BACKGROUND Mechanical ventilation can lead to the severe impairment of the metabolic pathway of alveolar surfactants,inactivating alveolar surfactants and significantly reducing lung-chest compliance.The cardiopulmona...BACKGROUND Mechanical ventilation can lead to the severe impairment of the metabolic pathway of alveolar surfactants,inactivating alveolar surfactants and significantly reducing lung-chest compliance.The cardiopulmonary function of elderly patients usually reduced to a certain extent,and there are lung complications after surgical anesthesia,just like lung barotrauma caused by mechanical ventilation,atelectasis and postoperative hypoxemia.AIM To investigate the effects of different positive end expiratory pressures(PEEPs)and tidal volumes(VTs)on respiratory function,the degree of the inflammatory response and hemodynamic indexes in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.METHODS A total of 120 patients undergoing surgery for gastric or colon cancer under general anesthesia in Xinghua People's Hospital from January 2017 to January 2021 were randomly divided into Group A and Group B,with 60 cases in each group.The ventilation mode in Group A was VT(6.0 mL/kg)+PEEP(5.0 cmH_(2)O),while that in Group B was VT(6.0 mL/kg)+PEEP(8.0 cmH_(2)O).Blood gas parameters,respiratory mechanical parameters,inflammatory response indicators,hemodynamic indicators and related complications were compared between the two groups.RESULTS There were no significant differences in PaCO_(2),PaO_(2),oxygen or the examined indexes at T0 between group A and group B(P>0.05).The measured PaO_(2) value of patients in group A at T3 was higher than that in group B,and the difference was significant(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in peak airway pressure(P_(peak)),mean airway pressure or dynamic pulmonary compliance(Cdyn)at T0 between group A and group B(P>0.05).The measured P_(peak) value of patients in group A at T1 was higher than that in group B,and the difference was significant(P<0.05).The measured Cdyn value at T1 and T2 was greater than that in group B(P<0.05).Before surgery,there were no significant differences in tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),interleukin(IL)-6 or IL-10 between group A and group B(P>0.05).After 4 h,the measured values of TNF-αand IL-6 in group A were lower than those in group B,and the differences were significant(P<0.05).The IL-10 Level in group A was higher than that in group B(P<0.05).At T0,there were no significant differences in cardiac output,cardiac index(CI),stroke volume index(SVI)or mean arterial pressure between group A and group B(P>0.05).The measured values of CI and SVI at T2 in patients in group A were higher than those in group B,and the differences were significant(P<0.05).CONCLUSION For patients undergoing surgery for gastric or colon cancer under general anesthesia,the VT(6.0 mL/kg)+PEEP(5.0 cmH_(2)O)regimen was more effective than the VT(6.0 mL/kg)+PEEP(8.0 cmH_(2)O)regimen in protecting the lung function and ventilatory function of patients,and it had better effects on maintaining hemodynamic stability and reducing inflammatory reactions.展开更多
目的 探讨肺复张治疗急性A型主动脉夹层(acute type A aortic dissection,ATAAD)术后低氧血症的疗效及安全性。方法 选取2019年11月至2022年5月广西医科大学第一附属医院ATAAD术后低氧血症患者56例,将其随机分为肺复张组(n=36)及常规治...目的 探讨肺复张治疗急性A型主动脉夹层(acute type A aortic dissection,ATAAD)术后低氧血症的疗效及安全性。方法 选取2019年11月至2022年5月广西医科大学第一附属医院ATAAD术后低氧血症患者56例,将其随机分为肺复张组(n=36)及常规治疗组(n=20)。常规治疗组患者在肺保护性通气基础上行常规机械通气,肺复张组患者采用呼气末正压通气(positive end expiratory pressure,PEEP)递增法进行肺复张。比较两组患者治疗前后的动脉血气分析、呼吸力学指标、血流动力学指标和血清白细胞介素(interleukin,IL)-6及IL-10水平。结果 治疗后12h、24h,两组患者的动脉血氧分压(arterial partial pressure of oxygen,PaO_(2))、氧合指数(oxygenation index,OI)、肺静态顺应性(C_(stat))及肺动态顺应性(C_(dyn))均显著高于本组治疗前,肺泡动脉氧分压差[PO_(2)(A-a)]、呼吸指数(respiratory index,RI)、气道峰压(P_(peak))及气道平台压(P_(plat))均显著低于本组治疗前(P<0.05);肺复张组患者的PaO_(2)、OI、C_(stat)及C_(dyn)均显著高于常规治疗组,PO_(2)(A-a)、RI、P_(peak)及P_(plat)均显著低于常规治疗组(P<0.05)。肺复张组患者肺复张过程中收缩压及平均动脉压有所下降(P<0.05),中心静脉压有所升高(P<0.05),肺复张结束后均恢复至基线水平。治疗后12h,两组患者的血清IL-6和IL-10水平均显著低于本组治疗前(P<0.05)。结论 PEEP递增法肺复张可改善ATAAD术后低氧血症患者的氧合及肺顺应性,但对血流动力学存在一过性影响,治疗时应进行严密监测。展开更多
Background High positive end-expiratory pressure （PEEP） and low tidal volume （VT） ventilation is thought to be a protective ventilation strategy. It is hypothesized that the stabilization of collapsible alveoli du...Background High positive end-expiratory pressure （PEEP） and low tidal volume （VT） ventilation is thought to be a protective ventilation strategy. It is hypothesized that the stabilization of collapsible alveoli during expiration contributes to lung protection. However, this hypothesis came from analysis of indirect indices like the analysis of the pressure-volume curve of the lung. The purpose of this study was to investigate isolated healthy and injured rat lungs by means of alveolar microscopy, in which combination of PEEP and VT is beneficial with respect to alveolar stability （I-E%）. Methods Alveolar stability was investigated in isolated, non-perfused mechanically ventilated rat lungs. Injured lungs were compared with normal lungs. For both groups three PEEP settings （5, 10, 20 cmH20） were combined with three VT settings （6, 10, 15 ml/kg） resulting in nine PEEP-VT combinations per group. Analysis was performed by alveolar microscopy. Results In normal lungs alveolar stability persisted in all PEEP-VT combinations （I-E% （3.2±11.0）%）. There was no significant difference using different settings （P 〉0.01）. In contrast, alveoli in injured lungs were extremely instable at PEEP levels of 5 cmH20 （mean I-E% 100%） and 10 cmH2O （mean I-E% （30.7±16.8）%）; only at a PEEP of 20 cmH20 were alveoli stabilized （mean I-E% of （0.2±9.3）%）. Conclusions In isolated healthy lungs alveolar stability is almost unaffected by different settings of PEEP and VT. In isolated injured lungs only a high PEEP level of 20 cmH2O resulted in stabilized alveoli whereas lower PEEP levels are associated with alveolar instability.展开更多
Objective To choose one optimal extrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPe) for ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to compare two methods for choosing the optimal level o...Objective To choose one optimal extrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPe) for ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to compare two methods for choosing the optimal level of PEEPe.Methods Ten ventilated patients with COPD were included in the study. First, static intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi,st) was measured when PEEPe was zero, and the PEEPi,st was called PEEPi,stz. PEEPe at 0%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% and 100% of PEEPi,stz, respectively, were applied randomly. Respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and oxygen dynamics were recorded 30 minutes after the level of PEEPe was changed.Results When PEEPe was not higher than 80% of PEEPi,stz, no measurement changed significantly. When PEEPe was increased to 90% and 100% of PEEPi,stz, PEEPi,st, peak inspiratory pressure, plateau pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and central venous pressure increased significantly, P<0.01. Cardiac output and left ventricular work index decreased significantly, P<0.01. Oxygen delivery decreased significantly, P<0.05. When PEEPe was increased to 100% of PEEPi,stz, the right ventricular work index decreased significantly, P<0.05.Conclusion Eighty percent of PEEPi,stz was the upper limit of PEEPe. The results of the two methods used to set the level of PEEPe were identical.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Mechanical ventilation can lead to the severe impairment of the metabolic pathway of alveolar surfactants,inactivating alveolar surfactants and significantly reducing lung-chest compliance.The cardiopulmonary function of elderly patients usually reduced to a certain extent,and there are lung complications after surgical anesthesia,just like lung barotrauma caused by mechanical ventilation,atelectasis and postoperative hypoxemia.AIM To investigate the effects of different positive end expiratory pressures(PEEPs)and tidal volumes(VTs)on respiratory function,the degree of the inflammatory response and hemodynamic indexes in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.METHODS A total of 120 patients undergoing surgery for gastric or colon cancer under general anesthesia in Xinghua People's Hospital from January 2017 to January 2021 were randomly divided into Group A and Group B,with 60 cases in each group.The ventilation mode in Group A was VT(6.0 mL/kg)+PEEP(5.0 cmH_(2)O),while that in Group B was VT(6.0 mL/kg)+PEEP(8.0 cmH_(2)O).Blood gas parameters,respiratory mechanical parameters,inflammatory response indicators,hemodynamic indicators and related complications were compared between the two groups.RESULTS There were no significant differences in PaCO_(2),PaO_(2),oxygen or the examined indexes at T0 between group A and group B(P>0.05).The measured PaO_(2) value of patients in group A at T3 was higher than that in group B,and the difference was significant(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in peak airway pressure(P_(peak)),mean airway pressure or dynamic pulmonary compliance(Cdyn)at T0 between group A and group B(P>0.05).The measured P_(peak) value of patients in group A at T1 was higher than that in group B,and the difference was significant(P<0.05).The measured Cdyn value at T1 and T2 was greater than that in group B(P<0.05).Before surgery,there were no significant differences in tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),interleukin(IL)-6 or IL-10 between group A and group B(P>0.05).After 4 h,the measured values of TNF-αand IL-6 in group A were lower than those in group B,and the differences were significant(P<0.05).The IL-10 Level in group A was higher than that in group B(P<0.05).At T0,there were no significant differences in cardiac output,cardiac index(CI),stroke volume index(SVI)or mean arterial pressure between group A and group B(P>0.05).The measured values of CI and SVI at T2 in patients in group A were higher than those in group B,and the differences were significant(P<0.05).CONCLUSION For patients undergoing surgery for gastric or colon cancer under general anesthesia,the VT(6.0 mL/kg)+PEEP(5.0 cmH_(2)O)regimen was more effective than the VT(6.0 mL/kg)+PEEP(8.0 cmH_(2)O)regimen in protecting the lung function and ventilatory function of patients,and it had better effects on maintaining hemodynamic stability and reducing inflammatory reactions.
文摘目的 探讨肺复张治疗急性A型主动脉夹层(acute type A aortic dissection,ATAAD)术后低氧血症的疗效及安全性。方法 选取2019年11月至2022年5月广西医科大学第一附属医院ATAAD术后低氧血症患者56例,将其随机分为肺复张组(n=36)及常规治疗组(n=20)。常规治疗组患者在肺保护性通气基础上行常规机械通气,肺复张组患者采用呼气末正压通气(positive end expiratory pressure,PEEP)递增法进行肺复张。比较两组患者治疗前后的动脉血气分析、呼吸力学指标、血流动力学指标和血清白细胞介素(interleukin,IL)-6及IL-10水平。结果 治疗后12h、24h,两组患者的动脉血氧分压(arterial partial pressure of oxygen,PaO_(2))、氧合指数(oxygenation index,OI)、肺静态顺应性(C_(stat))及肺动态顺应性(C_(dyn))均显著高于本组治疗前,肺泡动脉氧分压差[PO_(2)(A-a)]、呼吸指数(respiratory index,RI)、气道峰压(P_(peak))及气道平台压(P_(plat))均显著低于本组治疗前(P<0.05);肺复张组患者的PaO_(2)、OI、C_(stat)及C_(dyn)均显著高于常规治疗组,PO_(2)(A-a)、RI、P_(peak)及P_(plat)均显著低于常规治疗组(P<0.05)。肺复张组患者肺复张过程中收缩压及平均动脉压有所下降(P<0.05),中心静脉压有所升高(P<0.05),肺复张结束后均恢复至基线水平。治疗后12h,两组患者的血清IL-6和IL-10水平均显著低于本组治疗前(P<0.05)。结论 PEEP递增法肺复张可改善ATAAD术后低氧血症患者的氧合及肺顺应性,但对血流动力学存在一过性影响,治疗时应进行严密监测。
文摘Background High positive end-expiratory pressure （PEEP） and low tidal volume （VT） ventilation is thought to be a protective ventilation strategy. It is hypothesized that the stabilization of collapsible alveoli during expiration contributes to lung protection. However, this hypothesis came from analysis of indirect indices like the analysis of the pressure-volume curve of the lung. The purpose of this study was to investigate isolated healthy and injured rat lungs by means of alveolar microscopy, in which combination of PEEP and VT is beneficial with respect to alveolar stability （I-E%）. Methods Alveolar stability was investigated in isolated, non-perfused mechanically ventilated rat lungs. Injured lungs were compared with normal lungs. For both groups three PEEP settings （5, 10, 20 cmH20） were combined with three VT settings （6, 10, 15 ml/kg） resulting in nine PEEP-VT combinations per group. Analysis was performed by alveolar microscopy. Results In normal lungs alveolar stability persisted in all PEEP-VT combinations （I-E% （3.2±11.0）%）. There was no significant difference using different settings （P 〉0.01）. In contrast, alveoli in injured lungs were extremely instable at PEEP levels of 5 cmH20 （mean I-E% 100%） and 10 cmH2O （mean I-E% （30.7±16.8）%）; only at a PEEP of 20 cmH20 were alveoli stabilized （mean I-E% of （0.2±9.3）%）. Conclusions In isolated healthy lungs alveolar stability is almost unaffected by different settings of PEEP and VT. In isolated injured lungs only a high PEEP level of 20 cmH2O resulted in stabilized alveoli whereas lower PEEP levels are associated with alveolar instability.
文摘Objective To choose one optimal extrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPe) for ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to compare two methods for choosing the optimal level of PEEPe.Methods Ten ventilated patients with COPD were included in the study. First, static intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi,st) was measured when PEEPe was zero, and the PEEPi,st was called PEEPi,stz. PEEPe at 0%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% and 100% of PEEPi,stz, respectively, were applied randomly. Respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and oxygen dynamics were recorded 30 minutes after the level of PEEPe was changed.Results When PEEPe was not higher than 80% of PEEPi,stz, no measurement changed significantly. When PEEPe was increased to 90% and 100% of PEEPi,stz, PEEPi,st, peak inspiratory pressure, plateau pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and central venous pressure increased significantly, P<0.01. Cardiac output and left ventricular work index decreased significantly, P<0.01. Oxygen delivery decreased significantly, P<0.05. When PEEPe was increased to 100% of PEEPi,stz, the right ventricular work index decreased significantly, P<0.05.Conclusion Eighty percent of PEEPi,stz was the upper limit of PEEPe. The results of the two methods used to set the level of PEEPe were identical.
