Objective:To explore the recent influences of pacemaker with automatic search function of atrial hysteresis on atrial arrhythmias,and to evaluate it clinical efficacy and safety.Methods:Indentify ADx DDD 5286 implante...Objective:To explore the recent influences of pacemaker with automatic search function of atrial hysteresis on atrial arrhythmias,and to evaluate it clinical efficacy and safety.Methods:Indentify ADx DDD 5286 implanted dual chamber pacemaker for sick sinus syndrome in 43 cases.Automatic search of atrial lag was not opened with after pacemaker implantation,and the pacemaker settings were kept.Follow-up program after 3 months,DDD mode with automatic search of atrial lag was opened,and this mode was followed up for 6 months,comparing the atrial pacing percentage and DCG atrial tachyarrhythmias of pacemaker implantation to opening atrium lag mode.Results:Compared with the preoperative and operative 3 months later,dynamic electrocardiogram(DCG)24 h showed that the number of atrial premature beats(APB)and atrial tachycardia,atrial fibrillation(AF)array increased(p<.05);the cases of APB,atrial tachycardia and AF episodes were also increased(p<.05).Compared with the automatic search function in atrial hysteresis model opened with and not opened:atrial pacing percentage decreased[0.54(0.41,0.71)vs.0.82(0.65,0.93),p<.05];DCG 24 h showed that the number of APB,AF episodes was reduced(p<.05).Conclusions:Automation search function in atrial hysteresis model can obviously reduce the proportion of atrial pacing,reduce the occurrence of atrial arrhythmias;opened with automatic search function in atrial hysteresis model was safe and reliable.展开更多
目的评价心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)慢性心力衰竭(心衰)合并持续性心房颤动(房颤)患者的临床疗效。方法选择慢性心衰患者23例,其中13例窦性心律患者及4例房颤患者(房颤CRT患者)接受双心室起搏治疗,另6例房颤患者(药物治疗患者)继续服用抗心...目的评价心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)慢性心力衰竭(心衰)合并持续性心房颤动(房颤)患者的临床疗效。方法选择慢性心衰患者23例,其中13例窦性心律患者及4例房颤患者(房颤CRT患者)接受双心室起搏治疗,另6例房颤患者(药物治疗患者)继续服用抗心衰药物治疗。术后3个月进行随访,观察患者的心功能分级(NYHA),6 min步行距离,超声心动图测定各房室腔内径大小、LVEF、二尖瓣反流以及速度向量成像超声评价同步性参数的变化。结果 17例患者三腔起搏器置入术均取得成功。术后3个月随访,房颤CRT患者心功能分级[(3.00±0.00)级vs(2.25±0.50)级]、左心房内径[(52.75±3.50)mm vs (45.25±3.50)mm,P<0.05]、LVEF[(36.25±4.79)% vs (42.00±5.16)%]及二尖瓣反流(3.25±0.50 vs 1.50±0.58,P<0.01)较术前均有明显改善,速度向量成像超声结果显示,室内不同步较术前有明显改善。与药物治疗患者比较,房颤CRT患者LVEF、左心房内径、二尖瓣反流明显改善。结论对于慢性心衰合并持续性房颤患者,在有效控制心室率的基础上行CRT明显优于药物保守治疗,与窦性心律患者一样可以改善心功能。展开更多
文摘Objective:To explore the recent influences of pacemaker with automatic search function of atrial hysteresis on atrial arrhythmias,and to evaluate it clinical efficacy and safety.Methods:Indentify ADx DDD 5286 implanted dual chamber pacemaker for sick sinus syndrome in 43 cases.Automatic search of atrial lag was not opened with after pacemaker implantation,and the pacemaker settings were kept.Follow-up program after 3 months,DDD mode with automatic search of atrial lag was opened,and this mode was followed up for 6 months,comparing the atrial pacing percentage and DCG atrial tachyarrhythmias of pacemaker implantation to opening atrium lag mode.Results:Compared with the preoperative and operative 3 months later,dynamic electrocardiogram(DCG)24 h showed that the number of atrial premature beats(APB)and atrial tachycardia,atrial fibrillation(AF)array increased(p<.05);the cases of APB,atrial tachycardia and AF episodes were also increased(p<.05).Compared with the automatic search function in atrial hysteresis model opened with and not opened:atrial pacing percentage decreased[0.54(0.41,0.71)vs.0.82(0.65,0.93),p<.05];DCG 24 h showed that the number of APB,AF episodes was reduced(p<.05).Conclusions:Automation search function in atrial hysteresis model can obviously reduce the proportion of atrial pacing,reduce the occurrence of atrial arrhythmias;opened with automatic search function in atrial hysteresis model was safe and reliable.
文摘目的评价心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)慢性心力衰竭(心衰)合并持续性心房颤动(房颤)患者的临床疗效。方法选择慢性心衰患者23例,其中13例窦性心律患者及4例房颤患者(房颤CRT患者)接受双心室起搏治疗,另6例房颤患者(药物治疗患者)继续服用抗心衰药物治疗。术后3个月进行随访,观察患者的心功能分级(NYHA),6 min步行距离,超声心动图测定各房室腔内径大小、LVEF、二尖瓣反流以及速度向量成像超声评价同步性参数的变化。结果 17例患者三腔起搏器置入术均取得成功。术后3个月随访,房颤CRT患者心功能分级[(3.00±0.00)级vs(2.25±0.50)级]、左心房内径[(52.75±3.50)mm vs (45.25±3.50)mm,P<0.05]、LVEF[(36.25±4.79)% vs (42.00±5.16)%]及二尖瓣反流(3.25±0.50 vs 1.50±0.58,P<0.01)较术前均有明显改善,速度向量成像超声结果显示,室内不同步较术前有明显改善。与药物治疗患者比较,房颤CRT患者LVEF、左心房内径、二尖瓣反流明显改善。结论对于慢性心衰合并持续性房颤患者,在有效控制心室率的基础上行CRT明显优于药物保守治疗,与窦性心律患者一样可以改善心功能。
