The habitats for the wild animals are shrinking due to the clearance of forests for agriculture and industrialization.The idea of wildlife conservation begins with the identification of their acceptable habitat.Since ...The habitats for the wild animals are shrinking due to the clearance of forests for agriculture and industrialization.The idea of wildlife conservation begins with the identification of their acceptable habitat.Since this crucial information helps in the development and maintenance of the protected areas.The requirement of habitat varies with different landscapes.The bluebull(Boselaphus tragocamelus)is Asia’s largest antelope,widespread throughout the northern Indian subcontinent.Peter Simon Pallasin(1766)described it as the only member of the genus Boselaphus.The Wildlife(Protection)Act of 1972 lists it as a Schedule III animal,while the IUCN lists it as Least Concern(LC).Our goal was to design a habitat appropriateness model for blue bull so that it could reduce the conflict with farming community due to crop damage.Model will be develop using RS&GIS technique to protect the species inside the Pench Tiger Reserve(77°55’W to 79°35’E and 21°08’S to 22°00’N)the central highlands of India.The satellite data from LANDSAT-8 of 4th April 2015,Path-144,Row-45,with a ground resolution of 30 meters,were collected from the USGS website.This satellite image was then transferred in image format to ERDAS IMAGINE 2013 for further analysis.The data from satellites were gathered and analysed.The purpose of the field survey was to gather information about the presence of various ungulates.A ground truthing exercise was also carried out.For data processing and GIS analysis,ERDAS IMAGINE 13 and Arc GIS 10 were used.Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP)was used Factors were identified who were influencing the spatial distribution of the species for conservation planning.The linear additive model was used for HSI.The results show that 242 km^(2)(29.48 percent)of Pench Tiger Reserve forest was recognized to be highly suitable for bluebull,while 196 km^(2)(23.87 percent)was moderately suitable,231 km^(2)(28.14 percent)was suitable,109 km^(2)(13.28 percent)was least suitable,and about 43 km^(2)(5.249 percent)of PTR was completely avoided by bluebull.展开更多
文摘The habitats for the wild animals are shrinking due to the clearance of forests for agriculture and industrialization.The idea of wildlife conservation begins with the identification of their acceptable habitat.Since this crucial information helps in the development and maintenance of the protected areas.The requirement of habitat varies with different landscapes.The bluebull(Boselaphus tragocamelus)is Asia’s largest antelope,widespread throughout the northern Indian subcontinent.Peter Simon Pallasin(1766)described it as the only member of the genus Boselaphus.The Wildlife(Protection)Act of 1972 lists it as a Schedule III animal,while the IUCN lists it as Least Concern(LC).Our goal was to design a habitat appropriateness model for blue bull so that it could reduce the conflict with farming community due to crop damage.Model will be develop using RS&GIS technique to protect the species inside the Pench Tiger Reserve(77°55’W to 79°35’E and 21°08’S to 22°00’N)the central highlands of India.The satellite data from LANDSAT-8 of 4th April 2015,Path-144,Row-45,with a ground resolution of 30 meters,were collected from the USGS website.This satellite image was then transferred in image format to ERDAS IMAGINE 2013 for further analysis.The data from satellites were gathered and analysed.The purpose of the field survey was to gather information about the presence of various ungulates.A ground truthing exercise was also carried out.For data processing and GIS analysis,ERDAS IMAGINE 13 and Arc GIS 10 were used.Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP)was used Factors were identified who were influencing the spatial distribution of the species for conservation planning.The linear additive model was used for HSI.The results show that 242 km^(2)(29.48 percent)of Pench Tiger Reserve forest was recognized to be highly suitable for bluebull,while 196 km^(2)(23.87 percent)was moderately suitable,231 km^(2)(28.14 percent)was suitable,109 km^(2)(13.28 percent)was least suitable,and about 43 km^(2)(5.249 percent)of PTR was completely avoided by bluebull.
