Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy is a minimally invasive surgery with little pain, less blood loss, less hospital stay and the surgery can be done in local anesthesia, which was started during late 20...Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy is a minimally invasive surgery with little pain, less blood loss, less hospital stay and the surgery can be done in local anesthesia, which was started during late 20th century. Kambin and Gellmann in 1973 in the United States and Hijikata in Japanin 1977 individually preformed posterolateral percutaneous nucleotomy for the resection of the nucleus pulposus and release of compressed exiting nerve root, which is now spreading through the world and many surgeons are developing their skill but it needs experience and patience for successful outcomes. Along with advanced instruments now the surgery can be performed only giving a small skin incision of 8 - 10 mm and is as effective as the conventional method of surgery and open microdiscectomy surgery for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. In this review, we are explaining the technique of minimally invasive Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy surgery along its advantages and complications which can be encountered while performing this technique.展开更多
BACKGROUND Lumbar disc herniation is a common disease.Endoscopic treatment may have more advantages than traditional surgery.AIM To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of microendoscopic discectomy(MED)and open d...BACKGROUND Lumbar disc herniation is a common disease.Endoscopic treatment may have more advantages than traditional surgery.AIM To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of microendoscopic discectomy(MED)and open discectomy with lamina nucleus enucleation in the treatment of singlesegment lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.METHODS Ninety-six patients who were operated at our hospital were selected for this study.Patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation were admitted to the hospital from March 2018 to March 2019 and were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group with 48 cases in each group.The former group underwent lumbar discectomy and the latter underwent laparotomy and nucleus pulpectomy.Surgical effects were compared between the two groups.RESULTS In terms of surgical indicators,the observation group had a longer operation time,shorter postoperative bedtime and hospital stay,less intraoperative blood loss,and smaller incision length than the control group(P<0.05).The excellent recovery rate did not differ significantly between the observation group(93.75%)and the control group(91.67%).Visual analogue scale pain scores were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group at 1 d,3 d,1 mo,and 6 mo after surgery(P<0.05).The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(6.25%vs 22.92%,P<0.05).CONCLUSION Both MED and open discectomy can effectively improve single-segment lumbar disc herniation,but MED is associated with less trauma,less bleeding,and a lower incidence of complications.展开更多
Objective:To investigate the early efficacy of two approaches for lumbar disc herniation under spinal endoscopy.Methods:45 cases of lumbar disc herniation were divided into interlaminar approach(27 cases)and intervert...Objective:To investigate the early efficacy of two approaches for lumbar disc herniation under spinal endoscopy.Methods:45 cases of lumbar disc herniation were divided into interlaminar approach(27 cases)and intervertebral foramen approach(18 cases)according to different surgical approaches.Postoperative pain visual analogue scale(VAS)was used.Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)lumbar spine score(JOA)and modified Macnab criteria were used to evaluate the postoperative outcome.Results:(1)VAS score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=0.620,P=0.603).There were statistically significant differences in pain VAS scores between preoperative and postoperative time points,that is,there was a time effect(F=2157.488,P=0.000).The overall VAS scores of the two groups were compared,and the difference was not statistically significant,that is,there was no grouping effect(F=2.610,P=0.114).The VAS score of pain in both groups decreased with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);JOA score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=1.296,P=0.280).The difference of JOA score between preoperative and postoperative time points was statistically significant,that is,there was a time effect(F=1464.830,P=0.000).JOA scores of the two groups showed an increasing trend with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);(2)The improved Macnab standard was used to evaluate the excellent and good rate at 3 months after surgery.In the interlaminar group,12 cases were excellent,13 cases were good and 2 cases were fair.The excellent and good rate was 92.6%.In the intervertebral foramen group,7 cases were excellent,10 cases were good and 1 case was fair.The excellent and good rate was 94.4%.The overall excellent and good rate of the two groups was 93.3%.Conclusion:Both approaches can achieve satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation,which is worthy of clinical application.However,for beginners,l5-s1 lumbar disc herniation is more suitable for intervertebral disc approach,so as to achieve satisfactory efficacy.展开更多
文摘Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy is a minimally invasive surgery with little pain, less blood loss, less hospital stay and the surgery can be done in local anesthesia, which was started during late 20th century. Kambin and Gellmann in 1973 in the United States and Hijikata in Japanin 1977 individually preformed posterolateral percutaneous nucleotomy for the resection of the nucleus pulposus and release of compressed exiting nerve root, which is now spreading through the world and many surgeons are developing their skill but it needs experience and patience for successful outcomes. Along with advanced instruments now the surgery can be performed only giving a small skin incision of 8 - 10 mm and is as effective as the conventional method of surgery and open microdiscectomy surgery for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. In this review, we are explaining the technique of minimally invasive Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy surgery along its advantages and complications which can be encountered while performing this technique.
文摘BACKGROUND Lumbar disc herniation is a common disease.Endoscopic treatment may have more advantages than traditional surgery.AIM To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of microendoscopic discectomy(MED)and open discectomy with lamina nucleus enucleation in the treatment of singlesegment lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.METHODS Ninety-six patients who were operated at our hospital were selected for this study.Patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation were admitted to the hospital from March 2018 to March 2019 and were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group with 48 cases in each group.The former group underwent lumbar discectomy and the latter underwent laparotomy and nucleus pulpectomy.Surgical effects were compared between the two groups.RESULTS In terms of surgical indicators,the observation group had a longer operation time,shorter postoperative bedtime and hospital stay,less intraoperative blood loss,and smaller incision length than the control group(P<0.05).The excellent recovery rate did not differ significantly between the observation group(93.75%)and the control group(91.67%).Visual analogue scale pain scores were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group at 1 d,3 d,1 mo,and 6 mo after surgery(P<0.05).The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(6.25%vs 22.92%,P<0.05).CONCLUSION Both MED and open discectomy can effectively improve single-segment lumbar disc herniation,but MED is associated with less trauma,less bleeding,and a lower incidence of complications.
基金Anhui Province from Cong Qingwu Old Chinese Medicine Studio Project.Project No:2100601.
文摘Objective:To investigate the early efficacy of two approaches for lumbar disc herniation under spinal endoscopy.Methods:45 cases of lumbar disc herniation were divided into interlaminar approach(27 cases)and intervertebral foramen approach(18 cases)according to different surgical approaches.Postoperative pain visual analogue scale(VAS)was used.Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA)lumbar spine score(JOA)and modified Macnab criteria were used to evaluate the postoperative outcome.Results:(1)VAS score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=0.620,P=0.603).There were statistically significant differences in pain VAS scores between preoperative and postoperative time points,that is,there was a time effect(F=2157.488,P=0.000).The overall VAS scores of the two groups were compared,and the difference was not statistically significant,that is,there was no grouping effect(F=2.610,P=0.114).The VAS score of pain in both groups decreased with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);JOA score.There is no interaction effect between the access mode and the time factor(F=1.296,P=0.280).The difference of JOA score between preoperative and postoperative time points was statistically significant,that is,there was a time effect(F=1464.830,P=0.000).JOA scores of the two groups showed an increasing trend with time,and the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant before surgery,at discharge,1 month after surgery and 3 months after surgery(t=0.067,P=0.947;t=1.415,P=0.164;t=0.564,P=0.575;t=0.442,P=0.660);(2)The improved Macnab standard was used to evaluate the excellent and good rate at 3 months after surgery.In the interlaminar group,12 cases were excellent,13 cases were good and 2 cases were fair.The excellent and good rate was 92.6%.In the intervertebral foramen group,7 cases were excellent,10 cases were good and 1 case was fair.The excellent and good rate was 94.4%.The overall excellent and good rate of the two groups was 93.3%.Conclusion:Both approaches can achieve satisfactory efficacy in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation,which is worthy of clinical application.However,for beginners,l5-s1 lumbar disc herniation is more suitable for intervertebral disc approach,so as to achieve satisfactory efficacy.
