Background Prevalence of inadequate glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus （T2DM） remains high. We assessed glycaemic control in the real-life practice among people with T2DM in metropolises ...Background Prevalence of inadequate glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus （T2DM） remains high. We assessed glycaemic control in the real-life practice among people with T2DM in metropolises in China who were treated with oral antidiabetic drugs （OAD） alone and to determine factors associated with inadequate glycaemic control in this population. Methods An observational, cross-sectional multicentre study was conducted in 16 metropolitan medical centers. People with T2DM who had been followed-up before the index visit which occurred from January to September 2007 were included in the study. All subjects were 〉30 years of age at the time of T2DM diagnosis and had received monotherapy or combination therapy of OAD for at least 6 months. Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical records. The main study outcome was the inadequate glucose control rate, which was calculated by the proportion of patients with haemoglobin Alc （HbAlc） 〉6.5% detected on the index visit. Results In this cohort of 455 patients with T2DM whose mean age was 60.6 years and mean disease duration was 6.1 years, 45.5% had inadequate glycaemic control. The mean （SD） HbA1c was 6.7% （1.3）. Multivariate Logistic regression showed that physical inactivity, disease duration 〉10 years, body mass index （BMI） ≥24 kg/m2, low homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function （HOMA-13） index, less frequency of medical visit and hypertriglyceridaemia were independent determinants of inadequate glycaemic control. Higher incidence of self-reported hypoglycemia experience （47.1% vs. 34.8%, P=0.008） and more fear of hypoglycemia quantified by Worry subscale of the Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey （HFS） II were happened in subjects with good glycemic control. Conclusion Approximately one half of these outpatients with T2DM from the metropolitan medical centers in China had inadequate glycaemic control treated with OAD alone, which raises the need for more effective educational and therapeutic approaches on management of hypertriglycemia, enhancing physical exercise and weight control, and at the same time. Iowerina the hvooalvcemic risk and diminishina the hvooalvcemic fear of oatients.展开更多
目的观察利司那肽联合甘精胰岛素治疗口服药控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的效果。方法120例口服药控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组60例。对照组应用甘精胰岛素治疗,观察组在对照组基础上联合应用利司那肽注射液治疗。...目的观察利司那肽联合甘精胰岛素治疗口服药控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的效果。方法120例口服药控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组60例。对照组应用甘精胰岛素治疗,观察组在对照组基础上联合应用利司那肽注射液治疗。比较两组患者的血糖指标[空腹血糖(FBG)及三餐餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)]、胰岛功能指标[空腹C肽(FCP)、餐后2 h C肽(2 h PCP)、体质量指数(BMI)]水平及不良反应发生情况。结果治疗后,观察组患者的2 h PG(9.71±1.44)mmol/L、HbA1c(6.81±0.86)%均显著低于对照组的(10.65±1.98)mmol/L、(7.26±0.74)%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者的FBG水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,观察组患者的BMI(24.09±1.14)kg/m2显著低于对照组的(24.83±1.01)kg/m2,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者的FCP、2 h PCP水平比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者的不良反应发生率3.3%显著低于对照组的13.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用利司那肽联合甘精胰岛素对口服药控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的血糖进行控制,可以显著降低餐后血糖水平,其治疗效果明显,而且药物的不良反应较少,安全可靠,可以广泛在2型糖尿病患者中使用。展开更多
文摘Background Prevalence of inadequate glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus （T2DM） remains high. We assessed glycaemic control in the real-life practice among people with T2DM in metropolises in China who were treated with oral antidiabetic drugs （OAD） alone and to determine factors associated with inadequate glycaemic control in this population. Methods An observational, cross-sectional multicentre study was conducted in 16 metropolitan medical centers. People with T2DM who had been followed-up before the index visit which occurred from January to September 2007 were included in the study. All subjects were 〉30 years of age at the time of T2DM diagnosis and had received monotherapy or combination therapy of OAD for at least 6 months. Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical records. The main study outcome was the inadequate glucose control rate, which was calculated by the proportion of patients with haemoglobin Alc （HbAlc） 〉6.5% detected on the index visit. Results In this cohort of 455 patients with T2DM whose mean age was 60.6 years and mean disease duration was 6.1 years, 45.5% had inadequate glycaemic control. The mean （SD） HbA1c was 6.7% （1.3）. Multivariate Logistic regression showed that physical inactivity, disease duration 〉10 years, body mass index （BMI） ≥24 kg/m2, low homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function （HOMA-13） index, less frequency of medical visit and hypertriglyceridaemia were independent determinants of inadequate glycaemic control. Higher incidence of self-reported hypoglycemia experience （47.1% vs. 34.8%, P=0.008） and more fear of hypoglycemia quantified by Worry subscale of the Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey （HFS） II were happened in subjects with good glycemic control. Conclusion Approximately one half of these outpatients with T2DM from the metropolitan medical centers in China had inadequate glycaemic control treated with OAD alone, which raises the need for more effective educational and therapeutic approaches on management of hypertriglycemia, enhancing physical exercise and weight control, and at the same time. Iowerina the hvooalvcemic risk and diminishina the hvooalvcemic fear of oatients.
文摘目的观察利司那肽联合甘精胰岛素治疗口服药控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的效果。方法120例口服药控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组60例。对照组应用甘精胰岛素治疗,观察组在对照组基础上联合应用利司那肽注射液治疗。比较两组患者的血糖指标[空腹血糖(FBG)及三餐餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)]、胰岛功能指标[空腹C肽(FCP)、餐后2 h C肽(2 h PCP)、体质量指数(BMI)]水平及不良反应发生情况。结果治疗后,观察组患者的2 h PG(9.71±1.44)mmol/L、HbA1c(6.81±0.86)%均显著低于对照组的(10.65±1.98)mmol/L、(7.26±0.74)%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者的FBG水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,观察组患者的BMI(24.09±1.14)kg/m2显著低于对照组的(24.83±1.01)kg/m2,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者的FCP、2 h PCP水平比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者的不良反应发生率3.3%显著低于对照组的13.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用利司那肽联合甘精胰岛素对口服药控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的血糖进行控制,可以显著降低餐后血糖水平,其治疗效果明显,而且药物的不良反应较少,安全可靠,可以广泛在2型糖尿病患者中使用。
