CALL （computer-assisted language learning） has tremendously transformed the teaching of language, with its wide application in many aspects of language teaching. However, how to integrate CALL into the teaching of c...CALL （computer-assisted language learning） has tremendously transformed the teaching of language, with its wide application in many aspects of language teaching. However, how to integrate CALL into the teaching of culture is still rarely discussed. The purpose of the paper is to explore feasible models for teaching culture in CALL and their effects on students＇ acquisition process. Based on two fundamental pedagogical approaches （participatory pedagogy and multiliteracies pedagogy） for teaching culture, this paper proposes three pedagogical models （problem-posing model, web-quest model, and computer-supported collaborative learning model） for teaching culture in CALL. In the end, this paper illustrates a combination of the three models in real CALL setting by a cultural teaching case. A questionnaire survey and interviews are conducted to reflect on students＇ feedback, which gives an insight into possible adjustments in teaching models and the paper also proposes future possibilities in applying these models into teaching culture展开更多
目的研究多学科协作诊疗(multi-disciplinary collaborative diagnosis and treatment,MDT)模式在临床医学专业整体思维培养中的效果。方法选取雅安职业技术学院临床医学院2024年3—6月的33名临床专业22级学生作为观察组,另选取雅安职...目的研究多学科协作诊疗(multi-disciplinary collaborative diagnosis and treatment,MDT)模式在临床医学专业整体思维培养中的效果。方法选取雅安职业技术学院临床医学院2024年3—6月的33名临床专业22级学生作为观察组,另选取雅安职业技术学院临床医学院2023年3—6月的33名临床专业21级学生作为对照组。观察组采取MDT模式进行教学,对照组采用传统教学。比较2组学生的考试成绩、整体思维能力、考核评价得分以及教学总满意度。结果观察组学生考试成绩中的临床多学科基础知识[(22.42±1.28)分]、临床专业知识[(22.05±1.96)分]、临床技术实操[(18.75±1.57)分]、临床试验设计和验证[(13.29±0.42)分]及医患沟通基本技能[(14.66±0.25)分]成绩均高于对照组[(18.02±2.38)分、(15.33±3.01)分、(13.28±2.64)分、(10.04±2.02)分、(11.50±1.12)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组学生整体思维能力中的临床资料检索能力[(18.33±1.15)分]、临床实践操作能力[(17.18±2.86)分]、临床沟通应变能力[(18.19±0.97)分]、临床分析理解信息能力[(19.13±0.32)分]、临床团队协作能力[(18.33±1.67)分]及临床解决问题与创新能力[(18.43±1.07)分]评分均高于对照组[(12.06±2.11)分、(12.77±2.71)分、(13.28±2.24)分、(13.34±1.75)分、(12.34±1.92)分、(13.28±2.68)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组学生考核评价中的课前任务[(95.11±4.35)分]、课堂参与度[(96.11±2.34)分]、方案可行度[(92.49±4.22)分]、操作规范[(93.17±2.33)分]、医患沟通[(93.75±3.58)分]、人文关怀[(95.77±3.28)分]、课后作业评价得分[(95.65±4.30)分]均高于对照组[(80.23±5.35)分、(83.38±3.44)分、(80.28±3.17)分、(83.65±2.78)分、(80.37±3.65)分、(84.38±4.49)分、(80.44±5.75)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组的教学总满意度为100%,高于对照组的69.70%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在临床医学专业教学中采取MDT模式能有效提高医学生的考试成绩,培养学生的整体思维能力,提高教学总满意度,具有显著的教学效果。展开更多
文摘CALL （computer-assisted language learning） has tremendously transformed the teaching of language, with its wide application in many aspects of language teaching. However, how to integrate CALL into the teaching of culture is still rarely discussed. The purpose of the paper is to explore feasible models for teaching culture in CALL and their effects on students＇ acquisition process. Based on two fundamental pedagogical approaches （participatory pedagogy and multiliteracies pedagogy） for teaching culture, this paper proposes three pedagogical models （problem-posing model, web-quest model, and computer-supported collaborative learning model） for teaching culture in CALL. In the end, this paper illustrates a combination of the three models in real CALL setting by a cultural teaching case. A questionnaire survey and interviews are conducted to reflect on students＇ feedback, which gives an insight into possible adjustments in teaching models and the paper also proposes future possibilities in applying these models into teaching culture
文摘目的研究多学科协作诊疗(multi-disciplinary collaborative diagnosis and treatment,MDT)模式在临床医学专业整体思维培养中的效果。方法选取雅安职业技术学院临床医学院2024年3—6月的33名临床专业22级学生作为观察组,另选取雅安职业技术学院临床医学院2023年3—6月的33名临床专业21级学生作为对照组。观察组采取MDT模式进行教学,对照组采用传统教学。比较2组学生的考试成绩、整体思维能力、考核评价得分以及教学总满意度。结果观察组学生考试成绩中的临床多学科基础知识[(22.42±1.28)分]、临床专业知识[(22.05±1.96)分]、临床技术实操[(18.75±1.57)分]、临床试验设计和验证[(13.29±0.42)分]及医患沟通基本技能[(14.66±0.25)分]成绩均高于对照组[(18.02±2.38)分、(15.33±3.01)分、(13.28±2.64)分、(10.04±2.02)分、(11.50±1.12)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组学生整体思维能力中的临床资料检索能力[(18.33±1.15)分]、临床实践操作能力[(17.18±2.86)分]、临床沟通应变能力[(18.19±0.97)分]、临床分析理解信息能力[(19.13±0.32)分]、临床团队协作能力[(18.33±1.67)分]及临床解决问题与创新能力[(18.43±1.07)分]评分均高于对照组[(12.06±2.11)分、(12.77±2.71)分、(13.28±2.24)分、(13.34±1.75)分、(12.34±1.92)分、(13.28±2.68)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组学生考核评价中的课前任务[(95.11±4.35)分]、课堂参与度[(96.11±2.34)分]、方案可行度[(92.49±4.22)分]、操作规范[(93.17±2.33)分]、医患沟通[(93.75±3.58)分]、人文关怀[(95.77±3.28)分]、课后作业评价得分[(95.65±4.30)分]均高于对照组[(80.23±5.35)分、(83.38±3.44)分、(80.28±3.17)分、(83.65±2.78)分、(80.37±3.65)分、(84.38±4.49)分、(80.44±5.75)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组的教学总满意度为100%,高于对照组的69.70%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在临床医学专业教学中采取MDT模式能有效提高医学生的考试成绩,培养学生的整体思维能力,提高教学总满意度,具有显著的教学效果。
