Background: Multiple studies in the primary care field have indicated the benefits of using a patient centered approach in communication with the patient;such interviewing methods have been shown to improve patient sa...Background: Multiple studies in the primary care field have indicated the benefits of using a patient centered approach in communication with the patient;such interviewing methods have been shown to improve patient satisfaction and adherence. There is a scarcity of anesthetic literature regarding communication skills in the perioperative period. The goal is to analyze to what extent empathic patient-centered communication methods are being used by anesthesia providers. Communication scores will be compared among providers, as well as to providers across several different subspecialties. Methods: This study is an observational descriptive study at a large tertiary care center, University Hospital in Newark, NJ. The observer observes and grades patient interviews, scoring against established criteria using an adapted version of the Kalamazoo grading tool. The researcher observes and grades the preoperative interview using the adapted Kalamazoo scale. At the end of the observed encounter, the anesthesia providers are asked to fill out a brief form detailing their demographic history, details regarding the providers’ length and type of clinical education and training, undergraduate education, previous communication training, number of years of practice, primary language, gender, and age will be obtained. Results: Anesthesia providers included in the study were physician anesthesiologists, residents, and nurse anesthetists. The average Kalamazoo score was 28.7 amongst all providers. There was no significant effect of provider level on the score at the p Conclusions: The data revealed anesthesia providers provide patient-centered encounters with a mean score of 28.7, which is higher than the average for providers from multiple different specialties observed in Joyce, et al. study (mean score of 25.25). The subcategories “Understanding patient’s perspective” and “reaches agreement” scored 3.86, and 3.83, respectively. This may indicate that anesthesia providers can improve on allowing the patient to communicate their understanding of anesthesia, as well as collecting information from the patient that can affect their anesthesia (i.e., severe nausea following previous anesthesia).展开更多
Aim: This research aims to evaluate patient-centeredness and communication skills from the patients’ point of view and that of the physicians’ point of view and compares the two outcomes. Methods: This was a cross-s...Aim: This research aims to evaluate patient-centeredness and communication skills from the patients’ point of view and that of the physicians’ point of view and compares the two outcomes. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with a convenient sample of 418 patients and 94 residents. Instrument of the study was a structured questionnaire that aimed to evaluate patient centeredness and communication skills of the residents. Results: Residents gave themselves a significantly higher score than the score given to them by patients in most studied aspects such as the extent to which the doctor discussed the patient’s problem, the extent to which the doctor explained the problem, the doctor introduced himself, the doctor greeted the patient properly and others. The only aspect for which patients gave residents higher score than that residents gave themselves was the extent to which the doctor asked the patient about what is expected to be done (ECG, CT scan, giving antibiotics, …). Conclusion: A transformation from doctor centered approach to patient centered approach is needed.展开更多
目的汉化“以患者为中心”自我效能量表(The self-efficacy in patient-centeredness questionnaire,SEPCQ),并检验其在医生群体中应用的信效度,为评估医生“以患者为中心”的自我效能水平提供可靠工具。方法遵循Brislin量表翻译原则,...目的汉化“以患者为中心”自我效能量表(The self-efficacy in patient-centeredness questionnaire,SEPCQ),并检验其在医生群体中应用的信效度,为评估医生“以患者为中心”的自我效能水平提供可靠工具。方法遵循Brislin量表翻译原则,经过直译、回译、文化调适及预调查,形成中文版SEPCQ。采用分层随机抽样方法,选取珠三角、粤东、粤西及粤北地区26所三甲综合医院1318名临床医生进行问卷调查,并检验量表心理测量学特性。结果中文版SEPCQ具有较好的内部一致性(Cronbach’sα=0.988)和折半信度(Guttman系数=0.961)。探索性及验证性因子分析结果均反映量表结构效度良好。量表共包含识别患者需求、共享信息和权力、应对沟通挑战3个维度、26个条目,与原量表结构基本一致,累积方差解释率为85.162%。验证性因子分析显示模型拟合良好。结论中文版SEPCQ在医生群体中应用具有较好的信效度,可作为评估中国医生“以患者为中心”自我效能水平的工具。展开更多
Objective To understand the quality of life(QOL)and its influencing factors in maintenance hemodialysis patients(hemodialysis maintenance,MHD),and to provide theoretical basis for improving QOL of patients.Methods A c...Objective To understand the quality of life(QOL)and its influencing factors in maintenance hemodialysis patients(hemodialysis maintenance,MHD),and to provide theoretical basis for improving QOL of patients.Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in the blood purification centre in 8 hospitals in Hefei,and patients’clinical data were collected.KDQOL-SF self-ad-展开更多
Objective:The Accountable Care Organization(ACO)model of health care delivery is based on new payment models for general practice to reward improved quality and decreased cost of care.Methods:Banner Health Network(BHN...Objective:The Accountable Care Organization(ACO)model of health care delivery is based on new payment models for general practice to reward improved quality and decreased cost of care.Methods:Banner Health Network(BHN)is one of the original CMS Pioneer ACO programs and implemented a comprehensive disease management program based on the collaborative care model.Key performance indicators for CMS reflected quality and cost of care.Results:BHN has demonstrated both improved quality and cost savings in the first two years of the pilot program.The disease management program based on the collaborative care model appears to have improved patient health outcomes based on quality improvement measures.In addition the program has reduced emergency department and hospital utilization,resulting in cost savings.Conclusions:The BHN quality improvement program is the platform for analyzing and improving on the BHN ACO model.This model appears to have excellent application to the China health care system that is also focused on prevention and improvement of chronic disease and cost-effectiveness.展开更多
文摘Background: Multiple studies in the primary care field have indicated the benefits of using a patient centered approach in communication with the patient;such interviewing methods have been shown to improve patient satisfaction and adherence. There is a scarcity of anesthetic literature regarding communication skills in the perioperative period. The goal is to analyze to what extent empathic patient-centered communication methods are being used by anesthesia providers. Communication scores will be compared among providers, as well as to providers across several different subspecialties. Methods: This study is an observational descriptive study at a large tertiary care center, University Hospital in Newark, NJ. The observer observes and grades patient interviews, scoring against established criteria using an adapted version of the Kalamazoo grading tool. The researcher observes and grades the preoperative interview using the adapted Kalamazoo scale. At the end of the observed encounter, the anesthesia providers are asked to fill out a brief form detailing their demographic history, details regarding the providers’ length and type of clinical education and training, undergraduate education, previous communication training, number of years of practice, primary language, gender, and age will be obtained. Results: Anesthesia providers included in the study were physician anesthesiologists, residents, and nurse anesthetists. The average Kalamazoo score was 28.7 amongst all providers. There was no significant effect of provider level on the score at the p Conclusions: The data revealed anesthesia providers provide patient-centered encounters with a mean score of 28.7, which is higher than the average for providers from multiple different specialties observed in Joyce, et al. study (mean score of 25.25). The subcategories “Understanding patient’s perspective” and “reaches agreement” scored 3.86, and 3.83, respectively. This may indicate that anesthesia providers can improve on allowing the patient to communicate their understanding of anesthesia, as well as collecting information from the patient that can affect their anesthesia (i.e., severe nausea following previous anesthesia).
文摘Aim: This research aims to evaluate patient-centeredness and communication skills from the patients’ point of view and that of the physicians’ point of view and compares the two outcomes. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with a convenient sample of 418 patients and 94 residents. Instrument of the study was a structured questionnaire that aimed to evaluate patient centeredness and communication skills of the residents. Results: Residents gave themselves a significantly higher score than the score given to them by patients in most studied aspects such as the extent to which the doctor discussed the patient’s problem, the extent to which the doctor explained the problem, the doctor introduced himself, the doctor greeted the patient properly and others. The only aspect for which patients gave residents higher score than that residents gave themselves was the extent to which the doctor asked the patient about what is expected to be done (ECG, CT scan, giving antibiotics, …). Conclusion: A transformation from doctor centered approach to patient centered approach is needed.
文摘目的汉化“以患者为中心”自我效能量表(The self-efficacy in patient-centeredness questionnaire,SEPCQ),并检验其在医生群体中应用的信效度,为评估医生“以患者为中心”的自我效能水平提供可靠工具。方法遵循Brislin量表翻译原则,经过直译、回译、文化调适及预调查,形成中文版SEPCQ。采用分层随机抽样方法,选取珠三角、粤东、粤西及粤北地区26所三甲综合医院1318名临床医生进行问卷调查,并检验量表心理测量学特性。结果中文版SEPCQ具有较好的内部一致性(Cronbach’sα=0.988)和折半信度(Guttman系数=0.961)。探索性及验证性因子分析结果均反映量表结构效度良好。量表共包含识别患者需求、共享信息和权力、应对沟通挑战3个维度、26个条目,与原量表结构基本一致,累积方差解释率为85.162%。验证性因子分析显示模型拟合良好。结论中文版SEPCQ在医生群体中应用具有较好的信效度,可作为评估中国医生“以患者为中心”自我效能水平的工具。
文摘Objective To understand the quality of life(QOL)and its influencing factors in maintenance hemodialysis patients(hemodialysis maintenance,MHD),and to provide theoretical basis for improving QOL of patients.Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in the blood purification centre in 8 hospitals in Hefei,and patients’clinical data were collected.KDQOL-SF self-ad-
文摘Objective:The Accountable Care Organization(ACO)model of health care delivery is based on new payment models for general practice to reward improved quality and decreased cost of care.Methods:Banner Health Network(BHN)is one of the original CMS Pioneer ACO programs and implemented a comprehensive disease management program based on the collaborative care model.Key performance indicators for CMS reflected quality and cost of care.Results:BHN has demonstrated both improved quality and cost savings in the first two years of the pilot program.The disease management program based on the collaborative care model appears to have improved patient health outcomes based on quality improvement measures.In addition the program has reduced emergency department and hospital utilization,resulting in cost savings.Conclusions:The BHN quality improvement program is the platform for analyzing and improving on the BHN ACO model.This model appears to have excellent application to the China health care system that is also focused on prevention and improvement of chronic disease and cost-effectiveness.