BACKGROUND Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy(PTED)is a procedure that is commonly used to treat lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis.Despite its less invasiveness,this surgery is rarely used to treat spi...BACKGROUND Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy(PTED)is a procedure that is commonly used to treat lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis.Despite its less invasiveness,this surgery is rarely used to treat spinal metastases.Percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)has been utilized to treat lumbar vertebral body metastases but it has not proven useful in treating sciatic patients.CASE SUMMARY A 68-year-old woman presented with low back pain and radicular symptoms.She couldn't straighten her legs because of severe pain.Computed tomography(CT)showed a mass lesion in the lung and bone destruction in the L4 vertebrae.The biopsy of the lung lesion revealed adenocarcinoma and the biopsy for L4 vertebrae revealed metastatic adenocarcinoma.PTED paired with PVP was performed on the patient due to the patient's poor overall physical state and short survival time.Transcatheter arterial embolization of vertebral tumors was performed before surgical resection to reduce excessive blood loss during the operation.The incision was scaled up with the TESSY technology.The pain was obviously relieved following the operation and no serious complications occurred.Postoperative CT showed that the decompression around the nerve root was successful,polymethyl methacrylate filling was satisfactory and the tumor tissue around the nerve root was obviously removed.During the 1-year follow-up period,the patient was in a stable condition.CONCLUSION PTED in combination with PVP is an effective and safe treatment for Lumbar single-level Spinal Column metastases with radicular symptoms.Because of the small sample size and short followup time,the long-term clinical efficacy of this method needs to be further confirmed.展开更多
背景经皮脊柱内镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的日间手术模式逐渐在国内开展,日间手术模式和住院手术模式对于患者心理状态的影响鲜有报道。目的探讨在日间手术与住院手术模式下经皮脊柱内镜手术对于患者心理状态的影响及差异。方法收集2020...背景经皮脊柱内镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的日间手术模式逐渐在国内开展,日间手术模式和住院手术模式对于患者心理状态的影响鲜有报道。目的探讨在日间手术与住院手术模式下经皮脊柱内镜手术对于患者心理状态的影响及差异。方法收集2020年1月—2023年1月在解放军总医院第一医学中心骨科接受经皮脊柱内镜腰椎间盘切除术(percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy,PELD)患者的临床资料,应用倾向评分匹配(propensity score matching,PSM)法对日间手术组和住院手术组患者按照1∶1进行匹配。比较日间手术组和住院手术组术前术后以及两组之间的Zung焦虑自评量表(self-assessment anxiety scale,SAS)评分、Zung抑郁自评量表(self-assessment depression scale,SDS)评分、下肢疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale of lower limbs,VAS-L)、背部疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale of back,VAS-B)、日本骨科医师协会评分(Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)。结果匹配后日间手术组和住院手术组各纳入50例患者。日间手术组中,男性31例,女性19例,平均年龄(43.06±15.22)岁,平均病程(20.39±38.41)个月;住院手术组中,男性29例,女性21例,平均年龄(41.40±14.84)岁,平均病程(22.27±40.38)个月,两组一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前,日间手术组与住院手术组心理学评分及异常率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后,两组各个时间点的SAS评分、SDS评分和异常率均优于术前(P<0.05)。日间手术组与住院手术组相比,出院时的SAS评分差异有统计学意义(34.52±3.43 vs 36.58±4.52,P<0.05),SAS评分异常率差异有统计学意义(16%vs 34%,P=0.038);术后1周的SAS评分差异有统计学意义(28.77±2.52 vs 31.18±3.17,P<0.01);术后其他时间点的SAS评分、SDS评分和异常率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。此外,两组术后3个月的临床疗效均优于术前(P<0.05);两组间术后3个月临床疗效的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论住院手术和日间手术模式下,PELD术后患者的焦虑和抑郁状态较术前均有改善。相较于住院手术模式,日间手术模式下,术后短期内处于焦虑状态的患者比例更低。展开更多
目的本研究通过meta分析评估经皮内镜椎间孔入路微创手术(PETFA)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效,为临床提供科学依据。方法检索PubMed、EMbase、Web of Science、CNKI和万方数据库,筛选随机对照试验(RCTs),使用Rev Man 5.3软件,采用相对风险(...目的本研究通过meta分析评估经皮内镜椎间孔入路微创手术(PETFA)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效,为临床提供科学依据。方法检索PubMed、EMbase、Web of Science、CNKI和万方数据库,筛选随机对照试验(RCTs),使用Rev Man 5.3软件,采用相对风险(RR)和标准化平均差异(SMD)进行统计。结果纳入8篇高质量研究,涉及462例患者。结果显示PETFA手术的多项指标均优于传统手术,包括更短的手术时间[平均差(MD)=-6.51],较少的术中出血(MD=-7.09),更短的住院时间(MD=-2.85),以及更佳的术后疼痛缓解(MD=-1.68)和功能恢复(MD=-0.89)。结论PETFA微创手术在治疗腰椎间盘突出症方面具显著优势,推荐在临床中广泛应用。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy(PTED)is a procedure that is commonly used to treat lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis.Despite its less invasiveness,this surgery is rarely used to treat spinal metastases.Percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)has been utilized to treat lumbar vertebral body metastases but it has not proven useful in treating sciatic patients.CASE SUMMARY A 68-year-old woman presented with low back pain and radicular symptoms.She couldn't straighten her legs because of severe pain.Computed tomography(CT)showed a mass lesion in the lung and bone destruction in the L4 vertebrae.The biopsy of the lung lesion revealed adenocarcinoma and the biopsy for L4 vertebrae revealed metastatic adenocarcinoma.PTED paired with PVP was performed on the patient due to the patient's poor overall physical state and short survival time.Transcatheter arterial embolization of vertebral tumors was performed before surgical resection to reduce excessive blood loss during the operation.The incision was scaled up with the TESSY technology.The pain was obviously relieved following the operation and no serious complications occurred.Postoperative CT showed that the decompression around the nerve root was successful,polymethyl methacrylate filling was satisfactory and the tumor tissue around the nerve root was obviously removed.During the 1-year follow-up period,the patient was in a stable condition.CONCLUSION PTED in combination with PVP is an effective and safe treatment for Lumbar single-level Spinal Column metastases with radicular symptoms.Because of the small sample size and short followup time,the long-term clinical efficacy of this method needs to be further confirmed.
文摘背景经皮脊柱内镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的日间手术模式逐渐在国内开展,日间手术模式和住院手术模式对于患者心理状态的影响鲜有报道。目的探讨在日间手术与住院手术模式下经皮脊柱内镜手术对于患者心理状态的影响及差异。方法收集2020年1月—2023年1月在解放军总医院第一医学中心骨科接受经皮脊柱内镜腰椎间盘切除术(percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy,PELD)患者的临床资料,应用倾向评分匹配(propensity score matching,PSM)法对日间手术组和住院手术组患者按照1∶1进行匹配。比较日间手术组和住院手术组术前术后以及两组之间的Zung焦虑自评量表(self-assessment anxiety scale,SAS)评分、Zung抑郁自评量表(self-assessment depression scale,SDS)评分、下肢疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale of lower limbs,VAS-L)、背部疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale of back,VAS-B)、日本骨科医师协会评分(Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)。结果匹配后日间手术组和住院手术组各纳入50例患者。日间手术组中,男性31例,女性19例,平均年龄(43.06±15.22)岁,平均病程(20.39±38.41)个月;住院手术组中,男性29例,女性21例,平均年龄(41.40±14.84)岁,平均病程(22.27±40.38)个月,两组一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前,日间手术组与住院手术组心理学评分及异常率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后,两组各个时间点的SAS评分、SDS评分和异常率均优于术前(P<0.05)。日间手术组与住院手术组相比,出院时的SAS评分差异有统计学意义(34.52±3.43 vs 36.58±4.52,P<0.05),SAS评分异常率差异有统计学意义(16%vs 34%,P=0.038);术后1周的SAS评分差异有统计学意义(28.77±2.52 vs 31.18±3.17,P<0.01);术后其他时间点的SAS评分、SDS评分和异常率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。此外,两组术后3个月的临床疗效均优于术前(P<0.05);两组间术后3个月临床疗效的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论住院手术和日间手术模式下,PELD术后患者的焦虑和抑郁状态较术前均有改善。相较于住院手术模式,日间手术模式下,术后短期内处于焦虑状态的患者比例更低。
文摘目的本研究通过meta分析评估经皮内镜椎间孔入路微创手术(PETFA)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效,为临床提供科学依据。方法检索PubMed、EMbase、Web of Science、CNKI和万方数据库,筛选随机对照试验(RCTs),使用Rev Man 5.3软件,采用相对风险(RR)和标准化平均差异(SMD)进行统计。结果纳入8篇高质量研究,涉及462例患者。结果显示PETFA手术的多项指标均优于传统手术,包括更短的手术时间[平均差(MD)=-6.51],较少的术中出血(MD=-7.09),更短的住院时间(MD=-2.85),以及更佳的术后疼痛缓解(MD=-1.68)和功能恢复(MD=-0.89)。结论PETFA微创手术在治疗腰椎间盘突出症方面具显著优势,推荐在临床中广泛应用。
