Human tumors tend to activate the immune system regulatory checkpoints as a means of escaping immunosurveillance. For instance, interaction between program death-1(PD-1) and program death-ligand 1(PD-L1) will lead the...Human tumors tend to activate the immune system regulatory checkpoints as a means of escaping immunosurveillance. For instance, interaction between program death-1(PD-1) and program death-ligand 1(PD-L1) will lead the activated T cell to a state of anergy. PD-L1 is upregulated on a wide range of cancer cells. Anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies(m Abs), called immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs), have consequently been designed to restore T cell activity. Accumulating data are in favor of an association between PD-L1 expression in tumors and response to treatment. A PD-L1 expression is present in 30% to 50% of digestive cancers. Multiple anti-PD-1(nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and anti-PD-L1 m Abs(MPDL3280A, Medi4736) are under evaluation in digestive cancers. Preliminary results in metastatic gastric cancer with pembrolizumab are highly promising and phase Ⅱ will start soon. In metastatic colorectal cancer(CRC), a phase Ⅲ trial of MPDL3280 A as maintenance therapy will shortly be initiated. Trials are also ongoing in metastatic CRC with high immune T cell infiltration(i.e., microsatellite instability). Major challenges are ahead in order to determine how, when and for which patients we should use these ICIs. New radiologic criteria to evaluate tumor response to ICIs are awaiting prospective validation. The optimal therapeutic sequence and association with cytotoxic chemotherapy needs to be established. Finally, biomarker identification will be crucial to selection ofpatients likely to benefit from ICIs.展开更多
Objective: IMpower210(NCT02813785) explored the efficacy and safety of single-agent atezolizumab vs.docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) in East Asian patients.Methods: Key...Objective: IMpower210(NCT02813785) explored the efficacy and safety of single-agent atezolizumab vs.docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) in East Asian patients.Methods: Key eligibility criteria for this phase Ⅲ, open-label, randomized study included age ≥18 years;histologically documented advanced NSCLC per the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system(7th edition);Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1;and disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either atezolizumab(1,200 mg) or docetaxel(75 mg/m^(2)). The primary study endpoint was overall survival(OS) in the intention-to-treat(ITT) population with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor expression(ITT EGFR-WT) and in the overall ITT population.Results: Median OS in the ITT EGFR-WT population(n=467) was 12.3 [95% confidence interval(95% CI),10.3-13.8] months in the atezolizumab arm(n=312) and 9.9(95% CI, 7.8-13.9) months in the docetaxel arm[n=155;stratified hazard ratio(HR), 0.82;95% CI, 0.66-1.03]. Median OS in the overall ITT population was 12.5(95% CI, 10.8-13.8) months with atezolizumab treatment and 11.1(95% CI, 8.4-14.2) months(n=377) with docetaxel treatment(n=188;stratified HR, 0.87;95% CI, 0.71-1.08). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events(TRAEs) occurred in 18.4% of patients in the atezolizumab arm and 50.0% of patients in the docetaxel arm.Conclusions: IMpower210 did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint of OS in the ITT EGFR-WT or overall ITT populations. Atezolizumab was comparatively more tolerable than docetaxel, with a lower incidence of grade3/4 TRAEs.展开更多
目的分析阿替利珠单抗发生不良反应(adverse reactions,ADRs)的临床特点与规律,为临床安全用药提供参考。方法搜索中国知网、维普、万方、Web of Science、PubMed数据库,收集关于阿替利珠单抗所致不良反应的报道文献并进行分析,研究时间...目的分析阿替利珠单抗发生不良反应(adverse reactions,ADRs)的临床特点与规律,为临床安全用药提供参考。方法搜索中国知网、维普、万方、Web of Science、PubMed数据库,收集关于阿替利珠单抗所致不良反应的报道文献并进行分析,研究时间为2022年4—8月。结果阿替利珠致不良反应报道共94例;其中男性56例(59.57%),女性38例(40.43%),男性占比较高;年龄(62.8±12.0)岁,中老年人居多;多数发生在用药后的90 d内(71例,71.0%);阿替利珠单抗致ADRs累及多个系统/器官,其中以神经系统损害(22例,22.0%)占比最多;3~4级严重ADRs占比最多(64例,64.0%);94例经治疗和(或)停药后,好转或治愈80例,死亡5例。结论阿替利珠单抗所致ADRs涉及不同性别与年龄段病人,累及多个系统/器官,临床使用应随时监测,警惕ADRs的发生,做到及时识别与治疗。展开更多
近年来,肿瘤生物免疫治疗因其显著的疗效而迅速发展为肿瘤研究领域的热点。程序性死亡受体-1(programmed death-1,PD-1)与其配体(programmed death ligand-1,PD-L1)在多种肿瘤细胞中过表达,参与肿瘤的发生、发展及侵袭转移。因此,PD-1/P...近年来,肿瘤生物免疫治疗因其显著的疗效而迅速发展为肿瘤研究领域的热点。程序性死亡受体-1(programmed death-1,PD-1)与其配体(programmed death ligand-1,PD-L1)在多种肿瘤细胞中过表达,参与肿瘤的发生、发展及侵袭转移。因此,PD-1/PDL1信号通路成为了肿瘤免疫治疗的有效新靶点。目前,PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在淋巴瘤治疗研究中取得了较好的疗效。本文将对该类药物的相关临床研究现状进行综述,旨在加深对PD-1/PD-L1信号通路的作用机制及相关抗体应用于淋巴瘤治疗的认识。展开更多
文摘Human tumors tend to activate the immune system regulatory checkpoints as a means of escaping immunosurveillance. For instance, interaction between program death-1(PD-1) and program death-ligand 1(PD-L1) will lead the activated T cell to a state of anergy. PD-L1 is upregulated on a wide range of cancer cells. Anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies(m Abs), called immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs), have consequently been designed to restore T cell activity. Accumulating data are in favor of an association between PD-L1 expression in tumors and response to treatment. A PD-L1 expression is present in 30% to 50% of digestive cancers. Multiple anti-PD-1(nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and anti-PD-L1 m Abs(MPDL3280A, Medi4736) are under evaluation in digestive cancers. Preliminary results in metastatic gastric cancer with pembrolizumab are highly promising and phase Ⅱ will start soon. In metastatic colorectal cancer(CRC), a phase Ⅲ trial of MPDL3280 A as maintenance therapy will shortly be initiated. Trials are also ongoing in metastatic CRC with high immune T cell infiltration(i.e., microsatellite instability). Major challenges are ahead in order to determine how, when and for which patients we should use these ICIs. New radiologic criteria to evaluate tumor response to ICIs are awaiting prospective validation. The optimal therapeutic sequence and association with cytotoxic chemotherapy needs to be established. Finally, biomarker identification will be crucial to selection ofpatients likely to benefit from ICIs.
基金funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd sponsored the IMpower210 study。
文摘Objective: IMpower210(NCT02813785) explored the efficacy and safety of single-agent atezolizumab vs.docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) in East Asian patients.Methods: Key eligibility criteria for this phase Ⅲ, open-label, randomized study included age ≥18 years;histologically documented advanced NSCLC per the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system(7th edition);Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1;and disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either atezolizumab(1,200 mg) or docetaxel(75 mg/m^(2)). The primary study endpoint was overall survival(OS) in the intention-to-treat(ITT) population with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor expression(ITT EGFR-WT) and in the overall ITT population.Results: Median OS in the ITT EGFR-WT population(n=467) was 12.3 [95% confidence interval(95% CI),10.3-13.8] months in the atezolizumab arm(n=312) and 9.9(95% CI, 7.8-13.9) months in the docetaxel arm[n=155;stratified hazard ratio(HR), 0.82;95% CI, 0.66-1.03]. Median OS in the overall ITT population was 12.5(95% CI, 10.8-13.8) months with atezolizumab treatment and 11.1(95% CI, 8.4-14.2) months(n=377) with docetaxel treatment(n=188;stratified HR, 0.87;95% CI, 0.71-1.08). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events(TRAEs) occurred in 18.4% of patients in the atezolizumab arm and 50.0% of patients in the docetaxel arm.Conclusions: IMpower210 did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint of OS in the ITT EGFR-WT or overall ITT populations. Atezolizumab was comparatively more tolerable than docetaxel, with a lower incidence of grade3/4 TRAEs.
文摘目的分析阿替利珠单抗发生不良反应(adverse reactions,ADRs)的临床特点与规律,为临床安全用药提供参考。方法搜索中国知网、维普、万方、Web of Science、PubMed数据库,收集关于阿替利珠单抗所致不良反应的报道文献并进行分析,研究时间为2022年4—8月。结果阿替利珠致不良反应报道共94例;其中男性56例(59.57%),女性38例(40.43%),男性占比较高;年龄(62.8±12.0)岁,中老年人居多;多数发生在用药后的90 d内(71例,71.0%);阿替利珠单抗致ADRs累及多个系统/器官,其中以神经系统损害(22例,22.0%)占比最多;3~4级严重ADRs占比最多(64例,64.0%);94例经治疗和(或)停药后,好转或治愈80例,死亡5例。结论阿替利珠单抗所致ADRs涉及不同性别与年龄段病人,累及多个系统/器官,临床使用应随时监测,警惕ADRs的发生,做到及时识别与治疗。
文摘近年来,肿瘤生物免疫治疗因其显著的疗效而迅速发展为肿瘤研究领域的热点。程序性死亡受体-1(programmed death-1,PD-1)与其配体(programmed death ligand-1,PD-L1)在多种肿瘤细胞中过表达,参与肿瘤的发生、发展及侵袭转移。因此,PD-1/PDL1信号通路成为了肿瘤免疫治疗的有效新靶点。目前,PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在淋巴瘤治疗研究中取得了较好的疗效。本文将对该类药物的相关临床研究现状进行综述,旨在加深对PD-1/PD-L1信号通路的作用机制及相关抗体应用于淋巴瘤治疗的认识。
