Objective: To investigate the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer with two different surgeon positions and trocar placements. Methods: The data of 78 patients who underwen...Objective: To investigate the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer with two different surgeon positions and trocar placements. Methods: The data of 78 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer between January 2018 and August 2019 were retrospectively analysed. The surgical method was selected by the patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgeons’ positioning habits and trocar placements. The group with the lead surgeon standing between the patient’s legs had 35 patients, and the group with the lead surgeon standing at the left side of the patient had 43 patients. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anal gas evacuation time, postoperative urinary catheter indwelling time, postoperative hospital stay, C-reactive protein (CRP) level on the first day after surgery, and postoperative pathological data and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: All patients underwent the laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer, none converting to laparotomy. No significant difference (P > 0.05) in intraoperative blood loss (57.6 ± 21.3 ml vs 60.2 ± 35.3 ml), postoperative anal gas evacuation time (3.5 ± 1.1 d vs 3.8 ± 1.3 d), postoperative urinary catheter indwelling time (2.6 ± 1.3 d vs 2.4 ± 1.2 d), postoperative hospital stay (7.1 ± 1.8 d vs 7.5 ± 2.1 d), or CRP level on the first day after surgery (54.7 ± 9.6 mg/L vs 53.9 ± 8.2 mg/L) was detected between the two groups. The operation time was shorter in the group with the lead surgeon standing between the patient’s legs (185.2 ± 25.6 min vs 196.2 ±19.7 min) (P < 0.05). The two groups did not differ significantly in the tumour length (4.2 ± 1.3 cm vs 3.9 ± 1.5 cm), number of dissected lymph nodes (27.5 ± 11.6 vs 25.1 ± 15.4), pathological type, or postoperative pathological tumour-node-metastasis stage (P > 0.05). No patients died or had anastomotic fistula during their postoperative hospital stay, and the incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups (22.9% (8/35) vs 23.3% (10/42);P > 0.05). Conclusion: Under the principle of radical resection, the surgeon should adopt the most suitable standing position and trocar placement according to the specific situation. If the surgeon stands between the patient’s legs, this might shorten the operation time and promote a smoother surgery.展开更多
BACKGROUND Right hemicolectomy or ileocecal resection are used to treat benign conditions like Crohn’s disease(CD)and malignant ones like colon cancer(CC).AIM To investigate differences in pre-and peri-operative fact...BACKGROUND Right hemicolectomy or ileocecal resection are used to treat benign conditions like Crohn’s disease(CD)and malignant ones like colon cancer(CC).AIM To investigate differences in pre-and peri-operative factors and their impact on post-operative outcome in patients with CC and CD.METHODS This is a sub-group analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology’s prospective,multi-centre snapshot audit.Adult patients with CC and CD undergoing right hemicolectomy or ileocecal resection were included.Primary outcome measure was 30-d post-operative complications.Secondary outcome measures were post-operative length of stay(LOS)at and readmission.RESULTS Three hundred and seventy-five patients with CD and 2,515 patients with CC were included.Patients with CD were younger(median=37 years for CD and 71 years for CC(P<0.01),had lower American Society of Anesthesiology score(ASA)grade(P<0.01)and less comorbidity(P<0.01),but were more likely to be current smokers(P<0.01).Patients with CD were more frequently operated on by colorectal surgeons(P<0.01)and frequently underwent ileocecal resection(P<0.01)with higher rate of de-functioning/primary stoma construction(P<0.01).Thirty-day post-operative mortality occurred exclusively in the CC group(66/2515,2.3%).In multivariate analyses,the risk of post-operative complications was similar in the two groups(OR 0.80,95%CI:0.54-1.17;P=0.25).Patients with CD had a significantly longer LOS(Geometric mean 0.87,95%CI:0.79-0.95;P<0.01).There was no difference in re-admission rates.The audit did not collect data on post-operative enhanced recovery protocols that are implemented in the different participating centers.CONCLUSION Patients with CD were younger,with lower ASA grade,less comorbidity,operated on by experienced surgeons and underwent less radical resection but had a longer LOS than patients with CC although complications'rate was not different between the two groups.展开更多
目的探讨阑尾杯状细胞腺癌(goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix,GCA)的规范诊断与治疗。方法查阅国内外相关文献,对1例GCA患者的临床诊治进行回顾性分析。结果患者男,64岁,当地医院行腹腔镜下阑尾切除术,术后病理诊断为GCA后,...目的探讨阑尾杯状细胞腺癌(goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix,GCA)的规范诊断与治疗。方法查阅国内外相关文献,对1例GCA患者的临床诊治进行回顾性分析。结果患者男,64岁,当地医院行腹腔镜下阑尾切除术,术后病理诊断为GCA后,于南昌大学第一附属医院行腹腔镜下右半结肠根治性切除术,术后恢复可,无严重并发症,术后9 d出院,现已行2次奥沙利铂+左亚叶酸钙+氟尿嘧啶化疗方案以及6次奥沙利铂+卡培他滨规律化疗,术后随访19个月,未见明确肿瘤复发或转移。结论阑尾肿瘤诊断缺乏特异性,若阑尾切除患者年龄较大、术前肿瘤标志物升高、阑尾管壁增厚、质硬或触及肿块时,应考虑阑尾肿瘤的可能性,必要时行术中冰冻切片送检,以达到一期根治的目的。展开更多
目的:比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌围术期疗效及远期生存情况。方法:选取2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日采用腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗的T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌患者,分为腹腔镜组(n=102)与开腹组(n=43),分析两组围手术期资...目的:比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌围术期疗效及远期生存情况。方法:选取2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日采用腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗的T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌患者,分为腹腔镜组(n=102)与开腹组(n=43),分析两组围手术期资料、术后并发症、总生存期、无瘤生存期、1年与3年生存率及无瘤生存率、总生存率、总无瘤生存率、肿瘤复发转移情况。结果:两组患者基线资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹腔镜组术中出血量少于开腹组[50.00(20.00,50.00)mL vs. 50.00(50.00,100.00)mL,P<0.001],获取淋巴结数量多于开腹组[17.00(14.00,22.00)枚vs. 14.00(11.00,20.00)枚,P=0.018],术后恢复进食时间[3.00(3.00,4.00)d vs. 4.00(3.00,6.00)d,P<0.001]、排气时间[3.00(3.00,3.00)d vs. 4.00(3.00,5.00)d,P<0.001]短于开腹组,术后总体并发症与不完全肠梗阻发生率低于开腹组(32.35%vs. 51.16%,3.92%vs. 16.28%,P<0.05)。两组术后1年、3年生存率及无瘤生存率、总生存率、总无瘤生存率、肿瘤复发转移率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在T_(4a)亚组中,腹腔镜组与开腹组的各项生存指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:腹腔镜手术治疗T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌是安全、可行的,更利于术后恢复,可取得与开腹手术相当的肿瘤治疗效果。展开更多
文摘Objective: To investigate the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer with two different surgeon positions and trocar placements. Methods: The data of 78 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer between January 2018 and August 2019 were retrospectively analysed. The surgical method was selected by the patients. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgeons’ positioning habits and trocar placements. The group with the lead surgeon standing between the patient’s legs had 35 patients, and the group with the lead surgeon standing at the left side of the patient had 43 patients. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anal gas evacuation time, postoperative urinary catheter indwelling time, postoperative hospital stay, C-reactive protein (CRP) level on the first day after surgery, and postoperative pathological data and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: All patients underwent the laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer, none converting to laparotomy. No significant difference (P > 0.05) in intraoperative blood loss (57.6 ± 21.3 ml vs 60.2 ± 35.3 ml), postoperative anal gas evacuation time (3.5 ± 1.1 d vs 3.8 ± 1.3 d), postoperative urinary catheter indwelling time (2.6 ± 1.3 d vs 2.4 ± 1.2 d), postoperative hospital stay (7.1 ± 1.8 d vs 7.5 ± 2.1 d), or CRP level on the first day after surgery (54.7 ± 9.6 mg/L vs 53.9 ± 8.2 mg/L) was detected between the two groups. The operation time was shorter in the group with the lead surgeon standing between the patient’s legs (185.2 ± 25.6 min vs 196.2 ±19.7 min) (P < 0.05). The two groups did not differ significantly in the tumour length (4.2 ± 1.3 cm vs 3.9 ± 1.5 cm), number of dissected lymph nodes (27.5 ± 11.6 vs 25.1 ± 15.4), pathological type, or postoperative pathological tumour-node-metastasis stage (P > 0.05). No patients died or had anastomotic fistula during their postoperative hospital stay, and the incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups (22.9% (8/35) vs 23.3% (10/42);P > 0.05). Conclusion: Under the principle of radical resection, the surgeon should adopt the most suitable standing position and trocar placement according to the specific situation. If the surgeon stands between the patient’s legs, this might shorten the operation time and promote a smoother surgery.
文摘BACKGROUND Right hemicolectomy or ileocecal resection are used to treat benign conditions like Crohn’s disease(CD)and malignant ones like colon cancer(CC).AIM To investigate differences in pre-and peri-operative factors and their impact on post-operative outcome in patients with CC and CD.METHODS This is a sub-group analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology’s prospective,multi-centre snapshot audit.Adult patients with CC and CD undergoing right hemicolectomy or ileocecal resection were included.Primary outcome measure was 30-d post-operative complications.Secondary outcome measures were post-operative length of stay(LOS)at and readmission.RESULTS Three hundred and seventy-five patients with CD and 2,515 patients with CC were included.Patients with CD were younger(median=37 years for CD and 71 years for CC(P<0.01),had lower American Society of Anesthesiology score(ASA)grade(P<0.01)and less comorbidity(P<0.01),but were more likely to be current smokers(P<0.01).Patients with CD were more frequently operated on by colorectal surgeons(P<0.01)and frequently underwent ileocecal resection(P<0.01)with higher rate of de-functioning/primary stoma construction(P<0.01).Thirty-day post-operative mortality occurred exclusively in the CC group(66/2515,2.3%).In multivariate analyses,the risk of post-operative complications was similar in the two groups(OR 0.80,95%CI:0.54-1.17;P=0.25).Patients with CD had a significantly longer LOS(Geometric mean 0.87,95%CI:0.79-0.95;P<0.01).There was no difference in re-admission rates.The audit did not collect data on post-operative enhanced recovery protocols that are implemented in the different participating centers.CONCLUSION Patients with CD were younger,with lower ASA grade,less comorbidity,operated on by experienced surgeons and underwent less radical resection but had a longer LOS than patients with CC although complications'rate was not different between the two groups.
文摘目的探讨阑尾杯状细胞腺癌(goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix,GCA)的规范诊断与治疗。方法查阅国内外相关文献,对1例GCA患者的临床诊治进行回顾性分析。结果患者男,64岁,当地医院行腹腔镜下阑尾切除术,术后病理诊断为GCA后,于南昌大学第一附属医院行腹腔镜下右半结肠根治性切除术,术后恢复可,无严重并发症,术后9 d出院,现已行2次奥沙利铂+左亚叶酸钙+氟尿嘧啶化疗方案以及6次奥沙利铂+卡培他滨规律化疗,术后随访19个月,未见明确肿瘤复发或转移。结论阑尾肿瘤诊断缺乏特异性,若阑尾切除患者年龄较大、术前肿瘤标志物升高、阑尾管壁增厚、质硬或触及肿块时,应考虑阑尾肿瘤的可能性,必要时行术中冰冻切片送检,以达到一期根治的目的。
文摘目的:比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌围术期疗效及远期生存情况。方法:选取2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日采用腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗的T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌患者,分为腹腔镜组(n=102)与开腹组(n=43),分析两组围手术期资料、术后并发症、总生存期、无瘤生存期、1年与3年生存率及无瘤生存率、总生存率、总无瘤生存率、肿瘤复发转移情况。结果:两组患者基线资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹腔镜组术中出血量少于开腹组[50.00(20.00,50.00)mL vs. 50.00(50.00,100.00)mL,P<0.001],获取淋巴结数量多于开腹组[17.00(14.00,22.00)枚vs. 14.00(11.00,20.00)枚,P=0.018],术后恢复进食时间[3.00(3.00,4.00)d vs. 4.00(3.00,6.00)d,P<0.001]、排气时间[3.00(3.00,3.00)d vs. 4.00(3.00,5.00)d,P<0.001]短于开腹组,术后总体并发症与不完全肠梗阻发生率低于开腹组(32.35%vs. 51.16%,3.92%vs. 16.28%,P<0.05)。两组术后1年、3年生存率及无瘤生存率、总生存率、总无瘤生存率、肿瘤复发转移率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在T_(4a)亚组中,腹腔镜组与开腹组的各项生存指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:腹腔镜手术治疗T_(3)~T_(4a)期结肠癌是安全、可行的,更利于术后恢复,可取得与开腹手术相当的肿瘤治疗效果。
