Expanding endoscopic boundaries:Endoscopic resection of large appendiceal orifice polyps with endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND Large appendiceal orifice polyps are traditionally treated surgically.Recently,endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)have been utilized as alternative resection techniques.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection techniques for the management of large appendiceal orifice polyps.METHODS This was a retrospective observational study conducted to assess the feasibility and safety of EMR and ESD for large appendiceal orifice polyps.This project was approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board.Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of appendiceal orifice polyps≥1 cm from 2015 to 2022 at a tertiary referral endoscopy center in the United States were enrolled.The main outcomes of this study included en bloc resection,R0 resection,post resection adverse events,and polyp recurrence.RESULTS A total of 19 patients were identified.Most patients were female(53%)and Caucasian(95%).The mean age was 63.3±10.8 years,and the average body mass index was 28.8±6.4.The mean polyp size was 25.5±14.2 mm.74%of polyps were localized to the appendix(at or inside the appendiceal orifice)and the remaining extended into the cecum.68%of polyps occupied≥50%of the appendiceal orifice circumference.The mean procedure duration was 61.6±37.9 minutes.Polyps were resected via endoscopic mucosal resection,endoscopic submucosal dissection,and hybrid procedures in 5,6,and 8 patients,respectively.Final pathology was remarkable for tubular adenoma(n=10)[one with high grade dysplasia],sessile serrated adenoma(n=7),and tubulovillous adenoma(n=2)[two with high grade dysplasia].En bloc resection was achieved in 84%with an 88%R0 resection rate.Despite the large polyp sizes and challenging procedures,89%(n=17)of patients were discharged on the same day as their procedure.Two patients were admitted for post-procedure observation for conservative pain management.Eight patients underwent repeat colonoscopy without evidence of residual or recurrent adenomatous polyps.CONCLUSION Our study highlights how endoscopic mucosal resection,endoscopic submucosal dissection,and hybrid procedures are all appropriate techniques with minimal adverse effects,further validating the utility of endoscopic procedures in the management of large appendiceal polyps.

Risk factors for incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy

Colonoscopic polypectomy is extremely effective in protecting against colorectal cancers,and recognition of adenomas by colonoscopy is of paramount importance in preventing colorectal cancer(CRC)and CRC-associated mortality.Incomplete polyp resection(IPR)occurs routinely in medical practice following polypectomy.We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify studies that reported on the potential risk factors for IPR using MEDLINE,EMBASE,and PubMed.Publication time was limited between January 2004 and July 2021.Our search revealed assessments of the position,morphology,and histologic variation of the polypsdas well as the relevant skills that may interfere with IPR.The included studies showed that colonic polyps with a diameter>20 mm and proximal in location should be dealt with cautiously.For smaller polyps,cold-snare polypectomy appeared to be the most effective method used to accomplish comprehensive polyp removal.In addition,endoscopist experience in narrow-band imaging in polyp detection were also associated with IPR.Therefore,polypectomy should be performed cautiously if the polyp growth is expected to be cancerous and situated in the proximal portion of the colon or rectum,and modalities should be standardized so as to lower the potential risk for IPR.

Oral Glucose Combined with Short-Term Intravenous Nutrition for the Prevention of Hypoglycemia after Painless Endoscopic Gastric Polypectomy

Objective: To explore the application effect of oral glucose combined with short-term intravenous nutrition in preventing postoperative hypoglycemia after painless endoscopic gastric polyp resection, and to provide guidance for better management of patients undergoing such procedures. Methods: A total of 886 patients who underwent painless endoscopic gastric polyp resection in the Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, from January 2020 to December 2021, were selected as the study subjects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into an experimental group and a control group, with 443 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were subjected to routine fasting and water restriction for 8 hours before surgery, and routine fasting for 24 hours after surgery. Short-term intravenous nutrition support was provided through fluid supplementation, and finger blood glucose levels were monitored at 1 hour, 4 hours, and 8 hours after completion of intravenous infusion, or when symptoms such as palpitations and cold sweats occurred. The experimental group received oral administration of 5% glucose solution (500 ml) 2 hours before surgery based on the procedures of the control group. The incidence of preoperative discomfort (hunger, thirst, and fatigue), residual gastric fluid volume, and postoperative hypoglycemia were compared between the two groups. Results: The incidence of postoperative blood glucose Conclusion: Based on the study population, oral glucose combined with short-term intravenous nutrition can effectively prevent the incidence of hypoglycemia in patients undergoing painless endoscopic gastric polyp resection. However, due to the limitations of a single-center study and a small number of cases, its feasibility needs to be further validated with more data from multi-center and large-sample cases.