AIM To study the expression and significance of laminin in human colorectal carcinoma. METHODS Using the monoclonal antibody to laminin and streptavidin peroxidase immunohistochemical method, the expression of lam...AIM To study the expression and significance of laminin in human colorectal carcinoma. METHODS Using the monoclonal antibody to laminin and streptavidin peroxidase immunohistochemical method, the expression of laminin in 63 cases of human colorectal carcinoma tissues was determined. RESULTS In normal large intestinal mucosa adjacent to carcinoma, laminin was largely restricted to basement membrane in continuous linear pattern. In contrast, human colorectal carcinomas exhibited a progressive loss of an intact basement membrane that was correlated with decreasing differentiation degree. Well and moderately differentiated tumors exhibited a thin basement membrane with intermittent disruptions, and poorly differentiated tumors exhibited no areas of intact basement membrane. An association was found between lack of basement membrane laminin immunohistochemical staining in colorectal carcinoma and poorly differentiated tumor ( P <0 01) . CONCLUSION Immunohistochemical staining for laminin could provide a very useful index for the determination of the differentiation degree of colorectal carcinoma.展开更多
BACKGROUND pT2+prostate cancer(PCa),a term first used in 2004,refers to organ-confined PCa characterized by a positive surgical margin(PSM)without extracapsular extension.Patients with a PSM are vulnerable to biochemi...BACKGROUND pT2+prostate cancer(PCa),a term first used in 2004,refers to organ-confined PCa characterized by a positive surgical margin(PSM)without extracapsular extension.Patients with a PSM are vulnerable to biochemical recurrence(BCR)following radical prostatectomy(RP);however,whether adjuvant radiotherapy(aRT)is imperative to PSM after RP remains controversial.This study had the longest follow-up on pT2+PCa after robotic-assisted RP since 2004.Moreover,we discussed our viewpoints on pT2+PCa based on real-world experiences.AIM To conclude a 10-year surveillance on pT2+PCa and compare our results with those of the published literature.METHODS Forty-eight patients who underwent robotic-assisted RP between 2008 and 2011 were enrolled.Two serial tests of prostate specific antigen(PSA)≥0.2 ng/mL were defined as BCR.Various designed factors were analyzed using statistical tools for BCR risk.SAS 9.4 was applied and significance was defined as P<0.05.Univariate,multivariate,linear regression,and receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analyses were performed for statistical analyses.RESULTS With a median follow-up period of 9 years,25(52%)patients had BCR(BCR group),and the remaining 23(48%)patients did not(non-BCR group).The median time for BCR test was 4 years from the first postoperative PSA nadir.Preoperative PSA was significantly different between the BCR and non-BCR groups(P<0.001),and ROC curve analysis of preoperative PSA suggested a cutoff value of 19.09 ng/mL(sensitivity,0.600;specificity:0.739).The linear regression analysis showed no correlation between time to BCR and preoperative PSA(Pearson’s correlation,0.13;adjusted R2=0.026).CONCLUSION Robotic-assisted RP in pT2+PCa of worse conditions can provide better BCR-free survival.A surgical technique limiting the PSM in favorable situations is warranted to lower the pT2+PCa BCR rate.Preoperative PSA cut-off value of 19.09 ng/mL is a predictive factor for BCR.Based on our experiences and review of the literature,we do not recommend routine aRT for pT2+PCa.展开更多
Objective:The histological types of ovarian tumors were investigated and analyzed in China in order to compare with those in other countries, which will benefit to the prevention and treatment of ovarian cancer.Method...Objective:The histological types of ovarian tumors were investigated and analyzed in China in order to compare with those in other countries, which will benefit to the prevention and treatment of ovarian cancer.Methods:The pathological data from 42 197 cases of ovarian tumors in ten years during 1980 to 1989 were registered according to the WHO classification for ovarian tumors. Some indefinite cases pathologically in the first diagnosis should bereconfirmed according to the WHO classification.Results: Forty two thousand one hundred and ninety seven cases ofovarian tumors were selected from all tumors in 21 provinces and 3 major regional cities in China.There were 10 288(24.4%) malignant tumors in all cases.They were composed by 5 650(54.9%) cases of epithelial tumors,1 871(18.2%) cases of germ cell tumors,837(8.5%) cases of sex cord tumors,1 003(9.7%) cases of secondarytumors,and 891(8.7%) cases of other tumors.The malignant tumors constituent ratios were 58.5% and 50.9% respectively in the north and south of the Yangtze River.The histological types of ovarian tumors were about the same ratios,but the malignant tumors were different in Chinese six major administrative region andalso in the region both north and south of the Yangtzy River.The ratio of borderline epithelial ovarian tumors to epithelial tumors was 1:5.9.Borderlineserous cystadenocarcnoma appeared to be similar to borderline mucinous cystadenocarcinoma in frequency.Serous cystadenocarcinoma was found to be the most frequent one in malignant epithelial tumors.Conclusion:Compared with reports abroad,the different types of malignant ovarian tumors inChina represent a different distributive pattern.The malignant epithelial ovarian tumors were lower than that in other countries (55% vs 80%-90%),while the malignant germ cell tumors and sex cord stromal tumors were 6 and 3 times higher thanthose abroad,the main metastasizing tumors come from gastroenteric carcinoma,while the metastasizing tumors from breast cancer were only 2.5%.展开更多
目的观察卵巢-附件报告和数据系统超声2022版(O-RADS US v2022)及其联合恶性风险指数4(RMI4)鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的价值。方法回顾性分析126例手术病理诊断为附件肿瘤患者,根据O-RADS US v2022将1~3类归为良性病变、4~5类归为恶性病变,...目的观察卵巢-附件报告和数据系统超声2022版(O-RADS US v2022)及其联合恶性风险指数4(RMI4)鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的价值。方法回顾性分析126例手术病理诊断为附件肿瘤患者,根据O-RADS US v2022将1~3类归为良性病变、4~5类归为恶性病变,以450为RMI4分类的临界值,基于二者进行联合分类。以病理结果为金标准,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC),评估单一O-RADS US v2022、RMI4及其联合鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的效能。结果126例附件肿瘤中,良性94例、恶性32例。O-RADS US v2022鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的敏感度、特异度、准确率及AUC分别为78.13%、80.85%和80.16%、0.795,RMI4分别为71.88%、84.04%和80.95%、0.780;二者联合的特异度及准确率(93.62%、92.06%)均高于单一O-RADS US v2022(χ^(2)=7.322、5.967,P=0.007、0.015)或RMI4(χ^(2)=4.625、5.331,P=0.032、0.021),而敏感度及AUC(87.50%、0.906)差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论O-RADS US v2022能有效鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤,联合RMI4可提高鉴别特异度及准确率。展开更多
文摘AIM To study the expression and significance of laminin in human colorectal carcinoma. METHODS Using the monoclonal antibody to laminin and streptavidin peroxidase immunohistochemical method, the expression of laminin in 63 cases of human colorectal carcinoma tissues was determined. RESULTS In normal large intestinal mucosa adjacent to carcinoma, laminin was largely restricted to basement membrane in continuous linear pattern. In contrast, human colorectal carcinomas exhibited a progressive loss of an intact basement membrane that was correlated with decreasing differentiation degree. Well and moderately differentiated tumors exhibited a thin basement membrane with intermittent disruptions, and poorly differentiated tumors exhibited no areas of intact basement membrane. An association was found between lack of basement membrane laminin immunohistochemical staining in colorectal carcinoma and poorly differentiated tumor ( P <0 01) . CONCLUSION Immunohistochemical staining for laminin could provide a very useful index for the determination of the differentiation degree of colorectal carcinoma.
文摘BACKGROUND pT2+prostate cancer(PCa),a term first used in 2004,refers to organ-confined PCa characterized by a positive surgical margin(PSM)without extracapsular extension.Patients with a PSM are vulnerable to biochemical recurrence(BCR)following radical prostatectomy(RP);however,whether adjuvant radiotherapy(aRT)is imperative to PSM after RP remains controversial.This study had the longest follow-up on pT2+PCa after robotic-assisted RP since 2004.Moreover,we discussed our viewpoints on pT2+PCa based on real-world experiences.AIM To conclude a 10-year surveillance on pT2+PCa and compare our results with those of the published literature.METHODS Forty-eight patients who underwent robotic-assisted RP between 2008 and 2011 were enrolled.Two serial tests of prostate specific antigen(PSA)≥0.2 ng/mL were defined as BCR.Various designed factors were analyzed using statistical tools for BCR risk.SAS 9.4 was applied and significance was defined as P<0.05.Univariate,multivariate,linear regression,and receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analyses were performed for statistical analyses.RESULTS With a median follow-up period of 9 years,25(52%)patients had BCR(BCR group),and the remaining 23(48%)patients did not(non-BCR group).The median time for BCR test was 4 years from the first postoperative PSA nadir.Preoperative PSA was significantly different between the BCR and non-BCR groups(P<0.001),and ROC curve analysis of preoperative PSA suggested a cutoff value of 19.09 ng/mL(sensitivity,0.600;specificity:0.739).The linear regression analysis showed no correlation between time to BCR and preoperative PSA(Pearson’s correlation,0.13;adjusted R2=0.026).CONCLUSION Robotic-assisted RP in pT2+PCa of worse conditions can provide better BCR-free survival.A surgical technique limiting the PSM in favorable situations is warranted to lower the pT2+PCa BCR rate.Preoperative PSA cut-off value of 19.09 ng/mL is a predictive factor for BCR.Based on our experiences and review of the literature,we do not recommend routine aRT for pT2+PCa.
文摘Objective:The histological types of ovarian tumors were investigated and analyzed in China in order to compare with those in other countries, which will benefit to the prevention and treatment of ovarian cancer.Methods:The pathological data from 42 197 cases of ovarian tumors in ten years during 1980 to 1989 were registered according to the WHO classification for ovarian tumors. Some indefinite cases pathologically in the first diagnosis should bereconfirmed according to the WHO classification.Results: Forty two thousand one hundred and ninety seven cases ofovarian tumors were selected from all tumors in 21 provinces and 3 major regional cities in China.There were 10 288(24.4%) malignant tumors in all cases.They were composed by 5 650(54.9%) cases of epithelial tumors,1 871(18.2%) cases of germ cell tumors,837(8.5%) cases of sex cord tumors,1 003(9.7%) cases of secondarytumors,and 891(8.7%) cases of other tumors.The malignant tumors constituent ratios were 58.5% and 50.9% respectively in the north and south of the Yangtze River.The histological types of ovarian tumors were about the same ratios,but the malignant tumors were different in Chinese six major administrative region andalso in the region both north and south of the Yangtzy River.The ratio of borderline epithelial ovarian tumors to epithelial tumors was 1:5.9.Borderlineserous cystadenocarcnoma appeared to be similar to borderline mucinous cystadenocarcinoma in frequency.Serous cystadenocarcinoma was found to be the most frequent one in malignant epithelial tumors.Conclusion:Compared with reports abroad,the different types of malignant ovarian tumors inChina represent a different distributive pattern.The malignant epithelial ovarian tumors were lower than that in other countries (55% vs 80%-90%),while the malignant germ cell tumors and sex cord stromal tumors were 6 and 3 times higher thanthose abroad,the main metastasizing tumors come from gastroenteric carcinoma,while the metastasizing tumors from breast cancer were only 2.5%.
文摘目的观察卵巢-附件报告和数据系统超声2022版(O-RADS US v2022)及其联合恶性风险指数4(RMI4)鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的价值。方法回顾性分析126例手术病理诊断为附件肿瘤患者,根据O-RADS US v2022将1~3类归为良性病变、4~5类归为恶性病变,以450为RMI4分类的临界值,基于二者进行联合分类。以病理结果为金标准,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC),评估单一O-RADS US v2022、RMI4及其联合鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的效能。结果126例附件肿瘤中,良性94例、恶性32例。O-RADS US v2022鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤的敏感度、特异度、准确率及AUC分别为78.13%、80.85%和80.16%、0.795,RMI4分别为71.88%、84.04%和80.95%、0.780;二者联合的特异度及准确率(93.62%、92.06%)均高于单一O-RADS US v2022(χ^(2)=7.322、5.967,P=0.007、0.015)或RMI4(χ^(2)=4.625、5.331,P=0.032、0.021),而敏感度及AUC(87.50%、0.906)差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论O-RADS US v2022能有效鉴别附件良、恶性肿瘤,联合RMI4可提高鉴别特异度及准确率。
