Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis are the most common spine diseases which are mainly due to age related Spine degeneration. Diagnosis of both Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis depends on...Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis are the most common spine diseases which are mainly due to age related Spine degeneration. Diagnosis of both Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis depends on clinical findings as well as radiological investigations. Treatment of choice of these conditions is on the basis of the patient conditions. Surgical treatment is the option only when the conservative treatment does not improve the patient’s clinical condition. Advancement and improvement of the technology have resulted in the traditional open surgical treatment into minimal invasive surgery. Intervention of the different surgical instruments with expert spinal surgeons had made percutaneous endoscopic lumbar Spine surgery as one of the preferred choices of surgery for treating Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis. The concept of percutaneous endoscopic surgery for lumbar region is to provide surgical options without producing iatrogenic morbidity associated with the open surgical procedures. Conventionally, there are different approaches/techniques for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery, but in this review we are mainly focusing on the Transforaminal Technique. Regarding the Lumbar Disc Herniation treatment with transforaminal approach, a number of articles have been published due to which we mainly focused on those articles which were published after 2009 onwards. While fewer articles related to Lumbar Spine Stenosis treatment with Transforaminal approach were found, we tried to brief out all those articles. On the basis of comparative study of different surgeries done for Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis, Percutaneous Transforaminal endoscopic Lumbar Surgery provides a substantial benefit. Transforaminal approach for treating Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis is safe and effective. The Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Surgery has advantage as it is performed under local anesthesia with shorter length of hospitalization and early return to normal life. The clinical outcome of the patient that underwent Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis is quite good in regard of its fewer complication and more benefits.展开更多
Lumbar disc herniation is a spinal problem seen in both young and old people causing pain in the back with pain and numbness in lower extremity leading to disability limiting daily activities. When conservative treatm...Lumbar disc herniation is a spinal problem seen in both young and old people causing pain in the back with pain and numbness in lower extremity leading to disability limiting daily activities. When conservative treatments are ineffective, then it is treated by surgeries, more recently with minimal invasive percutaneous endoscopic lumbar surgery (PELS). One of the mostly accepted PELS by spinal surgeons is percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy, which can be performed for any age. The main aim of this review was to evaluate clinical outcome and safety based on the Oswestry Disable Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and MacNab criteria and complications of PELS surgery and its advantages in clinical basis.展开更多
Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy(TPED) is a minimally invasive technique mainly used for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation from a lateral approach. Performed under local anesthesia, TPED has bee...Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy(TPED) is a minimally invasive technique mainly used for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation from a lateral approach. Performed under local anesthesia, TPED has been proven to be a safe and effective technique which has been also associated with shorter rehabilitation period, reduced blood loss, trauma, and scar tissue compared to conventional procedures. However, the procedure should be performed by a spine surgeon experienced in the specific technique and capable of recognizing or avoiding various challenging conditions. In this review, pitfalls that a novice surgeon has to be mindful of, are reported and analyzed.展开更多
背景经皮脊柱内镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的日间手术模式逐渐在国内开展,日间手术模式和住院手术模式对于患者心理状态的影响鲜有报道。目的探讨在日间手术与住院手术模式下经皮脊柱内镜手术对于患者心理状态的影响及差异。方法收集2020...背景经皮脊柱内镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的日间手术模式逐渐在国内开展,日间手术模式和住院手术模式对于患者心理状态的影响鲜有报道。目的探讨在日间手术与住院手术模式下经皮脊柱内镜手术对于患者心理状态的影响及差异。方法收集2020年1月—2023年1月在解放军总医院第一医学中心骨科接受经皮脊柱内镜腰椎间盘切除术(percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy,PELD)患者的临床资料,应用倾向评分匹配(propensity score matching,PSM)法对日间手术组和住院手术组患者按照1∶1进行匹配。比较日间手术组和住院手术组术前术后以及两组之间的Zung焦虑自评量表(self-assessment anxiety scale,SAS)评分、Zung抑郁自评量表(self-assessment depression scale,SDS)评分、下肢疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale of lower limbs,VAS-L)、背部疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale of back,VAS-B)、日本骨科医师协会评分(Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)。结果匹配后日间手术组和住院手术组各纳入50例患者。日间手术组中,男性31例,女性19例,平均年龄(43.06±15.22)岁,平均病程(20.39±38.41)个月;住院手术组中,男性29例,女性21例,平均年龄(41.40±14.84)岁,平均病程(22.27±40.38)个月,两组一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前,日间手术组与住院手术组心理学评分及异常率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后,两组各个时间点的SAS评分、SDS评分和异常率均优于术前(P<0.05)。日间手术组与住院手术组相比,出院时的SAS评分差异有统计学意义(34.52±3.43 vs 36.58±4.52,P<0.05),SAS评分异常率差异有统计学意义(16%vs 34%,P=0.038);术后1周的SAS评分差异有统计学意义(28.77±2.52 vs 31.18±3.17,P<0.01);术后其他时间点的SAS评分、SDS评分和异常率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。此外,两组术后3个月的临床疗效均优于术前(P<0.05);两组间术后3个月临床疗效的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论住院手术和日间手术模式下,PELD术后患者的焦虑和抑郁状态较术前均有改善。相较于住院手术模式,日间手术模式下,术后短期内处于焦虑状态的患者比例更低。展开更多
目的比较经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术(PELD)和经椎间孔入路腰椎体间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎间盘突出症并神经根管狭窄的临床疗效。方法根据治疗方法不同将38例腰椎间盘突出症并神经根管狭窄患者分为2组:17例行PELD术治疗者作为PELD组,21例行T...目的比较经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术(PELD)和经椎间孔入路腰椎体间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎间盘突出症并神经根管狭窄的临床疗效。方法根据治疗方法不同将38例腰椎间盘突出症并神经根管狭窄患者分为2组:17例行PELD术治疗者作为PELD组,21例行TLIF术治疗者作为TLIF组,2组均随访12个月。比较2组手术完成情况,术中及术后并发症发生情况,治疗前后VAS评分、ODI评分变化,随访12个月手术疗效。结果 PELD组手术切口小于TLIF组(P<0.05),手术时间、住院时间均短于TLIF组(P均<0.05)。2组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义。PELD组术后1 d VAS评分明显低于TLIF组(P<0.05),2组术后1,6,12个月VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义。2组术后12个月ODI评分及改良Macnab疗效评价优良率比较差异均无统计学意义。结论 PELD与TLIF均是治疗腰椎间盘突出症并神经根管狭窄的有效手段。尽管前者学习曲线更陡峭,但其相对于后者更具微创性,对邻近节段的影响更小。展开更多
背景术后留置引流有利于减轻局部血肿、减小切口张力、缓解术后疼痛、加快术后康复等,但同时也存在着增加伤口感染概率等风险。对于经皮脊柱内镜腰椎间盘切除术后是否需放置引流尚无相关文献报道。目的分析脊柱内镜术后留置引流管的临...背景术后留置引流有利于减轻局部血肿、减小切口张力、缓解术后疼痛、加快术后康复等,但同时也存在着增加伤口感染概率等风险。对于经皮脊柱内镜腰椎间盘切除术后是否需放置引流尚无相关文献报道。目的分析脊柱内镜术后留置引流管的临床疗效,为进一步完善手术流程和术后康复方案提供数据支持。方法收集2018年11月-2020年12月解放军总医院海南医院骨科收治的140例单纯腰椎间盘突出症行脊柱内窥镜手术治疗患者的临床资料。按是否进行引流分为引流组和非引流组,观察分析两组术后感染率、术后血肿形成率、术前与术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS)。结果引流组70例,男性54例,女性16例,平均年龄(46.83±16.31)岁;非引流组70例,男性45例,女性25例,平均年龄(47.6±17.46)岁。140例患者均获得3个月随访。两组术后1周VAS评分,非引流组显著高于引流组(P<0.05)。术后15 d、术后3个月VAS评分,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后随访非引流组有1例出现术后血肿,引流组无血肿形成病例。两组均无术后感染病例。结论脊柱内镜术后留置引流对于降低患者术后血肿形成和减轻术后疼痛有一定作用。展开更多
文摘Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis are the most common spine diseases which are mainly due to age related Spine degeneration. Diagnosis of both Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis depends on clinical findings as well as radiological investigations. Treatment of choice of these conditions is on the basis of the patient conditions. Surgical treatment is the option only when the conservative treatment does not improve the patient’s clinical condition. Advancement and improvement of the technology have resulted in the traditional open surgical treatment into minimal invasive surgery. Intervention of the different surgical instruments with expert spinal surgeons had made percutaneous endoscopic lumbar Spine surgery as one of the preferred choices of surgery for treating Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis. The concept of percutaneous endoscopic surgery for lumbar region is to provide surgical options without producing iatrogenic morbidity associated with the open surgical procedures. Conventionally, there are different approaches/techniques for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery, but in this review we are mainly focusing on the Transforaminal Technique. Regarding the Lumbar Disc Herniation treatment with transforaminal approach, a number of articles have been published due to which we mainly focused on those articles which were published after 2009 onwards. While fewer articles related to Lumbar Spine Stenosis treatment with Transforaminal approach were found, we tried to brief out all those articles. On the basis of comparative study of different surgeries done for Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis, Percutaneous Transforaminal endoscopic Lumbar Surgery provides a substantial benefit. Transforaminal approach for treating Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis is safe and effective. The Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Surgery has advantage as it is performed under local anesthesia with shorter length of hospitalization and early return to normal life. The clinical outcome of the patient that underwent Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Spine Stenosis is quite good in regard of its fewer complication and more benefits.
文摘Lumbar disc herniation is a spinal problem seen in both young and old people causing pain in the back with pain and numbness in lower extremity leading to disability limiting daily activities. When conservative treatments are ineffective, then it is treated by surgeries, more recently with minimal invasive percutaneous endoscopic lumbar surgery (PELS). One of the mostly accepted PELS by spinal surgeons is percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy, which can be performed for any age. The main aim of this review was to evaluate clinical outcome and safety based on the Oswestry Disable Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and MacNab criteria and complications of PELS surgery and its advantages in clinical basis.
文摘Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy(TPED) is a minimally invasive technique mainly used for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation from a lateral approach. Performed under local anesthesia, TPED has been proven to be a safe and effective technique which has been also associated with shorter rehabilitation period, reduced blood loss, trauma, and scar tissue compared to conventional procedures. However, the procedure should be performed by a spine surgeon experienced in the specific technique and capable of recognizing or avoiding various challenging conditions. In this review, pitfalls that a novice surgeon has to be mindful of, are reported and analyzed.
文摘背景经皮脊柱内镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的日间手术模式逐渐在国内开展,日间手术模式和住院手术模式对于患者心理状态的影响鲜有报道。目的探讨在日间手术与住院手术模式下经皮脊柱内镜手术对于患者心理状态的影响及差异。方法收集2020年1月—2023年1月在解放军总医院第一医学中心骨科接受经皮脊柱内镜腰椎间盘切除术(percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy,PELD)患者的临床资料,应用倾向评分匹配(propensity score matching,PSM)法对日间手术组和住院手术组患者按照1∶1进行匹配。比较日间手术组和住院手术组术前术后以及两组之间的Zung焦虑自评量表(self-assessment anxiety scale,SAS)评分、Zung抑郁自评量表(self-assessment depression scale,SDS)评分、下肢疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale of lower limbs,VAS-L)、背部疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale of back,VAS-B)、日本骨科医师协会评分(Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)。结果匹配后日间手术组和住院手术组各纳入50例患者。日间手术组中,男性31例,女性19例,平均年龄(43.06±15.22)岁,平均病程(20.39±38.41)个月;住院手术组中,男性29例,女性21例,平均年龄(41.40±14.84)岁,平均病程(22.27±40.38)个月,两组一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前,日间手术组与住院手术组心理学评分及异常率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后,两组各个时间点的SAS评分、SDS评分和异常率均优于术前(P<0.05)。日间手术组与住院手术组相比,出院时的SAS评分差异有统计学意义(34.52±3.43 vs 36.58±4.52,P<0.05),SAS评分异常率差异有统计学意义(16%vs 34%,P=0.038);术后1周的SAS评分差异有统计学意义(28.77±2.52 vs 31.18±3.17,P<0.01);术后其他时间点的SAS评分、SDS评分和异常率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。此外,两组术后3个月的临床疗效均优于术前(P<0.05);两组间术后3个月临床疗效的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论住院手术和日间手术模式下,PELD术后患者的焦虑和抑郁状态较术前均有改善。相较于住院手术模式,日间手术模式下,术后短期内处于焦虑状态的患者比例更低。
文摘目的比较经皮椎间孔镜髓核摘除术(PELD)和经椎间孔入路腰椎体间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎间盘突出症并神经根管狭窄的临床疗效。方法根据治疗方法不同将38例腰椎间盘突出症并神经根管狭窄患者分为2组:17例行PELD术治疗者作为PELD组,21例行TLIF术治疗者作为TLIF组,2组均随访12个月。比较2组手术完成情况,术中及术后并发症发生情况,治疗前后VAS评分、ODI评分变化,随访12个月手术疗效。结果 PELD组手术切口小于TLIF组(P<0.05),手术时间、住院时间均短于TLIF组(P均<0.05)。2组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义。PELD组术后1 d VAS评分明显低于TLIF组(P<0.05),2组术后1,6,12个月VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义。2组术后12个月ODI评分及改良Macnab疗效评价优良率比较差异均无统计学意义。结论 PELD与TLIF均是治疗腰椎间盘突出症并神经根管狭窄的有效手段。尽管前者学习曲线更陡峭,但其相对于后者更具微创性,对邻近节段的影响更小。
文摘背景术后留置引流有利于减轻局部血肿、减小切口张力、缓解术后疼痛、加快术后康复等,但同时也存在着增加伤口感染概率等风险。对于经皮脊柱内镜腰椎间盘切除术后是否需放置引流尚无相关文献报道。目的分析脊柱内镜术后留置引流管的临床疗效,为进一步完善手术流程和术后康复方案提供数据支持。方法收集2018年11月-2020年12月解放军总医院海南医院骨科收治的140例单纯腰椎间盘突出症行脊柱内窥镜手术治疗患者的临床资料。按是否进行引流分为引流组和非引流组,观察分析两组术后感染率、术后血肿形成率、术前与术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS)。结果引流组70例,男性54例,女性16例,平均年龄(46.83±16.31)岁;非引流组70例,男性45例,女性25例,平均年龄(47.6±17.46)岁。140例患者均获得3个月随访。两组术后1周VAS评分,非引流组显著高于引流组(P<0.05)。术后15 d、术后3个月VAS评分,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后随访非引流组有1例出现术后血肿,引流组无血肿形成病例。两组均无术后感染病例。结论脊柱内镜术后留置引流对于降低患者术后血肿形成和减轻术后疼痛有一定作用。
