Cisplatin pretreatment enhances anti-tumor activity of cytokine-induced killer cells

AIM： To investigate whether cisplatin （DDP） enhances the anti-tumor activity of cytokine- induced killer （CIK） cells in a murine colon adenocarcinoma model. METHODS： Tumor size and weight served as indicators of therapeutic response. Immunohistochemistry was performed to observe intratumoral lymphocyte infiltration and tumor microvessel density. Changes in the percentage of regulatory T （Treg） cells within the spleens of tumor-bearing mice preconditioned with DDP were monitored using flow cytometry. RESULTS： A marked T cell-dependent, synergistic anti- tumor effect of the combined therapy was observed （1968 ± 491 mm3 ys 3872 ＋ 216 mm3; P = 0,003）, Preconditioning chemotherapy with DDP augmented the infiltration of CD3＋ T lymphocytes into the tumor mass and reduced the percentage of both intratumoral and splenic Treg cells. CONCLUSION： Preconditioning with DDP markedly enhances the efficacy of adoptively transferred CIK cells, providing a potential clinical modality for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.

The 150 most important questions in cancer research and clinical oncology series:questions 15-24

To accelerate our endeavors to overcome cancer,Chinese Journal of Cancer has launched a program of publishing 150most important questions in cancer research and clinical oncology.In this article,10 more questions are presented as follows.Question 15:Can tumor-induced erythrogenesis provide qualified red blood cells for carrying oxygen to distant organs?Question 16:Can we overcome tumor resistance to platinum-containing antineoplastic drugs by activating the sensitivity factors in the tumor?Question 17:How can a cancer cell stay dormant for years?Question 18:Why do cancer cells use distinct transcriptomic and proteomic programs to reach the same metastatic phenotype?Question 19:Why do some cancers regress spontaneously?Question 20:What are the regulatory mechanisms occurring in donor cells that determine selective sorting of biological content into vesicles and their biological consequences in recipient cells?Are the genetic transfer and exchange of biological messages between cells transient?Is the phenotypic manipulation of recipient cells temporary or prolonged and persistent?If extracellular vesicles possess immune-modulatory potential,how could they be exploited for immune interventions and cancer immunotherapy?Presumably the cargo of extracellular vesicles reflects the cells of their origin and can be used for cancer diagnosis,how could the uniform/stringent capture criteria be met universally for applying EVs in point-of-care diagnostics for cancer patients?Question 21:Can we use self-sampling technologies to monitor the tumor genetic alterations for more precise targeted therapy?Can we cure a heterogeneous tumor by sequentially targeting the driver molecules?Question 22:Can we postpone the onset of non-infection-related cancers?Question 23:How many types of cells can jointly form the tumor vasculature to provide blood supply for tumor progression?Question 24:How tumor cells transmit their epigenetic features to daughter cells and maintain the malignant phenotype?

Value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer

Data regarding the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT) are not definitive. Several randomized trials and meta-analyses demonstrate that this chemotherapy regimen decreases the morbidity and mortality rates and increases complete cytoreduction rates. If combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(HIPEC), NACT could potentially further improve upon these already promising results. Moreover the use of NACT could help in evaluating the chemo-sensitivity of the cancer, thus preventing unnecessary HIPEC procedures in chemo-resistant patients. NACT should definitely be considered as a preferred regimen in the management of advanced ovarian cancer, especially in association with cytoreductive surgery + HIPEC procedure in the context of a multidisciplinary team management in an experienced cancer centre.

Comparison of regional arterial chemotherapy and systemic intravenous chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer(stageⅢ/Ⅳ).However,conventional systemic intravenous chemotherapy(SIC)has been unsatisfactory for pancreatic cancer.In recent years,regional arterial infusion chemotherapy(RAIC)has been clinically used as a new chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer,but its efficacy is controversial.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of RAIC.We searched literatures in databases such as PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,and CNKI.After screening,this meta-analysis finally included 9 randomized controlled trials(RCTs)with 444 patients(230 RAIC and 214 SIC).We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool to assess risk of bias for included RCTs.Outcomes were overall survival(OS),overall response rate(ORR),adverse events rate(AER),and pain remission rate.Outcome indicators used relative risk(RR)and its 95%confidence interval(CI)as effect analysis statistics.The results showed that RAIC had some advantages over SIC in terms of ORR,OS,incidence of leukopenia,and pain remission.In conclusion,compared with SIC,RAIC has better clinical efficacy and lower toxicity in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.