Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome （POTS） has been recognized since at least 1940.A review of the literature identifies differences in the definition for this condition and wide variations in treatment and ou...Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome （POTS） has been recognized since at least 1940.A review of the literature identifies differences in the definition for this condition and wide variations in treatment and outcomes.This syndrome appears to describe a group of conditions with differing pathophysiology,which requires treatment tailored to the true underlying disorder.Patients need to be fully evaluated to guide treatment.Further research is required to effectively classify the range of underlying pathophysioiogy that can produce this syndrome and to guide optimal management.展开更多
Background Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome （POTS） is a common clinical problem in children and adolescents. The previous diagnostic approach to POTS of children and adolescents is based on a series of test...Background Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome （POTS） is a common clinical problem in children and adolescents. The previous diagnostic approach to POTS of children and adolescents is based on a series of tests to exclude all other causes, which is time and medical resource consuming. Recently, a new diagnostic approach has been developed. The present study was designed to statistically analyze the results of clinical investigation items and the cost for the diagnosis of POTS in children patients, and evaluate cost changes in the diagnosis of POTS. Methods A total of 315 children patients were divided into two groups according to diagnosis period, including group I diagnosed in 2002-2006 （100 cases） and group II in 2007-2010 （215 cases） and the diagnostic item-based distribution of the cost was analyzed. The diagnostic costs were compared between two groups using SPSS17.0. Results The per-capita cost of diagnosis in group I was （621.95±2.1.10） Yuan, costs of diagnostic tests （head-up tilt test standing test, etc） accounted for 8.68% and the exclusive tests for 91.32%. The per-capita cost of diagnosis in group II was （542.69±2.3.14） Yuan, diagnostic tests accounted for 10.50% and exclusive tests for 89.50%. Comparison of the total cost of diagnostic tests between the two groups showed significant differences （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The cost of POTS diagnosis has been declined in recent years, but the cost of exclusive diagnosis is still its major part.展开更多
文摘Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome （POTS） has been recognized since at least 1940.A review of the literature identifies differences in the definition for this condition and wide variations in treatment and outcomes.This syndrome appears to describe a group of conditions with differing pathophysiology,which requires treatment tailored to the true underlying disorder.Patients need to be fully evaluated to guide treatment.Further research is required to effectively classify the range of underlying pathophysioiogy that can produce this syndrome and to guide optimal management.
文摘Background Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome （POTS） is a common clinical problem in children and adolescents. The previous diagnostic approach to POTS of children and adolescents is based on a series of tests to exclude all other causes, which is time and medical resource consuming. Recently, a new diagnostic approach has been developed. The present study was designed to statistically analyze the results of clinical investigation items and the cost for the diagnosis of POTS in children patients, and evaluate cost changes in the diagnosis of POTS. Methods A total of 315 children patients were divided into two groups according to diagnosis period, including group I diagnosed in 2002-2006 （100 cases） and group II in 2007-2010 （215 cases） and the diagnostic item-based distribution of the cost was analyzed. The diagnostic costs were compared between two groups using SPSS17.0. Results The per-capita cost of diagnosis in group I was （621.95±2.1.10） Yuan, costs of diagnostic tests （head-up tilt test standing test, etc） accounted for 8.68% and the exclusive tests for 91.32%. The per-capita cost of diagnosis in group II was （542.69±2.3.14） Yuan, diagnostic tests accounted for 10.50% and exclusive tests for 89.50%. Comparison of the total cost of diagnostic tests between the two groups showed significant differences （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The cost of POTS diagnosis has been declined in recent years, but the cost of exclusive diagnosis is still its major part.
