This study aimed to explore the outcomes of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol （PPOS） in aged infertile women who failed to get pregnant in the first IVF/ICSI-ET cycles with GnRH-a long protocol. A self-c...This study aimed to explore the outcomes of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol （PPOS） in aged infertile women who failed to get pregnant in the first IVF/ICSI-ET cycles with GnRH-a long protocol. A self-controlled study was conducted to retrospectively investigate the clinical outcomes of 104 aged infertile patients who didn＇t get pregnant in the first IVF/ICSI-ET treatment by stimulating with GnRH-a long protocol （non-PPOS group）, and underwent PPOS protocol （PPOS group） in the second cycle between January 2016 and December 2016 in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The primary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate of frozen-thawed embryos transfer （FET） in PPOS group, and good-quality embryo rate in both groups. The secondary outcomes were fertilization rate, egg utilization rate and cycle cancellation rate. The results showed that there were no significant differences in basal follicle stimulating hormone （bFSH）, antral follicle count （AFC）, duration and total dosage of gonadotropin （Gn）, number of oocytes retrieved, intracytoplasmic sperm injection （ICSI） rate, fertilization rate, and cycle cancellation rate between the two groups （P〉0.05）. However, the oocyte utilization rate and good-quality embryo rate in PPOS group were significantly higher than those in non-PPOS group （P〈0.05）. By the end of April 2017, 62 FET cycles were conducted in PPOS group. The clinical pregnancy rate and embryo implantation rate were 22.58% and 12.70%, respectively. In conclusion, PPOS protocol may provide better clinical outcomes by improving the oocyte utilization rate and good-quality embryo rate for aged infertile patients who failed to get pregnant in the first IVF/ ICSI-ET cycles.展开更多
Background: Studies have shown a strong correlation between the growth of E2 in serum and estrone-3-glucuronide (E1-3G) in urine during ovarian stimulation. Thus, we developed theoretical models for using urinary E1-3...Background: Studies have shown a strong correlation between the growth of E2 in serum and estrone-3-glucuronide (E1-3G) in urine during ovarian stimulation. Thus, we developed theoretical models for using urinary E1-3G in ovarian stimulation and focused on their experimental verification and analysis. Methods: A prospective, observational pilot study was conducted involving 54 patients who underwent 54 cycles of ovarian stimulation. The goal was to establish the growth rate of urinary E1-3G during the course of stimulation and to determine the daily upper and lower limits of growth rates at which stimulation is appropriate and safe. Controlled ovarian stimulation was performed using two different stimulation protocols—an antagonist protocol in 25 cases and a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol (PPOS) in 29 cases, with fixed doses of gonadotropins. From the second day of stimulation, patients self-measured their daily urine E1-3G levels at home using a portable analyzer. In parallel, a standard ultrasound follow-up protocol accompanied by a determination of E2, LH, and P levels was applied to optimally control stimulation. Results: The average daily growth rates in both groups were about 50%. The daily increase in E1-3G for the antagonist protocol ranged from 14% to 79%, while they were 28% to 79% for the PPOS protocol. Conclusion: This is the first study to analyze the dynamics of E1-3G in two different protocols and to estimate the limits of its increase during the entire course of the stimulation. The results confirm our theoretical model for the viability of using urinary E1-3G for monitoring ovarian stimulation.展开更多
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation(PPOS)protocol in infertile women with high basal follicle-stimulating hormone(FSH)levels≥15 IU/L.Methods:Patients with high basal FSH levels...Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation(PPOS)protocol in infertile women with high basal follicle-stimulating hormone(FSH)levels≥15 IU/L.Methods:Patients with high basal FSH levels≥15 IU/L with autologous oocytes from September 2016 to March 2019 were reviewed.Either medroxyprogesterone acetate 4 mg/d or clomiphene citrate(CC)50 mg/d was administered daily from day 3 to the trigger day.When serum FSH levels decreased to≤15.0 IU/L,a low dose of human menopausal gonadotropin(hMG)75/150 IU/d was administered to promote late follicular development.Results:Two hundred and twenty women were retrospectively analyzed in this study.Among them,139 patients were administered with PPOS protocol as the study group,and 81 patients were administered with CC protocol as the control group.The numbers of received oocytes and viable embryos were higher in the study group than those in the control group(1.5±1.2 vs.1.2±0.8 and 0.8±0.8 vs.0.5±0.6,respectively,P<0.05).However,hMG duration and dosage were significantly higher in the study group than those in the control group(4.2±2.7 d vs.1.1±2.3 d and 609.1±424.5 IU vs.140.7±231.3 IU,respectively,P<0.01).Incidence of luteinizing hormone surge and cycle cancellation rate were lower in the study group than those in the control group with statistical difference(2.88%vs.16.05%and 36.50%vs.50.63%,respectively,P<0.05).Conclusions:PPOS protocol can effectively downregulate the endogenous FSH levels.Compared with CC protocol,treatment with PPOS protocol in patients with high basal FSH levels≥15 IU/L could receive more oocytes and more viable embryos.展开更多
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common causes of infertility in women. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol, which used oral progestin to prevent premature luteinizing hormone (LH) ...Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common causes of infertility in women. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol, which used oral progestin to prevent premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in ovarian stimulation, has been proved to be effective and safe in patients with PCOS. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of PPOS protocol with that of the traditional gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in patients with PCOS. A total of 157 patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were recruited into this study. The patients were divided into two groups by the stimulation protocols: the GnRH antagonist protocol group and the PPOS protocol group. There was no significant difference in the clinical characteristics between the two groups. Dose and duration of gonadotropin were higher in the PPOS protocol group. Estradiol levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration were significantly lower in the PPOS protocol group. Fertilization rates and the number of good quality embryos were similar between the two groups. Remarkably, we found 6 patients with moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in the GnRH antagonist protocol group but 0 in the PPOS protocol group. A total of 127 women completed their frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of clinical pregnancy rate per transfer, implantation rate, first-trimester miscarriage rate and on-going pregnancy rate per transfer. To conclude, PPOS protocol decreased the incidence of OHSS without adversely affecting clinical outcomes in patients with PCOS.展开更多
基金This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China （No.1471456）, and Guidance Foundation of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University （No. RMYD2018Z13）.
文摘This study aimed to explore the outcomes of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol （PPOS） in aged infertile women who failed to get pregnant in the first IVF/ICSI-ET cycles with GnRH-a long protocol. A self-controlled study was conducted to retrospectively investigate the clinical outcomes of 104 aged infertile patients who didn＇t get pregnant in the first IVF/ICSI-ET treatment by stimulating with GnRH-a long protocol （non-PPOS group）, and underwent PPOS protocol （PPOS group） in the second cycle between January 2016 and December 2016 in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The primary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate of frozen-thawed embryos transfer （FET） in PPOS group, and good-quality embryo rate in both groups. The secondary outcomes were fertilization rate, egg utilization rate and cycle cancellation rate. The results showed that there were no significant differences in basal follicle stimulating hormone （bFSH）, antral follicle count （AFC）, duration and total dosage of gonadotropin （Gn）, number of oocytes retrieved, intracytoplasmic sperm injection （ICSI） rate, fertilization rate, and cycle cancellation rate between the two groups （P〉0.05）. However, the oocyte utilization rate and good-quality embryo rate in PPOS group were significantly higher than those in non-PPOS group （P〈0.05）. By the end of April 2017, 62 FET cycles were conducted in PPOS group. The clinical pregnancy rate and embryo implantation rate were 22.58% and 12.70%, respectively. In conclusion, PPOS protocol may provide better clinical outcomes by improving the oocyte utilization rate and good-quality embryo rate for aged infertile patients who failed to get pregnant in the first IVF/ ICSI-ET cycles.
文摘Background: Studies have shown a strong correlation between the growth of E2 in serum and estrone-3-glucuronide (E1-3G) in urine during ovarian stimulation. Thus, we developed theoretical models for using urinary E1-3G in ovarian stimulation and focused on their experimental verification and analysis. Methods: A prospective, observational pilot study was conducted involving 54 patients who underwent 54 cycles of ovarian stimulation. The goal was to establish the growth rate of urinary E1-3G during the course of stimulation and to determine the daily upper and lower limits of growth rates at which stimulation is appropriate and safe. Controlled ovarian stimulation was performed using two different stimulation protocols—an antagonist protocol in 25 cases and a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol (PPOS) in 29 cases, with fixed doses of gonadotropins. From the second day of stimulation, patients self-measured their daily urine E1-3G levels at home using a portable analyzer. In parallel, a standard ultrasound follow-up protocol accompanied by a determination of E2, LH, and P levels was applied to optimally control stimulation. Results: The average daily growth rates in both groups were about 50%. The daily increase in E1-3G for the antagonist protocol ranged from 14% to 79%, while they were 28% to 79% for the PPOS protocol. Conclusion: This is the first study to analyze the dynamics of E1-3G in two different protocols and to estimate the limits of its increase during the entire course of the stimulation. The results confirm our theoretical model for the viability of using urinary E1-3G for monitoring ovarian stimulation.
文摘Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation(PPOS)protocol in infertile women with high basal follicle-stimulating hormone(FSH)levels≥15 IU/L.Methods:Patients with high basal FSH levels≥15 IU/L with autologous oocytes from September 2016 to March 2019 were reviewed.Either medroxyprogesterone acetate 4 mg/d or clomiphene citrate(CC)50 mg/d was administered daily from day 3 to the trigger day.When serum FSH levels decreased to≤15.0 IU/L,a low dose of human menopausal gonadotropin(hMG)75/150 IU/d was administered to promote late follicular development.Results:Two hundred and twenty women were retrospectively analyzed in this study.Among them,139 patients were administered with PPOS protocol as the study group,and 81 patients were administered with CC protocol as the control group.The numbers of received oocytes and viable embryos were higher in the study group than those in the control group(1.5±1.2 vs.1.2±0.8 and 0.8±0.8 vs.0.5±0.6,respectively,P<0.05).However,hMG duration and dosage were significantly higher in the study group than those in the control group(4.2±2.7 d vs.1.1±2.3 d and 609.1±424.5 IU vs.140.7±231.3 IU,respectively,P<0.01).Incidence of luteinizing hormone surge and cycle cancellation rate were lower in the study group than those in the control group with statistical difference(2.88%vs.16.05%and 36.50%vs.50.63%,respectively,P<0.05).Conclusions:PPOS protocol can effectively downregulate the endogenous FSH levels.Compared with CC protocol,treatment with PPOS protocol in patients with high basal FSH levels≥15 IU/L could receive more oocytes and more viable embryos.
基金This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.81471455,81100418).
文摘Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common causes of infertility in women. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol, which used oral progestin to prevent premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in ovarian stimulation, has been proved to be effective and safe in patients with PCOS. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of PPOS protocol with that of the traditional gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in patients with PCOS. A total of 157 patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were recruited into this study. The patients were divided into two groups by the stimulation protocols: the GnRH antagonist protocol group and the PPOS protocol group. There was no significant difference in the clinical characteristics between the two groups. Dose and duration of gonadotropin were higher in the PPOS protocol group. Estradiol levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration were significantly lower in the PPOS protocol group. Fertilization rates and the number of good quality embryos were similar between the two groups. Remarkably, we found 6 patients with moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in the GnRH antagonist protocol group but 0 in the PPOS protocol group. A total of 127 women completed their frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of clinical pregnancy rate per transfer, implantation rate, first-trimester miscarriage rate and on-going pregnancy rate per transfer. To conclude, PPOS protocol decreased the incidence of OHSS without adversely affecting clinical outcomes in patients with PCOS.
