BACKGROUND Prostaglandin E1(PGE1),or alprostadil,is a potent vasodilator that improves hepatic blood flow and reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury post-liver transplantation(LT).However,the benefits of PGE1 on renal fu...BACKGROUND Prostaglandin E1(PGE1),or alprostadil,is a potent vasodilator that improves hepatic blood flow and reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury post-liver transplantation(LT).However,the benefits of PGE1 on renal function after LT have not yet been well described.AIM To assess the impact of PGE1 administration on renal function in patients who underwent liver or liver-kidney transplant.METHODS This retrospective study included all patients who underwent liver or liverkidney transplant at our institution from January,2011 to December,2021.Patients were classified based on whether they received PGE1.PGE1 was administered post-LT to those with transaminases>1000 U/L in the immediate postoperative period.Demographics,post-LT treatments and/or complications,renal function,and survival were analyzed.Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed,and a two-tailed P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.RESULTS A total of 145 patients underwent LT,with 44(30%)receiving PGE1.Baseline patient characteristics were comparable,except the PGE1 group had significantly higher aspartate aminotransferase(AST)(1961.9 U/L±1862.3 U/L vs 878 U/L±741.4 U/L,P=0.000),alanine aminotransferase(1070.6 U/L±895 U/L vs 547.7 U/L±410 U/L,P=0.000),international normalized ratio on post-LT day 1(2±0.74 vs 1.8±0.4,P=0.03),a longer intensive care unit stay(8.1 days±11.8 days vs 3.8 days±4.6 days,P=0.003),more vasopressor use(55.53 hours±111 hours vs 16.33 hours±26.3 hours,P=0.002),and higher immediate postoperative complications(18.6%vs 4.9%,P=0.04).The PGE1 group also had a significantly higher 90-day readmission rate(29.6%vs 13.1%,P=0.02)and lower 1-year liver graft survival(87.5%vs 98.9%,P=0.005).However,30-day readmission(31.6%vs 27.4%,P=0.64),LT complications(hepatic artery thrombosis,biliary complications,rejection of liver graft,cardiomyopathy),1-year patient survival(96.9%vs 97.8%,P=0.77),overall liver graft survival,and overall patient survival were similar between the two groups(95.4%vs 93.9%,P=0.74 and 88.4%vs 86.9%,P=0.81 respectively).Although the PGE1 group had a significantly lower glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)on post-LT day 7(46.3 mL/minute±26.7 mL/minute vs 62.5 mL/minute±34 mL/minute,P=0.009),the eventual need for renal replacement therapy(13.6%vs 5.9%,P=0.09),the number of dialysis sessions(0.91 vs 0.27,P=0.13),and eGFR at 1-month(37.2 mL/minute±35.9 mL/minute vs 42 mL/minute±36.9 mL/minute,P=0.49),6-months(54.8 mL/minute±21.6 mL/minute vs 62 mL/minute±21.4 mL/minute,P=0.09),and 12-months(63.7 mL/minute±20.7 mL/minute vs 62.8 mL/minute±20.3 mL/minute,P=0.85)post-LT were similar to those in the non-PGE1 group.CONCLUSION In patients who received PGE1 for ischemia-reperfusion injury,despite immediate acute renal injury post-LT,the renal function at 1-month,6-months,and 12-months post-LT was similar compared to those without ischemiareperfusion injury.Prospective clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the benefits of PGE1 use in renal function.展开更多
BACKGROUND Hepatic artery obstruction is a critical consideration in graft outcomes after living donor liver transplantation.We report a case of diffuse arterial vasospasm that developed immediately after anastomosis ...BACKGROUND Hepatic artery obstruction is a critical consideration in graft outcomes after living donor liver transplantation.We report a case of diffuse arterial vasospasm that developed immediately after anastomosis and was managed with an intra-arterial infusion of lipo-prostaglandin E1(PGE1).CASE SUMMARY A 57-year-old male with hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma underwent ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplant.The grafted hepatic artery was first anastomosed to the recipient’s right hepatic artery stump.However,the arterial pulse immediately weakened.Although a new anastomosis was performed using the right gastroepiploic artery,the patient’s arterial pulse rate remained poor.We attempted angiographic intervention immediately after the operation;it showed diffuse arterial vasospasms like‘beads on a string’.We attempted continuous infusion of lipo-PGE1 overnight via an intra-arterial catheter.The next day,arterial flow improved without any spasms or strictures.The patient had no additional arterial complications or related sequelae at the time of writing,1-year post-liver transplantation.CONCLUSION Angiographic evaluation is helpful in cases of repetitive arterial obstruction,and intra-arterial infusion of lipo-PGE1 may be effective in treating diffuse arterial spasms.展开更多
Objective To investigate the effects of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) on the progression of aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN). Methods Twenty-four patients diagnosed as AAN with serum creatinine (Scr) between 1.5 mg/dL an...Objective To investigate the effects of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) on the progression of aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN). Methods Twenty-four patients diagnosed as AAN with serum creatinine (Scr) between 1.5 mg/dL and 4 mg/dL during September 2001 to August 2003 were randomly divided into 2 groups. All patients had ingested long dan xie gan wan con-taining aristolochic acid (0.219 mg/g) for at least 3 months. Twelve patients were injected with Alprostadil (10 μg/d for 10 days in one month, summing up to 6 months). Except for PGE1, the other therapy was same in both groups. Renal function was assessed using reciprocal serum creatinine levels (1/Scr). Results The level of Scr and serum hemoglobin (Hgb) was similar in both groups prior to therapy. During follow-up, 1/Scr levels in PGE1 group were significantly higher than control group (P < 0.01), and Hgb levels in PGE1 group were sig-nificantly increased compared with control (P < 0.05).Conclusion PGE1 can slow the progression of renal failure and increase Hgb level of AAN patient.展开更多
BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) is known to be protective in ischemia-reperfusion of heart, lung,renal, and liver tissue. It still remains to be determined whether PGE1 exhibits similar protection against spina...BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) is known to be protective in ischemia-reperfusion of heart, lung,renal, and liver tissue. It still remains to be determined whether PGE1 exhibits similar protection against spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rabbit model. OBJECTIVE: To observe the large, ventral horn, motor neurons of the spinal cord, as well as limb function, and to investigate whether perfusion of PGE1 exhibits protective effects against spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rabbit model. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: Controlled observation. The experiment was performed at the Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University between June and October 2007. MATERIALS: Twenty male, New Zealand white rabbits, weighing 2.0 kg and of mixed gender, were used in the present study. The following chemicals and compounds were used: prostaglandin E1 injectable powder,as well as malondialdehyde and ATPase kits. Animal intervention was in accordance with animal ethical standards. METHODS: We separated rabbits into control and experimental groups randomly, with 10 rabbits in each group. Rabbits were used as spinal cord ischemia models by segmentally cross-clamping the infrarenal aorta. The control group was subsequently perfused for five minutes with blood and saline solution, and the experimental group was perfused for 5 minutes with blood and saline solution containing PGE1 (100 ng/kg/min). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The neurological function of the hind limbs was assessed 12, 24, and 48 hours after model establishment. All animals were sacrificed and spinal cords were harvested for histological analyses. The large motor neurons in the ventral horn of L1-7 were observed by inverted microscope. RESULTS: All 20 rabbits were included in the final analysis, without any loss. In the ventral horn of the L5-7 segments, there were more large motor neurons that appeared viable in the experimental group than the control group (P 〈 0.05). The scores of hind limb functions were greater in the experimental group after 12, 24, and 48 hours (P 〈 0.01). CONCLUSION: Perfusion of PGE1 reduced the amount of neuronal damage in the spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury rabbit model. These results correlated with increased numbers large motor neurons in the ventral horn of the spinal cord, as well as improved hind limb function.展开更多
AIM: To detect the effect of intraoperative prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) infusion on survival of esophagectomized patients due to cancer. METHODS: In this preliminary study, a double blinded placebo based clinical trial wa...AIM: To detect the effect of intraoperative prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) infusion on survival of esophagectomized patients due to cancer. METHODS: In this preliminary study, a double blinded placebo based clinical trial was performed. Thirty patients with esophageal cancer scheduled for esophagectomy via the transthoracic approach were randomized by a block randomization method, in two equal groups: PGE1 group - infusion of PGE1 (20 ng/kg per minute) in the operating room and placebo group - saline 0.9% with the same volume and rate. The infusion began before induction of anesthesia and finished just before transfer to the intensive care unit. The patients, anesthetist, intensive care physicians, nurses and surgeons were blinded to both study groups. All the patients were anesthetized with the same method. For postoperative pain control, a thoracic epidural catheter was placed for all patients before induction of anesthesia. We followed up the patients until October 2010. Basic characteristics, duration of anesthesia, total surgery and thoracotomy time, preoperative hemoglobin, length of tumor, grade of histological differentiation, disease stage, number of lymph nodes in the resected mass, number of readmissions to hospital, total duration of readmission and survival rates were compared between the two groups. Some of the data originates from the historical data reported in our previous study. We report them for better realization of the follow up results. RESULTS: The patients’ characteristics and perioperative variables were compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences in age (P = 0.48), gender (P = 0.27), body mass index (P = 0.77), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status more than?I?(P = 0.71), and smoking (P = 0.65). The PGE1 and placebo group were comparable in the following variables: duration of anesthesia (277 ± 50 vs 270 ± 67, P = 0.86), duration of thoracotomy (89 ± 35 vs 96 ± 19, P = 0.46), duration of operation (234 ± 37 vs 240 ± 66, P = 0.75), volume of blood loss during operation (520 ± 130 vs 630 ± 330, P = 0.34), and preoperative hemoglobin (14.4 ± 2 vs 14.7 ± 1.9, P = 0.62), respectively. No hemodynamic complications requiring an infusion of dopamine or cessation of the PGE1 infusion were encountered. Cancer variables were compared between the PGE1 and placebo group. Length of tumor (11.9 ± 3 vs 12.3 ± 3, P = 0.83), poor/undifferentiated grade of histological differentiation [3 (20%) vs 3 (20%), P = 0.78], disease stage III [5 (33.3%), 4 (26.7%), P = 0.72] and more than 3 lymph nodes in the resected mass [3 (20%) vs 2 (13.3%), P = 0.79] were similar in both groups. All the patients were discharged from hospital except one patient in the control group who died because of a post operative myocardial infarction. No life threatening postoperative complication occurred in any patient. The results of outcome and survival were the same in PGE1 and placebo group: number of readmissions (2.1 ± 1 vs 1.9 ± 1, P = 0.61), total duration of readmission (27 ± 12 vs 29 ± 12, P = 0.67), survival rate (10.1 ± 3.8 vs 9.6 ± 3.4, P = 0.71), overall survival rate after one year [8 (53.3%) vs 7 (47%), P = 0.72], overall survival rate after two years [3 (20%) vs 3 (20%), P = 0.99], and overall survival rate after three years [0 vs 1 (6.7%), P = 0.99], respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, PGE1 did not shorten or lengthen the survival of patients with esophageal cancer. Larger studies are suggested.展开更多
Objective: To evaluate whether liposomal prostaglandin E1 (lipo-PGE1) can decrease reperfusion no-reflow in a catheter-based porcine model of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Twenty-two male Chinese m...Objective: To evaluate whether liposomal prostaglandin E1 (lipo-PGE1) can decrease reperfusion no-reflow in a catheter-based porcine model of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Twenty-two male Chinese mini-swines were randomized into three groups: six in a sham-operation group, and eight each in the control and lipo-PGE1 groups. The distal part of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in the latter two groups was completely occluded for 2 h, and then reperfused for 3 h. Lipo-PGE1 (1 pg/kg) was injected 10 min before LAD occlusion until reperfusion for 1 h in the lipo-PGE1 group. Hemodynamic data and proinflammatory cytokines were examined before AMI, 2 h after occlusion, and 1, 2, and 3 h after reperfusion. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and double staining were performed to evaluate the myocardial no-reflow area (NRA). Results: Left ventricular systolic pressure and end-diastolic pressure significantly improved in the lipo-PGE1 group after reperfusion compared with the control group and also 2 h after AMI (P〈0.05 for both). MCE and double staining both showed that lipo-PGE1 decreased reperfusion NRA after AMI (P〈0.05, P〈0.01). Lipo-PGE1 decreased serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) after myocardial infarction reperfusion (P〈0.05 for both). Conclusions: Lipo-PGE1 is cardioprotective in our porcine model of myocardial infarction reperfusion no-reflow, decreasing NRA and attenuating the inflammatory response.展开更多
Objective:To investigate the effect of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) (Alprostadii injection) on patients with primary nephrotic syndrome(PNS). Methods: 37 patients with PNS were recruited to study the effect of prostaglandi...Objective:To investigate the effect of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) (Alprostadii injection) on patients with primary nephrotic syndrome(PNS). Methods: 37 patients with PNS were recruited to study the effect of prostaglandin E1 on platelet aggregation function [ PAG (5,) PAG( m ) ], serum total protein (TP) , albumin (Al),blood urea nitrogen(BUN) ,serum creatinine(Scr) ,cholesterol(CHO), triglyceride(TG), protein in 24-hour urine (Pr/24h) and platelet account (PLT). Results: TP, Al, CHO, TG, BUN, Scr, Pr/24h, PAG(5) and PAG(m) in PNS group before treatment were significantly different from those in control group(P<0.05, P<0.01) while no significant difference was found for PLT. When treated with PGE1 , TP,Al,CHO, TG, Pr/24h, ADP- induced PAG(5) ,and Adr- induced PAG(5) and PAG(m) were significantly different from those before treatment (P<0.05). Adr- induced PAG(5) and PAG(m) were significantly different. Adr- induced PAG(5) was xsitively correlated with BUN and Scr in PNS(P<0.01). Similar correlation was found between ADP-induced PAG(5) and Al ,BUN,Scr,Pr/24h(P<0.05), AD- induced PAG(m) and TP,CHO(P<0.05). Conclusions: PGE1 may be an effective drug for the treatment for hypercoagulation in patients with PNS.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Prostaglandin E1(PGE1),or alprostadil,is a potent vasodilator that improves hepatic blood flow and reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury post-liver transplantation(LT).However,the benefits of PGE1 on renal function after LT have not yet been well described.AIM To assess the impact of PGE1 administration on renal function in patients who underwent liver or liver-kidney transplant.METHODS This retrospective study included all patients who underwent liver or liverkidney transplant at our institution from January,2011 to December,2021.Patients were classified based on whether they received PGE1.PGE1 was administered post-LT to those with transaminases>1000 U/L in the immediate postoperative period.Demographics,post-LT treatments and/or complications,renal function,and survival were analyzed.Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed,and a two-tailed P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.RESULTS A total of 145 patients underwent LT,with 44(30%)receiving PGE1.Baseline patient characteristics were comparable,except the PGE1 group had significantly higher aspartate aminotransferase(AST)(1961.9 U/L±1862.3 U/L vs 878 U/L±741.4 U/L,P=0.000),alanine aminotransferase(1070.6 U/L±895 U/L vs 547.7 U/L±410 U/L,P=0.000),international normalized ratio on post-LT day 1(2±0.74 vs 1.8±0.4,P=0.03),a longer intensive care unit stay(8.1 days±11.8 days vs 3.8 days±4.6 days,P=0.003),more vasopressor use(55.53 hours±111 hours vs 16.33 hours±26.3 hours,P=0.002),and higher immediate postoperative complications(18.6%vs 4.9%,P=0.04).The PGE1 group also had a significantly higher 90-day readmission rate(29.6%vs 13.1%,P=0.02)and lower 1-year liver graft survival(87.5%vs 98.9%,P=0.005).However,30-day readmission(31.6%vs 27.4%,P=0.64),LT complications(hepatic artery thrombosis,biliary complications,rejection of liver graft,cardiomyopathy),1-year patient survival(96.9%vs 97.8%,P=0.77),overall liver graft survival,and overall patient survival were similar between the two groups(95.4%vs 93.9%,P=0.74 and 88.4%vs 86.9%,P=0.81 respectively).Although the PGE1 group had a significantly lower glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)on post-LT day 7(46.3 mL/minute±26.7 mL/minute vs 62.5 mL/minute±34 mL/minute,P=0.009),the eventual need for renal replacement therapy(13.6%vs 5.9%,P=0.09),the number of dialysis sessions(0.91 vs 0.27,P=0.13),and eGFR at 1-month(37.2 mL/minute±35.9 mL/minute vs 42 mL/minute±36.9 mL/minute,P=0.49),6-months(54.8 mL/minute±21.6 mL/minute vs 62 mL/minute±21.4 mL/minute,P=0.09),and 12-months(63.7 mL/minute±20.7 mL/minute vs 62.8 mL/minute±20.3 mL/minute,P=0.85)post-LT were similar to those in the non-PGE1 group.CONCLUSION In patients who received PGE1 for ischemia-reperfusion injury,despite immediate acute renal injury post-LT,the renal function at 1-month,6-months,and 12-months post-LT was similar compared to those without ischemiareperfusion injury.Prospective clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the benefits of PGE1 use in renal function.
文摘BACKGROUND Hepatic artery obstruction is a critical consideration in graft outcomes after living donor liver transplantation.We report a case of diffuse arterial vasospasm that developed immediately after anastomosis and was managed with an intra-arterial infusion of lipo-prostaglandin E1(PGE1).CASE SUMMARY A 57-year-old male with hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma underwent ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplant.The grafted hepatic artery was first anastomosed to the recipient’s right hepatic artery stump.However,the arterial pulse immediately weakened.Although a new anastomosis was performed using the right gastroepiploic artery,the patient’s arterial pulse rate remained poor.We attempted angiographic intervention immediately after the operation;it showed diffuse arterial vasospasms like‘beads on a string’.We attempted continuous infusion of lipo-PGE1 overnight via an intra-arterial catheter.The next day,arterial flow improved without any spasms or strictures.The patient had no additional arterial complications or related sequelae at the time of writing,1-year post-liver transplantation.CONCLUSION Angiographic evaluation is helpful in cases of repetitive arterial obstruction,and intra-arterial infusion of lipo-PGE1 may be effective in treating diffuse arterial spasms.
文摘Objective To investigate the effects of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) on the progression of aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN). Methods Twenty-four patients diagnosed as AAN with serum creatinine (Scr) between 1.5 mg/dL and 4 mg/dL during September 2001 to August 2003 were randomly divided into 2 groups. All patients had ingested long dan xie gan wan con-taining aristolochic acid (0.219 mg/g) for at least 3 months. Twelve patients were injected with Alprostadil (10 μg/d for 10 days in one month, summing up to 6 months). Except for PGE1, the other therapy was same in both groups. Renal function was assessed using reciprocal serum creatinine levels (1/Scr). Results The level of Scr and serum hemoglobin (Hgb) was similar in both groups prior to therapy. During follow-up, 1/Scr levels in PGE1 group were significantly higher than control group (P < 0.01), and Hgb levels in PGE1 group were sig-nificantly increased compared with control (P < 0.05).Conclusion PGE1 can slow the progression of renal failure and increase Hgb level of AAN patient.
基金Tackle Key Problem Plan of Science and Technology in Liaoning Province, No.2004225003-8
文摘BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) is known to be protective in ischemia-reperfusion of heart, lung,renal, and liver tissue. It still remains to be determined whether PGE1 exhibits similar protection against spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rabbit model. OBJECTIVE: To observe the large, ventral horn, motor neurons of the spinal cord, as well as limb function, and to investigate whether perfusion of PGE1 exhibits protective effects against spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rabbit model. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: Controlled observation. The experiment was performed at the Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University between June and October 2007. MATERIALS: Twenty male, New Zealand white rabbits, weighing 2.0 kg and of mixed gender, were used in the present study. The following chemicals and compounds were used: prostaglandin E1 injectable powder,as well as malondialdehyde and ATPase kits. Animal intervention was in accordance with animal ethical standards. METHODS: We separated rabbits into control and experimental groups randomly, with 10 rabbits in each group. Rabbits were used as spinal cord ischemia models by segmentally cross-clamping the infrarenal aorta. The control group was subsequently perfused for five minutes with blood and saline solution, and the experimental group was perfused for 5 minutes with blood and saline solution containing PGE1 (100 ng/kg/min). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The neurological function of the hind limbs was assessed 12, 24, and 48 hours after model establishment. All animals were sacrificed and spinal cords were harvested for histological analyses. The large motor neurons in the ventral horn of L1-7 were observed by inverted microscope. RESULTS: All 20 rabbits were included in the final analysis, without any loss. In the ventral horn of the L5-7 segments, there were more large motor neurons that appeared viable in the experimental group than the control group (P 〈 0.05). The scores of hind limb functions were greater in the experimental group after 12, 24, and 48 hours (P 〈 0.01). CONCLUSION: Perfusion of PGE1 reduced the amount of neuronal damage in the spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury rabbit model. These results correlated with increased numbers large motor neurons in the ventral horn of the spinal cord, as well as improved hind limb function.
基金Supported by The Cancer Research Center of the Cancer Institute in Iran
文摘AIM: To detect the effect of intraoperative prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) infusion on survival of esophagectomized patients due to cancer. METHODS: In this preliminary study, a double blinded placebo based clinical trial was performed. Thirty patients with esophageal cancer scheduled for esophagectomy via the transthoracic approach were randomized by a block randomization method, in two equal groups: PGE1 group - infusion of PGE1 (20 ng/kg per minute) in the operating room and placebo group - saline 0.9% with the same volume and rate. The infusion began before induction of anesthesia and finished just before transfer to the intensive care unit. The patients, anesthetist, intensive care physicians, nurses and surgeons were blinded to both study groups. All the patients were anesthetized with the same method. For postoperative pain control, a thoracic epidural catheter was placed for all patients before induction of anesthesia. We followed up the patients until October 2010. Basic characteristics, duration of anesthesia, total surgery and thoracotomy time, preoperative hemoglobin, length of tumor, grade of histological differentiation, disease stage, number of lymph nodes in the resected mass, number of readmissions to hospital, total duration of readmission and survival rates were compared between the two groups. Some of the data originates from the historical data reported in our previous study. We report them for better realization of the follow up results. RESULTS: The patients’ characteristics and perioperative variables were compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences in age (P = 0.48), gender (P = 0.27), body mass index (P = 0.77), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status more than?I?(P = 0.71), and smoking (P = 0.65). The PGE1 and placebo group were comparable in the following variables: duration of anesthesia (277 ± 50 vs 270 ± 67, P = 0.86), duration of thoracotomy (89 ± 35 vs 96 ± 19, P = 0.46), duration of operation (234 ± 37 vs 240 ± 66, P = 0.75), volume of blood loss during operation (520 ± 130 vs 630 ± 330, P = 0.34), and preoperative hemoglobin (14.4 ± 2 vs 14.7 ± 1.9, P = 0.62), respectively. No hemodynamic complications requiring an infusion of dopamine or cessation of the PGE1 infusion were encountered. Cancer variables were compared between the PGE1 and placebo group. Length of tumor (11.9 ± 3 vs 12.3 ± 3, P = 0.83), poor/undifferentiated grade of histological differentiation [3 (20%) vs 3 (20%), P = 0.78], disease stage III [5 (33.3%), 4 (26.7%), P = 0.72] and more than 3 lymph nodes in the resected mass [3 (20%) vs 2 (13.3%), P = 0.79] were similar in both groups. All the patients were discharged from hospital except one patient in the control group who died because of a post operative myocardial infarction. No life threatening postoperative complication occurred in any patient. The results of outcome and survival were the same in PGE1 and placebo group: number of readmissions (2.1 ± 1 vs 1.9 ± 1, P = 0.61), total duration of readmission (27 ± 12 vs 29 ± 12, P = 0.67), survival rate (10.1 ± 3.8 vs 9.6 ± 3.4, P = 0.71), overall survival rate after one year [8 (53.3%) vs 7 (47%), P = 0.72], overall survival rate after two years [3 (20%) vs 3 (20%), P = 0.99], and overall survival rate after three years [0 vs 1 (6.7%), P = 0.99], respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, PGE1 did not shorten or lengthen the survival of patients with esophageal cancer. Larger studies are suggested.
基金Project (No. 03III02) supported by the Capital Medical Development Research Fund of China
文摘Objective: To evaluate whether liposomal prostaglandin E1 (lipo-PGE1) can decrease reperfusion no-reflow in a catheter-based porcine model of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Twenty-two male Chinese mini-swines were randomized into three groups: six in a sham-operation group, and eight each in the control and lipo-PGE1 groups. The distal part of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in the latter two groups was completely occluded for 2 h, and then reperfused for 3 h. Lipo-PGE1 (1 pg/kg) was injected 10 min before LAD occlusion until reperfusion for 1 h in the lipo-PGE1 group. Hemodynamic data and proinflammatory cytokines were examined before AMI, 2 h after occlusion, and 1, 2, and 3 h after reperfusion. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and double staining were performed to evaluate the myocardial no-reflow area (NRA). Results: Left ventricular systolic pressure and end-diastolic pressure significantly improved in the lipo-PGE1 group after reperfusion compared with the control group and also 2 h after AMI (P〈0.05 for both). MCE and double staining both showed that lipo-PGE1 decreased reperfusion NRA after AMI (P〈0.05, P〈0.01). Lipo-PGE1 decreased serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) after myocardial infarction reperfusion (P〈0.05 for both). Conclusions: Lipo-PGE1 is cardioprotective in our porcine model of myocardial infarction reperfusion no-reflow, decreasing NRA and attenuating the inflammatory response.
基金This work is supported by grant from Beijing Tide Pharmaceutical Co,Ltd.
文摘Objective:To investigate the effect of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) (Alprostadii injection) on patients with primary nephrotic syndrome(PNS). Methods: 37 patients with PNS were recruited to study the effect of prostaglandin E1 on platelet aggregation function [ PAG (5,) PAG( m ) ], serum total protein (TP) , albumin (Al),blood urea nitrogen(BUN) ,serum creatinine(Scr) ,cholesterol(CHO), triglyceride(TG), protein in 24-hour urine (Pr/24h) and platelet account (PLT). Results: TP, Al, CHO, TG, BUN, Scr, Pr/24h, PAG(5) and PAG(m) in PNS group before treatment were significantly different from those in control group(P<0.05, P<0.01) while no significant difference was found for PLT. When treated with PGE1 , TP,Al,CHO, TG, Pr/24h, ADP- induced PAG(5) ,and Adr- induced PAG(5) and PAG(m) were significantly different from those before treatment (P<0.05). Adr- induced PAG(5) and PAG(m) were significantly different. Adr- induced PAG(5) was xsitively correlated with BUN and Scr in PNS(P<0.01). Similar correlation was found between ADP-induced PAG(5) and Al ,BUN,Scr,Pr/24h(P<0.05), AD- induced PAG(m) and TP,CHO(P<0.05). Conclusions: PGE1 may be an effective drug for the treatment for hypercoagulation in patients with PNS.