期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Assessment of Radiological Hazards of Sedimentary, Igneous and Sediments Natural Rocks
1
作者 Wafaa Arafa Hala Mahmoud +3 位作者 Eman Yousf Ashry Ashry Ibrahim Elaassy Ahmed Elsersy 《World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology》 CAS 2024年第2期131-145,共15页
Gamma-ray spectroscopy based on a 100% efficiency hyper-pure germanium detector was used to evaluate the activity concentrations of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup... Gamma-ray spectroscopy based on a 100% efficiency hyper-pure germanium detector was used to evaluate the activity concentrations of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th, and <sup>40</sup>K natural radionuclides in sedimentary, conglomerate, igneous and sedi-ments rock samples collected from four different locations in Eastern desert in Egypt. The obtained activity concentrations are used to evaluate the radi-ological hazards indices, absorbed dose rate, annual effective dose equivalent in air, radium equivalent, external and internal hazard index, radiation level index, annual gonadal dose equivalent, excess lifetime cancer risk and expo-sure rate. The results show that 1) the absorbed dose rate depends on the rock type, 2) the annual effective dose equivalent in air in 71% of sample below 20 mSvy<sup>-1</sup> (permissible limit for workers), 3) the conglomerate rocks show low radioactivity level, 4) sedimentary rocks are rich in radium while igneous rocks are rich in thorium and the sediments rocks are rich in both radium and thorium. 展开更多
关键词 Gamma Spectrometry radiological Hazard indices NORM SEDIMENTARY CONGLOMERATE IGNEOUS SEDIMENTS
下载PDF
Assessment of Background Radiation and Associated Dose Rates in Soil Samples from Norochcholai in the North Western Coast of Sri Lanka
2
作者 Thiwanka Weerakkody Senani Williams +5 位作者 Tania Warnakulasuriya Shakila Priyadarshanee Thilaka Attanayaka Indrani Dissanayake Vajira Waduge Rajitha Wickremasinghe 《Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection》 2022年第1期189-206,共18页
This study assesses radiation levels in soil, water and air in the Norochcholai,<span> </span><span>an area in Sri Lanka closest to the Kundankulam nuclear power plant, India which is situated in the... This study assesses radiation levels in soil, water and air in the Norochcholai,<span> </span><span>an area in Sri Lanka closest to the Kundankulam nuclear power plant, India which is situated in the North Western coast. This is important for monitoring radiation hazards </span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">and</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> will be useful in case of a nuclear accident. Superficial soil and water samples from 23 locations were analyzed by Gamma spectrometry using<span style="color:red;"> </span>HPGe detector. The activity concentrations of Th232, K40, Ra226 and Pb210 in the soil were 56.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></sup></span></span></span></span><span></span><span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">, 96.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq</span></span></span>&#183;<span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">, 24.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> and 27.0</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>kg</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> respectively. Dose rate at 1</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">m height w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">as</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> recorded using a survey meter</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">(Automess 6150AD). Median dose rate was 0.098</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">μSv<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">. The median gamma ray absorbed dose rate w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">as</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> 51.2 nGy<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">,</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> which is lower than the global average of 57 nGy<span style="white-space:normal;">&#183;</span>h</span></span></span><span><span><sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span><span style="font-size:10px;">&#45;</span>1</span></span></sup></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">. Radium equivalent activity</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">(Raeq) ranged from 30.3</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg -</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">458.3</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg and only one sample recorded the Raeq ></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">370</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Bq/Kg as safe to be used in building materials. External hazardous indices of all the samples w</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">ere</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> below 1 a</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">nd the mean annual effective dose was within the safe limit of 1</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">mSv/y. The health risk of exposure to terrestrial radiation from the soil in the area is minimal. These data could be used as baseline for radiation assessment.</span></span></span> 展开更多
关键词 Background Radiation Gamma Spectrometry Norochcholai Health Risk radiological indices
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部