Pancreatic surgery represents one of the most challenging areas in digestive surgery. In recent years, an increasing number of laparoscopic pancreatic procedures have been performed and laparoscopic distal pancreatect...Pancreatic surgery represents one of the most challenging areas in digestive surgery. In recent years, an increasing number of laparoscopic pancreatic procedures have been performed and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has gained world-wide acceptance because it does not require anastomosis or other reconstruction. To date, English literature reports more than 300 papers focusing on LDP, but only 6% included more than 30 patients. Literature review confirms that LDP is a feasible and safe procedure in patients with benign or low grade malignancies. Decreased blood loss and morbidity, early recovery and shorter hospital stay may be the main advantages. Several concerns still exist for laparoscopic pancreatic adenocarcinoma excision. The individual surgeon determines the technical conduction of LDP, with or without spleen preservation; currently robotic pancreatic surgery has gained diffu- sion. Additional researches are necessary to determine the best technique to improve the procedure results.展开更多
BACKGROUND： The use of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy（LDP） increased in the past twenty years but the real diffusion of this technique is still unknown as well as the type of centers（high or low volume） in wh...BACKGROUND： The use of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy（LDP） increased in the past twenty years but the real diffusion of this technique is still unknown as well as the type of centers（high or low volume） in which this procedure is more frequently performed.DATA SOURCE： A systematic review was performed to evaluate the frequency of LDP in Italy and to compare indications and results in high volume centers（HVCs） and in low volume centers（LVCs）.RESULTS： From 95 potentially relevant citations identified, only5 studies were included. A total of 125 subjects were analyzed, of whom 95（76.0%） were from HVCs and 30（24.0%） from LVCs.The mean number of LDPs performed per year was 6.5. The mean number of patients who underwent LDP per year was 8.8in HVCs and 3.0 in LVCs（P0.001）. The most frequent lesions operated on in HVCs were cystic tumors（62.1%, P0.001） while,in LVCs, solid neoplasms（76.7%, P0.001）. In HVCs, malignant neoplasms were treated with LDP less frequently than in LVCs（17.9% vs 50.0%, P〈0.001）. Splenectomy was performed for non-oncologic reason frequenter in HVCs than in LVCs（70.2%vs 25.0%, P0.004）. The length of stay was shorter in HVCs than in LVCs（7.5 vs 11.3, P0.001）. No differences were found regarding age, gender, ductal adenocarcinoma treated, operative time, conversion, morbidity, postoperative pancreatic fistula,reoperation and margin status.CONCLUSIONS： LDPs were frequently performed in Italy.The ＂HVC approach＂ is characterized by a careful selection of patients undergoing LDP. The ＂LVC approach＂ is based on the hypothesis that LDPs are equivalent both in short-term and long-term results to laparotomic approach. These data are not conclusive and they point out the need for a national register of laparoscopic pancreatectomy.展开更多
Objective： To compare the peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy（LDP） and open distal pancreatectomy（ODP） for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms in two institutions. Methods： Thi...Objective： To compare the peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy（LDP） and open distal pancreatectomy（ODP） for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms in two institutions. Methods： This prospective comparative study included 91 consecutive patients who underwent LDP（n=45） or ODP（n=46） from Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2012. Demographics, intra-operative characteristics, and post-operative outcomes were compared. Results： The median operating time in the LDP group was（158.7±38.3） min compared with（92.2±24.1） min in the ODP group（P〈0.001）. Patients had lower blood loss in LDP than in the ODP（（122.6±61.1） ml vs.（203.1±84.8） ml, P〈0.001）. The rates of splenic conservation between the LDP and ODP groups were similar（53.3% vs. 47.8%, P=0.35）. All spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomies were conducted with vessel preservation. LDP also demonstrated better post-operative outcomes. The time to oral intake and normal daily activities was faster in the LDP group than in the ODP group（（1.6±0.5） d vs.（3.2±0.7） d, P〈0.01;（1.8±0.4） d vs.（2.1±0.6） d, P=0.02, respectively）, and the postoperative length of hospital stay in LDP was shorter than that in ODP（（7.9±3.8） d vs.（11.9±5.8） d, P=0.006）. No difference in tumor size（（4.7±3.2） cm vs.（4.5±1.8） cm, P=0.77） or overall pancreatic fistula rate（15.6% vs. 19.6%, P=0.62） was found between the groups, while the overall post-operative complication rate was lower in the LDP group（26.7% vs. 47.8%, P=0.04）. Conclusions： LDP is safe and effective for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms, featuring lower blood loss and substantially faster recovery.展开更多
Objective：The aim of this study was to compare complications and oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy（LDP）and open distal pancreatectomy（ODP）at a single center.Methods：Dis...Objective：The aim of this study was to compare complications and oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy（LDP）and open distal pancreatectomy（ODP）at a single center.Methods：Distal pancreatectomies performed for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma during a 4-year period were included in this study.A retrospective analysis of a database of this cohort was conducted.Results：Twenty-two patients underwent LDP for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,in comparison to seventy-six patients with comparable tumor characteristics treated by ODP.No patients with locally advanced lesions were included in this study.Comparing LDP group to ODP group,there were no significant differences in operation time（P=0.06）or blood loss（P=0.24）.Complications（pancreatic fistula,P=0.62;intra-abdominal abscess,P=0.44;postpancreatectomy hemorrhage,P=0.34）were similar.There were no significant differences in the number of lymph nodes harvested（11.2±4.6 in LDP group vs.14.4±5.5 in ODP group,P=0.44）nor the rate of patients with positive lymph nodes（36%in LDP group vs.41%in ODP group,P=0.71）.Incidence of positive margins was similar（9%in LDP group vs.13%in ODP group,P=0.61）.The mean overall survival time was（29.6±3.7）months for the LDP group and（27.6±2.1）months for ODP group.There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups（P=0.34）.Conclusions：LDP is a safe and effective treatment for selected patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.A slow-compression of pancreas tissue with the GIA stapler is effective in preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula.The oncologic outcome is comparable with the conventional open approach.Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy contributed to oncological clearance.展开更多
文摘Pancreatic surgery represents one of the most challenging areas in digestive surgery. In recent years, an increasing number of laparoscopic pancreatic procedures have been performed and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has gained world-wide acceptance because it does not require anastomosis or other reconstruction. To date, English literature reports more than 300 papers focusing on LDP, but only 6% included more than 30 patients. Literature review confirms that LDP is a feasible and safe procedure in patients with benign or low grade malignancies. Decreased blood loss and morbidity, early recovery and shorter hospital stay may be the main advantages. Several concerns still exist for laparoscopic pancreatic adenocarcinoma excision. The individual surgeon determines the technical conduction of LDP, with or without spleen preservation; currently robotic pancreatic surgery has gained diffu- sion. Additional researches are necessary to determine the best technique to improve the procedure results.
文摘BACKGROUND： The use of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy（LDP） increased in the past twenty years but the real diffusion of this technique is still unknown as well as the type of centers（high or low volume） in which this procedure is more frequently performed.DATA SOURCE： A systematic review was performed to evaluate the frequency of LDP in Italy and to compare indications and results in high volume centers（HVCs） and in low volume centers（LVCs）.RESULTS： From 95 potentially relevant citations identified, only5 studies were included. A total of 125 subjects were analyzed, of whom 95（76.0%） were from HVCs and 30（24.0%） from LVCs.The mean number of LDPs performed per year was 6.5. The mean number of patients who underwent LDP per year was 8.8in HVCs and 3.0 in LVCs（P0.001）. The most frequent lesions operated on in HVCs were cystic tumors（62.1%, P0.001） while,in LVCs, solid neoplasms（76.7%, P0.001）. In HVCs, malignant neoplasms were treated with LDP less frequently than in LVCs（17.9% vs 50.0%, P〈0.001）. Splenectomy was performed for non-oncologic reason frequenter in HVCs than in LVCs（70.2%vs 25.0%, P0.004）. The length of stay was shorter in HVCs than in LVCs（7.5 vs 11.3, P0.001）. No differences were found regarding age, gender, ductal adenocarcinoma treated, operative time, conversion, morbidity, postoperative pancreatic fistula,reoperation and margin status.CONCLUSIONS： LDPs were frequently performed in Italy.The ＂HVC approach＂ is characterized by a careful selection of patients undergoing LDP. The ＂LVC approach＂ is based on the hypothesis that LDPs are equivalent both in short-term and long-term results to laparotomic approach. These data are not conclusive and they point out the need for a national register of laparoscopic pancreatectomy.
基金Project supported by the Department of Health of Zhejiang Province,China(Nos.2011ZHB003 and 2013RCB010)
文摘Objective： To compare the peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy（LDP） and open distal pancreatectomy（ODP） for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms in two institutions. Methods： This prospective comparative study included 91 consecutive patients who underwent LDP（n=45） or ODP（n=46） from Jan. 2010 to Dec. 2012. Demographics, intra-operative characteristics, and post-operative outcomes were compared. Results： The median operating time in the LDP group was（158.7±38.3） min compared with（92.2±24.1） min in the ODP group（P〈0.001）. Patients had lower blood loss in LDP than in the ODP（（122.6±61.1） ml vs.（203.1±84.8） ml, P〈0.001）. The rates of splenic conservation between the LDP and ODP groups were similar（53.3% vs. 47.8%, P=0.35）. All spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomies were conducted with vessel preservation. LDP also demonstrated better post-operative outcomes. The time to oral intake and normal daily activities was faster in the LDP group than in the ODP group（（1.6±0.5） d vs.（3.2±0.7） d, P〈0.01;（1.8±0.4） d vs.（2.1±0.6） d, P=0.02, respectively）, and the postoperative length of hospital stay in LDP was shorter than that in ODP（（7.9±3.8） d vs.（11.9±5.8） d, P=0.006）. No difference in tumor size（（4.7±3.2） cm vs.（4.5±1.8） cm, P=0.77） or overall pancreatic fistula rate（15.6% vs. 19.6%, P=0.62） was found between the groups, while the overall post-operative complication rate was lower in the LDP group（26.7% vs. 47.8%, P=0.04）. Conclusions： LDP is safe and effective for benign or premalignant pancreatic neoplasms, featuring lower blood loss and substantially faster recovery.
基金supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(No.LY17H160026)
文摘Objective：The aim of this study was to compare complications and oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy（LDP）and open distal pancreatectomy（ODP）at a single center.Methods：Distal pancreatectomies performed for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma during a 4-year period were included in this study.A retrospective analysis of a database of this cohort was conducted.Results：Twenty-two patients underwent LDP for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,in comparison to seventy-six patients with comparable tumor characteristics treated by ODP.No patients with locally advanced lesions were included in this study.Comparing LDP group to ODP group,there were no significant differences in operation time（P=0.06）or blood loss（P=0.24）.Complications（pancreatic fistula,P=0.62;intra-abdominal abscess,P=0.44;postpancreatectomy hemorrhage,P=0.34）were similar.There were no significant differences in the number of lymph nodes harvested（11.2±4.6 in LDP group vs.14.4±5.5 in ODP group,P=0.44）nor the rate of patients with positive lymph nodes（36%in LDP group vs.41%in ODP group,P=0.71）.Incidence of positive margins was similar（9%in LDP group vs.13%in ODP group,P=0.61）.The mean overall survival time was（29.6±3.7）months for the LDP group and（27.6±2.1）months for ODP group.There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups（P=0.34）.Conclusions：LDP is a safe and effective treatment for selected patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.A slow-compression of pancreas tissue with the GIA stapler is effective in preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula.The oncologic outcome is comparable with the conventional open approach.Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy contributed to oncological clearance.
