Background:In the context of a growing appreciation for the wellbeing of the health workforce as the foundation of high-quality,sustainable health systems,this paper presents findings from two complementary studies to...Background:In the context of a growing appreciation for the wellbeing of the health workforce as the foundation of high-quality,sustainable health systems,this paper presents findings from two complementary studies to explore occupational stress and professional quality of life among health workers that were conducted in preparation for a task-shifting intervention to improve antenatal mental health services in Cape Town.Methods:This mixed-methods,cross-sectional study was conducted in public sector Midwife Obstetric Units and associated Non-Profit Organisations in Cape Town.Semi-structured interviews and a quantitative survey were conducted among facility-and community-based professional and lay health workers.The survey included demographic as well as effort-reward imbalance(ERI)and professional quality of life(PROQOL)questionnaires to examine overall levels of work-related psychosocial stress and professional quality of life,as well as differences between lay and professional health workers.Qualitative data was analysed using a thematic content analysis approach.Quantitative data was analysed using STATA 12.Results:Findings from 37 qualitative interviews highlighted the difficult working conditions and often limited reward and support structures experienced by health workers.Corroborating these findings,our quantitative survey of 165 professional and lay health workers revealed that most health workers experienced a mismatch between efforts spent and rewards gained at work(61.1%of professional and 70.2%of lay health workers;p=0.302).There were few statistically significant differences in ERI and PROQOL scores between professional and lay health workers.Although Compassion Satisfaction was high for all health worker groups,lay health workers also showed elevated levels of burnout and compassion fatigue,with community-based health workers particularly affected.Conclusions:Findings of this study add to the existing evidence base on adverse working conditions faced by South African public-sector health workers that should be taken into consideration as national and local governments seek to‘re-engineer’South Africa’s Primary Health Care system.Furthermore,they also highlight the importance of taking into consideration the wellbeing of health workers themselves to develop interventions that can sustainably foster resilient and high-quality health systems.展开更多
基金funded by the National Institute for Health Research(NIHR)Global Health Research Unit on Health System Strengthening in Sub-Saharan Africa,King’s College London(GHRU 16/136/54)using UK aid from the UK Government to support global health research。
文摘Background:In the context of a growing appreciation for the wellbeing of the health workforce as the foundation of high-quality,sustainable health systems,this paper presents findings from two complementary studies to explore occupational stress and professional quality of life among health workers that were conducted in preparation for a task-shifting intervention to improve antenatal mental health services in Cape Town.Methods:This mixed-methods,cross-sectional study was conducted in public sector Midwife Obstetric Units and associated Non-Profit Organisations in Cape Town.Semi-structured interviews and a quantitative survey were conducted among facility-and community-based professional and lay health workers.The survey included demographic as well as effort-reward imbalance(ERI)and professional quality of life(PROQOL)questionnaires to examine overall levels of work-related psychosocial stress and professional quality of life,as well as differences between lay and professional health workers.Qualitative data was analysed using a thematic content analysis approach.Quantitative data was analysed using STATA 12.Results:Findings from 37 qualitative interviews highlighted the difficult working conditions and often limited reward and support structures experienced by health workers.Corroborating these findings,our quantitative survey of 165 professional and lay health workers revealed that most health workers experienced a mismatch between efforts spent and rewards gained at work(61.1%of professional and 70.2%of lay health workers;p=0.302).There were few statistically significant differences in ERI and PROQOL scores between professional and lay health workers.Although Compassion Satisfaction was high for all health worker groups,lay health workers also showed elevated levels of burnout and compassion fatigue,with community-based health workers particularly affected.Conclusions:Findings of this study add to the existing evidence base on adverse working conditions faced by South African public-sector health workers that should be taken into consideration as national and local governments seek to‘re-engineer’South Africa’s Primary Health Care system.Furthermore,they also highlight the importance of taking into consideration the wellbeing of health workers themselves to develop interventions that can sustainably foster resilient and high-quality health systems.
