AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of peripheral portal vein(PV)-oriented non-dilated bile duct(BD) puncture for percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage(PTBD).METHODS: Thirty-five patients with non-dilated BDs underwent...AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of peripheral portal vein(PV)-oriented non-dilated bile duct(BD) puncture for percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage(PTBD).METHODS: Thirty-five patients with non-dilated BDs underwent PTBD for the management of various biliary disorders, including benign bilioenteric anastomotic stricture(n = 24), BD stricture(n = 5) associated with iatrogenic BD injury, and postoperative biliary leakage(n = 6). Under ultrasonographic guidance, percutaneous transhepatic puncture using a 21-G needle was performed along the running course of the peripheral targeted non-dilated BD(preferably B6 for right-sided approach, and B3 for left-sided approach) or along the accompanying PV when the BD was not well visualized. This technique could provide an appropriate insertion angle of less than 30° between the puncture needle and BD running course. The puncture needle was then advanced slightly beyond the accompanying PV. The needle tip was moved slightly backward while injecting a small amount of contrast agent to obtain the BD image, followed by insertion of a 0.018-inch guide wire(GW). A drainage catheter was then placed usinga two-step GW method. RESULTS: PTBD was successful in 33(94.3%) of the 35 patients with non-dilated intrahepatic BDs. A rightsided approach was performed in 25 cases, while a left-sided approach was performed in 10 cases. In 31 patients, the first PTBD attempt proved successful. Four cases required a second attempt a few days later to place a drainage catheter. PTBD was successful in two cases, but the second attempt also failed in the other two cases, probably due to poor breath-holding ability. Although most patients(n = 26) had been experiencing cholangitis with fever(including septic condition in 8 cases) before PTBD, only 5(14.3%) patients encountered PTBD procedure-related complications, such as transient hemobilia and cholangitis. No major complications such as bilioarterial fistula or portal thrombosis were observed. There was no mortality in our series.CONCLUSION: Peripheral PV-oriented BD puncture for PTBD in patients with non-dilated BDs is a safe and effective procedure for BD stricture and postoperative bile leakage.展开更多
目的探讨血必净配合经皮肝胆道穿刺引流术(Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangial Drainage,PTCD)治疗急性重症胆管炎(Acute Cholangitis of Severe Type,ACST)临床疗效。方法回顾性选取2019年1月-2020年12月湛江中心人民医院收治的103...目的探讨血必净配合经皮肝胆道穿刺引流术(Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangial Drainage,PTCD)治疗急性重症胆管炎(Acute Cholangitis of Severe Type,ACST)临床疗效。方法回顾性选取2019年1月-2020年12月湛江中心人民医院收治的103例ACST患者的临床资料,按不同治疗方案分为4组:PTCD+抗菌素+血必净组31例、PTCD+抗菌素组25例、抗菌素+血必净组25例、单纯抗菌素组22例。观察各组患者治疗前后血清白细胞(White Blood Cells,WBC)、血小板(Platelets,PLT)、降钙素原(Procalcitonin,PCT)、C反应蛋白(Creactive Protein,CRP)、总胆红素(Total Bilirubin,TBIL)、住院时间等相关指标变化,并比较各组患者的疗效,从而进一步探讨血必净治疗ACST的临床意义。结果治疗前,4组ACST患者血清WBC、PLT、PCT、CRP及TBIL各项指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。治疗后4组患者的TBIL、PCT、CRP比较,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05),其中PTCD+抗菌素+血必净组患者的TBIL平均(23.3±12.9)μmol/L、PCT平均(3.4±1.8)ng/L和CRP平均(16.6±7.3)mg/L,较其余3组均显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。治疗后4组患者的血清WBC、PLT比较,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。单纯抗菌素组平均住院(7.1±2.0)d,较其余3组显著减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。4组疗效比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中PTCD+抗菌素组及PTCD+抗菌素+血必净组的总有效率更高。结论血必净配合PTCD能明显缓解ACST患者的病情,血必净对促进病情恢复具有积极的临床意义。展开更多
文摘AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of peripheral portal vein(PV)-oriented non-dilated bile duct(BD) puncture for percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage(PTBD).METHODS: Thirty-five patients with non-dilated BDs underwent PTBD for the management of various biliary disorders, including benign bilioenteric anastomotic stricture(n = 24), BD stricture(n = 5) associated with iatrogenic BD injury, and postoperative biliary leakage(n = 6). Under ultrasonographic guidance, percutaneous transhepatic puncture using a 21-G needle was performed along the running course of the peripheral targeted non-dilated BD(preferably B6 for right-sided approach, and B3 for left-sided approach) or along the accompanying PV when the BD was not well visualized. This technique could provide an appropriate insertion angle of less than 30° between the puncture needle and BD running course. The puncture needle was then advanced slightly beyond the accompanying PV. The needle tip was moved slightly backward while injecting a small amount of contrast agent to obtain the BD image, followed by insertion of a 0.018-inch guide wire(GW). A drainage catheter was then placed usinga two-step GW method. RESULTS: PTBD was successful in 33(94.3%) of the 35 patients with non-dilated intrahepatic BDs. A rightsided approach was performed in 25 cases, while a left-sided approach was performed in 10 cases. In 31 patients, the first PTBD attempt proved successful. Four cases required a second attempt a few days later to place a drainage catheter. PTBD was successful in two cases, but the second attempt also failed in the other two cases, probably due to poor breath-holding ability. Although most patients(n = 26) had been experiencing cholangitis with fever(including septic condition in 8 cases) before PTBD, only 5(14.3%) patients encountered PTBD procedure-related complications, such as transient hemobilia and cholangitis. No major complications such as bilioarterial fistula or portal thrombosis were observed. There was no mortality in our series.CONCLUSION: Peripheral PV-oriented BD puncture for PTBD in patients with non-dilated BDs is a safe and effective procedure for BD stricture and postoperative bile leakage.
