Although there are many measures of variability for qualitative variables, they are little used in social research, nor are they included in statistical software. The aim of this article is to present six measures of ...Although there are many measures of variability for qualitative variables, they are little used in social research, nor are they included in statistical software. The aim of this article is to present six measures of variation for qualitative variables of simple calculation, as well as to facilitate their use by means of the R software. The measures considered are, on the one hand, Freemans variation ratio, Morals universal variation ratio, Kvalseths standard deviation from the mode, and Wilcoxs variation ratio which are most affected by proximity to a constant random variable, where the measures of variability for qualitative variables reach their minimum value of 0. On the other hand, the Gibbs-Poston index of qualitative variation and Shannons relative entropy are included, which are more affected by the proximity to a uniform distribution, where the measures of variability for qualitative variables reach their maximum value of 1. Point and interval estimation are addressed. Bootstrap by the percentile and bias-corrected and accelerated percentile methods are used to obtain confidence intervals. Two calculation situations are presented: with a sample mode and with two or more modes. The standard deviation from the mode among the six considered measures, and the universal variation ratio among the three variation ratios, are particularly recommended for use.展开更多
AIM：To compare the diagnostic performance of isolatedcheck visual evoked potential（ic VEP） and standard automated perimetry（SAP）,for evaluating the application values of ic VEP in the detection of early glaucoma....AIM：To compare the diagnostic performance of isolatedcheck visual evoked potential（ic VEP） and standard automated perimetry（SAP）,for evaluating the application values of ic VEP in the detection of early glaucoma.METHODS：Totally 144 subjects（288 eyes） were enrolled in this study.ic VEP testing was performed with the Neucodia visual electrophysiological diagnostic system.A 15% positive-contrast（bright） condition pattern was used in this device to differentiate between glaucoma patients and healthy control subjects.Signal-to-noise ratios（SNR） were derived based on a multivariate statistic.The eyes were judged as abnormal if the test yielded an SNR≤1.SAP testing was performed with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II.The visual fields were deemed as abnormality if the glaucoma hemifield test results outside normal limits;or the pattern standard deviation with P〈0.05;or the cluster of three or more non-edge points on the pattern deviation plot in a single hemifield with P〈0.05,one of which must have a P〈0.01.Disc photographs were graded as either glaucomatous optic neuropathy or normal by two experts who were masked to all other patient information.Moorfields regression analysis（MRA） used as a separate diagnostic classification was performed by Heidelberg retina tomograph（HRT）.RESULTS：When the disc photograph grader was used as diagnostic standard,the sensitivity for SAP and ic VEP was 32.3% and 38.5% respectively and specificity was 82.3% and 77.8% respectively.When the MRA Classifier was used as the diagnostic standard,the sensitivity for SAP and ic VEP was 48.6% and 51.4% respectively and specificity was 84.1% and 78.0% respectively.When the combined structural assessment was used as the diagnostic standard,the sensitivity for SAP and ic VEP was 59.2%and 53.1% respectively and specificity was 84.2% and 84.6% respectivlely.There was no statistical significance between the sensitivity or specificity of SAP and ic VEP,regardless of which diagnostic standard was based on.CONCLUSION：The diagnostic performance of ic VEP is not better than that of SAP in the detection of early glaucoma.展开更多
文摘Although there are many measures of variability for qualitative variables, they are little used in social research, nor are they included in statistical software. The aim of this article is to present six measures of variation for qualitative variables of simple calculation, as well as to facilitate their use by means of the R software. The measures considered are, on the one hand, Freemans variation ratio, Morals universal variation ratio, Kvalseths standard deviation from the mode, and Wilcoxs variation ratio which are most affected by proximity to a constant random variable, where the measures of variability for qualitative variables reach their minimum value of 0. On the other hand, the Gibbs-Poston index of qualitative variation and Shannons relative entropy are included, which are more affected by the proximity to a uniform distribution, where the measures of variability for qualitative variables reach their maximum value of 1. Point and interval estimation are addressed. Bootstrap by the percentile and bias-corrected and accelerated percentile methods are used to obtain confidence intervals. Two calculation situations are presented: with a sample mode and with two or more modes. The standard deviation from the mode among the six considered measures, and the universal variation ratio among the three variation ratios, are particularly recommended for use.
基金Supported by the Plan of Wenzhou Science and Technology(No.Y20160439)
文摘AIM：To compare the diagnostic performance of isolatedcheck visual evoked potential（ic VEP） and standard automated perimetry（SAP）,for evaluating the application values of ic VEP in the detection of early glaucoma.METHODS：Totally 144 subjects（288 eyes） were enrolled in this study.ic VEP testing was performed with the Neucodia visual electrophysiological diagnostic system.A 15% positive-contrast（bright） condition pattern was used in this device to differentiate between glaucoma patients and healthy control subjects.Signal-to-noise ratios（SNR） were derived based on a multivariate statistic.The eyes were judged as abnormal if the test yielded an SNR≤1.SAP testing was performed with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II.The visual fields were deemed as abnormality if the glaucoma hemifield test results outside normal limits;or the pattern standard deviation with P〈0.05;or the cluster of three or more non-edge points on the pattern deviation plot in a single hemifield with P〈0.05,one of which must have a P〈0.01.Disc photographs were graded as either glaucomatous optic neuropathy or normal by two experts who were masked to all other patient information.Moorfields regression analysis（MRA） used as a separate diagnostic classification was performed by Heidelberg retina tomograph（HRT）.RESULTS：When the disc photograph grader was used as diagnostic standard,the sensitivity for SAP and ic VEP was 32.3% and 38.5% respectively and specificity was 82.3% and 77.8% respectively.When the MRA Classifier was used as the diagnostic standard,the sensitivity for SAP and ic VEP was 48.6% and 51.4% respectively and specificity was 84.1% and 78.0% respectively.When the combined structural assessment was used as the diagnostic standard,the sensitivity for SAP and ic VEP was 59.2%and 53.1% respectively and specificity was 84.2% and 84.6% respectivlely.There was no statistical significance between the sensitivity or specificity of SAP and ic VEP,regardless of which diagnostic standard was based on.CONCLUSION：The diagnostic performance of ic VEP is not better than that of SAP in the detection of early glaucoma.
