●AIM:To evaluate the long-term effects of pattern scan laser(PASCAL)pan-retinal photocoagulation(PRP)on diabetic retinopathy(DR)in Chinese patients.●METHODS:In this retrospective study,we evaluated clinical data of ...●AIM:To evaluate the long-term effects of pattern scan laser(PASCAL)pan-retinal photocoagulation(PRP)on diabetic retinopathy(DR)in Chinese patients.●METHODS:In this retrospective study,we evaluated clinical data of 29 patients(53 eyes)with severe non-proliferative DR(SNPDR)or proliferative DR(PDR)who received PRP and follow-up at our hospital from 2008 to 2013.Sixteen patients(29 eyes)received PASCAL PRP and 13 patients(24 eyes)received 100-ms conventional laser PRP.●RESULTS:After long-term follow-up(mean,min-max days:719.8,290-1666 for PASCAL PRP vs 743.5,240-1348 for conventional PRP,P=0.569),patients receiving PASCAL PRP required fewer photocoagulation sessions than the conventional PRP group(2.6±1.0 vs 3.9±0.9,P<0.01).Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)was reduced slightly in PASCAL PRP group while reduced significantly in conventional PRP group.At last visit,24 eyes in the PASCAL group(88.9%)and 21 eyes in the conventional group(91.7%)were improved or stable.Two eyes in PASCAL PRP group(7.4%)and 3 eyes in the conventional PRP group(12.5%)developed vitreous hemorrhage or vitreous fibrovascular proliferation.●CONCLUSION:PASCAL PRP is as effective and may be more conducive to maintaining visual acuity with less treatment sessions for DR treatment compared to conventional laser PRP.展开更多
Purpose: To study the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the progression of diabetic retinopathy before and after treatment to determine if it can be used as a biomarker for progression or regression. Methods: This o...Purpose: To study the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the progression of diabetic retinopathy before and after treatment to determine if it can be used as a biomarker for progression or regression. Methods: This observational case study included 90 persons divided into 4 groups: group A of 30 normal persons (non diabetic) as a control group, group B of 30 diabetic patients without retinopathy, group C of 30 untreated patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and group D of the same patients of group C after 3 months of laser treatment by pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP). Serum CRP protein was measured in all groups, interpretation of results was applied. Results: The study revealed that serum CRP level increased significantly in patients with PDR (group C) in comparison to both groups of normal control persons (group A) and diabetic patients without retinopathy (group B) (P 0.05). Also the same finding was noticed in elderly patients above 50 years. Conclusion: CRP is considered a biomarker for PDR even in older age patients, but not a good indictor used for follow up patients after treatment.展开更多
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81670866)Sun Yat-Sen University Clinical Research 5010 Project(No.2013007).
文摘●AIM:To evaluate the long-term effects of pattern scan laser(PASCAL)pan-retinal photocoagulation(PRP)on diabetic retinopathy(DR)in Chinese patients.●METHODS:In this retrospective study,we evaluated clinical data of 29 patients(53 eyes)with severe non-proliferative DR(SNPDR)or proliferative DR(PDR)who received PRP and follow-up at our hospital from 2008 to 2013.Sixteen patients(29 eyes)received PASCAL PRP and 13 patients(24 eyes)received 100-ms conventional laser PRP.●RESULTS:After long-term follow-up(mean,min-max days:719.8,290-1666 for PASCAL PRP vs 743.5,240-1348 for conventional PRP,P=0.569),patients receiving PASCAL PRP required fewer photocoagulation sessions than the conventional PRP group(2.6±1.0 vs 3.9±0.9,P<0.01).Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)was reduced slightly in PASCAL PRP group while reduced significantly in conventional PRP group.At last visit,24 eyes in the PASCAL group(88.9%)and 21 eyes in the conventional group(91.7%)were improved or stable.Two eyes in PASCAL PRP group(7.4%)and 3 eyes in the conventional PRP group(12.5%)developed vitreous hemorrhage or vitreous fibrovascular proliferation.●CONCLUSION:PASCAL PRP is as effective and may be more conducive to maintaining visual acuity with less treatment sessions for DR treatment compared to conventional laser PRP.
文摘Purpose: To study the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the progression of diabetic retinopathy before and after treatment to determine if it can be used as a biomarker for progression or regression. Methods: This observational case study included 90 persons divided into 4 groups: group A of 30 normal persons (non diabetic) as a control group, group B of 30 diabetic patients without retinopathy, group C of 30 untreated patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and group D of the same patients of group C after 3 months of laser treatment by pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP). Serum CRP protein was measured in all groups, interpretation of results was applied. Results: The study revealed that serum CRP level increased significantly in patients with PDR (group C) in comparison to both groups of normal control persons (group A) and diabetic patients without retinopathy (group B) (P 0.05). Also the same finding was noticed in elderly patients above 50 years. Conclusion: CRP is considered a biomarker for PDR even in older age patients, but not a good indictor used for follow up patients after treatment.
