BACKGROUND Myocardial ischemia and ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)increase QT dispersion(QTD)and corrected QT dispersion(QTcD),and are also associated with ventricular arrhythmia.AIM To evaluate the effects ...BACKGROUND Myocardial ischemia and ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)increase QT dispersion(QTD)and corrected QT dispersion(QTcD),and are also associated with ventricular arrhythmia.AIM To evaluate the effects of reperfusion strategy[primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PPCI)or fibrinolytic therapy]on QTD and QTcD in STEMI patients and assess the impact of the chosen strategy on the occurrence of in-hospital arrhythmia.METHODS This prospective,observational,multicenter study included 240 patients admitted with STEMI who were treated with either PPCI(group I)or fibrinolytic therapy(group II).QTD and QTcD were measured on admission and 24 hr after reperfusion,and patients were observed to detect in-hospital arrhythmia.RESULTS There were significant reductions in QTD and QTcD from admission to 24 hr in both group I and group II patients.QTD and QTcD were found to be shorter in group I patients at 24 hr than those in group II(53±19 msec vs 60±18 msec,P=0.005 and 60±21 msec vs 69+22 msec,P=0.003,respectively).The occurrence of in-hospital arrhythmia was significantly more frequent in group II than in group I(25 patients,20.8%vs 8 patients,6.7%,P=0.001).Furthermore,QTD and QTcD were higher in patients with in-hospital arrhythmia than those without(P=0.001 and P=0.02,respectively).CONCLUSION In STEMI patients,PPCI and fibrinolytic therapy effectively reduced QTD and QTcD,with a higher observed reduction using PPCI.PPCI was associated with a lower incidence of in-hospital arrhythmia than fibrinolytic therapy.In addition,QTD and QTcD were shorter in patients not experiencing in-hospital arrhythmia than those with arrhythmia.展开更多
The Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction(MI) requires cardiac myocyte necrosis with an increase and/or a decrease in a patient's plasma of cardiac troponin(cT n) with at least one cT n measurement g...The Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction(MI) requires cardiac myocyte necrosis with an increase and/or a decrease in a patient's plasma of cardiac troponin(cT n) with at least one cT n measurement greater than the 99 th percentile of the upper normal reference limit during:(1) symptoms of myocardialischemia;(2) new significant electrocardiogram(ECG) ST-segment/T-wave changes or left bundle branch block;(3) the development of pathological ECG Q waves;(4) new loss of viable myocardium or regional wall motion abnormality identified by an imaging procedure; or(5) identification of intracoronary thrombus by angiography or autopsy.Myocardial infarction,when diagnosed,is now classified into five types.Detection of a rise and a fall of troponin are essential to the diagnosis of acute MI.However,high sensitivity troponin assays can increase the sensitivity but decrease the specificity of MI diagnosis.The ECG remains a cornerstone in the diagnosis of MI and should be frequently repeated,especially if the initial ECG is not diagnostic of MI.There have been significant advances in adjunctive pharmacotherapy,procedural techniques and stent technology in the treatment of patients with MIs.The routine use of antiplatelet agents such as clopidogrel,prasugrel or ticagrelor,in addition to aspirin,reduces patient morbidity and mortality.Percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in a timely manner is the primary treatment of patients with acute ST segment elevation MI.Drug eluting coronary stents are safe and beneficial with primary coronary intervention.Treatment with direct thrombin inhibitors during PCI is non-inferior to unfractionated heparin and glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor antagonists and is associated with a significant reduction in bleeding.The intra-coronary use of a glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa antagonist can reduce infarct size.Pre- and post-conditioning techniques can provide additional cardioprotection.However,the incidence and mortality due to MI continues to be high despite all these recent advances.The initial ten year experience with autologous human bone marrow mononuclear cells(BMCs) in patients with MI showed modest but significant increases in left ventricular(LV) ejection fraction,decreases in LV endsystolic volume and reductions in MI size.These studies established that the intramyocardial or intracoronary administration of stem cells is safe.However,many of these studies consisted of small numbers of patients who were not randomized to BMCs or placebo.The recent LateT ime,Time,and Swiss Multicenter Trials in patientswith MI did not demonstrate significant improvement in patient LV ejection fraction with BMCs in comparison with placebo.Possible explanations include the early use of PCI in these patients,heterogeneous BMC populations which died prematurely from patients with chronic ischemic disease,red blood cell contamination which decreases BMC renewal,and heparin which decreases BMC migration.In contrast,cardiac stem cells from the right atrial appendage and ventricular septum and apex in the SCIPIO and CADUCEUS Trials appear to reduce patient MI size and increase viable myocardium.Additional clinical studies with cardiac stem cells are in progress.展开更多
Background Although thrombolytic therapy with rescue percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） is a common treatment strategy for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction （STEMI）, scant data are available o...Background Although thrombolytic therapy with rescue percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） is a common treatment strategy for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction （STEMI）, scant data are available on its efficacy relative to primary PCI, and comparison was therefore the aim of this study. Methods This multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel trial was conducted in 12 hospitals on patients （age 〈70 years） with STEMI who presented within 12 hours of symptom onset （mean interval 〉3 hours）. Patients were randomized to three groups： primary PCI group （n=101）; recombinant staphylokinase （r-Sak） group （n=-104）; and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator （rt-PA） group （n=-106）. For all patients allocated to the thrombolytic therapy arm, coronary angiography was performed at 90 minutes after drug therapy to confirm infarct-related artery （IRA） patency; rescue PCI was performed in cases with TIMI flow grade 〈2. Bare-metal stent implantation was planned for all patients. Results After randomization it required an average of 113.4 minutes to start thrombolytic therapy （door-to-needle time）and 141.2 minutes to perform first balloon inflation in the IRA （door to balloon time）. Rates of IRA patency （TIMI flow grade 2 or 3） and TIMI flow grade 3 were significantly lower in the thrombolysis group at 90 minutes after drug therapy than in the primary PCI group at the end of the procedure （70.5% vs. 98.0%, P 〈0.0001, and 53.0% vs. 85.9%, P 〈0.0001, respectively）. Rescue PCI with stenting was performed in 117 patients （55.7%） in the thrombolytic therapy arm. Rates of patency and TIMI flow grade 3 were still significantly lower in the rescue PCI than in the primary PCI group （88.9% vs. 97.9%, P=-0.0222, and 68.4% vs. 85.0%, P=0.0190, respectively）. At 30 days post-therapy, mortality rate was significantly higher in the thrombolysis combined with rescue PCI group than in primary PCI group （7.1% vs. 0, P=0.0034）. Rates of death/MI and bleeding complications were significantly higher in the thrombolysis with rescue PCI group than in the primary PCI group （10.0% vs. 1.0%, P=-0.0380, and 28.10% vs. 8.91%, P=-0.O001, respectively）. Conclusions Thrombolytic therapy with rescue PCI was associated with significantly lower rates of coronary patency and TIMI flow grade 3, but with significantly higher rates of mortality, death/MI and hemorrhagic complications at 30 days, as compared with primary PCI in this group of Chinese STEMI patients with late presentation and delayed treatments.展开更多
Background The benefit/risk ratio of stenting in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions merits further study, therefore the subject...Background The benefit/risk ratio of stenting in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions merits further study, therefore the subject of the present study. Methods and results It was a pro- spective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Between April 2012 and July 2015, 399 acute STEMI patients with single vessel disease and intermediate （40%-70%） stenosis of the culprit lesion before or after aspiration thrombectomy and/or intracoronary tirofiban （15 pg/kg） were enrolled and were randomly assigned （h 1） to stenting group （n = 201） and non-stenting group （n = 198）. In stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy plus standard percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） with stent implantation. In non-stenting group, pa- tients received pharmacologic therapy and PCI （thrombectomy）, but without dilatation or stenting. Primary endpoint was 12-month rate of major adverse cardiac and eerebrovascular events （MACCE）, a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction （M1）, repeat re- vascularization and stroke. Secondary endpoints were 12-month rates of all cause death, ischemia driven admission and bleeding complica- tion. Median follow-up time was 12.4 ~ 3.1 months. At 12 months, MACCE occurred in 8.0% of the patients in stenting group, as compared with 15.2% in the non-stenting group （adjusted HR： 0.42, 95% Ch 0.19-0.89, P = 0.02）. The stenting group had lower non-fatal MI rate than non-stenting group, （1.5% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.03）. The two groups shared similar cardiac death, repeat revascularization, stroke, all cause death, ischemia driven readmission and bleeding rates at 12 months. Conclusions Stent implantation had better efficacy and safety in reducing MACCE risks among acute STEMI patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions.展开更多
Objectives To compare the different effects of late successful reperfusion with PCI on left ventricular function and its relationship with viable myocardium after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction in patients ...Objectives To compare the different effects of late successful reperfusion with PCI on left ventricular function and its relationship with viable myocardium after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction in patients with or without diabetes. Methods A total of 125 consecutive subjects with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction were selected, and divided into diabetes mellitus （DM） group （ n = 43） and Non-DM group （ n = 82） according to WHO diabetes diagnosis criteria. All patients received successful PCI at 12 ± 8 days from onset. Ischemic viable myocardium was detected with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography, and left ventricular function and wall motion abnormality were also assessed with echocardiography before PCI. The data of clinical manifestations and angiograms before and after PCI were analyzed. Levels of creatinine kinase-MB （CK-MB）, and troponin T （TnT） before PCI, 6 hours and 24 hours after PCI were assessed. All patients received clinic and echocardiography follow-up for 6 months. Results Higher rate of TIMI 2 flow, and lower rate of TIMI 3 flow in DM group were demonstrated immediately after PCI, and the rate of serum CK-MB and/or TnT levels were higher in DM group, compared with Non-DM group（P 〈 0.05）. 63% of DM patients and 56% of non-DM patients had viable myocardium before PCI（ P 〉 0. 05）. There were no significant differences of left ventricular ejection fraction （LVEF）, left ventricular end diastolic volume index （LVEDVI）, left ventricular end systolic volume index （LVESVI）, and wall motion score （WMS） between two groups at baseline before PCI（P 〉 0.05）. After six months, WMS was decreased and LVEF was increased in Non-DM group, but the WMS and the LVEF did not changed, and the LVEDVI was increased in DM group compared with baseline; the LVEDVI, LVESVI, LVEF, and WMS were significantly different between two groups （P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0. 01 ）. Conclusions Compared with non-diabetics, delayed successful revascularization with PCI in diabetics patient with acute myocardial infarction has less benefitial effect on the improvement of late phase left ventricular function, and it may be because the insufficient reperfusion or reperfusion injury to myocardium but not the viable myocardium contributing to the poor result. （S Chin J Cardiol 2009; 10（4） ： 196 -203）展开更多
Background It＇s an effective treatment to achieve percutaneous coronary intervention in AMI patients, which rapidly improves the blood supply of coronary artery. Studies have shown that different modes of PCI therapy...Background It＇s an effective treatment to achieve percutaneous coronary intervention in AMI patients, which rapidly improves the blood supply of coronary artery. Studies have shown that different modes of PCI therapy have different effects in AMI patients. The aim of this study was to explore the effects and clinical significances of emergency or late PCI therapy on left ventricular remodeling and cardiac autonomic function in acute myocardial infarction （AMI） patients. Methods One hundred and fifty cases of AMI patients were randomly divided into three groups, which all were given the routine medicine. The two therapy groups were the emergency PCI group （n = 60） and the late PCI group （n = 50）. The variations of heart rate turbulence （HRT） and heart rate variability （HRV） parameters were observed after 2 weeks of treatment by 24-hour ambulatory ECG. Results Compared with the control group, after 2 weeks of treatment, the levels of TS, SDNN and SDANN of two PCI-treated group was significantly higher （P 〈 0.01）, TO were lower （P 〈 0.01） than which in the control group. There were significant differences in TS, SDNN, SDANN and TO between the two PCI treatment group （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion Emergency PCI or late PCI may give coronary effective reperfusion, improve left ventricular function and autonomic nervous function, and prevent malignant arrhythmias to occur. The treatment of primary PCI is superior to delayed PCI.展开更多
目的:探讨左室压力-应变环技术对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后早期左室重构(LVR)的预测价值。方法:收集2021年10月—2022年7月佛山市第一人民医院心血管重症监护室行直接PCI术的102例STEMI患者,根...目的:探讨左室压力-应变环技术对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后早期左室重构(LVR)的预测价值。方法:收集2021年10月—2022年7月佛山市第一人民医院心血管重症监护室行直接PCI术的102例STEMI患者,根据术后3个月左室收缩末期容积(LVESV)是否增大≥15%分为重构组(n=42)与非重构组(n=60)。收集患者的一般资料,术后48h、术后1个月、术后3个月对患者进行常规二维超声心动图检查(2D-TTE)、左室纵向应变(LVGLS)及心肌做功参数检查,心肌做功参数包括整体做功指数(GWI)、整体有用功(GCW)、整体无用功(GWW)、整体做功效率(GWE),比较两组间以上参数的差异。结果:两组术后48h各参数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后1个月、术后3个月重构组的左室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、LVESV高于非重构组,左室射血分数(LVEF)低于非重构组,术后3个月重构组的左房内径高于非重构组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),余参数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后48h,术后1个月、术后3个月重构组LVGLS、GWE、GWI、GCW低于非重构组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),GWW高于非重构组,但仅术后1个月的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,术后48 h GWI≤1307 mmHg%及术后1个月GWE≤88%是行直接PCI术后的STEMI患者出现LVR的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论:术后48h GWI≤1307mmHg%和术后1个月GWE≤88%是STEMI患者行直接PCI术后早期出现LVR的独立危险因素。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Myocardial ischemia and ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)increase QT dispersion(QTD)and corrected QT dispersion(QTcD),and are also associated with ventricular arrhythmia.AIM To evaluate the effects of reperfusion strategy[primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PPCI)or fibrinolytic therapy]on QTD and QTcD in STEMI patients and assess the impact of the chosen strategy on the occurrence of in-hospital arrhythmia.METHODS This prospective,observational,multicenter study included 240 patients admitted with STEMI who were treated with either PPCI(group I)or fibrinolytic therapy(group II).QTD and QTcD were measured on admission and 24 hr after reperfusion,and patients were observed to detect in-hospital arrhythmia.RESULTS There were significant reductions in QTD and QTcD from admission to 24 hr in both group I and group II patients.QTD and QTcD were found to be shorter in group I patients at 24 hr than those in group II(53±19 msec vs 60±18 msec,P=0.005 and 60±21 msec vs 69+22 msec,P=0.003,respectively).The occurrence of in-hospital arrhythmia was significantly more frequent in group II than in group I(25 patients,20.8%vs 8 patients,6.7%,P=0.001).Furthermore,QTD and QTcD were higher in patients with in-hospital arrhythmia than those without(P=0.001 and P=0.02,respectively).CONCLUSION In STEMI patients,PPCI and fibrinolytic therapy effectively reduced QTD and QTcD,with a higher observed reduction using PPCI.PPCI was associated with a lower incidence of in-hospital arrhythmia than fibrinolytic therapy.In addition,QTD and QTcD were shorter in patients not experiencing in-hospital arrhythmia than those with arrhythmia.
基金Supported by Research facilities at the James A Haley VA Hospitalin part+3 种基金Grants from the Florida King Biomedical Research Programthe Muscular Dystrophy Associationthe Robert O Law Foundationthe Cornelius Foundation
文摘The Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction(MI) requires cardiac myocyte necrosis with an increase and/or a decrease in a patient's plasma of cardiac troponin(cT n) with at least one cT n measurement greater than the 99 th percentile of the upper normal reference limit during:(1) symptoms of myocardialischemia;(2) new significant electrocardiogram(ECG) ST-segment/T-wave changes or left bundle branch block;(3) the development of pathological ECG Q waves;(4) new loss of viable myocardium or regional wall motion abnormality identified by an imaging procedure; or(5) identification of intracoronary thrombus by angiography or autopsy.Myocardial infarction,when diagnosed,is now classified into five types.Detection of a rise and a fall of troponin are essential to the diagnosis of acute MI.However,high sensitivity troponin assays can increase the sensitivity but decrease the specificity of MI diagnosis.The ECG remains a cornerstone in the diagnosis of MI and should be frequently repeated,especially if the initial ECG is not diagnostic of MI.There have been significant advances in adjunctive pharmacotherapy,procedural techniques and stent technology in the treatment of patients with MIs.The routine use of antiplatelet agents such as clopidogrel,prasugrel or ticagrelor,in addition to aspirin,reduces patient morbidity and mortality.Percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in a timely manner is the primary treatment of patients with acute ST segment elevation MI.Drug eluting coronary stents are safe and beneficial with primary coronary intervention.Treatment with direct thrombin inhibitors during PCI is non-inferior to unfractionated heparin and glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor antagonists and is associated with a significant reduction in bleeding.The intra-coronary use of a glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa antagonist can reduce infarct size.Pre- and post-conditioning techniques can provide additional cardioprotection.However,the incidence and mortality due to MI continues to be high despite all these recent advances.The initial ten year experience with autologous human bone marrow mononuclear cells(BMCs) in patients with MI showed modest but significant increases in left ventricular(LV) ejection fraction,decreases in LV endsystolic volume and reductions in MI size.These studies established that the intramyocardial or intracoronary administration of stem cells is safe.However,many of these studies consisted of small numbers of patients who were not randomized to BMCs or placebo.The recent LateT ime,Time,and Swiss Multicenter Trials in patientswith MI did not demonstrate significant improvement in patient LV ejection fraction with BMCs in comparison with placebo.Possible explanations include the early use of PCI in these patients,heterogeneous BMC populations which died prematurely from patients with chronic ischemic disease,red blood cell contamination which decreases BMC renewal,and heparin which decreases BMC migration.In contrast,cardiac stem cells from the right atrial appendage and ventricular septum and apex in the SCIPIO and CADUCEUS Trials appear to reduce patient MI size and increase viable myocardium.Additional clinical studies with cardiac stem cells are in progress.
文摘Background Although thrombolytic therapy with rescue percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） is a common treatment strategy for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction （STEMI）, scant data are available on its efficacy relative to primary PCI, and comparison was therefore the aim of this study. Methods This multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel trial was conducted in 12 hospitals on patients （age 〈70 years） with STEMI who presented within 12 hours of symptom onset （mean interval 〉3 hours）. Patients were randomized to three groups： primary PCI group （n=101）; recombinant staphylokinase （r-Sak） group （n=-104）; and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator （rt-PA） group （n=-106）. For all patients allocated to the thrombolytic therapy arm, coronary angiography was performed at 90 minutes after drug therapy to confirm infarct-related artery （IRA） patency; rescue PCI was performed in cases with TIMI flow grade 〈2. Bare-metal stent implantation was planned for all patients. Results After randomization it required an average of 113.4 minutes to start thrombolytic therapy （door-to-needle time）and 141.2 minutes to perform first balloon inflation in the IRA （door to balloon time）. Rates of IRA patency （TIMI flow grade 2 or 3） and TIMI flow grade 3 were significantly lower in the thrombolysis group at 90 minutes after drug therapy than in the primary PCI group at the end of the procedure （70.5% vs. 98.0%, P 〈0.0001, and 53.0% vs. 85.9%, P 〈0.0001, respectively）. Rescue PCI with stenting was performed in 117 patients （55.7%） in the thrombolytic therapy arm. Rates of patency and TIMI flow grade 3 were still significantly lower in the rescue PCI than in the primary PCI group （88.9% vs. 97.9%, P=-0.0222, and 68.4% vs. 85.0%, P=0.0190, respectively）. At 30 days post-therapy, mortality rate was significantly higher in the thrombolysis combined with rescue PCI group than in primary PCI group （7.1% vs. 0, P=0.0034）. Rates of death/MI and bleeding complications were significantly higher in the thrombolysis with rescue PCI group than in the primary PCI group （10.0% vs. 1.0%, P=-0.0380, and 28.10% vs. 8.91%, P=-0.O001, respectively）. Conclusions Thrombolytic therapy with rescue PCI was associated with significantly lower rates of coronary patency and TIMI flow grade 3, but with significantly higher rates of mortality, death/MI and hemorrhagic complications at 30 days, as compared with primary PCI in this group of Chinese STEMI patients with late presentation and delayed treatments.
文摘Background The benefit/risk ratio of stenting in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions merits further study, therefore the subject of the present study. Methods and results It was a pro- spective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Between April 2012 and July 2015, 399 acute STEMI patients with single vessel disease and intermediate （40%-70%） stenosis of the culprit lesion before or after aspiration thrombectomy and/or intracoronary tirofiban （15 pg/kg） were enrolled and were randomly assigned （h 1） to stenting group （n = 201） and non-stenting group （n = 198）. In stenting group, patients received pharmacologic therapy plus standard percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） with stent implantation. In non-stenting group, pa- tients received pharmacologic therapy and PCI （thrombectomy）, but without dilatation or stenting. Primary endpoint was 12-month rate of major adverse cardiac and eerebrovascular events （MACCE）, a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction （M1）, repeat re- vascularization and stroke. Secondary endpoints were 12-month rates of all cause death, ischemia driven admission and bleeding complica- tion. Median follow-up time was 12.4 ~ 3.1 months. At 12 months, MACCE occurred in 8.0% of the patients in stenting group, as compared with 15.2% in the non-stenting group （adjusted HR： 0.42, 95% Ch 0.19-0.89, P = 0.02）. The stenting group had lower non-fatal MI rate than non-stenting group, （1.5% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.03）. The two groups shared similar cardiac death, repeat revascularization, stroke, all cause death, ischemia driven readmission and bleeding rates at 12 months. Conclusions Stent implantation had better efficacy and safety in reducing MACCE risks among acute STEMI patients with single vessel intermediate stenosis culprit lesions.
基金supported by the International Cooperation Foundation of Anhui Science and Technology Bureau(NO: 09080703042)
文摘Objectives To compare the different effects of late successful reperfusion with PCI on left ventricular function and its relationship with viable myocardium after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction in patients with or without diabetes. Methods A total of 125 consecutive subjects with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction were selected, and divided into diabetes mellitus （DM） group （ n = 43） and Non-DM group （ n = 82） according to WHO diabetes diagnosis criteria. All patients received successful PCI at 12 ± 8 days from onset. Ischemic viable myocardium was detected with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography, and left ventricular function and wall motion abnormality were also assessed with echocardiography before PCI. The data of clinical manifestations and angiograms before and after PCI were analyzed. Levels of creatinine kinase-MB （CK-MB）, and troponin T （TnT） before PCI, 6 hours and 24 hours after PCI were assessed. All patients received clinic and echocardiography follow-up for 6 months. Results Higher rate of TIMI 2 flow, and lower rate of TIMI 3 flow in DM group were demonstrated immediately after PCI, and the rate of serum CK-MB and/or TnT levels were higher in DM group, compared with Non-DM group（P 〈 0.05）. 63% of DM patients and 56% of non-DM patients had viable myocardium before PCI（ P 〉 0. 05）. There were no significant differences of left ventricular ejection fraction （LVEF）, left ventricular end diastolic volume index （LVEDVI）, left ventricular end systolic volume index （LVESVI）, and wall motion score （WMS） between two groups at baseline before PCI（P 〉 0.05）. After six months, WMS was decreased and LVEF was increased in Non-DM group, but the WMS and the LVEF did not changed, and the LVEDVI was increased in DM group compared with baseline; the LVEDVI, LVESVI, LVEF, and WMS were significantly different between two groups （P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0. 01 ）. Conclusions Compared with non-diabetics, delayed successful revascularization with PCI in diabetics patient with acute myocardial infarction has less benefitial effect on the improvement of late phase left ventricular function, and it may be because the insufficient reperfusion or reperfusion injury to myocardium but not the viable myocardium contributing to the poor result. （S Chin J Cardiol 2009; 10（4） ： 196 -203）
文摘Background It＇s an effective treatment to achieve percutaneous coronary intervention in AMI patients, which rapidly improves the blood supply of coronary artery. Studies have shown that different modes of PCI therapy have different effects in AMI patients. The aim of this study was to explore the effects and clinical significances of emergency or late PCI therapy on left ventricular remodeling and cardiac autonomic function in acute myocardial infarction （AMI） patients. Methods One hundred and fifty cases of AMI patients were randomly divided into three groups, which all were given the routine medicine. The two therapy groups were the emergency PCI group （n = 60） and the late PCI group （n = 50）. The variations of heart rate turbulence （HRT） and heart rate variability （HRV） parameters were observed after 2 weeks of treatment by 24-hour ambulatory ECG. Results Compared with the control group, after 2 weeks of treatment, the levels of TS, SDNN and SDANN of two PCI-treated group was significantly higher （P 〈 0.01）, TO were lower （P 〈 0.01） than which in the control group. There were significant differences in TS, SDNN, SDANN and TO between the two PCI treatment group （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion Emergency PCI or late PCI may give coronary effective reperfusion, improve left ventricular function and autonomic nervous function, and prevent malignant arrhythmias to occur. The treatment of primary PCI is superior to delayed PCI.
文摘目的:探讨左室压力-应变环技术对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后早期左室重构(LVR)的预测价值。方法:收集2021年10月—2022年7月佛山市第一人民医院心血管重症监护室行直接PCI术的102例STEMI患者,根据术后3个月左室收缩末期容积(LVESV)是否增大≥15%分为重构组(n=42)与非重构组(n=60)。收集患者的一般资料,术后48h、术后1个月、术后3个月对患者进行常规二维超声心动图检查(2D-TTE)、左室纵向应变(LVGLS)及心肌做功参数检查,心肌做功参数包括整体做功指数(GWI)、整体有用功(GCW)、整体无用功(GWW)、整体做功效率(GWE),比较两组间以上参数的差异。结果:两组术后48h各参数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后1个月、术后3个月重构组的左室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、LVESV高于非重构组,左室射血分数(LVEF)低于非重构组,术后3个月重构组的左房内径高于非重构组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),余参数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后48h,术后1个月、术后3个月重构组LVGLS、GWE、GWI、GCW低于非重构组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),GWW高于非重构组,但仅术后1个月的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,术后48 h GWI≤1307 mmHg%及术后1个月GWE≤88%是行直接PCI术后的STEMI患者出现LVR的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论:术后48h GWI≤1307mmHg%和术后1个月GWE≤88%是STEMI患者行直接PCI术后早期出现LVR的独立危险因素。
