBV RNA would likely be a promising predicator for safe drug discontinuation. The clinical status of consistent loss of serum HBV RNA accompanied with low serum HBsAg levels might be implicated as a ＂para-functional cure,＂ a status nearly close to the functional cure of chronic hepatitis B, to distinguish the ＂functional cure＂ characterized as serum HBsAg loss with or without anti-HBs seroconversion.

Long-term hepatitis B surface antigen kinetics after nucleos(t)ide analog discontinuation in patients with noncirrhotic chronic hepatitis B

Background and aim Few studies have reported hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg)kinetics after nucleos(t)ide analog(NA)discontinuation in patients with noncirrhotic chronic hepatitis B(CHB).The study specifically investigated long-term HBsAg kinetics after NA discontinuation.Methods Between January 2014 to January 2024,this study prospectively enrolled 106 outpatients with noncirrhotic CHB who met the discontinuation criteria after NA consolidation treatment.Demographic,clinical,and laboratory data were collected and analyzed after NA discontinuation.Results Ninety-six patients who finished 5 years of follow-up were included.HBsAg remained undetectable in 29 patients with end of treatment(EOT)HBsAg negativity.Among 67 patients with EOT HBsAg positivity,HBsAg seroclearance occurred in 12(17.9%)patients with an estimated annual incidence of HBsAg seroclearance of 3.6%.Patients with EOT HBsAg levels of≤1000 IU/mL had a higher HBsAg seroclearance rate than those with EOT HBsAg levels of>1000 IU/mL(33.3%vs.5.4%).The proportion of patients with HBsAg≤1000 IU/mL increased during follow-up.Logistic regression analysis indicated that the EOT HBsAg level was an independent factor for HBsAg seroclearance and an HBsAg level decline exceeding 1 log10 IU/mL.The optimal EOT HBsAg cutoff for both HBsAg seroclearance and an HBsAg level decline exceeding 1 log10 IU/mL was 359 IU/mL.Conclusions Patients with EOT HBsAg negativity experienced no relapse and maintained HBsAg seroclearance during 5 years of follow-up after NA discontinuation.A higher HBsAg seroclearance rate can be obtained in patients with EOT HBsAg levels of≤1000 IU/mL during 5 years of follow-up after NA discontinuation.Close monitoring and proper NA retreatment are recommended to guarantee the safety of NA discontinuation.

Management of hepatitis B virus infection during treatment for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Although liver resection is considered the most effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), treatment outcomes are unsatisfactory because of the high rate of HCC recurrence. Since we reported hepatitis B e-antigen positivity and high serum hepatitis B virus(HBV) DNA concentrations are strong risk factors for HCC recurrence after curative resection of HBV-related HCC in the early 2000 s, many investigators have demonstrated the effects of viral status on HCC recurrence and post-treatment outcomes. These findings suggest controlling viral status is important to prevent HCC recurrence and improve survival after curative treatment for HBV-related HCC. Antiviral therapy after curative treatment aims to improve prognosis by preventing HCC recurrence and maintaining liver function. Therapy with interferon and nucleos(t)ide analogs may be useful for preventing HCC recurrence and improving overall survival in patients who have undergone curative resection for HBV-related HCC. In addition, reactivation of viral replication can occur after liver resection for HBV-related HCC. Antiviral therapy can be recommended for patients to prevent HBV reactivation. Nevertheless, further studies are required to establish treatment guidelines for patients with HBVrelated HCC.

Current and future antiviral drug therapies of hepatitis B chronic infection

Despite significant improvement in the management of chronic hepatitis B virus(HBV) it remains a public health problem, affecting more than 350 million people worldwide. The natural course of the infection is dynamic and involves a complex interplay between the virus and the host's immune system. Currently the approved therapeutic regimens include pegylated-interferon(IFN)-α and monotherapy with five nucleos(t)ide analogues(NAs). Both antiviral treatments are not capable to eliminate the virus and do not establish long-term control of infection after treatment withdrawal. IFN therapy is of finite duration and associates with low response rates, liver decompensating and numerous side effects. NAs are well-tolerated therapies but have a high risk of drug resistance development that limits their prolonged use. The imperative for the development of new approaches for the treatment of chronic HBV infection is a challenging issue that cannot be over-sided. Research efforts are focusing on the identification and evaluation of various viral replication inhibitors that target viral replication and a number of immunomodulators that aim to restore the HBV specific immune hyporesponsiveness without inducing liver damage. This review brings together our current knowledge on the available treatment and discusses potential therapeutic approaches in the battle against chronic HBV infection.

Chronic hepatitis B: Advances in treatment

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B(CHB) has markedly improved in the last 15 years due to the availability of direct antivirals which greatly increase therapeutic options. Currently, there are two classes of agents licensed for CHB treatment: standard or pegylated interferon alpha(IFN or Peg-IFN) and five nucleoside/nucleotide analogues(NAs). Long-term treatment with NAs is the treatment option most often used in the majority of CHB patients. Entecavir and tenofovir, the most potent NAs with high barrier to resistance, are recommended as first-line monotherapy by all major treatment guidelines and can lead to long-lasting viro-logical suppression, resulting in histological improve-ment or reversal of advanced fibrosis and reduction in disease progression and liver-related complications. In this review, we focus on current treatment strategies of chronic hepatitis B and discuss the most recent efficacy and safety data from clinical trials and real life clinical practice. Recent findings of response-guided approach-es are also discussed.

Progression and status of antiviral monitoring in patients with chronic hepatitis B:From HBsAg to HBV RNA

As alternative indexes of hepatitis B virus(HBV),co-valently closed circular DNA(cccDNA) transcriptional activity,hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg),hepatitis B core-related antigen(HBcrAg),and peripheral blood RNA known as pgRNA,have been advocated as novel serum markers for prediction of prognosis and treatment response in chronic hepatitis B(CHB). Since the availability of commercial quantitative assays of HBsAg in 2011,HBsAg has been widely used for predicting treatment response of patients with CHB. Patients who received interferon therapy have shown a sharper reduction of HBsAg level than those who received nucleoside drug(NAs) therapy. Upon peginterferon treatment,sustained responders have presented a larger reduction of HBsAg level than the non-responders. An absence of HBsAg decline,together with < 2 log reduction in HBV DNA at week 12,can serve as a stopping rule in HBsAg-negative patients infected with genotype D HBV. A sharp reduction of HBs Ag titer in the NAs therapy is a predictor of HBsAg clearance in long-term treatment. HBcrAg,which consists of three species of related proteins sharing an identical 149 amino acid sequence,including HbcAg,hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg),and a truncated 22-kDa precore protein,is still detectable in situations where serum HBV DNA levels become undetectable or HBsAg loss is achieved. Therefore,HBcrAg remains a measurable serum marker to correlate with cccDNA in this situation. The decline in HBcrAg has been observed with NAs therapy and the pattern of decline might provide prognostic information on the risk of HBV posttreatment reactivation. Peripheral blood RNA,which is known as pgRNA,directly derives from cccDNA and reflects intrahepatic cccDNA level. Quantitative pgRNA has been suggested to be helpful in CHB management. However,commercial quantitative assays are lacking. Additionally,the use of simultaneous and continuous clearance of HBV RNA and HBV DNA in serum has been suggested to be a safe stopping rule of NAs therapy for patients with CHB. However,clinical studies of large sample sizes are needed to prove the feasibility andsignificance of using serum HBV RNA as the assessment standard of antiviral therapy in CHB and the safety of the stopping rule in clinics.

Update on hepatitis B virus infection

Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) leads to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma and/or chronic liver failure. Despite extensive research, the immunopathogenesis is not completely understood. Viral persistence and clinical outcomes following HBV infection depend on viral factors and host factors; including genetic factors that determine a host&#x02019;s immune mechanisms. The primary goal of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment is to eradicate HBV or to at least maintain suppression of HBV replication. Despite recent advances in anti-viral agents for chronic HBV infection, complete eradication of the virus has been difficult to achieve. Agents for the treatment of CHB are divided mainly into two groups: immunomodulating agents and antiviral nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs). Although NAs are safe, effective and easily administered orally, their long-term use poses the risk of drug resistance. Currently, international evidence-based guidelines have been developed to support physicians in managing CHB patients. However, treatment of patients with drug resistance is still challenging, as only a few classes of anti-HBV drugs are available and cross-resistance between drugs can occur. In addition, as the currently available genotypic test for detection of drug resistance still has limitations in identifying the different substitutions present in the same viral genome, the development of a new virologic test to overcome this limitation is necessary. Among the predictive factors associated with response to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) therapy, hepatitis B surface antigen quantification is considered to be a surrogate marker for monitoring response to PEG-IFN. Current practice guidelines stress the importance of profound and durable HBV viral suppression in the treatment of CHB patients. To this end, it is essential to choose a potent antiviral drug with a low risk of resistance for initial treatment of CHB to achieve sustained virological response. This review highlights recent advances in the understanding of the immunopathogenesis of HBV and currently available and developing treatment strategies against HBV infection.