BACKGROUND:Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta(REBOA)can temporarily control traumatic bleeding.However,its prolonged use potentially leads to ischemia-reperfusion injury(IRI).Partial REBOA(pREBO...BACKGROUND:Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta(REBOA)can temporarily control traumatic bleeding.However,its prolonged use potentially leads to ischemia-reperfusion injury(IRI).Partial REBOA(pREBOA)can alleviate ischemic burden;however,its security and eff ectiveness prior to operative hemorrhage control remains unknown.Hence,we aimed to estimate the effi cacy of pREBOA in a swine model of liver injury using an experimental sliding-chamber ballistic gun.METHODS:Twenty Landrace pigs were randomized into control(no aortic occlusion)(n=5),intervention with complete REBOA(cREBOA)(n=5),continuous pREBOA(C-pREBOA)(n=5),and sequential pREBOA(S-pREBOA)(n=5)groups.In the cREBOA and C-pREBOA groups,the balloon was inflated for 60 min.The hemodynamic and laboratory values were compared at various observation time points.Tissue samples immediately after animal euthanasia from the myocardium,liver,kidneys,and duodenum were collected for histological assessment using hematoxylin and eosin staining.RESULTS:Compared with the control group,the survival rate of the REBOA groups was prominently improved(all P<0.05).The total volume of blood loss was markedly lower in the cREBOA group(493.14±127.31 mL)compared with other groups(P<0.01).The pH was significantly lower at 180 min in the cREBOA and S-pREBOA groups(P<0.05).At 120 min,the S-pREBOA group showed higher alanine aminotransferase(P<0.05)but lower blood urea nitrogen compared with the cREBOA group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION:In this trauma model with liver injury,a 60-minute pREBOA resulted in improved survival rate and was effective in maintaining reliable aortic pressure,despite persistent hemorrhage.Extended tolerance time for aortic occlusion in Zone I for non-compressible torso hemorrhage was feasible with both continuous partial and sequential partial measures,and the significant improvement in the severity of acidosis and distal organ injury was observed in the sequential pREBOA.展开更多
BACKGROUND:Traumatic cardiac arrest(TCA)is a major contributor to mortality and morbidity in all age groups and poses a significant burden on the healthcare system.Although there have been advances in treatment modali...BACKGROUND:Traumatic cardiac arrest(TCA)is a major contributor to mortality and morbidity in all age groups and poses a significant burden on the healthcare system.Although there have been advances in treatment modalities,survival rates for TCA patients remain low.This narrative literature review critically examines the indications and eff ectiveness of current therapeutic approaches in treating TCA.METHODS:We performed a literature search in the PubMed and Scopus databases for studies published before December 31,2022.The search was refi ned by combining search terms,examining relevant study references,and restricting publications to the English language.Following the search,943 articles were retrieved,and two independent reviewers conducted a screening process.RESULTS:A review of various studies on pre-and intra-arrest prognostic factors showed that survival rates were higher when patients had an initial shockable rhythm.There were conflicting results regarding other prognostic factors,such as witnessed arrest,bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR),and the use of prehospital or in-hospital epinephrine.Emergency thoracotomy was found to result in more favorable outcomes in cases of penetrating trauma than in those with blunt trauma.Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta(REBOA)provides an advantage to emergency thoracotomy in terms of occupational safety for the operator as an alternative in managing hemorrhagic shock.When implemented in the setting of aortic occlusion,emergency thoracotomy and REBOA resulted in comparable mortality rates.Veno-venous extracorporeal life support(V-V ECLS)and veno-arterial extracorporeal life support(V-A ECLS)are viable options for treating respiratory failure and cardiogenic shock,respectively.In the context of traumatic injuries,V-V ECLS has been associated with higher rates of survival to discharge than V-A ECLS.CONCLUSION:TCA remains a signifi cant challenge for emergency medical services due to its high morbidity and mortality rates.Pre-and intra-arrest prognostic factors can help identify patients who are likely to benefit from aggressive and resource-intensive resuscitation measures.Further research is needed to enhance guidelines for the clinical use of established and emerging therapeutic approaches that can help optimize treatment effi cacy and ameliorate survival outcomes.展开更多
目的评价复苏性主动脉球囊阻断术(resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta,REBOA)治疗不可压迫性躯干出血的效果,探讨哪些研究领域可能是进一步推进REBOA应用的关键。方法使用“复苏性主动脉球囊阻断术(REBOA)”、...目的评价复苏性主动脉球囊阻断术(resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta,REBOA)治疗不可压迫性躯干出血的效果,探讨哪些研究领域可能是进一步推进REBOA应用的关键。方法使用“复苏性主动脉球囊阻断术(REBOA)”、“复苏性主动脉血管内球囊闭塞(resuscitation intravascular balloon occlusion of the aorta)”、“球囊闭塞(balloon occlusion)”、“部分主动脉球囊闭塞(partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta)”、“部分复苏性主动脉球囊阻断术(partial resuscitation of aortic balloon blockade)”、“部分球囊闭塞(part of the balloon is occluded)”等关键词在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane等数据库中对文献进行回顾。纳入临床研究文献,排除数据集重叠、缺少2个以上变量的文章,分为院前和院内环境下两组。采用SPSS 20.0统计软件进行分析。结果16篇临床文献表明,院前环境下进行REBOA手术共47例(存活率为87.2%),穿透伤19例(40.4%),钝性损伤28例(59.6%),接受REBOAⅠ区治疗26例(55.3%),Ⅲ区治疗21例(44.7%),球囊扩张时间为36.8min。院内环境进行REBOA手术共705例(存活率为41%),穿透伤138例(19.6%),钝性损伤549例(77.9%),其他损伤18例(2.6%),接受REBOAⅠ区治疗493例(74.3%),Ⅱ区治疗16例(2.4%),Ⅲ区治疗155例(23.3%),球囊扩张时间36min。院前组军事环境下此手术者共31例(存活率为96.8%),民用环境下此手术者共16例(存活率为68.8%),在院前环境、穿透伤和区域(Zone)分区为I区患者接受REBOA紧急止血后的存活率明显升高。结论REBOA具有微创、操作相对简单的优点,非常适合军事战争或灾害救援等特定条件下创伤急救的需求。但病情诊断困难与插管时间限制了院前REBOA的使用,因此该技术距离真正走向实际应用,还需要对最适宜的对象、优化的阻断技术和阻断持续的时间等问题进行进一步的研究。展开更多
非压迫性躯干部位出血是战场上可预防战斗死亡的主要原因。复苏性主动脉球囊阻断术(resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta,REBOA)作为一种血管腔内阻断技术可有效控制致死性大出血。然而,现有的REBOA球囊定位技...非压迫性躯干部位出血是战场上可预防战斗死亡的主要原因。复苏性主动脉球囊阻断术(resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta,REBOA)作为一种血管腔内阻断技术可有效控制致死性大出血。然而,现有的REBOA球囊定位技术均存在不同程度的瓶颈或弊端,成为限制技术广泛推广的重要原因。本文对现有的REBOA球囊定位技术要点进行梳理和综述,并展望未来REBOA定位技术的发展方向,供同道参考。展开更多
基金supported by military logistics scientific research project(AHJ16J004)。
文摘BACKGROUND:Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta(REBOA)can temporarily control traumatic bleeding.However,its prolonged use potentially leads to ischemia-reperfusion injury(IRI).Partial REBOA(pREBOA)can alleviate ischemic burden;however,its security and eff ectiveness prior to operative hemorrhage control remains unknown.Hence,we aimed to estimate the effi cacy of pREBOA in a swine model of liver injury using an experimental sliding-chamber ballistic gun.METHODS:Twenty Landrace pigs were randomized into control(no aortic occlusion)(n=5),intervention with complete REBOA(cREBOA)(n=5),continuous pREBOA(C-pREBOA)(n=5),and sequential pREBOA(S-pREBOA)(n=5)groups.In the cREBOA and C-pREBOA groups,the balloon was inflated for 60 min.The hemodynamic and laboratory values were compared at various observation time points.Tissue samples immediately after animal euthanasia from the myocardium,liver,kidneys,and duodenum were collected for histological assessment using hematoxylin and eosin staining.RESULTS:Compared with the control group,the survival rate of the REBOA groups was prominently improved(all P<0.05).The total volume of blood loss was markedly lower in the cREBOA group(493.14±127.31 mL)compared with other groups(P<0.01).The pH was significantly lower at 180 min in the cREBOA and S-pREBOA groups(P<0.05).At 120 min,the S-pREBOA group showed higher alanine aminotransferase(P<0.05)but lower blood urea nitrogen compared with the cREBOA group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION:In this trauma model with liver injury,a 60-minute pREBOA resulted in improved survival rate and was effective in maintaining reliable aortic pressure,despite persistent hemorrhage.Extended tolerance time for aortic occlusion in Zone I for non-compressible torso hemorrhage was feasible with both continuous partial and sequential partial measures,and the significant improvement in the severity of acidosis and distal organ injury was observed in the sequential pREBOA.
文摘BACKGROUND:Traumatic cardiac arrest(TCA)is a major contributor to mortality and morbidity in all age groups and poses a significant burden on the healthcare system.Although there have been advances in treatment modalities,survival rates for TCA patients remain low.This narrative literature review critically examines the indications and eff ectiveness of current therapeutic approaches in treating TCA.METHODS:We performed a literature search in the PubMed and Scopus databases for studies published before December 31,2022.The search was refi ned by combining search terms,examining relevant study references,and restricting publications to the English language.Following the search,943 articles were retrieved,and two independent reviewers conducted a screening process.RESULTS:A review of various studies on pre-and intra-arrest prognostic factors showed that survival rates were higher when patients had an initial shockable rhythm.There were conflicting results regarding other prognostic factors,such as witnessed arrest,bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR),and the use of prehospital or in-hospital epinephrine.Emergency thoracotomy was found to result in more favorable outcomes in cases of penetrating trauma than in those with blunt trauma.Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta(REBOA)provides an advantage to emergency thoracotomy in terms of occupational safety for the operator as an alternative in managing hemorrhagic shock.When implemented in the setting of aortic occlusion,emergency thoracotomy and REBOA resulted in comparable mortality rates.Veno-venous extracorporeal life support(V-V ECLS)and veno-arterial extracorporeal life support(V-A ECLS)are viable options for treating respiratory failure and cardiogenic shock,respectively.In the context of traumatic injuries,V-V ECLS has been associated with higher rates of survival to discharge than V-A ECLS.CONCLUSION:TCA remains a signifi cant challenge for emergency medical services due to its high morbidity and mortality rates.Pre-and intra-arrest prognostic factors can help identify patients who are likely to benefit from aggressive and resource-intensive resuscitation measures.Further research is needed to enhance guidelines for the clinical use of established and emerging therapeutic approaches that can help optimize treatment effi cacy and ameliorate survival outcomes.
文摘目的评价复苏性主动脉球囊阻断术(resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta,REBOA)治疗不可压迫性躯干出血的效果,探讨哪些研究领域可能是进一步推进REBOA应用的关键。方法使用“复苏性主动脉球囊阻断术(REBOA)”、“复苏性主动脉血管内球囊闭塞(resuscitation intravascular balloon occlusion of the aorta)”、“球囊闭塞(balloon occlusion)”、“部分主动脉球囊闭塞(partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta)”、“部分复苏性主动脉球囊阻断术(partial resuscitation of aortic balloon blockade)”、“部分球囊闭塞(part of the balloon is occluded)”等关键词在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane等数据库中对文献进行回顾。纳入临床研究文献,排除数据集重叠、缺少2个以上变量的文章,分为院前和院内环境下两组。采用SPSS 20.0统计软件进行分析。结果16篇临床文献表明,院前环境下进行REBOA手术共47例(存活率为87.2%),穿透伤19例(40.4%),钝性损伤28例(59.6%),接受REBOAⅠ区治疗26例(55.3%),Ⅲ区治疗21例(44.7%),球囊扩张时间为36.8min。院内环境进行REBOA手术共705例(存活率为41%),穿透伤138例(19.6%),钝性损伤549例(77.9%),其他损伤18例(2.6%),接受REBOAⅠ区治疗493例(74.3%),Ⅱ区治疗16例(2.4%),Ⅲ区治疗155例(23.3%),球囊扩张时间36min。院前组军事环境下此手术者共31例(存活率为96.8%),民用环境下此手术者共16例(存活率为68.8%),在院前环境、穿透伤和区域(Zone)分区为I区患者接受REBOA紧急止血后的存活率明显升高。结论REBOA具有微创、操作相对简单的优点,非常适合军事战争或灾害救援等特定条件下创伤急救的需求。但病情诊断困难与插管时间限制了院前REBOA的使用,因此该技术距离真正走向实际应用,还需要对最适宜的对象、优化的阻断技术和阻断持续的时间等问题进行进一步的研究。
文摘非压迫性躯干部位出血是战场上可预防战斗死亡的主要原因。复苏性主动脉球囊阻断术(resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta,REBOA)作为一种血管腔内阻断技术可有效控制致死性大出血。然而,现有的REBOA球囊定位技术均存在不同程度的瓶颈或弊端,成为限制技术广泛推广的重要原因。本文对现有的REBOA球囊定位技术要点进行梳理和综述,并展望未来REBOA定位技术的发展方向,供同道参考。
