Henry IV is an important figure in Shakespeare's history plays. Many of his personalities and ways of governing the state echo the Italian politician Machiavelli's ideas of a good prince, who should be a fierc...Henry IV is an important figure in Shakespeare's history plays. Many of his personalities and ways of governing the state echo the Italian politician Machiavelli's ideas of a good prince, who should be a fierce lion as well as an astute fox. But Henry IV is not a completely Machiavellian prince. His melancholy reflects Shakespeare's concerns about the legal inheritance of the throne, which is essentially different from Machiavelli's practical morality.展开更多
In the past fifty years,scholars have examined fields of England’s politics in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries;however,the politics of mobility has not been extensively studied.This article addresses Prince H...In the past fifty years,scholars have examined fields of England’s politics in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries;however,the politics of mobility has not been extensively studied.This article addresses Prince Hal and King Henry Ⅴ’s wildness within mobility as an important role to the advancement of metaphorical wildness.King Henry Ⅴ’s“wildness”is an element that is often discussed in Shakespeare’s Henry Ⅳ and Henry Ⅴ.Locating in Prince Hal’s wandering to uncertainty,unsettledness and changeability a potential to unveil the disguised aspects of the assumed politics,Shakespeare focuses on the interlocking aspect of wildness and mobility.He calls for exploring a recognition of ideal character and tactical figure into a transitional strategy of it.In reorganising civil culture,Shakespeare sees the possibility of re-configuring the approach from aimless roaming to communal mobility.It is the approach of these mobilities through ways of wildnes that permits us to explore between wildness as a strategy and as a metaphor,and to understand in the notion of early modern mobility that is as tactical in ambition as it is consequential in such contexts of Shakespeare.展开更多
目的:探讨中西医结合集束化护理对老年胆囊切除术的护理效果。方法:选取120例行胆囊切除术的老年患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各60例。对照组予常规护理,观察组予中西医结合集束化护理。观察两组术后疼痛情况、...目的:探讨中西医结合集束化护理对老年胆囊切除术的护理效果。方法:选取120例行胆囊切除术的老年患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各60例。对照组予常规护理,观察组予中西医结合集束化护理。观察两组术后疼痛情况、并发症及护理满意度。结果:两组术后Prince-Henry评分均呈下降趋势,组内不同时间段间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后12 h、24 h、48 h Prince-Henry评分均低于对照组(P<0.01)。老年胆囊切除术后并发症以胆漏、胆囊残株炎、切口感染、皮下气肿为主。切口感染率对照组为6.7%,观察组为0;并发症总发生率对照组为20.0%,观察组为6.7%,组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。总满意率对照组为75.0%,观察组为93.3%,组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:中西医结合集束化护理对老年胆囊切除术患者止痛效果显著,能有效降低术后并发症,提高护理满意度。展开更多
文摘Henry IV is an important figure in Shakespeare's history plays. Many of his personalities and ways of governing the state echo the Italian politician Machiavelli's ideas of a good prince, who should be a fierce lion as well as an astute fox. But Henry IV is not a completely Machiavellian prince. His melancholy reflects Shakespeare's concerns about the legal inheritance of the throne, which is essentially different from Machiavelli's practical morality.
基金This article is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(SWU1909514)the China Scholarship Council(201906990051).
文摘In the past fifty years,scholars have examined fields of England’s politics in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries;however,the politics of mobility has not been extensively studied.This article addresses Prince Hal and King Henry Ⅴ’s wildness within mobility as an important role to the advancement of metaphorical wildness.King Henry Ⅴ’s“wildness”is an element that is often discussed in Shakespeare’s Henry Ⅳ and Henry Ⅴ.Locating in Prince Hal’s wandering to uncertainty,unsettledness and changeability a potential to unveil the disguised aspects of the assumed politics,Shakespeare focuses on the interlocking aspect of wildness and mobility.He calls for exploring a recognition of ideal character and tactical figure into a transitional strategy of it.In reorganising civil culture,Shakespeare sees the possibility of re-configuring the approach from aimless roaming to communal mobility.It is the approach of these mobilities through ways of wildnes that permits us to explore between wildness as a strategy and as a metaphor,and to understand in the notion of early modern mobility that is as tactical in ambition as it is consequential in such contexts of Shakespeare.
文摘目的:探讨中西医结合集束化护理对老年胆囊切除术的护理效果。方法:选取120例行胆囊切除术的老年患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各60例。对照组予常规护理,观察组予中西医结合集束化护理。观察两组术后疼痛情况、并发症及护理满意度。结果:两组术后Prince-Henry评分均呈下降趋势,组内不同时间段间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后12 h、24 h、48 h Prince-Henry评分均低于对照组(P<0.01)。老年胆囊切除术后并发症以胆漏、胆囊残株炎、切口感染、皮下气肿为主。切口感染率对照组为6.7%,观察组为0;并发症总发生率对照组为20.0%,观察组为6.7%,组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。总满意率对照组为75.0%,观察组为93.3%,组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:中西医结合集束化护理对老年胆囊切除术患者止痛效果显著,能有效降低术后并发症,提高护理满意度。
