Joshua Cohen has recently remodelled Rawls＇ account of public reason into an explicitly global enterprise designed to both engage and regulate human rights discourses. Cohen＇s model is interesting because of the man...Joshua Cohen has recently remodelled Rawls＇ account of public reason into an explicitly global enterprise designed to both engage and regulate human rights discourses. Cohen＇s model is interesting because of the manners in which Cohen attempts to answer the questions the model begs： how can individuals with fundamentally incommensurable world views actually engage in common acts of practical reason with each other about issues like human rights？ What common convictions or a common social imaginary must these individuals share？ I argue that articulating potential common grounds on which acts of global public reasoning can transpire involves engaging with rather than seeking to reason autonomously from （or transcend） the material, social, and cultural forces--most importantly the tradition of liberal secularism which Cohen＇s model takes its normative bearings from--that make such discourses what they are. Doing so enhances the ability of a liberal secular human rights proponent to elucidate meaningful sites of common ground with others. Such common ground emerges not simply through toleration but also through critically engaging the worldviews of other globally public reasoners.展开更多
INTRODUCTION The global health issue is not a shortage of capital or technology, but a shortage of health manpower. Health human resource （HHR）, an important component of health resources, determines the quantity, ...INTRODUCTION The global health issue is not a shortage of capital or technology, but a shortage of health manpower. Health human resource （HHR）, an important component of health resources, determines the quantity, quality and effectiveness of health service, thus greatly impacting on health service to the citizens.展开更多
The article intends to point out affinities in the positions of Jürgen Habermas and Terry Eagleton on the relationship between religion and politics in contemporary world,demonstrating that the recognition of the...The article intends to point out affinities in the positions of Jürgen Habermas and Terry Eagleton on the relationship between religion and politics in contemporary world,demonstrating that the recognition of the limitations of human rationality leads both of them to criticize the Enlightenment pretension to suppress any religious viewpoints in the discussion of moral and political issues.It is argued that Habermas and Eagleton share the view that,outside the domain of private beliefs,there would be a horizon in which the aspirations towards the world could converge and a dialogue could be possible not only among religious cultures,but also between these and the secular thought.Such a dialogue could be a contribution to creating a democratic public space consisting of religious and non-religious individuals,since both sides are committed to having a self-critical attitude,an openness to learn with the other and an inclination towards reciprocal understanding.展开更多
文摘Joshua Cohen has recently remodelled Rawls＇ account of public reason into an explicitly global enterprise designed to both engage and regulate human rights discourses. Cohen＇s model is interesting because of the manners in which Cohen attempts to answer the questions the model begs： how can individuals with fundamentally incommensurable world views actually engage in common acts of practical reason with each other about issues like human rights？ What common convictions or a common social imaginary must these individuals share？ I argue that articulating potential common grounds on which acts of global public reasoning can transpire involves engaging with rather than seeking to reason autonomously from （or transcend） the material, social, and cultural forces--most importantly the tradition of liberal secularism which Cohen＇s model takes its normative bearings from--that make such discourses what they are. Doing so enhances the ability of a liberal secular human rights proponent to elucidate meaningful sites of common ground with others. Such common ground emerges not simply through toleration but also through critically engaging the worldviews of other globally public reasoners.
基金funded by the Philosophy and Social SciencesProgram of Nanjing Medical University(NO.2013NJZS04)
文摘INTRODUCTION The global health issue is not a shortage of capital or technology, but a shortage of health manpower. Health human resource （HHR）, an important component of health resources, determines the quantity, quality and effectiveness of health service, thus greatly impacting on health service to the citizens.
文摘The article intends to point out affinities in the positions of Jürgen Habermas and Terry Eagleton on the relationship between religion and politics in contemporary world,demonstrating that the recognition of the limitations of human rationality leads both of them to criticize the Enlightenment pretension to suppress any religious viewpoints in the discussion of moral and political issues.It is argued that Habermas and Eagleton share the view that,outside the domain of private beliefs,there would be a horizon in which the aspirations towards the world could converge and a dialogue could be possible not only among religious cultures,but also between these and the secular thought.Such a dialogue could be a contribution to creating a democratic public space consisting of religious and non-religious individuals,since both sides are committed to having a self-critical attitude,an openness to learn with the other and an inclination towards reciprocal understanding.
