期刊文献+
共找到1篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Wahaha vs. Danone Dispute Leads to Reflections on China's FDI Policies——A Special Interview with ZONG Qinghou and Emmanuel Faber
1
作者 叶文添 唐清建 《China Economist》 2007年第6期122-131,共10页
Background: In 1996, Wahaha, Danone and BNP (Hong Kong) jointly invested in and incorporated 5 companies to manufacture Wahaha brand products, including purified water and eight-treasure porridge. Wahaha holds 49% equ... Background: In 1996, Wahaha, Danone and BNP (Hong Kong) jointly invested in and incorporated 5 companies to manufacture Wahaha brand products, including purified water and eight-treasure porridge. Wahaha holds 49% equity interests in these companies, while Danone later became the dominant shareholder with a 51% stake after acquiring shares held by BNP in the aftermath of the Asian financial crisis. Danone then proposed to transfer the Wahaha brand to a joint venture but did not succeed. Subsequently, a trademark usage contract was signed by both parties instead. In the ensuing years, the Wahaha Group established non-JV companies in west China, central China and the Three Gorges reservoir area. These companies had RMB 5.6 billion of total assets as of December 31st, 2006 and made a net income of RMB 1.04 billion in that year. On April 3rd, 2007, Danone intended to force a deal by which it could acquire 51% equity interests in those non-JV companies for a sum of RMB 4 billion. Wahaha Chairman Zong Qinghou later complained that he and Wahaha fell into a trap set up by Danone. Both parties have since engaged in a lengthy "war of words", thereby arousing a grand debate on China's FDI policies. 展开更多
关键词 A Special Interview with ZONG Qinghou and Emmanuel Faber Danone dispute Leads to Reflections on China’s FDI Policies Wahaha vs FDI
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部