Significance of preoperative detrusor contractility to the postoperative assessment of prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Objective To study the value of preoperative detrusor contractility to the outcome assessment of prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH) . Methods A total of 109 patients with BPH were analyzed. Their ages ranged from 62 to 83 years with a mean of

Major liver resections,perioperative issues and posthepatectomy liver failure:A comprehensive update for the anesthesiologist

Significant advances in surgical techniques and relevant medium-and long-term outcomes over the past two decades have led to a substantial expansion in the indications for major liver resections.To support these outstanding results and to reduce perioperative complications,anesthesiologists must address and master key perioperative issues(preoperative assessment,proactive intraoperative anesthesia strategies,and implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery approach).Intensive care unit monitoring immediately following liver surgery remains a subject of active and often unresolved debate.Among postoperative complications,posthepatectomy liver failure(PHLF)occurs in different grades of severity(A-C)and frequency(9%-30%),and it is the main cause of 90-d postoperative mortality.PHLF,recently redefined with pragmatic clinical criteria and perioperative scores,can be predicted,prevented,or anticipated.This review highlights:(1)The systemic consequences of surgical manipulations anesthesiologistsmust respond to or prevent,to positively impact PHLF(a proactive approach);and(2)the maximal intensivetreatment of PHLF,including artificial options,mainly based,so far,on Acute Liver Failure treatment(s),to buytime waiting for the recovery of the native liver or,when appropriate and in very selected cases,toward livertransplant.Such a clinical context requires a strong commitment to surgeons,anesthesiologists,and intensivists towork together,for a fruitful collaboration in a mandatory clinical continuum.

Preoperative nuclear stress testing in the very old patient population

BACKGROUND Elderly patients awaiting moderate to high-risk surgery may undergo nuclear stress testing(NST)in order to evaluate their cardiovascular risk.The prognostic utility of such testing in the very elderly(≥85 years)has yet to be fully evaluated.Octogenarians and nonogenarians frequently have a number of concurrent conditions including a high rate of coronary disease,and therefore the prognostic value of NST for their preoperative risk assessment has been questioned.Our evaluation assesses the ability of nuclear stress testing to predict peri-operative cardiac outcomes in this patient population.AIM To investigate the ability of NST to predict peri-operative cardiac outcomes in elderly patients awaiting moderate to high-risk surgery.METHODS Patients≥85 years undergoing pre-operative NST were retrospectively evaluated.Patients undergoing low-risk surgery were excluded.Major adverse cardiac events(MACE)were considered any adverse event that occurred prior to discharge and included acute heart failure,arrhythmia,acute myocardial infarction,unstable angina,or death.Associations between patient risk factors,MACE,and the obtained results of the pre-operative stress testing,ejection fraction(<40%or≥40%),summed stress score(≤8,≥9),and the summed difference score(≤0,>0)were analyzed.RESULTS A total of 69 patients(mean age 88±2.6 years,31 males)underwent nuclear stress testing prior to surgery.There were 41(60%)patients found to have an abnormal NST.Sixteen(23%)patients were noted to experience post-operative MACE.No significant associations between risk factors and MACE were noted.Patients with an abnormal NST and/or a summed stress score≥9 weresignificantly(P<0.01)more likely to develop peri-operative MACE.CONCLUSION Indicated preoperative NST is useful to assess pre-operative risk in elderly patients≥85 years undergoing moderate to high-risk surgery.

A novel comprehensive ALPPS preoperative risk assessment (CAPRA) score is beneficial in creating a treatment strategy for advanced liver malignancy

Curability and safety are essential for patients with advanced liver malignancy undergoing extended liver resection.If the future liver remnant(FLR)volume is insufficient,portal embolization with or without hepatic arterial or venous embolization or a conventional two-stage hepatectomy(TSH)can be performed(1,2).Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy(ALPPS)was introduced in 2007.

Emergence of bariatric psychiatry as a new subspecialty

Bariatric surgery is the branch of surgery aimed at helping a person with obesity lose weight.The implementation of surgical treatment of obesity is growing at an impressive rate.As expected,the expanding implementation of bariatric procedures has progres-sively revealed critical issues that were not evident when the number of obese patients treated with surgery was relatively small.One critical issue is the importance of mental health assessment and care of bariatric patients.The aim of this review is to provide readers with an up-to-date summary of the goals,methods,and clinical strategies of bariatric psychiatry.The aims can be grouped into three distinct categories.First,to ascertain that there are no psychiatric contraindications to safe bariatric surgery.Second,to diagnose and treat pre-surgery mental conditions that could predict poor weight loss.Third,to diagnose and treat post-surgery mental conditions associated with poor quality of life.Although bariatric psychiatry has gained the status of a new subspecialty within the field of mental health and psychopathology,many clinical questions remain unsolved.We need more long-term data on outcome measures such as quality of life,adherence to behavioral guidelines,risk of suicide,and postsurgery prevalence of psychological disturbances and mental disorders.