BACKGROUND Postoperative complications remain a paramount concern for surgeons and healthcare practitioners.AIM To present a comprehensive analysis of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress(E-PASS)s...BACKGROUND Postoperative complications remain a paramount concern for surgeons and healthcare practitioners.AIM To present a comprehensive analysis of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress(E-PASS)scoring system’s efficacy in predicting postoperative complications following abdominal surgery.METHODS A systematic search of published studies was conducted,yielding 17 studies with pertinent data.Parameters such as preoperative risk score(PRS),surgical stress score(SSS),comprehensive risk score(CRS),postoperative complications,post-operative mortality,and other clinical data were collected for meta-analysis.Forest plots were employed for continuous and binary variables,withχ2 tests assessing heterogeneity(P value).RESULTS Patients experiencing complications after abdominal surgery exhibited significantly higher E-PASS scores compared to those without complications[mean difference and 95%confidence interval(CI)of PRS:0.10(0.05-0.15);SSS:0.04(0.001-0.08);CRS:0.19(0.07-0.31)].Following the exclusion of low-quality studies,results remained valid with no discernible heterogeneity.Subgroup analysis indicated that variations in sample size and age may contribute to hetero-geneity in CRS analysis.Binary variable meta-analysis demonstrated a correlation between high CRS and increased postoperative complication rates[odds ratio(OR)(95%CI):3.01(1.83-4.95)],with a significant association observed between high CRS and postoperative mortality[OR(95%CI):15.49(3.75-64.01)].CONCLUSION In summary,postoperative complications in abdominal surgery,as assessed by the E-PASS scoring system,are consistently linked to elevated PRS,SSS,and CRS scores.High CRS scores emerge as risk factors for heightened morbidity and mortality.This study establishes the accuracy of the E-PASS scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in abdominal surgery,underscoring its potential for widespread adoption in effective risk assessment.展开更多
AIM: To establish a scoring system for predicting the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality in general surgery based on the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality ...AIM: To establish a scoring system for predicting the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality in general surgery based on the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM), and to evaluate its efficacy. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with postoperative complications or death and 172 patients without postoperative complications, who underwent surgery in our department during the previous 2 years, were retrospectively analyzed by logistic regression. Fifteen indexes were investigated including age, cardiovascular function, respiratory function, blood test results, endocrine function, central nervous system function, hepatic function, renal function, nutritional status, extent of operative trauma, and course of anesthesia. Modified POSSUM (M-POSSUM) was developed using significant risk factors with its efficacy evaluated. RESULTS: The significant risk factors were found to be age, cardiovascular function, respiratory function, hepatic function, renal function, blood test results, endocrine function, nutritional status, duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, and course of anesthesia. These factors were all included in the scoring system. There were significant differences in the scores between the patients with and without postoperative complications, between the patients died and survived with complications, and between the patients died and survived without complications. The receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the M-POSSUM could accurately predict postoperative complications and mortality.CONCLUSION: M-POSSUM correlates well with postoperative complications and mortality, and is more accurate than POSSUM.展开更多
目的研究生理能力和手术应激评分(estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress,E⁃PASS)与原发性肝癌患者根治性肝切除术围术期并发症的关系。方法回顾性选择山东省立医院2022年3月—2023年5月收住入院的原发性肝癌患者124...目的研究生理能力和手术应激评分(estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress,E⁃PASS)与原发性肝癌患者根治性肝切除术围术期并发症的关系。方法回顾性选择山东省立医院2022年3月—2023年5月收住入院的原发性肝癌患者124例作为研究对象,均在本院接受根治性肝切除术。统计围术期并发症情况,按是否发生并发症分为发生组(n=29)和未发生组(n=95),对比两组患者临床资料和疾病相关特征,并进行E⁃PASS评价,采取多因素logistic回归方程分析根治性肝切除术围术期并发症和各指标的关系,并绘制受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线,预测E⁃PASS评价原发性肝癌患者根治性肝切除术围术期并发症的价值。结果124例接受根治性肝切除术的患者中,围术期出现并发症的患者有29例(23.39%),其中肝功能衰竭2例(1.61%)、胸腔积液6例(4.84%)、腹腔脓肿4例(3.23%)、术后出血8例(6.45%)、腹腔感染9例(7.26%);另外,未发生并发症的患者有95例(76.61%)。发生组和未发生组在年龄、术中出血量、术前总胆红素、术前白蛋白方面相比,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。发生组术前风险分值(preoperative risk score,PRS)、手术应激分值(surgical stress score,SSS)、综合风险分值(composite risk score,CRS)评分均高于未发生组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经多因素logistic回归方程分析,发现PRS、SSS、CRS均会对原发性肝癌患者根治性肝切除术围术期并发症产生显著的正向影响关系(P<0.05)。通过绘制ROC曲线,发现E⁃PASS预测根治性肝切除术围术期并发症存在一定价值,其曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)分别是0.617、0.614、0.601。结论原发性肝癌患者经根治性肝切除术后,围术期并发症发生率较高,需引起重视,且通过E-PASS预测其围术期并发症的价值较高,值得临床推广使用。展开更多
目的探讨感染性休克患者血清肽酰基精氨酸脱亚胺酶2(peptidylarginine deiminase type 2,PAD2)表达水平与急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分的相关性。方法选取内江市第...目的探讨感染性休克患者血清肽酰基精氨酸脱亚胺酶2(peptidylarginine deiminase type 2,PAD2)表达水平与急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分的相关性。方法选取内江市第一人民医院2020年6月~2022年6月收治的103例感染性休克患者作为研究组,采用APACHEⅡ评分根据患者病情严重程度将其分为轻度组(n=9)、中度组(n=51)和重度组(n=13),另外选取103例同期在该院体检且一般资料与研究组患者相匹配的健康者作为对照组。采用酶联免疫吸附法测定感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平;采用Spearman法分析感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分的相关性;采用Logistic回归分析影响感染性休克患者病情严重程度的相关因素;采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析血清PAD2对中重度感染性休克的诊断价值。结果研究组与对照组血肌酐(137.52±9.01μmol/L vs 112.22±8.67μmol/L)水平及血小板计数(74.58±5.19 vs 86.02±5.34)×109/L比较,差异具有统计学意义(t=20.535,15.591,均P<0.05);研究组患者血清PAD2表达水平(42.47±6.22 ng/ml)高于对照组(38.59±5.31 ng/ml),差异具有统计学意义(t=4.815,P<0.05);感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平和APACHEⅡ评分均随病情严重程度的增加而逐渐升高(F=3.777,176.582,均P<0.05);感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关(r=0.859,P<0.05);血肌酐(OR=1.927)、PAD2(OR=1.803)及APACHEⅡ评分(OR=1.657)均为发生中重度感染性休克的危险因素(均P<0.05),血小板计数(OR=0.781)则是发生中重度感染性休克的保护因素(P<0.05)。血清PAD2诊断中重度感染性休克的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.880,敏感度、特异度分别为75.73%(95%CI:0.701~0.826)和90.29%(95%CI:0.851~0.935),对中重度感染性休克具有较高的诊断价值。结论血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关,且对中重度感染性休克具有较好诊断价值。展开更多
目的分析白介素-4(interleukin-4,IL-4)联合急性生理与慢性健康评分(acute physiology and chronic health evaluation,APACHEⅡ)对耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌(carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii,CRAB)感染的预后评估价值。方...目的分析白介素-4(interleukin-4,IL-4)联合急性生理与慢性健康评分(acute physiology and chronic health evaluation,APACHEⅡ)对耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌(carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii,CRAB)感染的预后评估价值。方法将2021年11月至2023年10月在广东医科大学附属医院接受治疗的143例CRAB感染患者设为研究组,取同期院内治疗的碳青霉烯敏感鲍曼不动杆菌感染患者49例为对照组,根据研究组患者的临床结局区分为死亡组(n=46)和存活组(n=97)。对比研究组与对照组、死亡组与存活组患者IL-4和APACHEⅡ评分差异,采用Pearson相关性分析的方式,计算CRAB感染患者血清IL-4水平同APACHEⅡ评分的相关性,并采用绘制受试者工作(receiver operating characteristic curves,ROC)曲线的方式评估IL-4、APACHEⅡ评分以及联合诊断在预测CRAB感染患者不良临床结局中的应用价值。结果死亡组患者的IL-4水平以及APACHEⅡ评分显著高于存活组患者,组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Pearson相关性分析结果显示血清IL-4水平与APACHEⅡ评分具有明显的正相关性(r=0.093,P<0.001)。血清IL-4、APACHEⅡ评分以及联合检测对CRAB感染患者预后评估AUC分别为0.712(95%CI=0.606~0.817,P<0.001)、0.849(95%CI=0.763~0.936,P<0.001)和0.956(95%CI=0.927~0.985,P<0.001)。结论CRAB患者不良预后者血清IL-4和APACHEⅡ评分较存活组显著升高,可以考虑将血清IL-4和APACHEⅡ评分联合应用于此类患者预后评估中,有助于为其临床治疗提供参考。展开更多
目的探讨肺损伤预测评分(lung injury prediction score,LIPS)联合急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分对重症创伤性脑损伤(severe traumatic brain injury,sTBI)患者合并...目的探讨肺损伤预测评分(lung injury prediction score,LIPS)联合急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分对重症创伤性脑损伤(severe traumatic brain injury,sTBI)患者合并急性肺损伤(acute lung injury,ALI)的预测价值。方法回顾性选取2019年1月至2021年12月安徽医科大学附属省立医院收治的75例sTBI患者,根据是否合并ALI,将其分为ALI组(n=24)和非ALI组(n=51)。收集患者入院时的基本资料、实验室指标、APACHEⅡ评分、LIPS评分、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(Glasgow coma scale,GCS)评分;采用Logistic回归分析sTBI患者合并ALI的危险因素,绘制受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC曲线)评价指标对sTBI合并ALI的预测价值。结果ALI组患者的APACHEⅡ评分、LIPS评分均显著高于非ALI组,GCS评分、红细胞体积分布宽度显著低于非ALI组(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,APACHEⅡ评分和LIPS评分升高及GCS评分降低均是sTBI合并ALI的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,LIPS评分、APACHEⅡ评分诊断sTBI合并ALI的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)分别为0.869和0.754;二者联合检测的AUC为0.916(95%CI:0.855~0.976),敏感度和特异性分别为83.4%和84.3%。结论LIPS评分联合APACHEⅡ评分可有效预测sTBI合并ALI的风险。展开更多
BACKGROUND: Because of the complicated pathological features after liver transplantation, severe sepsis is difficult to treat and often leads to death. This study was undertaken to analyze the role of orthotopic liver...BACKGROUND: Because of the complicated pathological features after liver transplantation, severe sepsis is difficult to treat and often leads to death. This study was undertaken to analyze the role of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in patients with severe sepsis and to evaluate the effect of the scoring system. METHODS: Fifty-six patients conformed to the inclusion criteria. They were divided into two groups: non-OLT group (group A) and OLT group (group B). Besides the general data of the patients, the surveillance of blood lactate, the number of failed organs, acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ) and mutiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) were evaluated at the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after OLT. RESULTS: The mortality during hospitalization was 30% in the non-OLT group and 57.6% in the other group. The level of blood lactate at the 1st day of OLT increased more significantly in the OLT group than in the non-OLT group (P<0.01). It was decreased but higher than that in the non-OLT group in the seven days after OLT. The number of failed organs in the OLT group was greater than that in the non-OLT group (P<0.01). The continuous score of APACHEⅡwas not significantly different in the two groups. But the continuous MODS in the OLT group was higher than that in the non-OLT group (P<0.01), which was consistent with the number of failed organs. CONCLUSIONS: The persistently higher level of blood lactate during 7 days may be a dependent risk factor. Immunosuppression may be another risk factor for OLT patients. The mortality of OLT in patients with severe sepsis in 28 days is almost double that in non-OLT patients. The MODS score is better than the APACHEⅡscore in the assessment of organ failure in OLT patients with severe sepsis. The standard scoring system could be improved or a new scoring system that includes the blood lactate score should be established for liver transplantation.展开更多
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the modified physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) scoring system and the relationship between predicted dat...Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the modified physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) scoring system and the relationship between predicted data and actual data of complication and surgical mortality of lung cancer radical surgery made by such score system. Methods: Retrospective analysis on the 86 cases of the clinical materials of patients with primary lung cancer radical surgery for thoracic surgery of line lung cancer in the 81st Hospital of PLA from October 2010 to October 2011 and using the POSSUM scoring system to predict the cases of postoperative complication and death toll, then making a comparison with the actual cases. Results: The POSSUM scoring system predicting 29 cases of postoperative complications, but 32 cases of practical complications, the difference between them has no statistical significance (P﹥0.05), 8 cases of predicted postoperative deaths, 2 cases of practical deaths, by comparison, there was statistical significance (P﹤0.05). Conclusion: The modified POSSUM scoring system can be used to predict the postoperative complication of lung surgery patients, but sometimes overestimates the postoperative death cases.展开更多
基金Supported by Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province of China,No.2020PY053.
文摘BACKGROUND Postoperative complications remain a paramount concern for surgeons and healthcare practitioners.AIM To present a comprehensive analysis of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress(E-PASS)scoring system’s efficacy in predicting postoperative complications following abdominal surgery.METHODS A systematic search of published studies was conducted,yielding 17 studies with pertinent data.Parameters such as preoperative risk score(PRS),surgical stress score(SSS),comprehensive risk score(CRS),postoperative complications,post-operative mortality,and other clinical data were collected for meta-analysis.Forest plots were employed for continuous and binary variables,withχ2 tests assessing heterogeneity(P value).RESULTS Patients experiencing complications after abdominal surgery exhibited significantly higher E-PASS scores compared to those without complications[mean difference and 95%confidence interval(CI)of PRS:0.10(0.05-0.15);SSS:0.04(0.001-0.08);CRS:0.19(0.07-0.31)].Following the exclusion of low-quality studies,results remained valid with no discernible heterogeneity.Subgroup analysis indicated that variations in sample size and age may contribute to hetero-geneity in CRS analysis.Binary variable meta-analysis demonstrated a correlation between high CRS and increased postoperative complication rates[odds ratio(OR)(95%CI):3.01(1.83-4.95)],with a significant association observed between high CRS and postoperative mortality[OR(95%CI):15.49(3.75-64.01)].CONCLUSION In summary,postoperative complications in abdominal surgery,as assessed by the E-PASS scoring system,are consistently linked to elevated PRS,SSS,and CRS scores.High CRS scores emerge as risk factors for heightened morbidity and mortality.This study establishes the accuracy of the E-PASS scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in abdominal surgery,underscoring its potential for widespread adoption in effective risk assessment.
文摘AIM: To establish a scoring system for predicting the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality in general surgery based on the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM), and to evaluate its efficacy. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with postoperative complications or death and 172 patients without postoperative complications, who underwent surgery in our department during the previous 2 years, were retrospectively analyzed by logistic regression. Fifteen indexes were investigated including age, cardiovascular function, respiratory function, blood test results, endocrine function, central nervous system function, hepatic function, renal function, nutritional status, extent of operative trauma, and course of anesthesia. Modified POSSUM (M-POSSUM) was developed using significant risk factors with its efficacy evaluated. RESULTS: The significant risk factors were found to be age, cardiovascular function, respiratory function, hepatic function, renal function, blood test results, endocrine function, nutritional status, duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, and course of anesthesia. These factors were all included in the scoring system. There were significant differences in the scores between the patients with and without postoperative complications, between the patients died and survived with complications, and between the patients died and survived without complications. The receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the M-POSSUM could accurately predict postoperative complications and mortality.CONCLUSION: M-POSSUM correlates well with postoperative complications and mortality, and is more accurate than POSSUM.
文摘目的研究生理能力和手术应激评分(estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress,E⁃PASS)与原发性肝癌患者根治性肝切除术围术期并发症的关系。方法回顾性选择山东省立医院2022年3月—2023年5月收住入院的原发性肝癌患者124例作为研究对象,均在本院接受根治性肝切除术。统计围术期并发症情况,按是否发生并发症分为发生组(n=29)和未发生组(n=95),对比两组患者临床资料和疾病相关特征,并进行E⁃PASS评价,采取多因素logistic回归方程分析根治性肝切除术围术期并发症和各指标的关系,并绘制受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线,预测E⁃PASS评价原发性肝癌患者根治性肝切除术围术期并发症的价值。结果124例接受根治性肝切除术的患者中,围术期出现并发症的患者有29例(23.39%),其中肝功能衰竭2例(1.61%)、胸腔积液6例(4.84%)、腹腔脓肿4例(3.23%)、术后出血8例(6.45%)、腹腔感染9例(7.26%);另外,未发生并发症的患者有95例(76.61%)。发生组和未发生组在年龄、术中出血量、术前总胆红素、术前白蛋白方面相比,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。发生组术前风险分值(preoperative risk score,PRS)、手术应激分值(surgical stress score,SSS)、综合风险分值(composite risk score,CRS)评分均高于未发生组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经多因素logistic回归方程分析,发现PRS、SSS、CRS均会对原发性肝癌患者根治性肝切除术围术期并发症产生显著的正向影响关系(P<0.05)。通过绘制ROC曲线,发现E⁃PASS预测根治性肝切除术围术期并发症存在一定价值,其曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)分别是0.617、0.614、0.601。结论原发性肝癌患者经根治性肝切除术后,围术期并发症发生率较高,需引起重视,且通过E-PASS预测其围术期并发症的价值较高,值得临床推广使用。
文摘目的探讨感染性休克患者血清肽酰基精氨酸脱亚胺酶2(peptidylarginine deiminase type 2,PAD2)表达水平与急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分的相关性。方法选取内江市第一人民医院2020年6月~2022年6月收治的103例感染性休克患者作为研究组,采用APACHEⅡ评分根据患者病情严重程度将其分为轻度组(n=9)、中度组(n=51)和重度组(n=13),另外选取103例同期在该院体检且一般资料与研究组患者相匹配的健康者作为对照组。采用酶联免疫吸附法测定感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平;采用Spearman法分析感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分的相关性;采用Logistic回归分析影响感染性休克患者病情严重程度的相关因素;采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析血清PAD2对中重度感染性休克的诊断价值。结果研究组与对照组血肌酐(137.52±9.01μmol/L vs 112.22±8.67μmol/L)水平及血小板计数(74.58±5.19 vs 86.02±5.34)×109/L比较,差异具有统计学意义(t=20.535,15.591,均P<0.05);研究组患者血清PAD2表达水平(42.47±6.22 ng/ml)高于对照组(38.59±5.31 ng/ml),差异具有统计学意义(t=4.815,P<0.05);感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平和APACHEⅡ评分均随病情严重程度的增加而逐渐升高(F=3.777,176.582,均P<0.05);感染性休克患者血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关(r=0.859,P<0.05);血肌酐(OR=1.927)、PAD2(OR=1.803)及APACHEⅡ评分(OR=1.657)均为发生中重度感染性休克的危险因素(均P<0.05),血小板计数(OR=0.781)则是发生中重度感染性休克的保护因素(P<0.05)。血清PAD2诊断中重度感染性休克的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.880,敏感度、特异度分别为75.73%(95%CI:0.701~0.826)和90.29%(95%CI:0.851~0.935),对中重度感染性休克具有较高的诊断价值。结论血清PAD2表达水平与APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关,且对中重度感染性休克具有较好诊断价值。
文摘目的探讨肺损伤预测评分(lung injury prediction score,LIPS)联合急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ,APACHEⅡ)评分对重症创伤性脑损伤(severe traumatic brain injury,sTBI)患者合并急性肺损伤(acute lung injury,ALI)的预测价值。方法回顾性选取2019年1月至2021年12月安徽医科大学附属省立医院收治的75例sTBI患者,根据是否合并ALI,将其分为ALI组(n=24)和非ALI组(n=51)。收集患者入院时的基本资料、实验室指标、APACHEⅡ评分、LIPS评分、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(Glasgow coma scale,GCS)评分;采用Logistic回归分析sTBI患者合并ALI的危险因素,绘制受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC曲线)评价指标对sTBI合并ALI的预测价值。结果ALI组患者的APACHEⅡ评分、LIPS评分均显著高于非ALI组,GCS评分、红细胞体积分布宽度显著低于非ALI组(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,APACHEⅡ评分和LIPS评分升高及GCS评分降低均是sTBI合并ALI的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,LIPS评分、APACHEⅡ评分诊断sTBI合并ALI的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)分别为0.869和0.754;二者联合检测的AUC为0.916(95%CI:0.855~0.976),敏感度和特异性分别为83.4%和84.3%。结论LIPS评分联合APACHEⅡ评分可有效预测sTBI合并ALI的风险。
文摘BACKGROUND: Because of the complicated pathological features after liver transplantation, severe sepsis is difficult to treat and often leads to death. This study was undertaken to analyze the role of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in patients with severe sepsis and to evaluate the effect of the scoring system. METHODS: Fifty-six patients conformed to the inclusion criteria. They were divided into two groups: non-OLT group (group A) and OLT group (group B). Besides the general data of the patients, the surveillance of blood lactate, the number of failed organs, acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ) and mutiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) were evaluated at the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after OLT. RESULTS: The mortality during hospitalization was 30% in the non-OLT group and 57.6% in the other group. The level of blood lactate at the 1st day of OLT increased more significantly in the OLT group than in the non-OLT group (P<0.01). It was decreased but higher than that in the non-OLT group in the seven days after OLT. The number of failed organs in the OLT group was greater than that in the non-OLT group (P<0.01). The continuous score of APACHEⅡwas not significantly different in the two groups. But the continuous MODS in the OLT group was higher than that in the non-OLT group (P<0.01), which was consistent with the number of failed organs. CONCLUSIONS: The persistently higher level of blood lactate during 7 days may be a dependent risk factor. Immunosuppression may be another risk factor for OLT patients. The mortality of OLT in patients with severe sepsis in 28 days is almost double that in non-OLT patients. The MODS score is better than the APACHEⅡscore in the assessment of organ failure in OLT patients with severe sepsis. The standard scoring system could be improved or a new scoring system that includes the blood lactate score should be established for liver transplantation.
文摘Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the modified physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) scoring system and the relationship between predicted data and actual data of complication and surgical mortality of lung cancer radical surgery made by such score system. Methods: Retrospective analysis on the 86 cases of the clinical materials of patients with primary lung cancer radical surgery for thoracic surgery of line lung cancer in the 81st Hospital of PLA from October 2010 to October 2011 and using the POSSUM scoring system to predict the cases of postoperative complication and death toll, then making a comparison with the actual cases. Results: The POSSUM scoring system predicting 29 cases of postoperative complications, but 32 cases of practical complications, the difference between them has no statistical significance (P﹥0.05), 8 cases of predicted postoperative deaths, 2 cases of practical deaths, by comparison, there was statistical significance (P﹤0.05). Conclusion: The modified POSSUM scoring system can be used to predict the postoperative complication of lung surgery patients, but sometimes overestimates the postoperative death cases.
