This report attempts to ascertain the current state of, and outstanding issues relating to, nursing diagnosis, as taught in nursing education in Japan, and to obtain basic resources that will allow the improvement of ...This report attempts to ascertain the current state of, and outstanding issues relating to, nursing diagnosis, as taught in nursing education in Japan, and to obtain basic resources that will allow the improvement of said nursing diagnosis training. A self-completed, anonymous survey was carried out in regard to teaching staff responsible for classes in “nursing process” or “nursing diagnosis” at 183 university institutions involved in nursing education nationwide. Responses were received from 82 people, which clarified the following three points. 1) Of the 63 universities teaching nursing process as an independent subject, approximately 62% included nursing diagnosis. 2) A diverse range of educational materials were used in nursing diagnosis training, including NANDA-I nursing diagnosis. 3) In implementing nursing process using nursing diagnosis, issues raised included the following: the limitations of education “on paper”, using theoretical patients, insufficient skills among teaching staff, the difficulty of realizing practical training in a clinical setting, and the tendency to try to make a simple diagnosis fit the circumstances. In the future, this study suggests that it may be important to create a set of guidelines guaranteeing a minimum level of educational content in relation to nursing diagnosis, which must be learned before graduation.展开更多
A range of different language systems for nursing diagnosis, interventions and outcomes are currently available. Nursing terminologies are intended to support nursing practice but they have to be evaluated. This study...A range of different language systems for nursing diagnosis, interventions and outcomes are currently available. Nursing terminologies are intended to support nursing practice but they have to be evaluated. This study aims to assess the results of an expert survey to establish the face validity of a nursing interface terminology. The study applied a descriptive design with a cross-sectional survey strategy using a written questionnaire administered to expert nurses working in hospitals. Sample size was estimated at 35 participants. The questionnaire included topics related to validity and reliability criteria for nursing controlled vocabularies described in the literature. Mean global score and criteria scoring at least 7 were considered main outcome measures. The analysis included descriptive statistics with a confidence level of 95%. The mean global score was 8.1. The mean score for the validity criteria was 8.4 and 7.8 for reliability and applicability criteria. Two of the criteria for reliability and applicability evaluation did not achieve minimum scores. According to the experts’ responses, this terminology meets face validity, but that improvements are required in some criteria and further research is needed to completely demonstrate its metric properties.展开更多
目的分析目前我国对北美护理诊断分类系统(North American Nursing Diagnosis Association,NANDA)相关研究现状,探讨其发展趋势,为后期进一步研究提供理论参考及数据支持。方法收集万方、知网、维普数据库及PubMed-Medline、Cochrane-CE...目的分析目前我国对北美护理诊断分类系统(North American Nursing Diagnosis Association,NANDA)相关研究现状,探讨其发展趋势,为后期进一步研究提供理论参考及数据支持。方法收集万方、知网、维普数据库及PubMed-Medline、Cochrane-CENTRAL、Embase数据库自建库至2018年12月公开发表的有关护理诊断的研究文献,获取文献后从文献发文时间趋势、主题研究、研究类型、证据级别、研究关注点进行分析。结果检索获取1477篇文献,最终纳入264篇文献。基于NANDA的护理诊断相关研究发文时间集中在1999年—2002年;主题研究主要集中在护理方法学研究;研究类型以非干预性研究为主;研究证据级别以低级别的观察性和描述性文献为主;研究关注点以NANDA临床应用、推广和使用感受为主。结论我国护理研究者在护理诊断领域还没有形成一个核心的研究团队。需要对NANDA分类系统进行跨文化的信度和效度调试,以及研究在中国文化环境中对患者护理结果的影响,从而为我国护理诊断理论体系提供更全面的研究基础。展开更多
文摘This report attempts to ascertain the current state of, and outstanding issues relating to, nursing diagnosis, as taught in nursing education in Japan, and to obtain basic resources that will allow the improvement of said nursing diagnosis training. A self-completed, anonymous survey was carried out in regard to teaching staff responsible for classes in “nursing process” or “nursing diagnosis” at 183 university institutions involved in nursing education nationwide. Responses were received from 82 people, which clarified the following three points. 1) Of the 63 universities teaching nursing process as an independent subject, approximately 62% included nursing diagnosis. 2) A diverse range of educational materials were used in nursing diagnosis training, including NANDA-I nursing diagnosis. 3) In implementing nursing process using nursing diagnosis, issues raised included the following: the limitations of education “on paper”, using theoretical patients, insufficient skills among teaching staff, the difficulty of realizing practical training in a clinical setting, and the tendency to try to make a simple diagnosis fit the circumstances. In the future, this study suggests that it may be important to create a set of guidelines guaranteeing a minimum level of educational content in relation to nursing diagnosis, which must be learned before graduation.
文摘A range of different language systems for nursing diagnosis, interventions and outcomes are currently available. Nursing terminologies are intended to support nursing practice but they have to be evaluated. This study aims to assess the results of an expert survey to establish the face validity of a nursing interface terminology. The study applied a descriptive design with a cross-sectional survey strategy using a written questionnaire administered to expert nurses working in hospitals. Sample size was estimated at 35 participants. The questionnaire included topics related to validity and reliability criteria for nursing controlled vocabularies described in the literature. Mean global score and criteria scoring at least 7 were considered main outcome measures. The analysis included descriptive statistics with a confidence level of 95%. The mean global score was 8.1. The mean score for the validity criteria was 8.4 and 7.8 for reliability and applicability criteria. Two of the criteria for reliability and applicability evaluation did not achieve minimum scores. According to the experts’ responses, this terminology meets face validity, but that improvements are required in some criteria and further research is needed to completely demonstrate its metric properties.
文摘目的分析目前我国对北美护理诊断分类系统(North American Nursing Diagnosis Association,NANDA)相关研究现状,探讨其发展趋势,为后期进一步研究提供理论参考及数据支持。方法收集万方、知网、维普数据库及PubMed-Medline、Cochrane-CENTRAL、Embase数据库自建库至2018年12月公开发表的有关护理诊断的研究文献,获取文献后从文献发文时间趋势、主题研究、研究类型、证据级别、研究关注点进行分析。结果检索获取1477篇文献,最终纳入264篇文献。基于NANDA的护理诊断相关研究发文时间集中在1999年—2002年;主题研究主要集中在护理方法学研究;研究类型以非干预性研究为主;研究证据级别以低级别的观察性和描述性文献为主;研究关注点以NANDA临床应用、推广和使用感受为主。结论我国护理研究者在护理诊断领域还没有形成一个核心的研究团队。需要对NANDA分类系统进行跨文化的信度和效度调试,以及研究在中国文化环境中对患者护理结果的影响,从而为我国护理诊断理论体系提供更全面的研究基础。
