BACKGROUND In recent years,mesh has become a standard repair method for parastomal hernia surgery due to its low recurrence rate and low postoperative pain.However,using mesh to repair parastomal hernias also carries ...BACKGROUND In recent years,mesh has become a standard repair method for parastomal hernia surgery due to its low recurrence rate and low postoperative pain.However,using mesh to repair parastomal hernias also carries potential dangers.One of these dangers is mesh erosion,a rare but serious complication following hernia surgery,particularly parastomal hernia surgery,and has attracted the attention of surgeons in recent years.CASE SUMMARY Herein,we report the case of a 67-year-old woman with mesh erosion after parastomal hernia surgery.The patient,who underwent parastomal hernia repair surgery 3 years prior,presented to the surgery clinic with a complaint of chronic abdominal pain upon resuming defecation through the anus.Three months later,a portion of the mesh was excreted from the patient’s anus and was removed by a doctor.Imaging revealed that the patient’s colon had formed a t-branch tube structure,which was formed by the mesh erosion.The surgery reconstructed the structure of the colon and eliminated potential bowel perforation.CONCLUSION Surgeons should consider mesh erosion since it has an insidious development and is difficult to diagnose at the early stage.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic approaches for parastomal hernia repair reported in the literature.METHODS:A systematic review of PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted using various co...AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic approaches for parastomal hernia repair reported in the literature.METHODS:A systematic review of PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted using various combination of the following keywords:stoma repair,laparoscopic,parastomal,and hernia.Case reports,studies with less than 5 patients,and articles not written in English were excluded.Eligible studies were further scrutinized with the 2011 levels of evidence from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.Two authors reviewed and analyzed each study.If there was any discrepancy between scores,the study in question was referred to another author.A meta-analysis was performed using both random and fixed-effect models.Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test.The primary outcome analyzed was recurrence of parastomal hernia.Secondary outcomes were mesh infection,surgical site infection,obstruction requiring reoperation,death,and other complications.Studies were grouped by operative technique where indicated.Except for recurrence,most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort and not by approach so they were analyzed across approach.RESULTS:Fifteen articles with a total of 469 patients were deemed eligible for review.Most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort,and not by approach.The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 1.8%(95%CI:0.8-3.2),and there was no difference between techniques.The most common postoperative complication was surgical site infection,which was seen in 3.8%(95%CI:2.3-5.7).Infected mesh was observed in 1.7%(95%CI:0.7-3.1),and obstruction requiring reoperation also occurred in 1.7%(95%CI:0.7-3.0).Other complications such as ileus,pneumonia,or urinary tract infection were noted in16.6%(95%CI:11.9-22.1).Eighty-one recurrences were reported overall for a recurrence rate of 17.4%(95%CI:9.5-26.9).The recurrence rate was 10.2%(95%CI:3.9-19.0) for the modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker approach,whereas the recurrence rate was27.9%(95%CI:12.3-46.9) for the keyhole approach.There were no intraoperative mortalities reported and six mortalities during the postoperative course.CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh repair is safe and effective for treating parastomal hernia.A modified Sugarbaker approach appears to provide the best outcomes.展开更多
Purpose: To review potential risk factors for the development of ileal conduit fistulae. Methods: Two patients were identified who had a remote history of an ileal conduit and who formed a fistula from the conduit—on...Purpose: To review potential risk factors for the development of ileal conduit fistulae. Methods: Two patients were identified who had a remote history of an ileal conduit and who formed a fistula from the conduit—one to the small bowel and one to the skin. Their presentation, management and outcomes are described. Results: Both patients had parastomal hernias as the likely cause of their fistula formation. Discussion: Parastomal herniation may contribute to fistula formation due to a strangulated ischemic pressure necrosis of the adjacent ileal conduit and/or bowel.展开更多
Objective:To investigate the risk factors of parastomal hernia in patients with a colostomy.Methods:The related studies published in Embase,PubMed,CNKI,and other databases were searched.The search time limit was from ...Objective:To investigate the risk factors of parastomal hernia in patients with a colostomy.Methods:The related studies published in Embase,PubMed,CNKI,and other databases were searched.The search time limit was from the establishment of the database to March 2020.After the literature screening,data extraction and cross-checking were carried out independently by two researchers,the qualitative research method was used to summarize.Results:After screening,6 articles were included.The results of qualitative analysis showed that a total of 10 risk factors of parastomal hernia were concluded which could be classified into personal and colostomy factors.Conclusion:The current evidence showed that 10 risk factors such as age,Body Mass Index and colostomy were related to the occurrence of parastomal hernia in patients with a colostomy.Limited by the type and quantity of research,the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality research.展开更多
Despite significant advances in abdominal wall reconstruction,parastomal hernias remain a complex problem,with a high risk of recurrence following repair.While a number of surgical hernia repair techniques have been p...Despite significant advances in abdominal wall reconstruction,parastomal hernias remain a complex problem,with a high risk of recurrence following repair.While a number of surgical hernia repair techniques have been proposed,there is no consensus on optimal management.Several clinical variables must be considered when developing a comprehensive repair plan that minimizes the likelihood of hernia recurrence and surgical site occurrences.In this review,we describe the incidence of parastomal hernias and discuss pertinent risk factors,medical history findings,physical examination findings,supplementary diagnostic modalities,parastomal hernia classification systems,surgical indications,and repair techniques.Special consideration is given to the discussion of mesh reinforcement,including available biomaterials,anatomic plane selection,and the extent of mesh reinforcement.Although open repairs are the primary focus of this article,minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic approaches are also briefly described.It is our hope that the provided surgical outcome data will help guide surgical management and optimize outcomes for affected patients.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND In recent years,mesh has become a standard repair method for parastomal hernia surgery due to its low recurrence rate and low postoperative pain.However,using mesh to repair parastomal hernias also carries potential dangers.One of these dangers is mesh erosion,a rare but serious complication following hernia surgery,particularly parastomal hernia surgery,and has attracted the attention of surgeons in recent years.CASE SUMMARY Herein,we report the case of a 67-year-old woman with mesh erosion after parastomal hernia surgery.The patient,who underwent parastomal hernia repair surgery 3 years prior,presented to the surgery clinic with a complaint of chronic abdominal pain upon resuming defecation through the anus.Three months later,a portion of the mesh was excreted from the patient’s anus and was removed by a doctor.Imaging revealed that the patient’s colon had formed a t-branch tube structure,which was formed by the mesh erosion.The surgery reconstructed the structure of the colon and eliminated potential bowel perforation.CONCLUSION Surgeons should consider mesh erosion since it has an insidious development and is difficult to diagnose at the early stage.
文摘AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic approaches for parastomal hernia repair reported in the literature.METHODS:A systematic review of PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted using various combination of the following keywords:stoma repair,laparoscopic,parastomal,and hernia.Case reports,studies with less than 5 patients,and articles not written in English were excluded.Eligible studies were further scrutinized with the 2011 levels of evidence from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.Two authors reviewed and analyzed each study.If there was any discrepancy between scores,the study in question was referred to another author.A meta-analysis was performed using both random and fixed-effect models.Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test.The primary outcome analyzed was recurrence of parastomal hernia.Secondary outcomes were mesh infection,surgical site infection,obstruction requiring reoperation,death,and other complications.Studies were grouped by operative technique where indicated.Except for recurrence,most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort and not by approach so they were analyzed across approach.RESULTS:Fifteen articles with a total of 469 patients were deemed eligible for review.Most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort,and not by approach.The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 1.8%(95%CI:0.8-3.2),and there was no difference between techniques.The most common postoperative complication was surgical site infection,which was seen in 3.8%(95%CI:2.3-5.7).Infected mesh was observed in 1.7%(95%CI:0.7-3.1),and obstruction requiring reoperation also occurred in 1.7%(95%CI:0.7-3.0).Other complications such as ileus,pneumonia,or urinary tract infection were noted in16.6%(95%CI:11.9-22.1).Eighty-one recurrences were reported overall for a recurrence rate of 17.4%(95%CI:9.5-26.9).The recurrence rate was 10.2%(95%CI:3.9-19.0) for the modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker approach,whereas the recurrence rate was27.9%(95%CI:12.3-46.9) for the keyhole approach.There were no intraoperative mortalities reported and six mortalities during the postoperative course.CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh repair is safe and effective for treating parastomal hernia.A modified Sugarbaker approach appears to provide the best outcomes.
文摘Purpose: To review potential risk factors for the development of ileal conduit fistulae. Methods: Two patients were identified who had a remote history of an ileal conduit and who formed a fistula from the conduit—one to the small bowel and one to the skin. Their presentation, management and outcomes are described. Results: Both patients had parastomal hernias as the likely cause of their fistula formation. Discussion: Parastomal herniation may contribute to fistula formation due to a strangulated ischemic pressure necrosis of the adjacent ileal conduit and/or bowel.
文摘Objective:To investigate the risk factors of parastomal hernia in patients with a colostomy.Methods:The related studies published in Embase,PubMed,CNKI,and other databases were searched.The search time limit was from the establishment of the database to March 2020.After the literature screening,data extraction and cross-checking were carried out independently by two researchers,the qualitative research method was used to summarize.Results:After screening,6 articles were included.The results of qualitative analysis showed that a total of 10 risk factors of parastomal hernia were concluded which could be classified into personal and colostomy factors.Conclusion:The current evidence showed that 10 risk factors such as age,Body Mass Index and colostomy were related to the occurrence of parastomal hernia in patients with a colostomy.Limited by the type and quantity of research,the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality research.
文摘Despite significant advances in abdominal wall reconstruction,parastomal hernias remain a complex problem,with a high risk of recurrence following repair.While a number of surgical hernia repair techniques have been proposed,there is no consensus on optimal management.Several clinical variables must be considered when developing a comprehensive repair plan that minimizes the likelihood of hernia recurrence and surgical site occurrences.In this review,we describe the incidence of parastomal hernias and discuss pertinent risk factors,medical history findings,physical examination findings,supplementary diagnostic modalities,parastomal hernia classification systems,surgical indications,and repair techniques.Special consideration is given to the discussion of mesh reinforcement,including available biomaterials,anatomic plane selection,and the extent of mesh reinforcement.Although open repairs are the primary focus of this article,minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic approaches are also briefly described.It is our hope that the provided surgical outcome data will help guide surgical management and optimize outcomes for affected patients.
