Purpose： First, to review the state-of-the-art in patent citation analysis, particularly characteristics of patent citations to scientific literature （scientific non-patent references, SNPRs）. Second, to present a ...Purpose： First, to review the state-of-the-art in patent citation analysis, particularly characteristics of patent citations to scientific literature （scientific non-patent references, SNPRs）. Second, to present a novel mapping approach to identify technology-relevant research based on the papers cited by and referring to the SNPRs. Design/methodology/approach： In the review part we discuss the context of SNPRs such as the time lags between scientific achievements and inventions. Also patent-to-patent citation is addressed particularly because this type of patent citation analysis is a major element in the assessment of the economic value of patents. We also review the research on the role of universities and researchers in technological development, with important issues such as universities as sources of technological knowledge and inventor-author relations. We conclude the review part of this paper with an overview of recent research on mapping and network analysis of the science and technology interface and of technological progress in interaction with science. In the second part we apply new techniques for the direct visualization of the cited and citing relations of SNPRs, the mapping of the landscape around SNPRs by bibliographic coupling and co-citation analysis, and the mapping of the conceptual environment of SNPRs by keyword co-occurrence analysis. Findings： We discuss several properties of SNPRs. Only a small minority of publications covered by the Web of Science or Scopus are cited by patents, about 3%-4%. However, for publications based on university-industry collaboration the number of SNPRs is considerably higher, around 15%. The proposed mapping methodology based on a ＂second order SNPR approach＂ enables a better assessment of the technological relevance of research. Research limitations： The main limitation is that a more advanced merging of patent and publication data, in particular unification of author and inventor names, in still a necessity. Practical implications： The proposed mapping methodology enables the creation of a database of technology-relevant papers （TRPs）. In a bibliometric assessment the publications of research groups, research programs or institutes can be matched with the TRPs and thus the extent to which the work of groups, programs or institutes are relevant for technological development can be measured. Originality/value： The review part examines a wide range of findings in the research of patent citation analysis. The mapping approach to identify a broad range of technologyrelevant papers is novel and offers new opportunities in research evaluation practices.展开更多
【目的】利用文献数据库,客观地分析国内外桃的研究动态,为国内外桃科研工作者和决策者提供参考。【方法】基于Web of Science数据库,采用文献计量学方法,分析了2001—2012年全球发表桃文献的国家、研究机构、核心作者、来源期刊及学科...【目的】利用文献数据库,客观地分析国内外桃的研究动态,为国内外桃科研工作者和决策者提供参考。【方法】基于Web of Science数据库,采用文献计量学方法,分析了2001—2012年全球发表桃文献的国家、研究机构、核心作者、来源期刊及学科分布等情况。【结果】检索到全球2001—2012年间发表的桃文献共5 409篇,明确了桃文献类型,年度发文量趋势,居世界前20名的国家、机构、作者、期刊和主要的热点领域。【结论】全球桃研究文献以学术论文为主,文献的产出量呈逐年上升趋势,2010年发文量最多,是2001年的2.36倍。美国、西班牙、中国、意大利和巴西发文量位居世界前5位。美国农业部农业研究服务中心、加州大学戴维斯分校、法国农业科学研究院、西班牙国家科学研究理事会和美国克莱姆森大学等机构桃研究论文的影响力较大;中国科学院、中国农业大学和浙江大学桃发文量分别位居第6、第10和第12位。最有学术影响力的作者来自西班牙、美国和法国;桃论文累计被引频次前20名的作者均不是高产作者,文献质量有待提高;主要的期刊是美国《园艺科学》、荷兰《园艺科学》和《采后生物与技术》、英国《园艺科学生物技术学报》、巴西《巴西果园学报》;研究的主要热点领域是栽培生理与技术、采后、分子生物学、病虫防控和资源育种。展开更多
基于Web of Science数据库，采用文献计量学方法，分析了2001～2012年全球发表的草莓文献中不同国家、研究机构、核心作者、文献来源期刊及论文研究方向分布等情况。结果表明，全球草莓研究文献以学术论文为主，论文的产出量呈逐年上升...基于Web of Science数据库，采用文献计量学方法，分析了2001～2012年全球发表的草莓文献中不同国家、研究机构、核心作者、文献来源期刊及论文研究方向分布等情况。结果表明，全球草莓研究文献以学术论文为主，论文的产出量呈逐年上升趋势。美国、西班牙、中国、意大利和巴西居论文数量前5位。美国农业部农业研究中心、美国佛罗里达大学、美国加州大学戴维斯分校和加拿大农业和农产品部、美国康奈尔大学等机构的草莓研究论文影响力较大，中国农业大学位居第13位。最有学术影响力的作者来自德国、中国和美国，主要的发文期刊是《Hort Science》、《Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry》、《Phytopathology》、《Food Chemistry》和《Postharvest Biology and Technology》；主要研究方向是农业、食品科学与技术、植物科学、化学、生物技术与应用微生物学。本研究为国内外草莓科研工作者和相关决策者提供了基础数据和参考依据。展开更多
文摘Purpose： First, to review the state-of-the-art in patent citation analysis, particularly characteristics of patent citations to scientific literature （scientific non-patent references, SNPRs）. Second, to present a novel mapping approach to identify technology-relevant research based on the papers cited by and referring to the SNPRs. Design/methodology/approach： In the review part we discuss the context of SNPRs such as the time lags between scientific achievements and inventions. Also patent-to-patent citation is addressed particularly because this type of patent citation analysis is a major element in the assessment of the economic value of patents. We also review the research on the role of universities and researchers in technological development, with important issues such as universities as sources of technological knowledge and inventor-author relations. We conclude the review part of this paper with an overview of recent research on mapping and network analysis of the science and technology interface and of technological progress in interaction with science. In the second part we apply new techniques for the direct visualization of the cited and citing relations of SNPRs, the mapping of the landscape around SNPRs by bibliographic coupling and co-citation analysis, and the mapping of the conceptual environment of SNPRs by keyword co-occurrence analysis. Findings： We discuss several properties of SNPRs. Only a small minority of publications covered by the Web of Science or Scopus are cited by patents, about 3%-4%. However, for publications based on university-industry collaboration the number of SNPRs is considerably higher, around 15%. The proposed mapping methodology based on a ＂second order SNPR approach＂ enables a better assessment of the technological relevance of research. Research limitations： The main limitation is that a more advanced merging of patent and publication data, in particular unification of author and inventor names, in still a necessity. Practical implications： The proposed mapping methodology enables the creation of a database of technology-relevant papers （TRPs）. In a bibliometric assessment the publications of research groups, research programs or institutes can be matched with the TRPs and thus the extent to which the work of groups, programs or institutes are relevant for technological development can be measured. Originality/value： The review part examines a wide range of findings in the research of patent citation analysis. The mapping approach to identify a broad range of technologyrelevant papers is novel and offers new opportunities in research evaluation practices.
文摘【目的】利用文献数据库,客观地分析国内外桃的研究动态,为国内外桃科研工作者和决策者提供参考。【方法】基于Web of Science数据库,采用文献计量学方法,分析了2001—2012年全球发表桃文献的国家、研究机构、核心作者、来源期刊及学科分布等情况。【结果】检索到全球2001—2012年间发表的桃文献共5 409篇,明确了桃文献类型,年度发文量趋势,居世界前20名的国家、机构、作者、期刊和主要的热点领域。【结论】全球桃研究文献以学术论文为主,文献的产出量呈逐年上升趋势,2010年发文量最多,是2001年的2.36倍。美国、西班牙、中国、意大利和巴西发文量位居世界前5位。美国农业部农业研究服务中心、加州大学戴维斯分校、法国农业科学研究院、西班牙国家科学研究理事会和美国克莱姆森大学等机构桃研究论文的影响力较大;中国科学院、中国农业大学和浙江大学桃发文量分别位居第6、第10和第12位。最有学术影响力的作者来自西班牙、美国和法国;桃论文累计被引频次前20名的作者均不是高产作者,文献质量有待提高;主要的期刊是美国《园艺科学》、荷兰《园艺科学》和《采后生物与技术》、英国《园艺科学生物技术学报》、巴西《巴西果园学报》;研究的主要热点领域是栽培生理与技术、采后、分子生物学、病虫防控和资源育种。
文摘基于Web of Science数据库，采用文献计量学方法，分析了2001～2012年全球发表的草莓文献中不同国家、研究机构、核心作者、文献来源期刊及论文研究方向分布等情况。结果表明，全球草莓研究文献以学术论文为主，论文的产出量呈逐年上升趋势。美国、西班牙、中国、意大利和巴西居论文数量前5位。美国农业部农业研究中心、美国佛罗里达大学、美国加州大学戴维斯分校和加拿大农业和农产品部、美国康奈尔大学等机构的草莓研究论文影响力较大，中国农业大学位居第13位。最有学术影响力的作者来自德国、中国和美国，主要的发文期刊是《Hort Science》、《Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry》、《Phytopathology》、《Food Chemistry》和《Postharvest Biology and Technology》；主要研究方向是农业、食品科学与技术、植物科学、化学、生物技术与应用微生物学。本研究为国内外草莓科研工作者和相关决策者提供了基础数据和参考依据。
