Objective:To explore the application effect of flipped classroom combined with case-based learning teaching methods in pharmacoeconomics teaching.Methods:The students majoring in clinical pharmacy in 2019 were selecte...Objective:To explore the application effect of flipped classroom combined with case-based learning teaching methods in pharmacoeconomics teaching.Methods:The students majoring in clinical pharmacy in 2019 were selected as the study subjects,and the cost-effectiveness analysis of different dosage forms of Yinzhihuang in the treatment of neonatal jaundice was selected as the teaching case.The flipped classroom combined with case-based learning teaching method was used to carry out theoretical teaching to the students.After the course,questionnaires were distributed through the Sojump platform to evaluate the teaching effect.Results:The results of the questionnaire showed that 85.71%of the students believed that the flipped classroom combined with case-based learning teaching method was helpful in mobilizing the learning enthusiasm and initiative,and improving the comprehensive application ability of the knowledge of pharmacoeconomics.92.86%of the students think that it is conducive to the understanding and memorization of learning content,as well as the cultivation of teamwork,communication,etc.Conclusion:Flipped classroom combined with case-based learning teaching method can improve students’knowledge mastery,thinking skills,and practical application skills,as well as optimize and improve teachers’teaching levels.展开更多
目的综述脊髓性肌萎缩(SMA)药物经济学评价的研究新进展,以期为相关临床治疗、筛查和医保支付决策提供参考。方法计算机检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane Library、EBSCOhost、中国知网、维普、中国生物医学文献...目的综述脊髓性肌萎缩(SMA)药物经济学评价的研究新进展,以期为相关临床治疗、筛查和医保支付决策提供参考。方法计算机检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane Library、EBSCOhost、中国知网、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据等数据库和英国国家健康研究所、国际卫生保健技术评估协会、美国医疗保健研究与质量局等卫生技术评估(HTA)机构的网站,搜集与SMA相关的药物经济学评价研究。检索时限为建库至2023年12月31日。由2名研究人员严格按照纳入、排除标准进行文献/报告筛选,并使用Excel 2019软件提取所纳入文献/报告的基本信息;采用卫生经济学评价报告标准共识2022评价纳入文献/报告的研究质量。结果最终纳入9篇文献和15篇HTA报告,文献的质量整体较好,但HTA报告的质量较差。SMA药物经济学评价研究共计24项,治疗方案包括诺西那生钠、索伐瑞韦、利司扑兰和最佳支持治疗等。综述结果显示,诺西那生钠治疗SMA不具有经济性;利司扑兰和索伐瑞韦等治疗方案的经济性尚无一致结论;新生儿/产前筛查联合药物治疗方案具有经济性。结论新生儿/产前筛查联合药物治疗SMA具有经济学优势。建议未来基于我国本土化参数和医保价格继续探讨SMA新型治疗药物与SMA筛查相关的经济性,逐步将SMA筛查纳入新生儿遗传病检测范围,从而缓解患者家庭和卫生体系沉重的经济负担。展开更多
Objectives: To assess the efficiency in terms of cost-effectiveness (CE) of oral Renalof® treatment versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of kidney stones ≤ 1 cm in Nicaragua. Metho...Objectives: To assess the efficiency in terms of cost-effectiveness (CE) of oral Renalof® treatment versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of kidney stones ≤ 1 cm in Nicaragua. Methods: A cost-effectiveness economic evaluation was carried out based on the results obtained in the randomised, prospective, observational, single-blind, prospective, phase 2 clinical trial. Cost-effectiveness and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. Economic data were obtained from the Economics Department of Clínica Senior in Managua, Nicaragua. The monetary cost was expressed in US dollars (USD). Results: Treatment with Renalof® yielded a CE of $1,323.08/% remission, while ESWL was $9,498.54/% remission. The ICER shows that, in order to achieve a high percentage of kidney stone remission with ESWL, an extra $4,734.70 per patient must be invested. Conclusions: The use of Renalof® is shown to be a more cost-effective option than ESWL. It is recommended for the treatment of kidney stones ≤ 1 cm in size.展开更多
基金2022 Medical Innovation and Development Project of Lanzhou University(lzuyxcx-2022-40)2022 Education and Teaching Reform Research Project of Lanzhou University General Project(202201)The Foundation of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University(ldyyyn 2021-92)。
文摘Objective:To explore the application effect of flipped classroom combined with case-based learning teaching methods in pharmacoeconomics teaching.Methods:The students majoring in clinical pharmacy in 2019 were selected as the study subjects,and the cost-effectiveness analysis of different dosage forms of Yinzhihuang in the treatment of neonatal jaundice was selected as the teaching case.The flipped classroom combined with case-based learning teaching method was used to carry out theoretical teaching to the students.After the course,questionnaires were distributed through the Sojump platform to evaluate the teaching effect.Results:The results of the questionnaire showed that 85.71%of the students believed that the flipped classroom combined with case-based learning teaching method was helpful in mobilizing the learning enthusiasm and initiative,and improving the comprehensive application ability of the knowledge of pharmacoeconomics.92.86%of the students think that it is conducive to the understanding and memorization of learning content,as well as the cultivation of teamwork,communication,etc.Conclusion:Flipped classroom combined with case-based learning teaching method can improve students’knowledge mastery,thinking skills,and practical application skills,as well as optimize and improve teachers’teaching levels.
文摘目的综述脊髓性肌萎缩(SMA)药物经济学评价的研究新进展,以期为相关临床治疗、筛查和医保支付决策提供参考。方法计算机检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane Library、EBSCOhost、中国知网、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据等数据库和英国国家健康研究所、国际卫生保健技术评估协会、美国医疗保健研究与质量局等卫生技术评估(HTA)机构的网站,搜集与SMA相关的药物经济学评价研究。检索时限为建库至2023年12月31日。由2名研究人员严格按照纳入、排除标准进行文献/报告筛选,并使用Excel 2019软件提取所纳入文献/报告的基本信息;采用卫生经济学评价报告标准共识2022评价纳入文献/报告的研究质量。结果最终纳入9篇文献和15篇HTA报告,文献的质量整体较好,但HTA报告的质量较差。SMA药物经济学评价研究共计24项,治疗方案包括诺西那生钠、索伐瑞韦、利司扑兰和最佳支持治疗等。综述结果显示,诺西那生钠治疗SMA不具有经济性;利司扑兰和索伐瑞韦等治疗方案的经济性尚无一致结论;新生儿/产前筛查联合药物治疗方案具有经济性。结论新生儿/产前筛查联合药物治疗SMA具有经济学优势。建议未来基于我国本土化参数和医保价格继续探讨SMA新型治疗药物与SMA筛查相关的经济性,逐步将SMA筛查纳入新生儿遗传病检测范围,从而缓解患者家庭和卫生体系沉重的经济负担。
文摘Objectives: To assess the efficiency in terms of cost-effectiveness (CE) of oral Renalof® treatment versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of kidney stones ≤ 1 cm in Nicaragua. Methods: A cost-effectiveness economic evaluation was carried out based on the results obtained in the randomised, prospective, observational, single-blind, prospective, phase 2 clinical trial. Cost-effectiveness and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. Economic data were obtained from the Economics Department of Clínica Senior in Managua, Nicaragua. The monetary cost was expressed in US dollars (USD). Results: Treatment with Renalof® yielded a CE of $1,323.08/% remission, while ESWL was $9,498.54/% remission. The ICER shows that, in order to achieve a high percentage of kidney stone remission with ESWL, an extra $4,734.70 per patient must be invested. Conclusions: The use of Renalof® is shown to be a more cost-effective option than ESWL. It is recommended for the treatment of kidney stones ≤ 1 cm in size.
