Objective:To observe therapeutic effect of sodium aescinate Tablets on knee osteoarthritis complicated with synovitis.Methods:86 patients with knee osteoarthritis combined with synovitis treated in the Honghui Hospita...Objective:To observe therapeutic effect of sodium aescinate Tablets on knee osteoarthritis complicated with synovitis.Methods:86 patients with knee osteoarthritis combined with synovitis treated in the Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi’an Jiaotong University from January 2018 to December 2019 were randomly divided into control group and intervention group,with 43 cases in each group.The control group was given routine treatment,and the intervention group was given sodium aescinate Tablets orally on the basis of routine treatment,twice a day,2 tablets each time.The curative effect was evaluated after 2 weeks of treatment.The knee pain and joint function of the two groups were evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index(WOMAC),and the clinical effects of the two groups were compared.Results:Before treatment,there was no significant difference in general information,VAS and WOMAC scores between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the VAS and WOMAC scores of the two groups were both lower than those before treatment,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The vas and WOMAC scores of the intervention group were lower than those of the control group(VAS,1.87±0.79 vs 3.38±0.81).In this study,sodium aescinate tablets were applied to the treatment of KOA combined with synovitis.The results showed that the intervention group was better than the control group in alleviating knee pain,improving joint function and improving clinical efficacy,and the difference was statistically significant.The total effective rate of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group(100%vs 86.05%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Sodium aescinate tablet in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis combined with synovitis can effectively alleviate knee pain,improve joint function and improve clinical efficacy.展开更多
BACKGROUND Arthroscopic debridement is a mature treatment for knee osteoarthritis(KOA).Due to the differences in the research subjects,methods,and efficacy evaluation indexes,there are great differences in the surgica...BACKGROUND Arthroscopic debridement is a mature treatment for knee osteoarthritis(KOA).Due to the differences in the research subjects,methods,and efficacy evaluation indexes,there are great differences in the surgical efficacy reported in the literature.AIM To compare the medium-term efficacy of arthroscopic debridement and conservative treatment for KOA of Kellgren-Lawrence grades I-III.METHODS Patients with KOA of Kellgren-Lawrence grades I-III who were admitted to the orthopedic clinic of our hospital from July 2018 to December 2018 and agreed to undergo arthroscopic surgery were included in an arthroscopic debridement group,and those who refused surgical treatment were included in a conservative treatment group.Gender,age,body mass index(BMI),side of KOA,American hospital for special surgery knee score(HSS score)before treatment,visual analogue scale(VAS)score during walking and rest before treatment,conservative treatment content,and surgical procedure were recorded.Outpatient visits were conducted at the 1st,3rd,6th,12th,and 24th mo after treatment in the two groups.The changes of HSS score and VAS score in each group before and after treatment were statistically analyzed,and the differences of HSS score and VAS score in different treatment stages between the two groups were also compared.RESULTS In the conservative treatment group,there were 80 patients with complete followup data,including 20 males and 60 females,aged 58.75±14.66 years old.And in the knee arthroscopic debridement group,there were 98 patients with complete follow-up data,including 24 males and 74 females,aged 59.27±14.48 years old.There was no statistically significant difference in the general data(gender,age,BMI,side of KOA,Kellgren-Lawrence grade distribution,HSS score,and VAS score)between the two groups before treatment.The HSS scores of the conservative treatment group at the 1st,3rd,6th,12th,and 24th mo after treatment were significantly higher than that before treatment(P<0.05).There was no statistical difference in HSS score of the conservative treatment group among the 1st,3rd,6th,12th,and 24th mo(P>0.05).The HSS score of the knee arthroscopic debridement group at the 1st mo after surgery was significantly higher than that before surgery(P<0.05).HSS scores of the knee arthroscopic debridement group at the 3rd,6th,12th,and 24th mo were significantly higher than those before surgery and at the 1st mo after surgery(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in HSS scores at the 3rd,6th,12th,and 24th mo after surgery(P>0.05).HSS scores at the 3rd,6th,12th,and 24th mo were significantly higher in the arthroscopic debridement group than in the conservative treatment group(P<0.05).There was no statistical difference in HSS scores between the two groups before treatment and at the 1st mo of follow-up(P>0.05).VAS scores during walking and rest were significantly decreased in both groups,and the VAS score during rest was significantly lower in the arthroscopic debridement group than in the conservative treatment group,but there was no significant difference in the VAS score during walking between the two groups after treatment.CONCLUSION Compared with conservative treatment,arthroscopic debridement can significantly improve the knee resting pain and knee functional status of patients with KOA of Kellgren-Lawrence grades I-III within 2 years after treatment.展开更多
BACKGROUND Osteoarthritis(OA)is the most prevalent form of degenerative whole-joint disease.Before the final option of knee replacement,arthroscopic surgery was the most widely used joint-preserving surgical treatment...BACKGROUND Osteoarthritis(OA)is the most prevalent form of degenerative whole-joint disease.Before the final option of knee replacement,arthroscopic surgery was the most widely used joint-preserving surgical treatment.Emerging regenerative therapies,such as those involving platelet-rich plasma,mesenchymal stem cells,and microfragmented adipose tissue(MFAT),have been pushed to the forefront of treatment to prevent the progression of OA.Currently,MFAT has been successfully applied to treat different types of orthopedic diseases.AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of MFAT with arthroscopic surgery in patients with knee OA(KOA).METHODS A randomized,multicenter study was conducted between June 2017 and November 2022 in 10 hospitals in Zhejiang,China.Overall,302 patients diagnosed with KOA(Kellgren-Lawrence grades 2-3)were randomized to the MFAT group(n=151,were administered MFAT following arthroscopic surgery),or the control group(n=151,were administered hyaluronic acid following arthroscopic surgery).The study outcomes were changes in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC)score,the visual analog scale(VAS)score,the Lequesne index score,the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score(WORMS),and safety over a 24-mo period from baseline.RESULTS The changes in the WOMAC score(including the three subscale scores),VAS pain score,and Lequesne index score at the 24-mo mark were significantly different in the MFAT and control groups,as well as when comparing values at the posttreatment visit and those at baseline(P<0.001).The MFAT group consistently demonstrated significant decreases in the WOMAC pain scores and VAS scores at all follow-ups compared to the control group(P<0.05).Furthermore,the WOMAC stiffness score,WOMAC function score,and Lequesne index score differed significantly between the groups at 12 and 24 mo(P<0.05).However,no signicant between-group differences were observed in the WORMS at 24 mo(P=0.367).No serious adverse events occurred in both groups.CONCLUSION The MFAT injection combined with arthroscopic surgery treatment group showed better mid-term clinical outcomes compared to the control group,suggesting its efficacy as a therapeutic approach for patients with KOA.展开更多
The role of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy(APM) in reducing pain and improving function in patients with meniscal tears remains controversial. Five recent highquality randomized controlled trials(RCTs) compared non...The role of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy(APM) in reducing pain and improving function in patients with meniscal tears remains controversial. Five recent highquality randomized controlled trials(RCTs) compared non-operative management of meniscal tears to APM, with four showing no difference and one demonstrating superiority of APM. In this review, we examined the strengths and weaknesses of each of these RCTs, with particular attention to the occurrence of inadvertent biases. We also completed a quantitative analysis that compares treatment successes in each treatment arm, considering crossovers as treatment failures. Our analysis revealed that each study was an excellent attempt to compare APM with non-surgical treatment but suffered from selection, performance, detection, and/or transfer biases that reduce confidence in its conclusions. While the RCT remains the methodological gold standard for establishing treatment efficacy, the use of an RCT design does not in itself ensure internal or external validity. Furthermore, under our alternative analysis of treatment successes, two studies had significantly more treatment successes in the APM arm than the non-operative arm although original intention-totreat analyses showed no difference between these two groups. Crossovers remain an important problem in surgical trials with no perfect analytical solution. With the studies available at present, no conclusion can be drawn concerning the optimal treatment modality for meniscal tears. Further work that minimizes significant biases and crossovers and incorporates sub-group and cost-benefit analyses may clarify therapeutic indications.展开更多
目的:探讨温针灸联合关节镜微创手术治疗膝骨关节炎(knee osteoarthritis,KOA)的临床效果。方法:选取2022年1—10月马鞍山市人民医院收治的60例膝骨关节炎患者为研究对象,根据治疗方式分为两组,其中治疗组30例,应用温针灸联合关节镜微...目的:探讨温针灸联合关节镜微创手术治疗膝骨关节炎(knee osteoarthritis,KOA)的临床效果。方法:选取2022年1—10月马鞍山市人民医院收治的60例膝骨关节炎患者为研究对象,根据治疗方式分为两组,其中治疗组30例,应用温针灸联合关节镜微创手术治疗,对照组30例,应用单纯关节镜微创手术治疗。对比两组Lequesne疗效、Lysholm膝关节评分、美国西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis index,WOMAC)功能评分。结果:治疗后,治疗组患者总有效率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组Lysholm膝关节功能评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后3个月、6个月,治疗组Lysholm膝关节功能评分显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组WOMAC评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后3个月、6个月,治疗组WOMAC评分显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:温针灸联合关节镜微创手术治疗KOA较单纯关节镜微创手术效果更好。展开更多
目的全膝关节置换术对晚期膝关节骨性关节炎治疗的效果评估。方法回顾性选取2022年1月—2023年12月平度市人民医院收治的76例晚期膝关节骨性关节炎患者的临床资料,按照不同手术方法分为分析组(38例)和对照组(38例)。分析组进行全膝关节...目的全膝关节置换术对晚期膝关节骨性关节炎治疗的效果评估。方法回顾性选取2022年1月—2023年12月平度市人民医院收治的76例晚期膝关节骨性关节炎患者的临床资料,按照不同手术方法分为分析组(38例)和对照组(38例)。分析组进行全膝关节置换术,对照组进行常规关节镜手术。对两组恢复优良率、美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score,HSS)、膝关节协会评分(Knee So-cirty Score,KSS)进行分析对比。结果分析组恢复优良率为100.00%,高于对照组的84.21%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.524,P<0.05)。治疗后,分析组HSS评分显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,分析组KSS评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论晚期膝关节骨性关节炎患者实施全膝关节置换术能够提高优良率,并对关节功能进行改善。展开更多
文摘Objective:To observe therapeutic effect of sodium aescinate Tablets on knee osteoarthritis complicated with synovitis.Methods:86 patients with knee osteoarthritis combined with synovitis treated in the Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi’an Jiaotong University from January 2018 to December 2019 were randomly divided into control group and intervention group,with 43 cases in each group.The control group was given routine treatment,and the intervention group was given sodium aescinate Tablets orally on the basis of routine treatment,twice a day,2 tablets each time.The curative effect was evaluated after 2 weeks of treatment.The knee pain and joint function of the two groups were evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index(WOMAC),and the clinical effects of the two groups were compared.Results:Before treatment,there was no significant difference in general information,VAS and WOMAC scores between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the VAS and WOMAC scores of the two groups were both lower than those before treatment,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The vas and WOMAC scores of the intervention group were lower than those of the control group(VAS,1.87±0.79 vs 3.38±0.81).In this study,sodium aescinate tablets were applied to the treatment of KOA combined with synovitis.The results showed that the intervention group was better than the control group in alleviating knee pain,improving joint function and improving clinical efficacy,and the difference was statistically significant.The total effective rate of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group(100%vs 86.05%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Sodium aescinate tablet in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis combined with synovitis can effectively alleviate knee pain,improve joint function and improve clinical efficacy.
基金Shanghai Jing'an District Health Research Project,China,No.2018MS09.
文摘BACKGROUND Arthroscopic debridement is a mature treatment for knee osteoarthritis(KOA).Due to the differences in the research subjects,methods,and efficacy evaluation indexes,there are great differences in the surgical efficacy reported in the literature.AIM To compare the medium-term efficacy of arthroscopic debridement and conservative treatment for KOA of Kellgren-Lawrence grades I-III.METHODS Patients with KOA of Kellgren-Lawrence grades I-III who were admitted to the orthopedic clinic of our hospital from July 2018 to December 2018 and agreed to undergo arthroscopic surgery were included in an arthroscopic debridement group,and those who refused surgical treatment were included in a conservative treatment group.Gender,age,body mass index(BMI),side of KOA,American hospital for special surgery knee score(HSS score)before treatment,visual analogue scale(VAS)score during walking and rest before treatment,conservative treatment content,and surgical procedure were recorded.Outpatient visits were conducted at the 1st,3rd,6th,12th,and 24th mo after treatment in the two groups.The changes of HSS score and VAS score in each group before and after treatment were statistically analyzed,and the differences of HSS score and VAS score in different treatment stages between the two groups were also compared.RESULTS In the conservative treatment group,there were 80 patients with complete followup data,including 20 males and 60 females,aged 58.75±14.66 years old.And in the knee arthroscopic debridement group,there were 98 patients with complete follow-up data,including 24 males and 74 females,aged 59.27±14.48 years old.There was no statistically significant difference in the general data(gender,age,BMI,side of KOA,Kellgren-Lawrence grade distribution,HSS score,and VAS score)between the two groups before treatment.The HSS scores of the conservative treatment group at the 1st,3rd,6th,12th,and 24th mo after treatment were significantly higher than that before treatment(P<0.05).There was no statistical difference in HSS score of the conservative treatment group among the 1st,3rd,6th,12th,and 24th mo(P>0.05).The HSS score of the knee arthroscopic debridement group at the 1st mo after surgery was significantly higher than that before surgery(P<0.05).HSS scores of the knee arthroscopic debridement group at the 3rd,6th,12th,and 24th mo were significantly higher than those before surgery and at the 1st mo after surgery(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in HSS scores at the 3rd,6th,12th,and 24th mo after surgery(P>0.05).HSS scores at the 3rd,6th,12th,and 24th mo were significantly higher in the arthroscopic debridement group than in the conservative treatment group(P<0.05).There was no statistical difference in HSS scores between the two groups before treatment and at the 1st mo of follow-up(P>0.05).VAS scores during walking and rest were significantly decreased in both groups,and the VAS score during rest was significantly lower in the arthroscopic debridement group than in the conservative treatment group,but there was no significant difference in the VAS score during walking between the two groups after treatment.CONCLUSION Compared with conservative treatment,arthroscopic debridement can significantly improve the knee resting pain and knee functional status of patients with KOA of Kellgren-Lawrence grades I-III within 2 years after treatment.
基金the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.82274547the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province,No.LD22C060002+1 种基金the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Zhejiang Province,No.GZY-ZJ-KJ-23064the Zhejiang Provincial Research Foundation for Basic Public Welfare Research,No.LGF20H270005.
文摘BACKGROUND Osteoarthritis(OA)is the most prevalent form of degenerative whole-joint disease.Before the final option of knee replacement,arthroscopic surgery was the most widely used joint-preserving surgical treatment.Emerging regenerative therapies,such as those involving platelet-rich plasma,mesenchymal stem cells,and microfragmented adipose tissue(MFAT),have been pushed to the forefront of treatment to prevent the progression of OA.Currently,MFAT has been successfully applied to treat different types of orthopedic diseases.AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of MFAT with arthroscopic surgery in patients with knee OA(KOA).METHODS A randomized,multicenter study was conducted between June 2017 and November 2022 in 10 hospitals in Zhejiang,China.Overall,302 patients diagnosed with KOA(Kellgren-Lawrence grades 2-3)were randomized to the MFAT group(n=151,were administered MFAT following arthroscopic surgery),or the control group(n=151,were administered hyaluronic acid following arthroscopic surgery).The study outcomes were changes in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC)score,the visual analog scale(VAS)score,the Lequesne index score,the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score(WORMS),and safety over a 24-mo period from baseline.RESULTS The changes in the WOMAC score(including the three subscale scores),VAS pain score,and Lequesne index score at the 24-mo mark were significantly different in the MFAT and control groups,as well as when comparing values at the posttreatment visit and those at baseline(P<0.001).The MFAT group consistently demonstrated significant decreases in the WOMAC pain scores and VAS scores at all follow-ups compared to the control group(P<0.05).Furthermore,the WOMAC stiffness score,WOMAC function score,and Lequesne index score differed significantly between the groups at 12 and 24 mo(P<0.05).However,no signicant between-group differences were observed in the WORMS at 24 mo(P=0.367).No serious adverse events occurred in both groups.CONCLUSION The MFAT injection combined with arthroscopic surgery treatment group showed better mid-term clinical outcomes compared to the control group,suggesting its efficacy as a therapeutic approach for patients with KOA.
文摘The role of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy(APM) in reducing pain and improving function in patients with meniscal tears remains controversial. Five recent highquality randomized controlled trials(RCTs) compared non-operative management of meniscal tears to APM, with four showing no difference and one demonstrating superiority of APM. In this review, we examined the strengths and weaknesses of each of these RCTs, with particular attention to the occurrence of inadvertent biases. We also completed a quantitative analysis that compares treatment successes in each treatment arm, considering crossovers as treatment failures. Our analysis revealed that each study was an excellent attempt to compare APM with non-surgical treatment but suffered from selection, performance, detection, and/or transfer biases that reduce confidence in its conclusions. While the RCT remains the methodological gold standard for establishing treatment efficacy, the use of an RCT design does not in itself ensure internal or external validity. Furthermore, under our alternative analysis of treatment successes, two studies had significantly more treatment successes in the APM arm than the non-operative arm although original intention-totreat analyses showed no difference between these two groups. Crossovers remain an important problem in surgical trials with no perfect analytical solution. With the studies available at present, no conclusion can be drawn concerning the optimal treatment modality for meniscal tears. Further work that minimizes significant biases and crossovers and incorporates sub-group and cost-benefit analyses may clarify therapeutic indications.
文摘目的:探讨温针灸联合关节镜微创手术治疗膝骨关节炎(knee osteoarthritis,KOA)的临床效果。方法:选取2022年1—10月马鞍山市人民医院收治的60例膝骨关节炎患者为研究对象,根据治疗方式分为两组,其中治疗组30例,应用温针灸联合关节镜微创手术治疗,对照组30例,应用单纯关节镜微创手术治疗。对比两组Lequesne疗效、Lysholm膝关节评分、美国西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis index,WOMAC)功能评分。结果:治疗后,治疗组患者总有效率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组Lysholm膝关节功能评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后3个月、6个月,治疗组Lysholm膝关节功能评分显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组WOMAC评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后3个月、6个月,治疗组WOMAC评分显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:温针灸联合关节镜微创手术治疗KOA较单纯关节镜微创手术效果更好。
文摘目的全膝关节置换术对晚期膝关节骨性关节炎治疗的效果评估。方法回顾性选取2022年1月—2023年12月平度市人民医院收治的76例晚期膝关节骨性关节炎患者的临床资料,按照不同手术方法分为分析组(38例)和对照组(38例)。分析组进行全膝关节置换术,对照组进行常规关节镜手术。对两组恢复优良率、美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score,HSS)、膝关节协会评分(Knee So-cirty Score,KSS)进行分析对比。结果分析组恢复优良率为100.00%,高于对照组的84.21%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.524,P<0.05)。治疗后,分析组HSS评分显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,分析组KSS评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论晚期膝关节骨性关节炎患者实施全膝关节置换术能够提高优良率,并对关节功能进行改善。
