<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Cancer colon is one of the most common malignancies.</span><sp...<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Cancer colon is one of the most common malignancies.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">After colon cancer surgery patients may experience severe pain.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Several studies have reported that a significant decrease in postoperative pain with propofol while other studies have showed this effect was not significant. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Aim:</span></b><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Our goal was to assess the effect of combined epidural anaesthesia either with propofol</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or sevoflurane on intraoperative fentanyl consumption and postoperative pain</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">in patients undergoing open surgical resection of colon cancer.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Patients and Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 48 adult patients suffering from cancer colon scheduled for </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">open surgical resection randomly allocated either to receive epidural-pro</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">pofol</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> by total intra venous anaesthesia</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(TIVA)</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(n</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">24) or epidural-sevoflu</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">rane</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">anaesthesia (n</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">24),</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">intraoperative heart rate and fentanyl consumption and postoperative pain score</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(verbal analogue scale,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">10) were recorded.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In our study we found that</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the intensity of postoperative pain was low in all patients and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the propofol based anaesthesia had relatively lower pain scores up to 24</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">hrs postoperatively in comparison to sevoflurane based anaesthesia,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">intraoperative fentanyl consumption was lower with sevoflurane and heart rate lower with propofol group. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions:</span></b><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">we recommend that use of multimodal analgesia decrease postoperative pain in all cancer colon patients undergoing open surgery who anaesthetized with either propofol or sevoflurane.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Also use of propofol</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">showed better analgesic outcomes postoperatively.</span>展开更多
目的评估瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉或复合七氟烷与纯七氟烷全麻分别用于小儿扁桃体、腺样体手术对术后躁动(EA)的影响。方法选择2011年7月~2012年10月间120例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级择期行扁桃体、腺样体手术的学龄前患儿分为三组:瑞芬太...目的评估瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉或复合七氟烷与纯七氟烷全麻分别用于小儿扁桃体、腺样体手术对术后躁动(EA)的影响。方法选择2011年7月~2012年10月间120例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级择期行扁桃体、腺样体手术的学龄前患儿分为三组:瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚静脉全麻组(Ⅰ组)、瑞芬太尼复合七氟烷组(Ⅱ组)和纯七氟烷吸入全麻组(Ⅲ组),每组40例。术中根据患儿的血压心率变化调整七氟烷吸入浓度和丙泊酚泵注速度。观察患儿术后苏醒、拔管情况及术后躁动发生情况。结果Ⅰ组患儿自主呼吸恢复时间、苏醒时间、拔管时间均少于Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组[(4.03±1.38)vs(9.42±1.21)vs(10.22±1.71)min,(5.15±1.27)vs(9.68±1.58)vs(11.64±1.78)min,(5.89±1.60)vs(10.58±2.10)vs(12.18±2.30)min,P〈0.001];Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组儿童麻醉后躁动评分(PAED)≥10分的例数少于Ⅲ组(15 vs 27,P〈0.001;16 vs 27,P〈0.05),Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组四点法EA评分≥3分的例数少于Ⅲ组(11 vs 11 vs21,P〈0.05)。结论瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚全凭静脉或复合静吸复合七氟烷麻醉用于小儿扁桃体、腺样体手术,较单纯七氟烷吸入麻醉术后躁动的发生率低,其中瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉术后苏醒更快。展开更多
目的:观察不同麻醉深度对老年全麻术后谵妄(POD)的影响。方法:选择期行开腹胆囊切除术高龄患者120例,随机分为静脉麻醉组(A组)和吸入麻醉组(B组),依BIS值40~49分为A1及B1组、BIS值50~59分为A2及B2组,每组各30例。比较4组一般情况、简易...目的:观察不同麻醉深度对老年全麻术后谵妄(POD)的影响。方法:选择期行开腹胆囊切除术高龄患者120例,随机分为静脉麻醉组(A组)和吸入麻醉组(B组),依BIS值40~49分为A1及B1组、BIS值50~59分为A2及B2组,每组各30例。比较4组一般情况、简易精神状态量表(MMSE)评分、POD发生率以及血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和星形胶质源性蛋白(S100β)浓度。结果:A1、A2两组个组一般资料及术后疼痛评分均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。A1组术后3 d MMSE评分为24.1,术后5 d为25.2;A2组术后3 d MMSE评分为26.9,术后5 d为27.1,两组与术前比较均明显降低(P<0.05),A1组明显低于A2组(P<0.05)。A1组术后7 d内POD发生率为20%,明显高于A2组(0)(P<0.05);A1及A2组T_(1~3)时刻血清NSE和S100β浓度均较T_0时刻升高(P<0.05);A1组T_(1~3)时刻血清NSE、S100β浓度高于A2组(P<0.05)。B组一般情况、MMSE评分、POD发生率及血清NSE和S100β浓度变化与A组相似。结论:全身麻醉时保持BIS值在50~59可使高龄患者POD发生率降低,静脉全身麻醉和吸入全身麻醉之间结果相似。展开更多
文摘<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Cancer colon is one of the most common malignancies.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">After colon cancer surgery patients may experience severe pain.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Several studies have reported that a significant decrease in postoperative pain with propofol while other studies have showed this effect was not significant. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Aim:</span></b><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Our goal was to assess the effect of combined epidural anaesthesia either with propofol</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or sevoflurane on intraoperative fentanyl consumption and postoperative pain</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">in patients undergoing open surgical resection of colon cancer.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Patients and Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 48 adult patients suffering from cancer colon scheduled for </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">open surgical resection randomly allocated either to receive epidural-pro</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">pofol</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> by total intra venous anaesthesia</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(TIVA)</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(n</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">24) or epidural-sevoflu</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">rane</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">anaesthesia (n</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">24),</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">intraoperative heart rate and fentanyl consumption and postoperative pain score</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(verbal analogue scale,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">10) were recorded.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In our study we found that</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the intensity of postoperative pain was low in all patients and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the propofol based anaesthesia had relatively lower pain scores up to 24</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">hrs postoperatively in comparison to sevoflurane based anaesthesia,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">intraoperative fentanyl consumption was lower with sevoflurane and heart rate lower with propofol group. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions:</span></b><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">we recommend that use of multimodal analgesia decrease postoperative pain in all cancer colon patients undergoing open surgery who anaesthetized with either propofol or sevoflurane.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Also use of propofol</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">showed better analgesic outcomes postoperatively.</span>
文摘目的评估瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉或复合七氟烷与纯七氟烷全麻分别用于小儿扁桃体、腺样体手术对术后躁动(EA)的影响。方法选择2011年7月~2012年10月间120例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级择期行扁桃体、腺样体手术的学龄前患儿分为三组:瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚静脉全麻组(Ⅰ组)、瑞芬太尼复合七氟烷组(Ⅱ组)和纯七氟烷吸入全麻组(Ⅲ组),每组40例。术中根据患儿的血压心率变化调整七氟烷吸入浓度和丙泊酚泵注速度。观察患儿术后苏醒、拔管情况及术后躁动发生情况。结果Ⅰ组患儿自主呼吸恢复时间、苏醒时间、拔管时间均少于Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组[(4.03±1.38)vs(9.42±1.21)vs(10.22±1.71)min,(5.15±1.27)vs(9.68±1.58)vs(11.64±1.78)min,(5.89±1.60)vs(10.58±2.10)vs(12.18±2.30)min,P〈0.001];Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组儿童麻醉后躁动评分(PAED)≥10分的例数少于Ⅲ组(15 vs 27,P〈0.001;16 vs 27,P〈0.05),Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组四点法EA评分≥3分的例数少于Ⅲ组(11 vs 11 vs21,P〈0.05)。结论瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚全凭静脉或复合静吸复合七氟烷麻醉用于小儿扁桃体、腺样体手术,较单纯七氟烷吸入麻醉术后躁动的发生率低,其中瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉术后苏醒更快。
文摘目的通过观察不同麻醉维持方式下妇科腹腔镜手术患者术后疼痛的情况,比较七氟醚或丙泊酚维持麻醉对患者术后疼痛的影响。方法选择择期行妇科腹腔镜手术女性患者60例,年龄18~65岁,BMI 18~30 kg/m^2,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级。采用随机数字表法随机分为七氟醚组(S组)和丙泊酚组(P组),每组30例。两组以相同方案麻醉诱导后,S组吸入1.5%~4%七氟醚维持麻醉,P组靶控输注丙泊酚,血浆靶浓度3~6μg/ml。术中维持BIS 40~60。记录术后30 min、1、3、6、24和48 h时患者活动时VAS评分;记录术前1 d、术后3、24和48 h机械性痛阈值;记录术后24 h PCIA按压次数、芬太尼消耗量;记录追加哌替啶的例数和恶心呕吐、寒颤、瘙痒、躁动等不良反应发生情况。结果与术后30 min比较,术后3、6 h两组活动时VAS评分明显升高(P<0.05),术后48 h明显降低(P<0.05)。术后30 min、1和3 h P组活动时VAS评分明显低于S组(P<0.05)。与术前1 d比较,术后3、24和48 h S组机械性痛阈明显降低(P<0.05),术后3 h P组机械性痛阈明显降低(P<0.05)。术后3 h P组机械性痛阈值明显高于S组(P<0.05)。两组PCIA按压次数、芬太尼消耗量、追加哌替啶情况和不良反应发生情况等差异无统计学意义。结论与七氟醚吸入维持麻醉比较,妇科腹腔镜手术中使用丙泊酚静脉维持麻醉可以提高患者术后的机械性痛阈,减轻患者在术后3 h内的疼痛。
文摘目的:观察不同麻醉深度对老年全麻术后谵妄(POD)的影响。方法:选择期行开腹胆囊切除术高龄患者120例,随机分为静脉麻醉组(A组)和吸入麻醉组(B组),依BIS值40~49分为A1及B1组、BIS值50~59分为A2及B2组,每组各30例。比较4组一般情况、简易精神状态量表(MMSE)评分、POD发生率以及血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和星形胶质源性蛋白(S100β)浓度。结果:A1、A2两组个组一般资料及术后疼痛评分均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。A1组术后3 d MMSE评分为24.1,术后5 d为25.2;A2组术后3 d MMSE评分为26.9,术后5 d为27.1,两组与术前比较均明显降低(P<0.05),A1组明显低于A2组(P<0.05)。A1组术后7 d内POD发生率为20%,明显高于A2组(0)(P<0.05);A1及A2组T_(1~3)时刻血清NSE和S100β浓度均较T_0时刻升高(P<0.05);A1组T_(1~3)时刻血清NSE、S100β浓度高于A2组(P<0.05)。B组一般情况、MMSE评分、POD发生率及血清NSE和S100β浓度变化与A组相似。结论:全身麻醉时保持BIS值在50~59可使高龄患者POD发生率降低,静脉全身麻醉和吸入全身麻醉之间结果相似。