BACKGROUND Pancreatic fistula is one of the most serious complications after pancreatoduodenectomy for treating any lesions at the pancreatic head. For years, surgeons have tried various methods to reduce its incidenc...BACKGROUND Pancreatic fistula is one of the most serious complications after pancreatoduodenectomy for treating any lesions at the pancreatic head. For years, surgeons have tried various methods to reduce its incidence. AIM To investigate and emphasize the clinical outcomes of Blumgart anastomosis compared with traditional anastomosis in reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula. METHODS In this observational study, a retrospective analysis of 291 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy, including Blumgart anastomosis (201 patients) and traditional embedded pancreaticojejunostomy (90 patients), was performed in our hospital. The preoperative and perioperative courses and longterm follow-up status were analyzed to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. Moreover, 291 patients were then separated by the severity of postoperative pancreatic fistula, and two methods of pancreaticojejunostomy were compared to detect the features of different anastomosis. Six experienced surgeons were involved and all of them were proficient in both surgical techniques.RESULTS The characteristics of the patients in the two groups showed no significant differences, nor the preoperative information and pathological diagnoses. The operative time was significantly shorter in the Blumgart group (343.5 ± 23.0 vs 450.0 ± 40.1 min, P = 0.028), as well as the duration of pancreaticojejunostomy drainage tube placement and postoperative hospital stay (12.7 ± 0.9 d vs 17.4 ± 1.8 d, P = 0.031;and 21.9 ± 1.3 d vs 28.9 ± 1.3 d, P = 0.020, respectively). The overall complications after surgery were much less in the Blumgart group than in the embedded group (11.9% vs 26.7%, P = 0.002). Patients who underwent Blumgart anastomosis would suffer less from severe pancreatic fistula (71.9% vs 50.0%, P = 0.006), and this pancreaticojejunostomy procedure did not have worse influences on long-term complications and life quality. Thus, Blumgart anastomosis is a feasible pancreaticojejunostomy procedure in pancreatoduodenectomy surgery. It is safe in causing less postoperative complications, especially pancreatic fistula, and thus shortens the hospitalization duration. CONCLUSION Surgical method should be a key factor in reducing pancreatic fistula, and Blumgart anastomosis needs further promotion.展开更多
Background: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex procedure with a relatively high risk of complications. There is an increasing trend showing that the success of pancreato-enteral anastomosis depends on surgical sk...Background: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex procedure with a relatively high risk of complications. There is an increasing trend showing that the success of pancreato-enteral anastomosis depends on surgical skill and the material used. Methods: We present four cases of pancreato-enteral anastomosis resected 37 - 114 days after primary surgery and the analysis of the healing process, i.e., morphology of the pancreatic parenchyma, pancreatic duct, and digestive tract mucosa, as well as the pancreatic reaction to the sewing material by microscopic morphometry. Results: Evidence of regeneration in the columnar-lined mucosa of main pancreatic ducts in all cases of pancreato-enterostomy was observed. The inflammatory foreign-body reaction around monofilament stitch was present without an evident infection. There were no microscopic signs of pancreatic duct damage. Total foreign body reaction varied between 138.1 μm and 207.3 μm. Conclusions: This observation supports the beneficial use of thin monofilament threads for pancreato-enteral anastomosis. There was no evidence of harmful action from gastric or intestinal juices on pancreatic remnant or the Wirsung duct.展开更多
BACKGROUND The Partington-Rochelle pancreaticojejunostomy(PJ)is an essential management option for patients with chronic pancreatitis(CP)associated with intractable pain and a dilated pancreatic duct(PD).Wide ductotom...BACKGROUND The Partington-Rochelle pancreaticojejunostomy(PJ)is an essential management option for patients with chronic pancreatitis(CP)associated with intractable pain and a dilated pancreatic duct(PD).Wide ductotomy and long PJ(L-PJ)have been advocated as the standard of care to ensure full PD decompression.However,the role of short PJ(S-PJ)in a uniformly dilated PD has not yet been evaluated.AIM To evaluate the possible advantages and disadvantages of S-PJ and L-PJ and to interpret the perspective of S-PJ in the treatment of CP.METHODS A retrospective review of prospectively collected cohort data was conducted on surgically treated CP patients subjected to side-to-side PJ.The length of the PJ was adapted to anatomical alterations in PD.A comparison was made of S-PJ(<50 mm)for uniformly dilated PD and L-PJ(50-100 mm)in the setting of multiple PD strictures,calcifications and dilatations.We hypothesized that S-PJ and L-PJ ensure comparable clinical outcomes.The primary outcomes were pain relief and quality of life(QOL);the secondary outcomes were perioperative characteristics,body weight,patients’satisfaction with treatment,and readmission rate due to CP.RESULTS Overall,91 patients underwent side-to-side PJ for CP,including S-PJ in 46 patients and L-PJ in 45 patients.S-PJ resulted in better perioperative outcomes:Significantly shorter operative time(107.5 min vs 134 min),lower need for intraoperative(0%vs 15.6%)and total(2.2%vs 31.1%)blood transfusions,and lower rate of perioperative complications(6.5%vs 17.8%).We noted no significant difference in pain relief,improvement in QOL,body weight gain,patients’satisfaction with surgical treatment,or readmission rate due to CP.CONCLUSION Based on our data,in the setting of a uniformly dilated PD,S-PJ provides adequate decompression of the PD.As the clinical outcomes following S-PJ are not inferior to those of L-PJ,S-PJ should be preferred as a surgical option in the case of a uniformly dilated PD.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Pancreatic fistula is one of the most serious complications after pancreatoduodenectomy for treating any lesions at the pancreatic head. For years, surgeons have tried various methods to reduce its incidence. AIM To investigate and emphasize the clinical outcomes of Blumgart anastomosis compared with traditional anastomosis in reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula. METHODS In this observational study, a retrospective analysis of 291 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy, including Blumgart anastomosis (201 patients) and traditional embedded pancreaticojejunostomy (90 patients), was performed in our hospital. The preoperative and perioperative courses and longterm follow-up status were analyzed to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. Moreover, 291 patients were then separated by the severity of postoperative pancreatic fistula, and two methods of pancreaticojejunostomy were compared to detect the features of different anastomosis. Six experienced surgeons were involved and all of them were proficient in both surgical techniques.RESULTS The characteristics of the patients in the two groups showed no significant differences, nor the preoperative information and pathological diagnoses. The operative time was significantly shorter in the Blumgart group (343.5 ± 23.0 vs 450.0 ± 40.1 min, P = 0.028), as well as the duration of pancreaticojejunostomy drainage tube placement and postoperative hospital stay (12.7 ± 0.9 d vs 17.4 ± 1.8 d, P = 0.031;and 21.9 ± 1.3 d vs 28.9 ± 1.3 d, P = 0.020, respectively). The overall complications after surgery were much less in the Blumgart group than in the embedded group (11.9% vs 26.7%, P = 0.002). Patients who underwent Blumgart anastomosis would suffer less from severe pancreatic fistula (71.9% vs 50.0%, P = 0.006), and this pancreaticojejunostomy procedure did not have worse influences on long-term complications and life quality. Thus, Blumgart anastomosis is a feasible pancreaticojejunostomy procedure in pancreatoduodenectomy surgery. It is safe in causing less postoperative complications, especially pancreatic fistula, and thus shortens the hospitalization duration. CONCLUSION Surgical method should be a key factor in reducing pancreatic fistula, and Blumgart anastomosis needs further promotion.
文摘Background: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex procedure with a relatively high risk of complications. There is an increasing trend showing that the success of pancreato-enteral anastomosis depends on surgical skill and the material used. Methods: We present four cases of pancreato-enteral anastomosis resected 37 - 114 days after primary surgery and the analysis of the healing process, i.e., morphology of the pancreatic parenchyma, pancreatic duct, and digestive tract mucosa, as well as the pancreatic reaction to the sewing material by microscopic morphometry. Results: Evidence of regeneration in the columnar-lined mucosa of main pancreatic ducts in all cases of pancreato-enterostomy was observed. The inflammatory foreign-body reaction around monofilament stitch was present without an evident infection. There were no microscopic signs of pancreatic duct damage. Total foreign body reaction varied between 138.1 μm and 207.3 μm. Conclusions: This observation supports the beneficial use of thin monofilament threads for pancreato-enteral anastomosis. There was no evidence of harmful action from gastric or intestinal juices on pancreatic remnant or the Wirsung duct.
文摘BACKGROUND The Partington-Rochelle pancreaticojejunostomy(PJ)is an essential management option for patients with chronic pancreatitis(CP)associated with intractable pain and a dilated pancreatic duct(PD).Wide ductotomy and long PJ(L-PJ)have been advocated as the standard of care to ensure full PD decompression.However,the role of short PJ(S-PJ)in a uniformly dilated PD has not yet been evaluated.AIM To evaluate the possible advantages and disadvantages of S-PJ and L-PJ and to interpret the perspective of S-PJ in the treatment of CP.METHODS A retrospective review of prospectively collected cohort data was conducted on surgically treated CP patients subjected to side-to-side PJ.The length of the PJ was adapted to anatomical alterations in PD.A comparison was made of S-PJ(<50 mm)for uniformly dilated PD and L-PJ(50-100 mm)in the setting of multiple PD strictures,calcifications and dilatations.We hypothesized that S-PJ and L-PJ ensure comparable clinical outcomes.The primary outcomes were pain relief and quality of life(QOL);the secondary outcomes were perioperative characteristics,body weight,patients’satisfaction with treatment,and readmission rate due to CP.RESULTS Overall,91 patients underwent side-to-side PJ for CP,including S-PJ in 46 patients and L-PJ in 45 patients.S-PJ resulted in better perioperative outcomes:Significantly shorter operative time(107.5 min vs 134 min),lower need for intraoperative(0%vs 15.6%)and total(2.2%vs 31.1%)blood transfusions,and lower rate of perioperative complications(6.5%vs 17.8%).We noted no significant difference in pain relief,improvement in QOL,body weight gain,patients’satisfaction with surgical treatment,or readmission rate due to CP.CONCLUSION Based on our data,in the setting of a uniformly dilated PD,S-PJ provides adequate decompression of the PD.As the clinical outcomes following S-PJ are not inferior to those of L-PJ,S-PJ should be preferred as a surgical option in the case of a uniformly dilated PD.
