Objective: To investigate the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer with two different surgeon positions and trocar placements. Methods: The data of 78 patients who underwen...Objective: To investigate the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer with two different surgeon positions and trocar placements. Methods: The data of 78 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer between January 2018 and August 2019 were retrospectively analysed. The surgical method was selected by the patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgeons’ positioning habits and trocar placements. The group with the lead surgeon standing between the patient’s legs had 35 patients, and the group with the lead surgeon standing at the left side of the patient had 43 patients. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anal gas evacuation time, postoperative urinary catheter indwelling time, postoperative hospital stay, C-reactive protein (CRP) level on the first day after surgery, and postoperative pathological data and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: All patients underwent the laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer, none converting to laparotomy. No significant difference (P > 0.05) in intraoperative blood loss (57.6 ± 21.3 ml vs 60.2 ± 35.3 ml), postoperative anal gas evacuation time (3.5 ± 1.1 d vs 3.8 ± 1.3 d), postoperative urinary catheter indwelling time (2.6 ± 1.3 d vs 2.4 ± 1.2 d), postoperative hospital stay (7.1 ± 1.8 d vs 7.5 ± 2.1 d), or CRP level on the first day after surgery (54.7 ± 9.6 mg/L vs 53.9 ± 8.2 mg/L) was detected between the two groups. The operation time was shorter in the group with the lead surgeon standing between the patient’s legs (185.2 ± 25.6 min vs 196.2 ±19.7 min) (P < 0.05). The two groups did not differ significantly in the tumour length (4.2 ± 1.3 cm vs 3.9 ± 1.5 cm), number of dissected lymph nodes (27.5 ± 11.6 vs 25.1 ± 15.4), pathological type, or postoperative pathological tumour-node-metastasis stage (P > 0.05). No patients died or had anastomotic fistula during their postoperative hospital stay, and the incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups (22.9% (8/35) vs 23.3% (10/42);P > 0.05). Conclusion: Under the principle of radical resection, the surgeon should adopt the most suitable standing position and trocar placement according to the specific situation. If the surgeon stands between the patient’s legs, this might shorten the operation time and promote a smoother surgery.展开更多
目的:比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌围术期疗效及远期生存情况。方法:选取2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日采用腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗的T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌患者,分为腹腔镜组(n=102)与开腹组(n=43),分析两组围手术期资...目的:比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌围术期疗效及远期生存情况。方法:选取2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日采用腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗的T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌患者,分为腹腔镜组(n=102)与开腹组(n=43),分析两组围手术期资料、术后并发症、总生存期、无瘤生存期、1年与3年生存率及无瘤生存率、总生存率、总无瘤生存率、肿瘤复发转移情况。结果:两组患者基线资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹腔镜组术中出血量少于开腹组[50.00(20.00,50.00)mL vs. 50.00(50.00,100.00)mL,P<0.001],获取淋巴结数量多于开腹组[17.00(14.00,22.00)枚vs. 14.00(11.00,20.00)枚,P=0.018],术后恢复进食时间[3.00(3.00,4.00)d vs. 4.00(3.00,6.00)d,P<0.001]、排气时间[3.00(3.00,3.00)d vs. 4.00(3.00,5.00)d,P<0.001]短于开腹组,术后总体并发症与不完全肠梗阻发生率低于开腹组(32.35%vs. 51.16%,3.92%vs. 16.28%,P<0.05)。两组术后1年、3年生存率及无瘤生存率、总生存率、总无瘤生存率、肿瘤复发转移率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在T_(4a)亚组中,腹腔镜组与开腹组的各项生存指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:腹腔镜手术治疗T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌是安全、可行的,更利于术后恢复,可取得与开腹手术相当的肿瘤治疗效果。展开更多
文摘Objective: To investigate the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer with two different surgeon positions and trocar placements. Methods: The data of 78 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer between January 2018 and August 2019 were retrospectively analysed. The surgical method was selected by the patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgeons’ positioning habits and trocar placements. The group with the lead surgeon standing between the patient’s legs had 35 patients, and the group with the lead surgeon standing at the left side of the patient had 43 patients. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anal gas evacuation time, postoperative urinary catheter indwelling time, postoperative hospital stay, C-reactive protein (CRP) level on the first day after surgery, and postoperative pathological data and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: All patients underwent the laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer, none converting to laparotomy. No significant difference (P > 0.05) in intraoperative blood loss (57.6 ± 21.3 ml vs 60.2 ± 35.3 ml), postoperative anal gas evacuation time (3.5 ± 1.1 d vs 3.8 ± 1.3 d), postoperative urinary catheter indwelling time (2.6 ± 1.3 d vs 2.4 ± 1.2 d), postoperative hospital stay (7.1 ± 1.8 d vs 7.5 ± 2.1 d), or CRP level on the first day after surgery (54.7 ± 9.6 mg/L vs 53.9 ± 8.2 mg/L) was detected between the two groups. The operation time was shorter in the group with the lead surgeon standing between the patient’s legs (185.2 ± 25.6 min vs 196.2 ±19.7 min) (P < 0.05). The two groups did not differ significantly in the tumour length (4.2 ± 1.3 cm vs 3.9 ± 1.5 cm), number of dissected lymph nodes (27.5 ± 11.6 vs 25.1 ± 15.4), pathological type, or postoperative pathological tumour-node-metastasis stage (P > 0.05). No patients died or had anastomotic fistula during their postoperative hospital stay, and the incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups (22.9% (8/35) vs 23.3% (10/42);P > 0.05). Conclusion: Under the principle of radical resection, the surgeon should adopt the most suitable standing position and trocar placement according to the specific situation. If the surgeon stands between the patient’s legs, this might shorten the operation time and promote a smoother surgery.
文摘目的:比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌围术期疗效及远期生存情况。方法:选取2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日采用腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗的T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌患者,分为腹腔镜组(n=102)与开腹组(n=43),分析两组围手术期资料、术后并发症、总生存期、无瘤生存期、1年与3年生存率及无瘤生存率、总生存率、总无瘤生存率、肿瘤复发转移情况。结果:两组患者基线资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹腔镜组术中出血量少于开腹组[50.00(20.00,50.00)mL vs. 50.00(50.00,100.00)mL,P<0.001],获取淋巴结数量多于开腹组[17.00(14.00,22.00)枚vs. 14.00(11.00,20.00)枚,P=0.018],术后恢复进食时间[3.00(3.00,4.00)d vs. 4.00(3.00,6.00)d,P<0.001]、排气时间[3.00(3.00,3.00)d vs. 4.00(3.00,5.00)d,P<0.001]短于开腹组,术后总体并发症与不完全肠梗阻发生率低于开腹组(32.35%vs. 51.16%,3.92%vs. 16.28%,P<0.05)。两组术后1年、3年生存率及无瘤生存率、总生存率、总无瘤生存率、肿瘤复发转移率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在T_(4a)亚组中,腹腔镜组与开腹组的各项生存指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:腹腔镜手术治疗T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌是安全、可行的,更利于术后恢复,可取得与开腹手术相当的肿瘤治疗效果。
