AIM: To compare the clinical efficacies of two surgical procedures for hemorrhoid rectal prolapse with outlet obstruction-induced constipation.METHODS: One hundred eight inpatients who underwent surgery for outlet obs...AIM: To compare the clinical efficacies of two surgical procedures for hemorrhoid rectal prolapse with outlet obstruction-induced constipation.METHODS: One hundred eight inpatients who underwent surgery for outlet obstructive constipation caused by internal rectal prolapse and circumferential hemorrhoids at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from June 2012 to June 2013 were prospectively included in the study.The patients with rectal prolapse hemorrhoids with outlet obstructioninduced constipation were randomly divided into two groups to undergo either a procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)(n = 54) or conventional surgery(n = 54; control group).Short-term(operative time,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative urinary retention,postoperative perianal edema,and postoperative pain) and long-term(postoperative anal stenosis,postoperative sensory anal incontinence,postoperative recurrence,and postoperative difficulty in defecation) clinical effects were compared between the two groups.The short- and long-term efficacies of the two procedures were determined.RESULTS: In terms of short-term clinical effects,operative time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the PPH group than in the control group(24.36 ± 5.16 min vs 44.27 ± 6.57 min,2.1 ± 1.4 d vs 3.6 ± 2.3 d,both P < 0.01).The incidence of postoperative urinary retention was higher in the PPH group than in the control group,but the difference was not statistically significant(48.15% vs 37.04%).Theincidence of perianal edema was significantly lower in the PPH group(11.11% vs 42.60%,P < 0.05).The visual analogue scale scores at 24 h after surgery,first defecation,and one week after surgery were significantly lower in the PPH group(2.9 ± 0.9 vs 8.3 ± 1.1,2.0 ± 0.5 vs 6.5 ± 0.8,and 1.7 ± 0.5 vs 5.0 ± 0.7,respectively,all P < 0.01).With regard to long-term clinical effects,the incidence of anal stenosis was lower in the PPH group than in the control group,but the difference was not significant(1.85% vs 5.56%).The incidence of sensory anal incontinence was significantly lower in the PPH group(3.70% vs 12.96%,P < 0.05).The incidences of recurrent internal rectal prolapse and difficulty in defecation were lower in the PPH group than in the control group,but the differences were not significant(11.11% vs 16.67% and 12.96% vs 24.07%,respectively).CONCLUSION: PPH is superior to the traditional surgery in the management of outlet obstructive constipation caused by internal rectal prolapse with circumferential hemorrhoids.展开更多
AIM: To report our experience with perineal repair(Delorme's procedure) of rectal prolapse with particular focus on treatment of the recurrence.METHODS: Clinical records of 40 patients who underwent Delorme's ...AIM: To report our experience with perineal repair(Delorme's procedure) of rectal prolapse with particular focus on treatment of the recurrence.METHODS: Clinical records of 40 patients who underwent Delorme's procedure between 2003 and 2014 were reviewed to obtain the following data: Gender; duration of symptoms, length of prolapse, operation time, ASA grade, length of post-operative stay, procedure-related complications, development and treatment of recurrent prolapse. Analysis of post-operative complications, rate and time of recurrence and factors influencing the choice of the procedure for recurrent disease was conducted. Continuous variables were expressed as the median with interquartile range(IQR). Statistical analysis was carried out using the Fisher exact test.RESULTS: Median age at the time of surgery was 76 years(IQR: 71-81.5) and there were 38 females and 2 males. The median duration of symptoms was 6 mo(IQR: 3.5-12) and majority of patients presented electively whereas four patients presented in the emergency department with irreducible rectal prolapse. The median length of prolapse was 5 cm(IQR: 5-7), median operative time was 100 min(IQR: 85-120) and median post-operative stay was 4 d(IQR: 3-6). Approximately16% of the patients suffered minor complications such as- urinary retention, delayed defaecation and infected haematoma. One patient died constituting postoperative mortality of 2.5%. Median follow-up was 6.5 mo(IQR: 2.15-16). Overall recurrence rate was 28%(n = 12). Recurrence rate for patients undergoing an urgent Delorme's procedure who presented as an emergency was higher(75.0%) compared to those treated electively(20.5%), P value 0.034. Median time interval from surgery to the development of recurrence was 16 mo(IQR: 5-30). There were three patients who developed an early recurrence, within two weeks of the initial procedure. The management of the recurrent prolapse was as follows: No further intervention(n = 1), repeat Delorme's procedure(n = 3), Altemeier's procedure(n = 5) and rectopexy with faecal diversion(n = 3). One patient was lost during follow up.CONCLUSION: Delorme's procedure is a suitable treatment for rectal prolapse due to low morbidity and mortality and acceptable rate of recurrence. The management of the recurrent rectal prolapse is often restricted to the pelvic approach by the same patientrelated factors that influenced the choice of the initial operation, i.e., Delorme's procedure. Early recurrence developing within days or weeks often represents a technical failure and may require abdominal rectopexy with faecal diversion.展开更多
BACKGROUND Hemorrhoidal prolapse is a common benign disease with a high incidence.The treatment procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)remains an operative method used for internal hemorrhoid prolapse.Although it ...BACKGROUND Hemorrhoidal prolapse is a common benign disease with a high incidence.The treatment procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)remains an operative method used for internal hemorrhoid prolapse.Although it is related to less posoperative pain,faster recovery and shorter hospital stays,the postoperative recurrence rate is higher than that of the Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy(MMH).We have considered that recurrence could be due to shortage of the pulling-up effect.This issue may be overcome by using lower purse-string sutures[modified-PPH(M-PPH)].AIM To compare the therapeutic effects and the patients’satisfaction after M-PPH,PPH and MMH.METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 1163 patients(M-PPH,461;original PPH,321;MMH,381)with severe hemorrhoids(stage III/IV)who were admitted to The 2nd Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from 2012 to 2014.Early postoperative complications,efficacy,postoperative anal dysfunction and patient satisfaction were compared among the three groups.Established criteria were used to assess short-and long-term postoperative complications.A visual analog scale was used to evaluate postoperative pain.Follow-up was conducted 5 years postoperatively.RESULT Length of hospital stay and operating time were significantly longer in the MMH group(8.05±2.50 d,19.98±4.21 min;P<0.0001)than in other groups.The incidence of postoperative anastomotic bleeding was significantly lower after MPPH than after PPH or MMH(1.9%,5.1%and 3.7%;n=9,16 and 14;respectively).There was a significantly higher rate of sensation of rectal tenesmus after M-PPH than after MMH or PPH(15%,8%and 10%;n=69,30 and 32;respectively).There was a significantly lower rate of recurrence after M-PPH than after PPH(8.7%and 18.8%,n=40 and 61;P<0.0001).The incidence of postoperative anal incontinence differed significantly only between the MMH and M-PPH groups(1.3%and 4.3%,n=5 and 20;P=0.04).Patient satisfaction was significantly greater after M-PPH than after other surgeries.CONCLUSION M-PPH has many advantages for severe hemorrhoids(Goligher stage III/IV),with a low rate of anastomotic bleeding and recurrence and a very high rate of patient satisfaction.展开更多
Objective:To summarize the experience without hemorrhage after PPH of 218 patients with mixed hemorrhoid.Methods:PPH(Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids)was performed routinely.During operation,it is paid attention...Objective:To summarize the experience without hemorrhage after PPH of 218 patients with mixed hemorrhoid.Methods:PPH(Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids)was performed routinely.During operation,it is paid attention that the hemorrhoid artery should be completely mutilated,the anastomat should be squeezed before and after the anastomosis,the anastomosis should be carefully examined,the hemostasis should be completely performed,and relevant hemostasis measures should be taken after the operation.Results:None of the 218 patients had postoperative hemorrhage.Conclusion:Relevant measures can be taken after operation to prevent the occurrence of postoperative hemorrhage.展开更多
BACKGROUND Although rectal prolapse is not a life-threatening condition,it can cause defecation disorders,anal incontinence,sensory abnormalities,and other problems that can seriously affect quality of life.AIM To stu...BACKGROUND Although rectal prolapse is not a life-threatening condition,it can cause defecation disorders,anal incontinence,sensory abnormalities,and other problems that can seriously affect quality of life.AIM To study the efficacy of the modified Gant procedure for elderly women with internal rectal prolapse.METHODS Sixty-three elderly female patients with internal rectal prolapse underwent the modified Gant procedure.The preoperative and postoperative anal symptoms,Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life(PAC-QOL),Wexner incontinence score,incontinence quality of life score,and complications(massive hemorrhage,infection,anorectal stenosis,and anorectal fistula)were compared.RESULTS The improvement rates of postoperative symptoms were defecation disorders(84.5%),anal distention(69.6%),defecation sensation(81.4%),frequent defecation(88.7%),and anal incontinence(42.9%)(P<0.05).All dimensions and total scores of the PAC-QOL after the procedure were lower than those before the operation(P<0.05).The postoperative anal incontinence score and Wexner score were significantly lower than those before the procedure(P<0.05).The quality of life and total scores of postoperative anal incontinence were significantly higher than those before the procedure(P<0.05).There were no serious complications and no deaths.CONCLUSION The modified Gant procedure has significant advantages in the treatment of elderly women with internal rectal prolapse.展开更多
Patients with an incarcerated rectal prolapse usually present in the emergency department where manual reduction is first attempted. If reduction is unsuccessful, an emergency laparotomy and internal reduction is requ...Patients with an incarcerated rectal prolapse usually present in the emergency department where manual reduction is first attempted. If reduction is unsuccessful, an emergency laparotomy and internal reduction is required. Edema in the rectal and perineal tissues and impaired blood flow are the main factors for a high percentage of anastomotic leaks. The traditional single stage perineal rectosigmoidectomy is not a safe surgical procedure for treating incarcerated or strangulated rectal prolapses associated with severe edema. Herein we report a case of an incarcerated rectal prolapse treated with the Notaras procedure.展开更多
BACKGROUND Obstructed defecation syndrome(ODS) is a widespread disease in the world.Rectocele is the most common cause of ODS in females. Multiple procedures have been performed to treat rectocele and no procedure has...BACKGROUND Obstructed defecation syndrome(ODS) is a widespread disease in the world.Rectocele is the most common cause of ODS in females. Multiple procedures have been performed to treat rectocele and no procedure has been accepted as the gold-standard procedure. Stapled transanal rectal resection(STARR) has been widely used. However, there are still some disadvantages in this procedure and its effectiveness in anterior wall repair is doubtful. Therefore, new procedures are expected to further improve the treatment of rectocele.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel rectocele repair combining Khubchandani's procedure with stapled posterior rectal wall resection.METHODS A cohort of 93 patients were recruited in our randomized clinical trial and were divided into two different groups in a randomized manner. Forty-two patients(group A) underwent Khubchandani's procedure with stapled posterior rectal wall resection and 51 patients(group B) underwent the STARR procedure.Follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo after the operation. Preoperative and postoperative ODS scores and depth of rectocele, postoperative complications, blood loss, and hospital stay of each patient were documented. All data were analyzed statistically to evaluate the efficiency and safety of our procedure.RESULTS In group A, 42 patients underwent Khubchandani's procedure with stapled posterior rectal wall resection and 34 were followed until the final analysis. In group B, 51 patients underwent the STARR procedure and 37 were followed until the final analysis. Mean operative duration was 41.47 ± 6.43 min(group A) vs39.24 ± 6.53 min(group B). Mean hospital stay was 3.15 ± 0.70 d(group A) vs 3.14± 0.54 d(group B). Mean blood loss was 10.91 ± 2.52 mL(group A) vs 10.14 ± 1.86 m L(group B). Mean ODS score in group A declined from 16.50 ± 2.06 before operation to 5.06 ± 1.07 one year after the operation, whereas in group B it was17.11 ± 2.57 before operation and 6.03 ± 2.63 one year after the operation. Mean depth of rectocele decreased from 4.32 ± 0.96 cm(group A) vs 4.18 ± 0.95 cm(group B) preoperatively to 1.19 ± 0.43 cm(group A) vs 1.54 ± 0.82 cm(group B)one year after operation. No other serious complications, such as rectovaginal fistula, perianal sepsis, or deaths, were recorded. After 12 mo of follow-up, 30 patients'(30/34, 88.2%) final outcomes were judged as effective and 4(4/34,11.8%) as moderate in group A, whereas in group B, 30(30/37, 81.1%) patients' outcomes were judged as effective, 5(5/37, 13.5%) as moderate, and 2(2/37,5.4%) as poor.CONCLUSION Khubchandani's procedure combined with stapled posterior rectal wall resection is an effective, feasible, and safe procedure with minor trauma to rectocele.展开更多
Rectal prolapse is a circumferential,full-thickness protrusion of the rectum through the anus.It is a rare condition,and only affects 0.5%of the general population.Multiple treatment modalities have been described,whi...Rectal prolapse is a circumferential,full-thickness protrusion of the rectum through the anus.It is a rare condition,and only affects 0.5%of the general population.Multiple treatment modalities have been described,which have changed significantly over time.Particularly in the last decade,laparoscopic and robotic surgical approaches with different mobilization techniques,combined with medical therapies,have been widely implemented.Because patients have presented with a wide range of complaints(ranging from abdominal discomfort to incomplete bowel evacuation,mucus discharge,constipation,diarrhea,and fecal incontinence),understanding the extent of complaints and ruling out differential diagnoses are essential for choosing a tailored surgical procedure.It is crucial to assess these additional symptoms and their severities using preoperative scoring systems.Additionally,radiological and physiological evaluations may explain some vague symptoms and reveal concomitant pelvic disorders.However,there is no consensus on or standardization of the optimal extent of dissection,type of procedure,and materials used for rectal fixation;this makes providing maximum benefits to patients with minimal complications difficult.Even recent publications and systematic reviews have not recommended the most appropriate treatment options.This review explains the appropriate diagnostic tools for different conditions and summarizes the current treatment approaches based on existing literature and expert opinions.展开更多
Fecal incontinence is a common symptom among patients with rectal prolapse.Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency(PNTML)testing can serve as a reference indicator for predicting the outcomes of rectal prolapse surgery,...Fecal incontinence is a common symptom among patients with rectal prolapse.Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency(PNTML)testing can serve as a reference indicator for predicting the outcomes of rectal prolapse surgery,thereby assisting surgeons in formulating more appropriate surgical plans.The direct correlation between preoperative PNTML testing results and postoperative fecal incontinence in patients with rectal prolapse remains a contentious issue,necessitating further clarification.Thus,we analyze the existing publications from both clinical and statistical perspectives to comprehensively evaluate the accuracy of preoperative PNTML testing in rectal prolapse and provide some feasible statistical solutions.展开更多
目的探讨痔上黏膜环形切除订合术(procedure for prolapsed and hemorrhoids,PPH)加外痔切除术的临床疗效。方法治疗组48例采用PPH加外痔切除术,对照组48例采用外剥内扎术。结果治疗组手术时间、术后各合并症评分少于对照组,两组比较差...目的探讨痔上黏膜环形切除订合术(procedure for prolapsed and hemorrhoids,PPH)加外痔切除术的临床疗效。方法治疗组48例采用PPH加外痔切除术,对照组48例采用外剥内扎术。结果治疗组手术时间、术后各合并症评分少于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组手术疗效与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗组住院费用多于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 PPH加外痔切除术临床疗效显著。展开更多
目的：研究吻合器痔上粘膜环切术（procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids,PPH）吻合器击发位置对内痔疗效及并发症的影响。方法：收集汕头大学医学院第一附属医院2004年至2009年的198例内痔患者,随机分成3组,并通过比较3组志愿者PPH...目的：研究吻合器痔上粘膜环切术（procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids,PPH）吻合器击发位置对内痔疗效及并发症的影响。方法：收集汕头大学医学院第一附属医院2004年至2009年的198例内痔患者,随机分成3组,并通过比较3组志愿者PPH吻合器分别在齿状线以上1.5cm、2.5cm、3.0cm三个击发位置所产生的临床效果,对各组术后并发症发生情况进行描述分析。结果：PPH吻合器击发位置在齿状线以上1.5cm组与2.5cm组、3.0cm组的临床治疗效果,术后肛周疼痛及吻合口出血并发症比较有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;2.5cm组与3.0cm组的临床治疗效果比较无统计学差异（P〉0.05）。结论：PPH吻合器击发位置在齿状线以上2.5-3.0cm的临床治疗效果好,同时可减少术后肛周疼痛及出血等并发症。展开更多
文摘AIM: To compare the clinical efficacies of two surgical procedures for hemorrhoid rectal prolapse with outlet obstruction-induced constipation.METHODS: One hundred eight inpatients who underwent surgery for outlet obstructive constipation caused by internal rectal prolapse and circumferential hemorrhoids at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from June 2012 to June 2013 were prospectively included in the study.The patients with rectal prolapse hemorrhoids with outlet obstructioninduced constipation were randomly divided into two groups to undergo either a procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)(n = 54) or conventional surgery(n = 54; control group).Short-term(operative time,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative urinary retention,postoperative perianal edema,and postoperative pain) and long-term(postoperative anal stenosis,postoperative sensory anal incontinence,postoperative recurrence,and postoperative difficulty in defecation) clinical effects were compared between the two groups.The short- and long-term efficacies of the two procedures were determined.RESULTS: In terms of short-term clinical effects,operative time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the PPH group than in the control group(24.36 ± 5.16 min vs 44.27 ± 6.57 min,2.1 ± 1.4 d vs 3.6 ± 2.3 d,both P < 0.01).The incidence of postoperative urinary retention was higher in the PPH group than in the control group,but the difference was not statistically significant(48.15% vs 37.04%).Theincidence of perianal edema was significantly lower in the PPH group(11.11% vs 42.60%,P < 0.05).The visual analogue scale scores at 24 h after surgery,first defecation,and one week after surgery were significantly lower in the PPH group(2.9 ± 0.9 vs 8.3 ± 1.1,2.0 ± 0.5 vs 6.5 ± 0.8,and 1.7 ± 0.5 vs 5.0 ± 0.7,respectively,all P < 0.01).With regard to long-term clinical effects,the incidence of anal stenosis was lower in the PPH group than in the control group,but the difference was not significant(1.85% vs 5.56%).The incidence of sensory anal incontinence was significantly lower in the PPH group(3.70% vs 12.96%,P < 0.05).The incidences of recurrent internal rectal prolapse and difficulty in defecation were lower in the PPH group than in the control group,but the differences were not significant(11.11% vs 16.67% and 12.96% vs 24.07%,respectively).CONCLUSION: PPH is superior to the traditional surgery in the management of outlet obstructive constipation caused by internal rectal prolapse with circumferential hemorrhoids.
文摘AIM: To report our experience with perineal repair(Delorme's procedure) of rectal prolapse with particular focus on treatment of the recurrence.METHODS: Clinical records of 40 patients who underwent Delorme's procedure between 2003 and 2014 were reviewed to obtain the following data: Gender; duration of symptoms, length of prolapse, operation time, ASA grade, length of post-operative stay, procedure-related complications, development and treatment of recurrent prolapse. Analysis of post-operative complications, rate and time of recurrence and factors influencing the choice of the procedure for recurrent disease was conducted. Continuous variables were expressed as the median with interquartile range(IQR). Statistical analysis was carried out using the Fisher exact test.RESULTS: Median age at the time of surgery was 76 years(IQR: 71-81.5) and there were 38 females and 2 males. The median duration of symptoms was 6 mo(IQR: 3.5-12) and majority of patients presented electively whereas four patients presented in the emergency department with irreducible rectal prolapse. The median length of prolapse was 5 cm(IQR: 5-7), median operative time was 100 min(IQR: 85-120) and median post-operative stay was 4 d(IQR: 3-6). Approximately16% of the patients suffered minor complications such as- urinary retention, delayed defaecation and infected haematoma. One patient died constituting postoperative mortality of 2.5%. Median follow-up was 6.5 mo(IQR: 2.15-16). Overall recurrence rate was 28%(n = 12). Recurrence rate for patients undergoing an urgent Delorme's procedure who presented as an emergency was higher(75.0%) compared to those treated electively(20.5%), P value 0.034. Median time interval from surgery to the development of recurrence was 16 mo(IQR: 5-30). There were three patients who developed an early recurrence, within two weeks of the initial procedure. The management of the recurrent prolapse was as follows: No further intervention(n = 1), repeat Delorme's procedure(n = 3), Altemeier's procedure(n = 5) and rectopexy with faecal diversion(n = 3). One patient was lost during follow up.CONCLUSION: Delorme's procedure is a suitable treatment for rectal prolapse due to low morbidity and mortality and acceptable rate of recurrence. The management of the recurrent rectal prolapse is often restricted to the pelvic approach by the same patientrelated factors that influenced the choice of the initial operation, i.e., Delorme's procedure. Early recurrence developing within days or weeks often represents a technical failure and may require abdominal rectopexy with faecal diversion.
文摘BACKGROUND Hemorrhoidal prolapse is a common benign disease with a high incidence.The treatment procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)remains an operative method used for internal hemorrhoid prolapse.Although it is related to less posoperative pain,faster recovery and shorter hospital stays,the postoperative recurrence rate is higher than that of the Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy(MMH).We have considered that recurrence could be due to shortage of the pulling-up effect.This issue may be overcome by using lower purse-string sutures[modified-PPH(M-PPH)].AIM To compare the therapeutic effects and the patients’satisfaction after M-PPH,PPH and MMH.METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 1163 patients(M-PPH,461;original PPH,321;MMH,381)with severe hemorrhoids(stage III/IV)who were admitted to The 2nd Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from 2012 to 2014.Early postoperative complications,efficacy,postoperative anal dysfunction and patient satisfaction were compared among the three groups.Established criteria were used to assess short-and long-term postoperative complications.A visual analog scale was used to evaluate postoperative pain.Follow-up was conducted 5 years postoperatively.RESULT Length of hospital stay and operating time were significantly longer in the MMH group(8.05±2.50 d,19.98±4.21 min;P<0.0001)than in other groups.The incidence of postoperative anastomotic bleeding was significantly lower after MPPH than after PPH or MMH(1.9%,5.1%and 3.7%;n=9,16 and 14;respectively).There was a significantly higher rate of sensation of rectal tenesmus after M-PPH than after MMH or PPH(15%,8%and 10%;n=69,30 and 32;respectively).There was a significantly lower rate of recurrence after M-PPH than after PPH(8.7%and 18.8%,n=40 and 61;P<0.0001).The incidence of postoperative anal incontinence differed significantly only between the MMH and M-PPH groups(1.3%and 4.3%,n=5 and 20;P=0.04).Patient satisfaction was significantly greater after M-PPH than after other surgeries.CONCLUSION M-PPH has many advantages for severe hemorrhoids(Goligher stage III/IV),with a low rate of anastomotic bleeding and recurrence and a very high rate of patient satisfaction.
文摘Objective:To summarize the experience without hemorrhage after PPH of 218 patients with mixed hemorrhoid.Methods:PPH(Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids)was performed routinely.During operation,it is paid attention that the hemorrhoid artery should be completely mutilated,the anastomat should be squeezed before and after the anastomosis,the anastomosis should be carefully examined,the hemostasis should be completely performed,and relevant hemostasis measures should be taken after the operation.Results:None of the 218 patients had postoperative hemorrhage.Conclusion:Relevant measures can be taken after operation to prevent the occurrence of postoperative hemorrhage.
基金Jinan Health Commission Science and Technology Project,No.2019-1-61.
文摘BACKGROUND Although rectal prolapse is not a life-threatening condition,it can cause defecation disorders,anal incontinence,sensory abnormalities,and other problems that can seriously affect quality of life.AIM To study the efficacy of the modified Gant procedure for elderly women with internal rectal prolapse.METHODS Sixty-three elderly female patients with internal rectal prolapse underwent the modified Gant procedure.The preoperative and postoperative anal symptoms,Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life(PAC-QOL),Wexner incontinence score,incontinence quality of life score,and complications(massive hemorrhage,infection,anorectal stenosis,and anorectal fistula)were compared.RESULTS The improvement rates of postoperative symptoms were defecation disorders(84.5%),anal distention(69.6%),defecation sensation(81.4%),frequent defecation(88.7%),and anal incontinence(42.9%)(P<0.05).All dimensions and total scores of the PAC-QOL after the procedure were lower than those before the operation(P<0.05).The postoperative anal incontinence score and Wexner score were significantly lower than those before the procedure(P<0.05).The quality of life and total scores of postoperative anal incontinence were significantly higher than those before the procedure(P<0.05).There were no serious complications and no deaths.CONCLUSION The modified Gant procedure has significant advantages in the treatment of elderly women with internal rectal prolapse.
文摘Patients with an incarcerated rectal prolapse usually present in the emergency department where manual reduction is first attempted. If reduction is unsuccessful, an emergency laparotomy and internal reduction is required. Edema in the rectal and perineal tissues and impaired blood flow are the main factors for a high percentage of anastomotic leaks. The traditional single stage perineal rectosigmoidectomy is not a safe surgical procedure for treating incarcerated or strangulated rectal prolapses associated with severe edema. Herein we report a case of an incarcerated rectal prolapse treated with the Notaras procedure.
文摘BACKGROUND Obstructed defecation syndrome(ODS) is a widespread disease in the world.Rectocele is the most common cause of ODS in females. Multiple procedures have been performed to treat rectocele and no procedure has been accepted as the gold-standard procedure. Stapled transanal rectal resection(STARR) has been widely used. However, there are still some disadvantages in this procedure and its effectiveness in anterior wall repair is doubtful. Therefore, new procedures are expected to further improve the treatment of rectocele.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel rectocele repair combining Khubchandani's procedure with stapled posterior rectal wall resection.METHODS A cohort of 93 patients were recruited in our randomized clinical trial and were divided into two different groups in a randomized manner. Forty-two patients(group A) underwent Khubchandani's procedure with stapled posterior rectal wall resection and 51 patients(group B) underwent the STARR procedure.Follow-up was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo after the operation. Preoperative and postoperative ODS scores and depth of rectocele, postoperative complications, blood loss, and hospital stay of each patient were documented. All data were analyzed statistically to evaluate the efficiency and safety of our procedure.RESULTS In group A, 42 patients underwent Khubchandani's procedure with stapled posterior rectal wall resection and 34 were followed until the final analysis. In group B, 51 patients underwent the STARR procedure and 37 were followed until the final analysis. Mean operative duration was 41.47 ± 6.43 min(group A) vs39.24 ± 6.53 min(group B). Mean hospital stay was 3.15 ± 0.70 d(group A) vs 3.14± 0.54 d(group B). Mean blood loss was 10.91 ± 2.52 mL(group A) vs 10.14 ± 1.86 m L(group B). Mean ODS score in group A declined from 16.50 ± 2.06 before operation to 5.06 ± 1.07 one year after the operation, whereas in group B it was17.11 ± 2.57 before operation and 6.03 ± 2.63 one year after the operation. Mean depth of rectocele decreased from 4.32 ± 0.96 cm(group A) vs 4.18 ± 0.95 cm(group B) preoperatively to 1.19 ± 0.43 cm(group A) vs 1.54 ± 0.82 cm(group B)one year after operation. No other serious complications, such as rectovaginal fistula, perianal sepsis, or deaths, were recorded. After 12 mo of follow-up, 30 patients'(30/34, 88.2%) final outcomes were judged as effective and 4(4/34,11.8%) as moderate in group A, whereas in group B, 30(30/37, 81.1%) patients' outcomes were judged as effective, 5(5/37, 13.5%) as moderate, and 2(2/37,5.4%) as poor.CONCLUSION Khubchandani's procedure combined with stapled posterior rectal wall resection is an effective, feasible, and safe procedure with minor trauma to rectocele.
文摘Rectal prolapse is a circumferential,full-thickness protrusion of the rectum through the anus.It is a rare condition,and only affects 0.5%of the general population.Multiple treatment modalities have been described,which have changed significantly over time.Particularly in the last decade,laparoscopic and robotic surgical approaches with different mobilization techniques,combined with medical therapies,have been widely implemented.Because patients have presented with a wide range of complaints(ranging from abdominal discomfort to incomplete bowel evacuation,mucus discharge,constipation,diarrhea,and fecal incontinence),understanding the extent of complaints and ruling out differential diagnoses are essential for choosing a tailored surgical procedure.It is crucial to assess these additional symptoms and their severities using preoperative scoring systems.Additionally,radiological and physiological evaluations may explain some vague symptoms and reveal concomitant pelvic disorders.However,there is no consensus on or standardization of the optimal extent of dissection,type of procedure,and materials used for rectal fixation;this makes providing maximum benefits to patients with minimal complications difficult.Even recent publications and systematic reviews have not recommended the most appropriate treatment options.This review explains the appropriate diagnostic tools for different conditions and summarizes the current treatment approaches based on existing literature and expert opinions.
基金Supported by The Shenyang Science and Technology Plan Project of 2022,No.22-321-33-79The Shenyang Science and Technology Plan Project of 2023,No.23-408-3-01The Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province,No.2022-MS-435.
文摘Fecal incontinence is a common symptom among patients with rectal prolapse.Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency(PNTML)testing can serve as a reference indicator for predicting the outcomes of rectal prolapse surgery,thereby assisting surgeons in formulating more appropriate surgical plans.The direct correlation between preoperative PNTML testing results and postoperative fecal incontinence in patients with rectal prolapse remains a contentious issue,necessitating further clarification.Thus,we analyze the existing publications from both clinical and statistical perspectives to comprehensively evaluate the accuracy of preoperative PNTML testing in rectal prolapse and provide some feasible statistical solutions.
文摘目的探讨痔上黏膜环形切除订合术(procedure for prolapsed and hemorrhoids,PPH)加外痔切除术的临床疗效。方法治疗组48例采用PPH加外痔切除术,对照组48例采用外剥内扎术。结果治疗组手术时间、术后各合并症评分少于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组手术疗效与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗组住院费用多于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 PPH加外痔切除术临床疗效显著。
文摘目的：研究吻合器痔上粘膜环切术（procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids,PPH）吻合器击发位置对内痔疗效及并发症的影响。方法：收集汕头大学医学院第一附属医院2004年至2009年的198例内痔患者,随机分成3组,并通过比较3组志愿者PPH吻合器分别在齿状线以上1.5cm、2.5cm、3.0cm三个击发位置所产生的临床效果,对各组术后并发症发生情况进行描述分析。结果：PPH吻合器击发位置在齿状线以上1.5cm组与2.5cm组、3.0cm组的临床治疗效果,术后肛周疼痛及吻合口出血并发症比较有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;2.5cm组与3.0cm组的临床治疗效果比较无统计学差异（P〉0.05）。结论：PPH吻合器击发位置在齿状线以上2.5-3.0cm的临床治疗效果好,同时可减少术后肛周疼痛及出血等并发症。
