It is imperative that all stakeholders within the research ecosystem take responsibility to improve research integrity and reliability of published research.Based on the unique experiences of a specialist publishing e...It is imperative that all stakeholders within the research ecosystem take responsibility to improve research integrity and reliability of published research.Based on the unique experiences of a specialist publishing ethics and research integrity team within a major publisher,this article provides insights into the observed trends of misconduct and how those have evolved over time,and addresses key actions needed to improve the interface between researchers,funders,institutions and publishers to collectively improve research integrity on a global scale.展开更多
Purpose: This study aims to present the key systemic changes in the Polish book evaluation model to focus on the publisher list, as inspired by the Norwegian Model. Design/methodology/approach: In this study we recons...Purpose: This study aims to present the key systemic changes in the Polish book evaluation model to focus on the publisher list, as inspired by the Norwegian Model. Design/methodology/approach: In this study we reconstruct the framework of the 2010 and 2018 models of book evaluation in Poland within the performance-based research funding system. Findings: For almost 20 years the book evaluation system in Poland has been based on the verification of various technical criteria(e.g. length of the book). The new 2018 model is based on the principle of prestige inheritance(a book is worth as much as its publisher is) and is inspired by the publisher list used in the Norwegian Model. In this paper, we argue that this solution may be a more balanced policy instrument than the previous 2010 model in which neither the quality of the publisher nor the quality of the book played any role in the evaluation.Research limitations: We work from the framework of the 2018 model of book evaluation specified in the law on higher education and science from 20 July 2018, as implementation acts are not available yet. Practical implications: This study may provide a valuable point of reference on how structural reforms in the research evaluation model were implemented on a country level. The results of this study may be interesting to policy makers, stakeholders and researchers focused on science policy. Originality/value: This is the very first study that presents the new framework of the Polish research evaluation model and policy instruments for scholarly book evaluation. We describe what motivated policy makers to change the book evaluation model, and what arguments were explicitly raised to argue for the new solution.展开更多
Western-raised scientists are taught with the traditional concepts of:purpose,method,observation and conclusion.This is not true for Chinese educated students.Since all international journals publish papers following ...Western-raised scientists are taught with the traditional concepts of:purpose,method,observation and conclusion.This is not true for Chinese educated students.Since all international journals publish papers following these,or similar parameters,the Chinese scientist who wishes to publish in such a journal,must adjust his thinking to fit within this scheme.In this presentation we wish to assist our Chinese colleagues on how this thought process can be followed.展开更多
【目的】基于对SCI收录Integrative and Complementary Medicine领域顶刊Journal of Ginseng Research (JGR)办刊模式的深度解析,探索我国世界一流期刊建设背景下中医药英文期刊国际影响力提升之路,为我国中医药英文期刊国际出圈提供参...【目的】基于对SCI收录Integrative and Complementary Medicine领域顶刊Journal of Ginseng Research (JGR)办刊模式的深度解析,探索我国世界一流期刊建设背景下中医药英文期刊国际影响力提升之路,为我国中医药英文期刊国际出圈提供参考借鉴。【方法】以在SCI Integrative and Complementary Medicine领域影响因子居于前列的韩国期刊JGR为研究对象,全面梳理其办刊历史、成功因素与办刊策略,从学术规范、办刊团队、出版内容、办刊模式等方面总结其办刊经验,对比我国中医药英文期刊的现状,提出较为清晰的发展路径与可行建议。【结果】近年来韩国期刊JGR国际影响力稳步提高,办刊模式深度优化,具体表现在其国际编委团队建设、国际出版规范优化、期刊资源集约化管理、热点选题策划等方面。【结论】我国中医药英文期刊在“走出去”的过程中面临诸多问题和严峻挑战,我国中医药英文期刊需要进一步立足本土优势优化期刊布局,突出学科特色,重视跨学科融合研究,提高前瞻性认知,高效运用网络平台与人工智能技术,全面提升期刊的学术组织力、选题策划力与国际传播力。展开更多
文摘It is imperative that all stakeholders within the research ecosystem take responsibility to improve research integrity and reliability of published research.Based on the unique experiences of a specialist publishing ethics and research integrity team within a major publisher,this article provides insights into the observed trends of misconduct and how those have evolved over time,and addresses key actions needed to improve the interface between researchers,funders,institutions and publishers to collectively improve research integrity on a global scale.
基金supported by the DIALOG Program[grant name“Research into Excellence Patterns in Science and Art”]financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland
文摘Purpose: This study aims to present the key systemic changes in the Polish book evaluation model to focus on the publisher list, as inspired by the Norwegian Model. Design/methodology/approach: In this study we reconstruct the framework of the 2010 and 2018 models of book evaluation in Poland within the performance-based research funding system. Findings: For almost 20 years the book evaluation system in Poland has been based on the verification of various technical criteria(e.g. length of the book). The new 2018 model is based on the principle of prestige inheritance(a book is worth as much as its publisher is) and is inspired by the publisher list used in the Norwegian Model. In this paper, we argue that this solution may be a more balanced policy instrument than the previous 2010 model in which neither the quality of the publisher nor the quality of the book played any role in the evaluation.Research limitations: We work from the framework of the 2018 model of book evaluation specified in the law on higher education and science from 20 July 2018, as implementation acts are not available yet. Practical implications: This study may provide a valuable point of reference on how structural reforms in the research evaluation model were implemented on a country level. The results of this study may be interesting to policy makers, stakeholders and researchers focused on science policy. Originality/value: This is the very first study that presents the new framework of the Polish research evaluation model and policy instruments for scholarly book evaluation. We describe what motivated policy makers to change the book evaluation model, and what arguments were explicitly raised to argue for the new solution.
文摘Western-raised scientists are taught with the traditional concepts of:purpose,method,observation and conclusion.This is not true for Chinese educated students.Since all international journals publish papers following these,or similar parameters,the Chinese scientist who wishes to publish in such a journal,must adjust his thinking to fit within this scheme.In this presentation we wish to assist our Chinese colleagues on how this thought process can be followed.
文摘【目的】基于对SCI收录Integrative and Complementary Medicine领域顶刊Journal of Ginseng Research (JGR)办刊模式的深度解析,探索我国世界一流期刊建设背景下中医药英文期刊国际影响力提升之路,为我国中医药英文期刊国际出圈提供参考借鉴。【方法】以在SCI Integrative and Complementary Medicine领域影响因子居于前列的韩国期刊JGR为研究对象,全面梳理其办刊历史、成功因素与办刊策略,从学术规范、办刊团队、出版内容、办刊模式等方面总结其办刊经验,对比我国中医药英文期刊的现状,提出较为清晰的发展路径与可行建议。【结果】近年来韩国期刊JGR国际影响力稳步提高,办刊模式深度优化,具体表现在其国际编委团队建设、国际出版规范优化、期刊资源集约化管理、热点选题策划等方面。【结论】我国中医药英文期刊在“走出去”的过程中面临诸多问题和严峻挑战,我国中医药英文期刊需要进一步立足本土优势优化期刊布局,突出学科特色,重视跨学科融合研究,提高前瞻性认知,高效运用网络平台与人工智能技术,全面提升期刊的学术组织力、选题策划力与国际传播力。
